Capital Flows to Latin America (2003-2017): A Critical Survey from Prebisch’s Business Cycle Theory

Autores
Lampa, Roberto
Año de publicación
2020
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The economic literature on capital flows to developing countries has shared two important commonalities since the 1990s. Published works (whether they focus on the external situation or stress the domestic determinants of capital flows) tend to assume a beneficial effect of capital inflows, which leads to an improvement of peripheral institutions, whose deficiencies are ostensibly the main cause of economic turmoil and/or failure in attracting capital flows, in continuity with New Institutional Economics. In doing so, mainstream economists deliberately overlook the asymmetric characteristics of the international monetary system and the persisting hegemony of dollar. Raul Prebisch’s pioneering work on business cycles in Latin America provide an alternative view, one capable of amending the existing mainstream literature. On the one hand, Prebisch stressed the destabilizing role of capital inflows on Latin American economies, particularly short-term speculative capital. On the other hand, Prebisch designed a set of counter cyclical monetary policies in order to contrast capital volatility, particularly during downturns. An analysis of stylized facts shows that, when correctly updated, Prebisch’s theory has remarkable explanatory potential when applied to Latin America’s current economic and financial situation.
Fil: Lampa, Roberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Instituto de Altos Estudios Sociales; Argentina
Materia
CAPITAL FLOWS
CURRENCY HIERARCHY
LIQUIDITY CYCLE
NEW INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS
RAUL PREBISCH
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/169351

id CONICETDig_6f7aaaae2393b5c53f55fb07cc861cd5
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/169351
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Capital Flows to Latin America (2003-2017): A Critical Survey from Prebisch’s Business Cycle TheoryLampa, RobertoCAPITAL FLOWSCURRENCY HIERARCHYLIQUIDITY CYCLENEW INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICSRAUL PREBISCHhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5The economic literature on capital flows to developing countries has shared two important commonalities since the 1990s. Published works (whether they focus on the external situation or stress the domestic determinants of capital flows) tend to assume a beneficial effect of capital inflows, which leads to an improvement of peripheral institutions, whose deficiencies are ostensibly the main cause of economic turmoil and/or failure in attracting capital flows, in continuity with New Institutional Economics. In doing so, mainstream economists deliberately overlook the asymmetric characteristics of the international monetary system and the persisting hegemony of dollar. Raul Prebisch’s pioneering work on business cycles in Latin America provide an alternative view, one capable of amending the existing mainstream literature. On the one hand, Prebisch stressed the destabilizing role of capital inflows on Latin American economies, particularly short-term speculative capital. On the other hand, Prebisch designed a set of counter cyclical monetary policies in order to contrast capital volatility, particularly during downturns. An analysis of stylized facts shows that, when correctly updated, Prebisch’s theory has remarkable explanatory potential when applied to Latin America’s current economic and financial situation.Fil: Lampa, Roberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Instituto de Altos Estudios Sociales; ArgentinaTaylor & Francis2020-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/169351Lampa, Roberto; Capital Flows to Latin America (2003-2017): A Critical Survey from Prebisch’s Business Cycle Theory; Taylor & Francis; Review Of Political Economy; 33; 1; 12-2020; 103-1250953-82591465-3982CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09538259.2020.1846872?journalCode=crpe20info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/09538259.2020.1846872info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-12-03T09:14:51Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/169351instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-12-03 09:14:51.892CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Capital Flows to Latin America (2003-2017): A Critical Survey from Prebisch’s Business Cycle Theory
title Capital Flows to Latin America (2003-2017): A Critical Survey from Prebisch’s Business Cycle Theory
spellingShingle Capital Flows to Latin America (2003-2017): A Critical Survey from Prebisch’s Business Cycle Theory
Lampa, Roberto
CAPITAL FLOWS
CURRENCY HIERARCHY
LIQUIDITY CYCLE
NEW INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS
RAUL PREBISCH
title_short Capital Flows to Latin America (2003-2017): A Critical Survey from Prebisch’s Business Cycle Theory
title_full Capital Flows to Latin America (2003-2017): A Critical Survey from Prebisch’s Business Cycle Theory
title_fullStr Capital Flows to Latin America (2003-2017): A Critical Survey from Prebisch’s Business Cycle Theory
title_full_unstemmed Capital Flows to Latin America (2003-2017): A Critical Survey from Prebisch’s Business Cycle Theory
title_sort Capital Flows to Latin America (2003-2017): A Critical Survey from Prebisch’s Business Cycle Theory
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Lampa, Roberto
author Lampa, Roberto
author_facet Lampa, Roberto
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv CAPITAL FLOWS
CURRENCY HIERARCHY
LIQUIDITY CYCLE
NEW INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS
RAUL PREBISCH
topic CAPITAL FLOWS
CURRENCY HIERARCHY
LIQUIDITY CYCLE
NEW INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS
RAUL PREBISCH
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The economic literature on capital flows to developing countries has shared two important commonalities since the 1990s. Published works (whether they focus on the external situation or stress the domestic determinants of capital flows) tend to assume a beneficial effect of capital inflows, which leads to an improvement of peripheral institutions, whose deficiencies are ostensibly the main cause of economic turmoil and/or failure in attracting capital flows, in continuity with New Institutional Economics. In doing so, mainstream economists deliberately overlook the asymmetric characteristics of the international monetary system and the persisting hegemony of dollar. Raul Prebisch’s pioneering work on business cycles in Latin America provide an alternative view, one capable of amending the existing mainstream literature. On the one hand, Prebisch stressed the destabilizing role of capital inflows on Latin American economies, particularly short-term speculative capital. On the other hand, Prebisch designed a set of counter cyclical monetary policies in order to contrast capital volatility, particularly during downturns. An analysis of stylized facts shows that, when correctly updated, Prebisch’s theory has remarkable explanatory potential when applied to Latin America’s current economic and financial situation.
Fil: Lampa, Roberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Instituto de Altos Estudios Sociales; Argentina
description The economic literature on capital flows to developing countries has shared two important commonalities since the 1990s. Published works (whether they focus on the external situation or stress the domestic determinants of capital flows) tend to assume a beneficial effect of capital inflows, which leads to an improvement of peripheral institutions, whose deficiencies are ostensibly the main cause of economic turmoil and/or failure in attracting capital flows, in continuity with New Institutional Economics. In doing so, mainstream economists deliberately overlook the asymmetric characteristics of the international monetary system and the persisting hegemony of dollar. Raul Prebisch’s pioneering work on business cycles in Latin America provide an alternative view, one capable of amending the existing mainstream literature. On the one hand, Prebisch stressed the destabilizing role of capital inflows on Latin American economies, particularly short-term speculative capital. On the other hand, Prebisch designed a set of counter cyclical monetary policies in order to contrast capital volatility, particularly during downturns. An analysis of stylized facts shows that, when correctly updated, Prebisch’s theory has remarkable explanatory potential when applied to Latin America’s current economic and financial situation.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/169351
Lampa, Roberto; Capital Flows to Latin America (2003-2017): A Critical Survey from Prebisch’s Business Cycle Theory; Taylor & Francis; Review Of Political Economy; 33; 1; 12-2020; 103-125
0953-8259
1465-3982
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/169351
identifier_str_mv Lampa, Roberto; Capital Flows to Latin America (2003-2017): A Critical Survey from Prebisch’s Business Cycle Theory; Taylor & Francis; Review Of Political Economy; 33; 1; 12-2020; 103-125
0953-8259
1465-3982
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09538259.2020.1846872?journalCode=crpe20
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/09538259.2020.1846872
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1850505428553695232
score 13.275514