Disintegration of the genus Prosopis L. (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade)
- Autores
- Hughes, Colin E.; Ringelberg, Jens J.; Lewis, Gwilym P.; Catalano, Santiago Andres
- Año de publicación
- 2022
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Robust evidence from phylogenomic analyses of 997 nuclear genes has recently shown, beyond doubt, that the genus Prosopis is polyphyletic with three separate lineages, each with affinities to other genera of mimosoids: (i) Prosopis africana is an isolated lineage placed in the grade of Plathymenia, Newtonia and Fillaeopsis that subtends the core mimosoid clade; (ii) the remaining Old World species of Prosopis form a clade that is sister to the Indo-Nepalese monospecific genus Indopiptadenia and (iii) New World Prosopis has the Namibian / Namaqualand monospecific endemic genus Xerocladia nested within it. This means that it is now clear that maintaining the unity of the genus Prosopis sensu Burkart (1976) is no longer tenable. These three distinct lineages of Prosopis species correspond directly to Burkart’s (1976) sectional classification of the genus, to previously recognised genera and to the differences in types of armature that underpin Burkart’s sections. Here, we address this non-monophyly by resurrecting three segregate genera – Anonychium, Neltuma and Strombocarpa and provide 57 new name combinations where necessary, while maintaining the morphologically distinctive and geographically isolated genera Xerocladia and Indopiptadenia. The genus Prosopis itself is reduced to just three species and an emended description is presented. The impacts of these name changes for a genus of such high ecological and human use importance are discussed. These impacts are mitigated by clear differences in armature which facilitate identification and by potential benefits from the deeper biological understanding brought about by recognition of these divergent lineages at generic rank. We provide an identification key to genera and present a map showing the distributions of the segregate genera, as well as drawings and photos illustrating variation in armature and fruits.
Fil: Hughes, Colin E.. Universitat Zurich; Suiza
Fil: Ringelberg, Jens J.. Universitat Zurich; Suiza
Fil: Lewis, Gwilym P.. Royal Botanic Gardens; Reino Unido
Fil: Catalano, Santiago Andres. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico - Tucumán. Unidad Ejecutora Lillo; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo; Argentina - Materia
-
ANONYCHIUM
FABACEAE
GENERIC DELIMITATION
INDOPIPTADENIA
MONOPHYLY
NELTUMA
STROMBOCARPA
TAXONOMY
XEROCLADIA - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/211252
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_6f4b62410e1e515c928ef0f86b957b1a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/211252 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Disintegration of the genus Prosopis L. (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade)Hughes, Colin E.Ringelberg, Jens J.Lewis, Gwilym P.Catalano, Santiago AndresANONYCHIUMFABACEAEGENERIC DELIMITATIONINDOPIPTADENIAMONOPHYLYNELTUMASTROMBOCARPATAXONOMYXEROCLADIAhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Robust evidence from phylogenomic analyses of 997 nuclear genes has recently shown, beyond doubt, that the genus Prosopis is polyphyletic with three separate lineages, each with affinities to other genera of mimosoids: (i) Prosopis africana is an isolated lineage placed in the grade of Plathymenia, Newtonia and Fillaeopsis that subtends the core mimosoid clade; (ii) the remaining Old World species of Prosopis form a clade that is sister to the Indo-Nepalese monospecific genus Indopiptadenia and (iii) New World Prosopis has the Namibian / Namaqualand monospecific endemic genus Xerocladia nested within it. This means that it is now clear that maintaining the unity of the genus Prosopis sensu Burkart (1976) is no longer tenable. These three distinct lineages of Prosopis species correspond directly to Burkart’s (1976) sectional classification of the genus, to previously recognised genera and to the differences in types of armature that underpin Burkart’s sections. Here, we address this non-monophyly by resurrecting three segregate genera – Anonychium, Neltuma and Strombocarpa and provide 57 new name combinations where necessary, while maintaining the morphologically distinctive and geographically isolated genera Xerocladia and Indopiptadenia. The genus Prosopis itself is reduced to just three species and an emended description is presented. The impacts of these name changes for a genus of such high ecological and human use importance are discussed. These impacts are mitigated by clear differences in armature which facilitate identification and by potential benefits from the deeper biological understanding brought about by recognition of these divergent lineages at generic rank. We provide an identification key to genera and present a map showing the distributions of the segregate genera, as well as drawings and photos illustrating variation in armature and fruits.Fil: Hughes, Colin E.. Universitat Zurich; SuizaFil: Ringelberg, Jens J.. Universitat Zurich; SuizaFil: Lewis, Gwilym P.. Royal Botanic Gardens; Reino UnidoFil: Catalano, Santiago Andres. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico - Tucumán. Unidad Ejecutora Lillo; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo; ArgentinaPensoft Publishers2022-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/211252Hughes, Colin E.; Ringelberg, Jens J.; Lewis, Gwilym P.; Catalano, Santiago Andres; Disintegration of the genus Prosopis L. (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade); Pensoft Publishers; PhytoKeys; 205; 8-2022; 147-1891314-2003CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3897/PHYTOKEYS.205.75379info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://phytokeys.pensoft.net/article/75379/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:02:07Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/211252instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:02:07.621CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Disintegration of the genus Prosopis L. (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade) |
title |
Disintegration of the genus Prosopis L. (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade) |
spellingShingle |
Disintegration of the genus Prosopis L. (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade) Hughes, Colin E. ANONYCHIUM FABACEAE GENERIC DELIMITATION INDOPIPTADENIA MONOPHYLY NELTUMA STROMBOCARPA TAXONOMY XEROCLADIA |
