Measuring What Works: An Impact Evaluation of Women’s Groups on Maternal Health Uptake in Rural Nepal

Autores
Sharma, Sheetal; Teijlingen, Edwin van; Belizan, Jose; Hundley, Vanora; Simkhada, Padam; Sicuri, Elisa
Año de publicación
2016
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Backgroundç: There is a need for studies evaluating maternal health interventions in low-income countries. This paper evaluates one such intervention designed to promote maternal health among rural women in Nepal. Methods and Results: This was a five-year controlled, non-randomised, repeated cross-sectional study (2007, 2010, 2012) of a participatory community-based maternal health promotion intervention focusing on women’s groups to improve maternal health services uptake. In total 1,236 women of childbearing age, who had their last child ≤ two years ago, were interviewed. Difference-in-Difference estimation assessed the effects of the intervention on selected outcome variables while controlling for a constructed wealth index and women’s characteristics. In the first three years (from 2007 to the 2010), the intervention increased women’s likelihood of attending for antenatal care at least once during pregnancy by seven times [OR = 7.0, 95%CI (2.3; 21.4)], of taking iron and folic acid by three times [OR = 3.0, 95%CI (1.2; 7.8)], and of seeking four or more antenatal care visits of two times, although not significantly [OR = 2.2, 95%CI (1.0; 4.7)]. Over five years, women were more likely to seek antenatal care at least once [OR = 3.0, 95%CI (1.5; 5.2)], to take iron/folic acid [OR = 1.9, [95% CI (1.1; 3.2)], and to attend postnatal care [OR = 1.5, [95% CI (1.1; 2.2)]. No improvement was found on attending antenatal care in the first trimester, birthing at an institution or with a skilled birth attendant. Conclusion: Community-based health promotion has a much stronger effect on the uptake of antenatal care and less on delivery care. Other factors not easily resolved through health promotion interventions may influence these outcomes, such as costs or geographical constraints. The evaluation has implications for policy and practice in public health, especially maternal health promotion.
Fil: Sharma, Sheetal. Bournemouth University; Reino Unido
Fil: Teijlingen, Edwin van. Bournemouth University; Reino Unido
Fil: Belizan, Jose. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Hundley, Vanora. Bournemouth University; Reino Unido
Fil: Simkhada, Padam. Liverpool John Moores University; Reino Unido
Fil: Sicuri, Elisa. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; España. Imperial College London; Reino Unido
Materia
Maternal
Health
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/45117

id CONICETDig_7890e52dcbae5dbe9941bb3f9a69c7b3
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/45117
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Measuring What Works: An Impact Evaluation of Women’s Groups on Maternal Health Uptake in Rural NepalSharma, SheetalTeijlingen, Edwin vanBelizan, JoseHundley, VanoraSimkhada, PadamSicuri, ElisaMaternalHealthhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3Backgroundç: There is a need for studies evaluating maternal health interventions in low-income countries. This paper evaluates one such intervention designed to promote maternal health among rural women in Nepal. Methods and Results: This was a five-year controlled, non-randomised, repeated cross-sectional study (2007, 2010, 2012) of a participatory community-based maternal health promotion intervention focusing on women’s groups to improve maternal health services uptake. In total 1,236 women of childbearing age, who had their last child ≤ two years ago, were interviewed. Difference-in-Difference estimation assessed the effects of the intervention on selected outcome variables while controlling for a constructed wealth index and women’s characteristics. In the first three years (from 2007 to the 2010), the intervention increased women’s likelihood of attending for antenatal care at least once during pregnancy by seven times [OR = 7.0, 95%CI (2.3; 21.4)], of taking iron and folic acid by three times [OR = 3.0, 95%CI (1.2; 7.8)], and of seeking four or more antenatal care visits of two times, although not significantly [OR = 2.2, 95%CI (1.0; 4.7)]. Over five years, women were more likely to seek antenatal care at least once [OR = 3.0, 95%CI (1.5; 5.2)], to take iron/folic acid [OR = 1.9, [95% CI (1.1; 3.2)], and to attend postnatal care [OR = 1.5, [95% CI (1.1; 2.2)]. No improvement was found on attending antenatal care in the first trimester, birthing at an institution or with a skilled birth attendant. Conclusion: Community-based health promotion has a much stronger effect on the uptake of antenatal care and less on delivery care. Other factors not easily resolved through health promotion interventions may influence these outcomes, such as costs or geographical constraints. The evaluation has implications for policy and practice in public health, especially maternal health promotion.Fil: Sharma, Sheetal. Bournemouth University; Reino UnidoFil: Teijlingen, Edwin van. Bournemouth University; Reino UnidoFil: Belizan, Jose. