Psychotherapy Researchers: reported misbehaviors and opinions

Autores
Braun, Malena; Roussos, Andres Jorge
Año de publicación
2012
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The ethical practices of psychotherapy researchers were surveyed online. A total of 257 completed surveys were received from researchers worldwide. Eighty-nine percent of researchers admitted to at least one of the listed behaviors. The most common faults were related to excessive work demands: 44% of the respondents reported "inadequate monitoring of research projects due to work overload" and 37% reported "cutting corners in a hurry to complete a project." North America was lower in almost all of the reported behaviors. The results about specific behaviors related to psychotherapy research for which rules are still fuzzy reflect the disagreement among researchers. The high prevalence of misbehavior in psychotherapy research is a warning that cannot be ignored.
Fil: Braun, Malena. Universidad de Belgrano; Argentina
Fil: Roussos, Andres Jorge. Universidad de Belgrano; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH
QUESTIONABLE RESEARCH PRACTICES
RESEARCH INTEGRITY
SCIENTIFIC MISBEHAVIOR
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/199401
Acceder
id CONICETDig_78f50fed9f183e045c014e6fb505d27b
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/199401
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Psychotherapy Researchers: reported misbehaviors and opinionsBraun, MalenaRoussos, Andres JorgePSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCHQUESTIONABLE RESEARCH PRACTICESRESEARCH INTEGRITYSCIENTIFIC MISBEHAVIORhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5The ethical practices of psychotherapy researchers were surveyed online. A total of 257 completed surveys were received from researchers worldwide. Eighty-nine percent of researchers admitted to at least one of the listed behaviors. The most common faults were related to excessive work demands: 44% of the respondents reported "inadequate monitoring of research projects due to work overload" and 37% reported "cutting corners in a hurry to complete a project." North America was lower in almost all of the reported behaviors. The results about specific behaviors related to psychotherapy research for which rules are still fuzzy reflect the disagreement among researchers. The high prevalence of misbehavior in psychotherapy research is a warning that cannot be ignored.Fil: Braun, Malena. Universidad de Belgrano; ArgentinaFil: Roussos, Andres Jorge. Universidad de Belgrano; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaUniv California Press2012-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/199401Braun, Malena; Roussos, Andres Jorge; Psychotherapy Researchers: reported misbehaviors and opinions; Univ California Press; Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics; 7; 5; 12-2012; 25-291556-2646CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1525/jer.2012.7.5.25info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1525/jer.2012.7.5.25info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-10T13:09:35Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/199401instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-10 13:09:36.129CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Psychotherapy Researchers: reported misbehaviors and opinions
title Psychotherapy Researchers: reported misbehaviors and opinions
spellingShingle Psychotherapy Researchers: reported misbehaviors and opinions
Braun, Malena
PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH
QUESTIONABLE RESEARCH PRACTICES
RESEARCH INTEGRITY
SCIENTIFIC MISBEHAVIOR
title_short Psychotherapy Researchers: reported misbehaviors and opinions
title_full Psychotherapy Researchers: reported misbehaviors and opinions
title_fullStr Psychotherapy Researchers: reported misbehaviors and opinions
title_full_unstemmed Psychotherapy Researchers: reported misbehaviors and opinions
title_sort Psychotherapy Researchers: reported misbehaviors and opinions
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Braun, Malena
Roussos, Andres Jorge
author Braun, Malena
author_facet Braun, Malena
Roussos, Andres Jorge
author_role author
author2 Roussos, Andres Jorge
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH
QUESTIONABLE RESEARCH PRACTICES
RESEARCH INTEGRITY
SCIENTIFIC MISBEHAVIOR
topic PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH
QUESTIONABLE RESEARCH PRACTICES
RESEARCH INTEGRITY
SCIENTIFIC MISBEHAVIOR
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The ethical practices of psychotherapy researchers were surveyed online. A total of 257 completed surveys were received from researchers worldwide. Eighty-nine percent of researchers admitted to at least one of the listed behaviors. The most common faults were related to excessive work demands: 44% of the respondents reported "inadequate monitoring of research projects due to work overload" and 37% reported "cutting corners in a hurry to complete a project." North America was lower in almost all of the reported behaviors. The results about specific behaviors related to psychotherapy research for which rules are still fuzzy reflect the disagreement among researchers. The high prevalence of misbehavior in psychotherapy research is a warning that cannot be ignored.
Fil: Braun, Malena. Universidad de Belgrano; Argentina
Fil: Roussos, Andres Jorge. Universidad de Belgrano; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description The ethical practices of psychotherapy researchers were surveyed online. A total of 257 completed surveys were received from researchers worldwide. Eighty-nine percent of researchers admitted to at least one of the listed behaviors. The most common faults were related to excessive work demands: 44% of the respondents reported "inadequate monitoring of research projects due to work overload" and 37% reported "cutting corners in a hurry to complete a project." North America was lower in almost all of the reported behaviors. The results about specific behaviors related to psychotherapy research for which rules are still fuzzy reflect the disagreement among researchers. The high prevalence of misbehavior in psychotherapy research is a warning that cannot be ignored.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/199401
Braun, Malena; Roussos, Andres Jorge; Psychotherapy Researchers: reported misbehaviors and opinions; Univ California Press; Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics; 7; 5; 12-2012; 25-29
1556-2646
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/199401
identifier_str_mv Braun, Malena; Roussos, Andres Jorge; Psychotherapy Researchers: reported misbehaviors and opinions; Univ California Press; Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics; 7; 5; 12-2012; 25-29
1556-2646
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1525/jer.2012.7.5.25
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1525/jer.2012.7.5.25
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Univ California Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Univ California Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842980473237667840
score 12.993085

Publicaciones similares