Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Stance towards Science and Technology in the Context of his Critique to Positivism

Autores
García Cherep, Paula; Gonzalo, Adriana Noemi
Año de publicación
2022
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Notions of Science and Technique in the Context of his Critique to Positivism Paula García Cherep1Adriana Gonzalo2 Abstract: This paper discusses scholarly interpretations according to which in 1937 a radical shift in Horkheimer´s thought can be observed. This shift consists of a growing mistrust in science and technology, and a pessimistic view concern¬ing the possibilities of social transformation. Our purpose is to refute this inter¬pretation and to defend the hypothesis of absence of a negative perspective of the role of science and technology in that period. We aim to contrast the criticism of the position of positivism in relation to science and technology and the one de¬fended by Horkheimer. For this purpose, we will examine a set of Horkheimer?s texts from the forties. We focus on the topics related to his stance on science and its demarcation from metaphysics, the role of science and technology in capital-ist society, and the possibility of scientific progress and social transformation. In relation to the last topic, we argue that even if Horkheimer has always been faithful to a social transformative goal, he does not defend this goal from a blindly optimistic perspective. We will also consider the role of technology in Horkheimer?s thought regarding the social task of critical theory. In this sense, we will point out that Horkheimer?s view of science should be interpreted as nei¬ther negativist nor hopeless but must be considered in light of a new position regarding the relationship between the human being and nature. The last part of the article intends to be a contribution upholding the thesis that the notion of reason emerging from Horkheimer?s analysis is linked to a new idea of science based on a relation of non-domination of nature.
Fil: García Cherep, Paula. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral; Argentina
Fil: Gonzalo, Adriana Noemi. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral; Argentina
Materia
VIEW OF SCIENCE
NEW INTERPRETATION
HORHEIMER
AGAINST POSITIVISM
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/202942

id CONICETDig_6fbd4eaad546ba59730ca5d145f400d7
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/202942
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Stance towards Science and Technology in the Context of his Critique to PositivismGarcía Cherep, PaulaGonzalo, Adriana NoemiVIEW OF SCIENCENEW INTERPRETATIONHORHEIMERAGAINST POSITIVISMhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Notions of Science and Technique in the Context of his Critique to Positivism Paula García Cherep1Adriana Gonzalo2 Abstract: This paper discusses scholarly interpretations according to which in 1937 a radical shift in Horkheimer´s thought can be observed. This shift consists of a growing mistrust in science and technology, and a pessimistic view concern¬ing the possibilities of social transformation. Our purpose is to refute this inter¬pretation and to defend the hypothesis of absence of a negative perspective of the role of science and technology in that period. We aim to contrast the criticism of the position of positivism in relation to science and technology and the one de¬fended by Horkheimer. For this purpose, we will examine a set of Horkheimer?s texts from the forties. We focus on the topics related to his stance on science and its demarcation from metaphysics, the role of science and technology in capital-ist society, and the possibility of scientific progress and social transformation. In relation to the last topic, we argue that even if Horkheimer has always been faithful to a social transformative goal, he does not defend this goal from a blindly optimistic perspective. We will also consider the role of technology in Horkheimer?s thought regarding the social task of critical theory. In this sense, we will point out that Horkheimer?s view of science should be interpreted as nei¬ther negativist nor hopeless but must be considered in light of a new position regarding the relationship between the human being and nature. The last part of the article intends to be a contribution upholding the thesis that the notion of reason emerging from Horkheimer?s analysis is linked to a new idea of science based on a relation of non-domination of nature.Fil: García Cherep, Paula. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral; ArgentinaFil: Gonzalo, Adriana Noemi. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral; ArgentinaXenomoi Verlag2022-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/202942García Cherep, Paula; Gonzalo, Adriana Noemi; Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Stance towards Science and Technology in the Context of his Critique to Positivism; Xenomoi Verlag; Berlin Journal of Critical Theory; 6; 1; 1-2022; 177-2052567-40482567-4056CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.bjct.de/BJCT_text_archive.htmlinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.bjct.de/files/Issues%20of%20the%20BJCT/BJCT_1-2022.pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:59:04Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/202942instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:59:04.997CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Stance towards Science and Technology in the Context of his Critique to Positivism
title Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Stance towards Science and Technology in the Context of his Critique to Positivism
spellingShingle Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Stance towards Science and Technology in the Context of his Critique to Positivism
García Cherep, Paula
VIEW OF SCIENCE
NEW INTERPRETATION
HORHEIMER
AGAINST POSITIVISM
title_short Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Stance towards Science and Technology in the Context of his Critique to Positivism
