Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Stance towards Science and Technology in the Context of his Critique to Positivism
- Autores
- García Cherep, Paula; Gonzalo, Adriana Noemi
- Año de publicación
- 2022
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Notions of Science and Technique in the Context of his Critique to Positivism Paula García Cherep1Adriana Gonzalo2 Abstract: This paper discusses scholarly interpretations according to which in 1937 a radical shift in Horkheimer´s thought can be observed. This shift consists of a growing mistrust in science and technology, and a pessimistic view concern¬ing the possibilities of social transformation. Our purpose is to refute this inter¬pretation and to defend the hypothesis of absence of a negative perspective of the role of science and technology in that period. We aim to contrast the criticism of the position of positivism in relation to science and technology and the one de¬fended by Horkheimer. For this purpose, we will examine a set of Horkheimer?s texts from the forties. We focus on the topics related to his stance on science and its demarcation from metaphysics, the role of science and technology in capital-ist society, and the possibility of scientific progress and social transformation. In relation to the last topic, we argue that even if Horkheimer has always been faithful to a social transformative goal, he does not defend this goal from a blindly optimistic perspective. We will also consider the role of technology in Horkheimer?s thought regarding the social task of critical theory. In this sense, we will point out that Horkheimer?s view of science should be interpreted as nei¬ther negativist nor hopeless but must be considered in light of a new position regarding the relationship between the human being and nature. The last part of the article intends to be a contribution upholding the thesis that the notion of reason emerging from Horkheimer?s analysis is linked to a new idea of science based on a relation of non-domination of nature.
Fil: García Cherep, Paula. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral; Argentina
Fil: Gonzalo, Adriana Noemi. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral; Argentina - Materia
-
VIEW OF SCIENCE
NEW INTERPRETATION
HORHEIMER
AGAINST POSITIVISM - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/202942
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_6fbd4eaad546ba59730ca5d145f400d7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/202942 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Stance towards Science and Technology in the Context of his Critique to PositivismGarcía Cherep, PaulaGonzalo, Adriana NoemiVIEW OF SCIENCENEW INTERPRETATIONHORHEIMERAGAINST POSITIVISMhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Notions of Science and Technique in the Context of his Critique to Positivism Paula García Cherep1Adriana Gonzalo2 Abstract: This paper discusses scholarly interpretations according to which in 1937 a radical shift in Horkheimer´s thought can be observed. This shift consists of a growing mistrust in science and technology, and a pessimistic view concern¬ing the possibilities of social transformation. Our purpose is to refute this inter¬pretation and to defend the hypothesis of absence of a negative perspective of the role of science and technology in that period. We aim to contrast the criticism of the position of positivism in relation to science and technology and the one de¬fended by Horkheimer. For this purpose, we will examine a set of Horkheimer?s texts from the forties. We focus on the topics related to his stance on science and its demarcation from metaphysics, the role of science and technology in capital-ist society, and the possibility of scientific progress and social transformation. In relation to the last topic, we argue that even if Horkheimer has always been faithful to a social transformative goal, he does not defend this goal from a blindly optimistic perspective. We will also consider the role of technology in Horkheimer?s thought regarding the social task of critical theory. In this sense, we will point out that Horkheimer?s view of science should be interpreted as nei¬ther negativist nor hopeless but must be considered in light of a new position regarding the relationship between the human being and nature. The last part of the article intends to be a contribution upholding the thesis that the notion of reason emerging from Horkheimer?s analysis is linked to a new idea of science based on a relation of non-domination of nature.Fil: García Cherep, Paula. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral; ArgentinaFil: Gonzalo, Adriana Noemi. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral; ArgentinaXenomoi Verlag2022-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/202942García Cherep, Paula; Gonzalo, Adriana Noemi; Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Stance towards Science and Technology in the Context of his Critique to Positivism; Xenomoi Verlag; Berlin Journal of Critical Theory; 6; 1; 1-2022; 177-2052567-40482567-4056CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.bjct.de/BJCT_text_archive.htmlinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.bjct.de/files/Issues%20of%20the%20BJCT/BJCT_1-2022.pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:59:04Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/202942instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:59:04.997CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Stance towards Science and Technology in the Context of his Critique to Positivism |
title |
Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Stance towards Science and Technology in the Context of his Critique to Positivism |
spellingShingle |
Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Stance towards Science and Technology in the Context of his Critique to Positivism García Cherep, Paula VIEW OF SCIENCE NEW INTERPRETATION HORHEIMER AGAINST POSITIVISM |
title_short |
Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Stance towards Science and Technology in the Context of his Critique to Positivism |
