Fungal and bacterial functional groups explain variance in soil nutrient cycling
- Autores
- Vietorisz, Corinne; Policelli, Nahuel; Li, Abigail; Bhatnagar, Jennifer M.; Adams, Lindsey
- Año de publicación
- 2023
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- documento de conferencia
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Soil microbes are the driving force behind soil nutrient cycling, yet the role of their composition and function in controlling forest nutrient cycling is poorly understood and rarely used to predict rates of biogeochemical cycling. We aimed to answer: 1) Which microbial traits are the best predictors of soil nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) cycling rates in temperate forests? 2) What are the relative contributions of microbial, plant, and abiotic traits in explaining rates of soil N and P cycling? We hypothesized that including fungal and bacterial gene abundances would better predict soil N and P cycling than plant traits and abiotic conditions alone. To test this hypothesis, we designed a field system in New England where variation in microbial community composition was crossed with variation in vegetation composition and soil nutrient content. At 6 sites, we sampled soil along a transect from the forest edge to interior from four stand types: pine, hardwood, hardwood with pine saplings in the understory, and mixed mature pine-hardwood. In each sample, we measured net ammonification, nitrification, and phosphate release rates. We performed high-throughput sequencing of fungal and bacterial rDNA amplicons (16S/ITS), used PICRUSt2 to calculate bacterial gene abundances, and used all published fungal genomes to calculate genus-level gene abundances. Abundances of bacterial and fungal genes coding for decomposition of plant litter were positively correlated with net ammonification (bacterial: p = 1.6e-08, R2 = 0.27; fungal: p = 0.006, R2 = 0.09) and phosphate release (fungal: p = 0.002, R2 = 0.23; bacterial: p = 0.03, R2 = 0.17). However, instead of gene abundances, microbial functional guilds were the best predictors of nitrification: N-cycling bacterial abundance positively correlated with nitrification (N cycling: p = 1e-06, R2 = 0.18) and ectomycorrhizal abundance was negatively correlated with nitrification (p = 4e-08, R2 = 0.26). Using model selection, the best linear models to explain nitrification and phosphate release included microbial, plant, and abiotic traits, and for ammonification included microbial and abiotic traits. Our results show that multiple microbial traits are important predictors of soil N and P cycling and should be included in future ecosystem-level biogeochemistry models.
Fil: Vietorisz, Corinne. Boston University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Policelli, Nahuel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Instituto Patagónico para el Estudio de los Ecosistemas Continentales; Argentina
Fil: Li, Abigail. Boston University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Bhatnagar, Jennifer M.. Boston University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Adams, Lindsey. Boston University; Estados Unidos
American Geophysical Union 2023 meeting
San Francisco
Estados Unidos
American Geophysical Union - Materia
-
NITROGEN
CARBON
MICROBIAL COMMUNITY
SOIL - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/228885
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_77936b02b36152307c167512ee3721f8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/228885 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Fungal and bacterial functional groups explain variance in soil nutrient cyclingVietorisz, CorinnePolicelli, NahuelLi, AbigailBhatnagar, Jennifer M.Adams, LindseyNITROGENCARBONMICROBIAL COMMUNITYSOILhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Soil microbes are the driving force behind soil nutrient cycling, yet the role of their composition and function in controlling forest nutrient cycling is poorly understood and rarely used to predict rates of biogeochemical cycling. We aimed to answer: 1) Which microbial traits are the best predictors of soil nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) cycling rates in temperate forests? 2) What are the relative contributions of microbial, plant, and abiotic traits in explaining rates of soil N and P cycling? We hypothesized that including fungal and bacterial gene abundances would better predict soil N and P cycling than plant traits and abiotic conditions alone. To test this hypothesis, we designed a field system in New England where variation in microbial community composition was crossed with variation in vegetation composition and soil nutrient content. At 6 sites, we sampled soil along a transect from the forest edge to interior from four stand types: pine, hardwood, hardwood with pine saplings in the understory, and mixed mature pine-hardwood. In each sample, we measured net ammonification, nitrification, and phosphate release rates. We performed high-throughput sequencing of fungal and bacterial rDNA amplicons (16S/ITS), used PICRUSt2 to calculate bacterial gene abundances, and used all published fungal genomes to calculate genus-level gene abundances. Abundances of bacterial and fungal genes coding for decomposition of plant litter were positively correlated with net ammonification (bacterial: p = 1.6e-08, R2 = 0.27; fungal: p = 0.006, R2 = 0.09) and phosphate release (fungal: p = 0.002, R2 = 0.23; bacterial: p = 0.03, R2 = 0.17). However, instead of gene abundances, microbial functional guilds were the best predictors of nitrification: N-cycling bacterial abundance positively correlated with nitrification (N cycling: p = 1e-06, R2 = 0.18) and ectomycorrhizal abundance was negatively correlated with nitrification (p = 4e-08, R2 = 0.26). Using model selection, the best linear models to explain nitrification and phosphate release included microbial, plant, and abiotic traits, and for ammonification included microbial and abiotic traits. Our results show that multiple microbial traits are important predictors of soil N and P cycling and should be included in future ecosystem-level biogeochemistry models.Fil: Vietorisz, Corinne. Boston University; Estados UnidosFil: Policelli, Nahuel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Instituto Patagónico para el Estudio de los Ecosistemas Continentales; ArgentinaFil: Li, Abigail. Boston University; Estados UnidosFil: Bhatnagar, Jennifer M.. Boston University; Estados UnidosFil: Adams, Lindsey. Boston University; Estados UnidosAmerican Geophysical Union 2023 meetingSan FranciscoEstados UnidosAmerican Geophysical UnionAmerican Geophysical Union2023info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectReuniónBookhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/pdfimage/pngapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/228885Fungal and bacterial functional groups explain variance in soil nutrient cycling; American Geophysical Union 2023 meeting; San Francisco; Estados Unidos; 2023; 1-2CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://agu.confex.com/agu/fm23/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/1439269Internacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:32:52Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/228885instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:32:52.799CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Fungal and bacterial functional groups explain variance in soil nutrient cycling |
title |
Fungal and bacterial functional groups explain variance in soil nutrient cycling |
spellingShingle |
Fungal and bacterial functional groups explain variance in soil nutrient cycling Vietorisz, Corinne NITROGEN CARBON MICROBIAL COMMUNITY SOIL |
title_short |
Fungal and bacterial functional groups explain variance in soil nutrient cycling |
title_full |
Fungal and bacterial functional groups explain variance in soil nutrient cycling |
title_fullStr |
Fungal and bacterial functional groups explain variance in soil nutrient cycling |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fungal and bacterial functional groups explain variance in soil nutrient cycling |
title_sort |
Fungal and bacterial functional groups explain variance in soil nutrient cycling |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Vietorisz, Corinne Policelli, Nahuel Li, Abigail Bhatnagar, Jennifer M. Adams, Lindsey |
author |
Vietorisz, Corinne |
author_facet |
Vietorisz, Corinne Policelli, Nahuel Li, Abigail Bhatnagar, Jennifer M. Adams, Lindsey |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Policelli, Nahuel Li, Abigail Bhatnagar, Jennifer M. Adams, Lindsey |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
NITROGEN CARBON MICROBIAL COMMUNITY SOIL |
topic |
NITROGEN CARBON MICROBIAL COMMUNITY SOIL |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Soil microbes are the driving force behind soil nutrient cycling, yet the role of their composition and function in controlling forest nutrient cycling is poorly understood and rarely used to predict rates of biogeochemical cycling. We aimed to answer: 1) Which microbial traits are the best predictors of soil nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) cycling rates in temperate forests? 2) What are the relative contributions of microbial, plant, and abiotic traits in explaining rates of soil N and P cycling? We hypothesized that including fungal and bacterial gene abundances would better predict soil N and P cycling than plant traits and abiotic conditions alone. To test this hypothesis, we designed a field system in New England where variation in microbial community composition was crossed with variation in vegetation composition and soil nutrient content. At 6 sites, we sampled soil along a transect from the forest edge to interior from four stand types: pine, hardwood, hardwood with pine saplings in the understory, and mixed mature pine-hardwood. In each sample, we measured net ammonification, nitrification, and phosphate release rates. We performed high-throughput sequencing of fungal and bacterial rDNA amplicons (16S/ITS), used PICRUSt2 to calculate