title_full Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Stance towards Science and Technology in the Context of his Critique to Positivism
title_fullStr Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Stance towards Science and Technology in the Context of his Critique to Positivism
title_full_unstemmed Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Stance towards Science and Technology in the Context of his Critique to Positivism
title_sort Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Stance towards Science and Technology in the Context of his Critique to Positivism
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv García Cherep, Paula
Gonzalo, Adriana Noemi
author García Cherep, Paula
author_facet García Cherep, Paula
Gonzalo, Adriana Noemi
author_role author
author2 Gonzalo, Adriana Noemi
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv VIEW OF SCIENCE
NEW INTERPRETATION
HORHEIMER
AGAINST POSITIVISM
topic VIEW OF SCIENCE
NEW INTERPRETATION
HORHEIMER
AGAINST POSITIVISM
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Notions of Science and Technique in the Context of his Critique to Positivism Paula García Cherep1Adriana Gonzalo2 Abstract: This paper discusses scholarly interpretations according to which in 1937 a radical shift in Horkheimer´s thought can be observed. This shift consists of a growing mistrust in science and technology, and a pessimistic view concern¬ing the possibilities of social transformation. Our purpose is to refute this inter¬pretation and to defend the hypothesis of absence of a negative perspective of the role of science and technology in that period. We aim to contrast the criticism of the position of positivism in relation to science and technology and the one de¬fended by Horkheimer. For this purpose, we will examine a set of Horkheimer?s texts from the forties. We focus on the topics related to his stance on science and its demarcation from metaphysics, the role of science and technology in capital-ist society, and the possibility of scientific progress and social transformation. In relation to the last topic, we argue that even if Horkheimer has always been faithful to a social transformative goal, he does not defend this goal from a blindly optimistic perspective. We will also consider the role of technology in Horkheimer?s thought regarding the social task of critical theory. In this sense, we will point out that Horkheimer?s view of science should be interpreted as nei¬ther negativist nor hopeless but must be considered in light of a new position regarding the relationship between the human being and nature. The last part of the article intends to be a contribution upholding the thesis that the notion of reason emerging from Horkheimer?s analysis is linked to a new idea of science based on a relation of non-domination of nature.
Fil: García Cherep, Paula. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral; Argentina
Fil: Gonzalo, Adriana Noemi. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral; Argentina
description Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Notions of Science and Technique in the Context of his Critique to Positivism Paula García Cherep1Adriana Gonzalo2 Abstract: This paper discusses scholarly interpretations according to which in 1937 a radical shift in Horkheimer´s thought can be observed. This shift consists of a growing mistrust in science and technology, and a pessimistic view concern¬ing the possibilities of social transformation. Our purpose is to refute this inter¬pretation and to defend the hypothesis of absence of a negative perspective of the role of science and technology in that period. We aim to contrast the criticism of the position of positivism in relation to science and technology and the one de¬fended by Horkheimer. For this purpose, we will examine a set of Horkheimer?s texts from the forties. We focus on the topics related to his stance on science and its demarcation from metaphysics, the role of science and technology in capital-ist society, and the possibility of scientific progress and social transformation. In relation to the last topic, we argue that even if Horkheimer has always been faithful to a social transformative goal, he does not defend this goal from a blindly optimistic perspective. We will also consider the role of technology in Horkheimer?s thought regarding the social task of critical theory. In this sense, we will point out that Horkheimer?s view of science should be interpreted as nei¬ther negativist nor hopeless but must be considered in light of a new position regarding the relationship between the human being and nature. The last part of the article intends to be a contribution upholding the thesis that the notion of reason emerging from Horkheimer?s analysis is linked to a new idea of science based on a relation of non-domination of nature.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/202942
García Cherep, Paula; Gonzalo, Adriana Noemi; Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Stance towards Science and Technology in the Context of his Critique to Positivism; Xenomoi Verlag; Berlin Journal of Critical Theory; 6; 1; 1-2022; 177-205
2567-4048
2567-4056
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/202942
identifier_str_mv García Cherep, Paula; Gonzalo, Adriana Noemi; Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Stance towards Science and Technology in the Context of his Critique to Positivism; Xenomoi Verlag; Berlin Journal of Critical Theory; 6; 1; 1-2022; 177-205
2567-4048
2567-4056
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.bjct.de/BJCT_text_archive.html
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.bjct.de/files/Issues%20of%20the%20BJCT/BJCT_1-2022.pdf
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Xenomoi Verlag
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Xenomoi Verlag
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846083131887583232
score 13.22299