title_full |
Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Stance towards Science and Technology in the Context of his Critique to Positivism |
title_fullStr |
Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Stance towards Science and Technology in the Context of his Critique to Positivism |
title_full_unstemmed |
Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Stance towards Science and Technology in the Context of his Critique to Positivism |
title_sort |
Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Stance towards Science and Technology in the Context of his Critique to Positivism |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
García Cherep, Paula Gonzalo, Adriana Noemi |
author |
García Cherep, Paula |
author_facet |
García Cherep, Paula Gonzalo, Adriana Noemi |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gonzalo, Adriana Noemi |
author2_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
VIEW OF SCIENCE NEW INTERPRETATION HORHEIMER AGAINST POSITIVISM |
topic |
VIEW OF SCIENCE NEW INTERPRETATION HORHEIMER AGAINST POSITIVISM |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Notions of Science and Technique in the Context of his Critique to Positivism Paula García Cherep1Adriana Gonzalo2 Abstract: This paper discusses scholarly interpretations according to which in 1937 a radical shift in Horkheimer´s thought can be observed. This shift consists of a growing mistrust in science and technology, and a pessimistic view concern¬ing the possibilities of social transformation. Our purpose is to refute this inter¬pretation and to defend the hypothesis of absence of a negative perspective of the role of science and technology in that period. We aim to contrast the criticism of the position of positivism in relation to science and technology and the one de¬fended by Horkheimer. For this purpose, we will examine a set of Horkheimer?s texts from the forties. We focus on the topics related to his stance on science and its demarcation from metaphysics, the role of science and technology in capital-ist society, and the possibility of scientific progress and social transformation. In relation to the last topic, we argue that even if Horkheimer has always been faithful to a social transformative goal, he does not defend this goal from a blindly optimistic perspective. We will also consider the role of technology in Horkheimer?s thought regarding the social task of critical theory. In this sense, we will point out that Horkheimer?s view of science should be interpreted as nei¬ther negativist nor hopeless but must be considered in light of a new position regarding the relationship between the human being and nature. The last part of the article intends to be a contribution upholding the thesis that the notion of reason emerging from Horkheimer?s analysis is linked to a new idea of science based on a relation of non-domination of nature. Fil: García Cherep, Paula. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral; Argentina Fil: Gonzalo, Adriana Noemi. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral; Argentina |
description |
Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Notions of Science and Technique in the Context of his Critique to Positivism Paula García Cherep1Adriana Gonzalo2 Abstract: This paper discusses scholarly interpretations according to which in 1937 a radical shift in Horkheimer´s thought can be observed. This shift consists of a growing mistrust in science and technology, and a pessimistic view concern¬ing the possibilities of social transformation. Our purpose is to refute this inter¬pretation and to defend the hypothesis of absence of a negative perspective of the role of science and technology in that period. We aim to contrast the criticism of the position of positivism in relation to science and technology and the one de¬fended by Horkheimer. For this purpose, we will examine a set of Horkheimer?s texts from the forties. We focus on the topics related to his stance on science and its demarcation from metaphysics, the role of science and technology in capital-ist society, and the possibility of scientific progress and social transformation. In relation to the last topic, we argue that even if Horkheimer has always been faithful to a social transformative goal, he does not defend this goal from a blindly optimistic perspective. We will also consider the role of technology in Horkheimer?s thought regarding the social task of critical theory. In this sense, we will point out that Horkheimer?s view of science should be interpreted as nei¬ther negativist nor hopeless but must be considered in light of a new position regarding the relationship between the human being and nature. The last part of the article intends to be a contribution upholding the thesis that the notion of reason emerging from Horkheimer?s analysis is linked to a new idea of science based on a relation of non-domination of nature. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/202942 García Cherep, Paula; Gonzalo, Adriana Noemi; Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Stance towards Science and Technology in the Context of his Critique to Positivism; Xenomoi Verlag; Berlin Journal of Critical Theory; 6; 1; 1-2022; 177-205 2567-4048 2567-4056 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/202942 |
identifier_str_mv |
García Cherep, Paula; Gonzalo, Adriana Noemi; Towards a New Interpretation of Horkheimer´s Stance towards Science and Technology in the Context of his Critique to Positivism; Xenomoi Verlag; Berlin Journal of Critical Theory; 6; 1; 1-2022; 177-205 2567-4048 2567-4056 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.bjct.de/BJCT_text_archive.html info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.bjct.de/files/Issues%20of%20the%20BJCT/BJCT_1-2022.pdf |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Xenomoi Verlag |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Xenomoi Verlag |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1846083131887583232 |
score |
13.22299 |