bacterial gene abundances, and used all published fungal genomes to calculate genus-level gene abundances. Abundances of bacterial and fungal genes coding for decomposition of plant litter were positively correlated with net ammonification (bacterial: p = 1.6e-08, R2 = 0.27; fungal: p = 0.006, R2 = 0.09) and phosphate release (fungal: p = 0.002, R2 = 0.23; bacterial: p = 0.03, R2 = 0.17). However, instead of gene abundances, microbial functional guilds were the best predictors of nitrification: N-cycling bacterial abundance positively correlated with nitrification (N cycling: p = 1e-06, R2 = 0.18) and ectomycorrhizal abundance was negatively correlated with nitrification (p = 4e-08, R2 = 0.26). Using model selection, the best linear models to explain nitrification and phosphate release included microbial, plant, and abiotic traits, and for ammonification included microbial and abiotic traits. Our results show that multiple microbial traits are important predictors of soil N and P cycling and should be included in future ecosystem-level biogeochemistry models. Fil: Vietorisz, Corinne. Boston University; Estados Unidos Fil: Policelli, Nahuel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Instituto Patagónico para el Estudio de los Ecosistemas Continentales; Argentina Fil: Li, Abigail. Boston University; Estados Unidos Fil: Bhatnagar, Jennifer M.. Boston University; Estados Unidos Fil: Adams, Lindsey. Boston University; Estados Unidos American Geophysical Union 2023 meeting San Francisco Estados Unidos American Geophysical Union |
description |
Soil microbes are the driving force behind soil nutrient cycling, yet the role of their composition and function in controlling forest nutrient cycling is poorly understood and rarely used to predict rates of biogeochemical cycling. We aimed to answer: 1) Which microbial traits are the best predictors of soil nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) cycling rates in temperate forests? 2) What are the relative contributions of microbial, plant, and abiotic traits in explaining rates of soil N and P cycling? We hypothesized that including fungal and bacterial gene abundances would better predict soil N and P cycling than plant traits and abiotic conditions alone. To test this hypothesis, we designed a field system in New England where variation in microbial community composition was crossed with variation in vegetation composition and soil nutrient content. At 6 sites, we sampled soil along a transect from the forest edge to interior from four stand types: pine, hardwood, hardwood with pine saplings in the understory, and mixed mature pine-hardwood. In each sample, we measured net ammonification, nitrification, and phosphate release rates. We performed high-throughput sequencing of fungal and bacterial rDNA amplicons (16S/ITS), used PICRUSt2 to calculate bacterial gene abundances, and used all published fungal genomes to calculate genus-level gene abundances. Abundances of bacterial and fungal genes coding for decomposition of plant litter were positively correlated with net ammonification (bacterial: p = 1.6e-08, R2 = 0.27; fungal: p = 0.006, R2 = 0.09) and phosphate release (fungal: p = 0.002, R2 = 0.23; bacterial: p = 0.03, R2 = 0.17). However, instead of gene abundances, microbial functional guilds were the best predictors of nitrification: N-cycling bacterial abundance positively correlated with nitrification (N cycling: p = 1e-06, R2 = 0.18) and ectomycorrhizal abundance was negatively correlated with nitrification (p = 4e-08, R2 = 0.26). Using model selection, the best linear models to explain nitrification and phosphate release included microbial, plant, and abiotic traits, and for ammonification included microbial and abiotic traits. Our results show that multiple microbial traits are important predictors of soil N and P cycling and should be included in future ecosystem-level biogeochemistry models. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject Reunión Book http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
format |
conferenceObject |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/228885 Fungal and bacterial functional groups explain variance in soil nutrient cycling; American Geophysical Union 2023 meeting; San Francisco; Estados Unidos; 2023; 1-2 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/228885 |
identifier_str_mv |
Fungal and bacterial functional groups explain variance in soil nutrient cycling; American Geophysical Union 2023 meeting; San Francisco; Estados Unidos; 2023; 1-2 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://agu.confex.com/agu/fm23/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/1439269 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document application/pdf image/png application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Internacional |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Geophysical Union |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Geophysical Union |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613005688438784 |
score |
13.070432 |