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Hundley, Vanora. Bournemouth University; Reino UnidoFil: Simkhada, Padam. Liverpool John Moores University; Reino UnidoFil: Sicuri, Elisa. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; España. Imperial College London; Reino UnidoPublic Library of Science2016-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/45117Sharma, Sheetal; Teijlingen, Edwin van; Belizan, Jose; Hundley, Vanora; Simkhada, Padam; et al.; Measuring What Works: An Impact Evaluation of Women’s Groups on Maternal Health Uptake in Rural Nepal; Public Library of Science; Plos One; 11; 5; 5-2016; 1-16; e01551441932-6203CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0155144info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0155144info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-10T13:24:29Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/45117instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-10 13:24:29.851CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Measuring What Works: An Impact Evaluation of Women’s Groups on Maternal Health Uptake in Rural Nepal
title Measuring What Works: An Impact Evaluation of Women’s Groups on Maternal Health Uptake in Rural Nepal
spellingShingle Measuring What Works: An Impact Evaluation of Women’s Groups on Maternal Health Uptake in Rural Nepal
Sharma, Sheetal
Maternal
Health
title_short Measuring What Works: An Impact Evaluation of Women’s Groups on Maternal Health Uptake in Rural Nepal
title_full Measuring What Works: An Impact Evaluation of Women’s Groups on Maternal Health Uptake in Rural Nepal
title_fullStr Measuring What Works: An Impact Evaluation of Women’s Groups on Maternal Health Uptake in Rural Nepal
title_full_unstemmed Measuring What Works: An Impact Evaluation of Women’s Groups on Maternal Health Uptake in Rural Nepal
title_sort Measuring What Works: An Impact Evaluation of Women’s Groups on Maternal Health Uptake in Rural Nepal
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Sharma, Sheetal
Teijlingen, Edwin van
Belizan, Jose
Hundley, Vanora
Simkhada, Padam
Sicuri, Elisa
author Sharma, Sheetal
author_facet Sharma, Sheetal
Teijlingen, Edwin van
Belizan, Jose
Hundley, Vanora
Simkhada, Padam
Sicuri, Elisa
author_role author
author2 Teijlingen, Edwin van
Belizan, Jose
Hundley, Vanora
Simkhada, Padam
Sicuri, Elisa
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Maternal
Health
topic Maternal
Health
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Backgroundç: There is a need for studies evaluating maternal health interventions in low-income countries. This paper evaluates one such intervention designed to promote maternal health among rural women in Nepal. Methods and Results: This was a five-year controlled, non-randomised, repeated cross-sectional study (2007, 2010, 2012) of a participatory community-based maternal health promotion intervention focusing on women’s groups to improve maternal health services uptake. In total 1,236 women of childbearing age, who had their last child ≤ two years ago, were interviewed. Difference-in-Difference estimation assessed the effects of the intervention on selected outcome variables while controlling for a constructed wealth index and women’s characteristics. In the first three years (from 2007 to the 2010), the intervention increased women’s likelihood of attending for antenatal care at least once during pregnancy by seven times [OR = 7.0, 95%CI (2.3; 21.4)], of taking iron and folic acid by three times [OR = 3.0, 95%CI (1.2; 7.8)], and of seeking four or more antenatal care visits of two times, although not significantly [OR = 2.2, 95%CI (1.0; 4.7)]. Over five years, women were more likely to seek antenatal care at least once [OR = 3.0, 95%CI (1.5; 5.2)], to take iron/folic acid [OR = 1.9, [95% CI (1.1; 3.2)], and to attend postnatal care [OR = 1.5, [95% CI (1.1; 2.2)]. No improvement was found on attending antenatal care in the first trimester, birthing at an institution or with a skilled birth attendant. Conclusion: Community-based health promotion has a much stronger effect on the uptake of antenatal care and less on delivery care. Other factors not easily resolved through health promotion interventions may influence these outcomes, such as costs or geographical constraints. The evaluation has implications for policy and practice in public health, especially maternal health promotion.