title_short |
Disintegration of the genus Prosopis L. (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade) |
title_full |
Disintegration of the genus Prosopis L. (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade) |
title_fullStr |
Disintegration of the genus Prosopis L. (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Disintegration of the genus Prosopis L. (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade) |
title_sort |
Disintegration of the genus Prosopis L. (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade) |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Hughes, Colin E. Ringelberg, Jens J. Lewis, Gwilym P. Catalano, Santiago Andres |
author |
Hughes, Colin E. |
author_facet |
Hughes, Colin E. Ringelberg, Jens J. Lewis, Gwilym P. Catalano, Santiago Andres |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ringelberg, Jens J. Lewis, Gwilym P. Catalano, Santiago Andres |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
ANONYCHIUM FABACEAE GENERIC DELIMITATION INDOPIPTADENIA MONOPHYLY NELTUMA STROMBOCARPA TAXONOMY XEROCLADIA |
topic |
ANONYCHIUM FABACEAE GENERIC DELIMITATION INDOPIPTADENIA MONOPHYLY NELTUMA STROMBOCARPA TAXONOMY XEROCLADIA |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Robust evidence from phylogenomic analyses of 997 nuclear genes has recently shown, beyond doubt, that the genus Prosopis is polyphyletic with three separate lineages, each with affinities to other genera of mimosoids: (i) Prosopis africana is an isolated lineage placed in the grade of Plathymenia, Newtonia and Fillaeopsis that subtends the core mimosoid clade; (ii) the remaining Old World species of Prosopis form a clade that is sister to the Indo-Nepalese monospecific genus Indopiptadenia and (iii) New World Prosopis has the Namibian / Namaqualand monospecific endemic genus Xerocladia nested within it. This means that it is now clear that maintaining the unity of the genus Prosopis sensu Burkart (1976) is no longer tenable. These three distinct lineages of Prosopis species correspond directly to Burkart’s (1976) sectional classification of the genus, to previously recognised genera and to the differences in types of armature that underpin Burkart’s sections. Here, we address this non-monophyly by resurrecting three segregate genera – Anonychium, Neltuma and Strombocarpa and provide 57 new name combinations where necessary, while maintaining the morphologically distinctive and geographically isolated genera Xerocladia and Indopiptadenia. The genus Prosopis itself is reduced to just three species and an emended description is presented. The impacts of these name changes for a genus of such high ecological and human use importance are discussed. These impacts are mitigated by clear differences in armature which facilitate identification and by potential benefits from the deeper biological understanding brought about by recognition of these divergent lineages at generic rank. We provide an identification key to genera and present a map showing the distributions of the segregate genera, as well as drawings and photos illustrating variation in armature and fruits. Fil: Hughes, Colin E.. Universitat Zurich; Suiza Fil: Ringelberg, Jens J.. Universitat Zurich; Suiza Fil: Lewis, Gwilym P.. Royal Botanic Gardens; Reino Unido Fil: Catalano, Santiago Andres. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico - Tucumán. Unidad Ejecutora Lillo; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo; Argentina |
description |
Robust evidence from phylogenomic analyses of 997 nuclear genes has recently shown, beyond doubt, that the genus Prosopis is polyphyletic with three separate lineages, each with affinities to other genera of mimosoids: (i) Prosopis africana is an isolated lineage placed in the grade of Plathymenia, Newtonia and Fillaeopsis that subtends the core mimosoid clade; (ii) the remaining Old World species of Prosopis form a clade that is sister to the Indo-Nepalese monospecific genus Indopiptadenia and (iii) New World Prosopis has the Namibian / Namaqualand monospecific endemic genus Xerocladia nested within it. This means that it is now clear that maintaining the unity of the genus Prosopis sensu Burkart (1976) is no longer tenable. These three distinct lineages of Prosopis species correspond directly to Burkart’s (1976) sectional classification of the genus, to previously recognised genera and to the differences in types of armature that underpin Burkart’s sections. Here, we address this non-monophyly by resurrecting three segregate genera – Anonychium, Neltuma and Strombocarpa and provide 57 new name combinations where necessary, while maintaining the morphologically distinctive and geographically isolated genera Xerocladia and Indopiptadenia. The genus Prosopis itself is reduced to just three species and an emended description is presented. The impacts of these name changes for a genus of such high ecological and human use importance are discussed. These impacts are mitigated by clear differences in armature which facilitate identification and by potential benefits from the deeper biological understanding brought about by recognition of these divergent lineages at generic rank. We provide an identification key to genera and present a map showing the distributions of the segregate genera, as well as drawings and photos illustrating variation in armature and fruits. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-08 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/211252 Hughes, Colin E.; Ringelberg, Jens J.; Lewis, Gwilym P.; Catalano, Santiago Andres; Disintegration of the genus Prosopis L. (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade); Pensoft Publishers; PhytoKeys; 205; 8-2022; 147-189 1314-2003 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/211252 |
identifier_str_mv |
Hughes, Colin E.; Ringelberg, Jens J.; Lewis, Gwilym P.; Catalano, Santiago Andres; Disintegration of the genus Prosopis L. (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade); Pensoft Publishers; PhytoKeys; 205; 8-2022; 147-189 1314-2003 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3897/PHYTOKEYS.205.75379 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://phytokeys.pensoft.net/article/75379/ |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pensoft Publishers |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pensoft Publishers |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613821743759360 |
score |
13.070432 |