Fil: Sharma, Sheetal. Bournemouth University; Reino Unido
Fil: Teijlingen, Edwin van. Bournemouth University; Reino Unido
Fil: Belizan, Jose. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Hundley, Vanora. Bournemouth University; Reino Unido
Fil: Simkhada, Padam. Liverpool John Moores University; Reino Unido
Fil: Sicuri, Elisa. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; España. Imperial College London; Reino Unido
description Backgroundç: There is a need for studies evaluating maternal health interventions in low-income countries. This paper evaluates one such intervention designed to promote maternal health among rural women in Nepal. Methods and Results: This was a five-year controlled, non-randomised, repeated cross-sectional study (2007, 2010, 2012) of a participatory community-based maternal health promotion intervention focusing on women’s groups to improve maternal health services uptake. In total 1,236 women of childbearing age, who had their last child ≤ two years ago, were interviewed. Difference-in-Difference estimation assessed the effects of the intervention on selected outcome variables while controlling for a constructed wealth index and women’s characteristics. In the first three years (from 2007 to the 2010), the intervention increased women’s likelihood of attending for antenatal care at least once during pregnancy by seven times [OR = 7.0, 95%CI (2.3; 21.4)], of taking iron and folic acid by three times [OR = 3.0, 95%CI (1.2; 7.8)], and of seeking four or more antenatal care visits of two times, although not significantly [OR = 2.2, 95%CI (1.0; 4.7)]. Over five years, women were more likely to seek antenatal care at least once [OR = 3.0, 95%CI (1.5; 5.2)], to take iron/folic acid [OR = 1.9, [95% CI (1.1; 3.2)], and to attend postnatal care [OR = 1.5, [95% CI (1.1; 2.2)]. No improvement was found on attending antenatal care in the first trimester, birthing at an institution or with a skilled birth attendant. Conclusion: Community-based health promotion has a much stronger effect on the uptake of antenatal care and less on delivery care. Other factors not easily resolved through health promotion interventions may influence these outcomes, such as costs or geographical constraints. The evaluation has implications for policy and practice in public health, especially maternal health promotion.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/45117
Sharma, Sheetal; Teijlingen, Edwin van; Belizan, Jose; Hundley, Vanora; Simkhada, Padam; et al.; Measuring What Works: An Impact Evaluation of Women’s Groups on Maternal Health Uptake in Rural Nepal; Public Library of Science; Plos One; 11; 5; 5-2016; 1-16; e0155144
1932-6203
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/45117
identifier_str_mv Sharma, Sheetal; Teijlingen, Edwin van; Belizan, Jose; Hundley, Vanora; Simkhada, Padam; et al.; Measuring What Works: An Impact Evaluation of Women’s Groups on Maternal Health Uptake in Rural Nepal; Public Library of Science; Plos One; 11; 5; 5-2016; 1-16; e0155144
1932-6203
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0155144
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0155144
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Public Library of Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Public Library of Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842981359216230400
score 12.48226