Methodological interests and the teaching of research methods in Latin America

Autores
Piovani, Juan Ignacio
Año de publicación
2015
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This article analyzes a series of historical processes related to the development of shared methodological interests within the community of Latin American social scientists. First, it illustrates how a specific methodological field emerged as part of the institutionalization and professionalization of the social sciences, especially in the US, and how the methodological concerns and debates changed over time. On the other hand, it describes the repercussions of these processes in Latin America, particularly for the emergence of a “scientific” sociology, and how the accumulation of experiences related to the methodological field led to the establishment of specialized institutions in the region, such as the Latin American Network of Social Science Methodology (RedMet). With regard to the methodological interests of Latin American academics, the article focuses on those that have been put forward in the regional congresses of social science methodology (ELMECS) organized biannually by RedMet and, in particular, on the problem of the teaching and learning of research methods, that has been a core concern in all the different countries and institutions. Within this broad interest related to the teaching of methodology, special attention is paid to the results of empirical research conducted on how methods are actually taught in various PhD programs of different Latin American universities from Argentina, Brazil and Mexico.
Fil: Piovani, Juan Ignacio. Universidad Nacional de La Plata; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
LATIN AMERICA
NETWORKS
METHODOLOGY
TEACHING
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/71117

id CONICETDig_6f17e7526a8065eefdf02bf6b174403e
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/71117
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Methodological interests and the teaching of research methods in Latin AmericaPiovani, Juan IgnacioLATIN AMERICANETWORKSMETHODOLOGYTEACHINGhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5This article analyzes a series of historical processes related to the development of shared methodological interests within the community of Latin American social scientists. First, it illustrates how a specific methodological field emerged as part of the institutionalization and professionalization of the social sciences, especially in the US, and how the methodological concerns and debates changed over time. On the other hand, it describes the repercussions of these processes in Latin America, particularly for the emergence of a “scientific” sociology, and how the accumulation of experiences related to the methodological field led to the establishment of specialized institutions in the region, such as the Latin American Network of Social Science Methodology (RedMet). With regard to the methodological interests of Latin American academics, the article focuses on those that have been put forward in the regional congresses of social science methodology (ELMECS) organized biannually by RedMet and, in particular, on the problem of the teaching and learning of research methods, that has been a core concern in all the different countries and institutions. Within this broad interest related to the teaching of methodology, special attention is paid to the results of empirical research conducted on how methods are actually taught in various PhD programs of different Latin American universities from Argentina, Brazil and Mexico.Fil: Piovani, Juan Ignacio. Universidad Nacional de La Plata; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaSociedade Brasileira de Sociologia2015-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/71117Piovani, Juan Ignacio; Methodological interests and the teaching of research methods in Latin America; Sociedade Brasileira de Sociologia; Sociologies in Dialogue; 1; 1; 9-2015; 106-1182447-2670CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sbsociologia.com.br/sid/index.php/sid/article/view/15info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.20336/sid.v1i1.15info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-11-12T09:55:27Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/71117instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-11-12 09:55:27.853CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Methodological interests and the teaching of research methods in Latin America
title Methodological interests and the teaching of research methods in Latin America
spellingShingle Methodological interests and the teaching of research methods in Latin America
Piovani, Juan Ignacio
LATIN AMERICA
NETWORKS
METHODOLOGY
TEACHING
title_short Methodological interests and the teaching of research methods in Latin America
title_full Methodological interests and the teaching of research methods in Latin America
title_fullStr Methodological interests and the teaching of research methods in Latin America
title_full_unstemmed Methodological interests and the teaching of research methods in Latin America
title_sort Methodological interests and the teaching of research methods in Latin America
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Piovani, Juan Ignacio
author Piovani, Juan Ignacio
author_facet Piovani, Juan Ignacio
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv LATIN AMERICA
NETWORKS
METHODOLOGY
TEACHING
topic LATIN AMERICA
NETWORKS
METHODOLOGY
TEACHING
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This article analyzes a series of historical processes related to the development of shared methodological interests within the community of Latin American social scientists. First, it illustrates how a specific methodological field emerged as part of the institutionalization and professionalization of the social sciences, especially in the US, and how the methodological concerns and debates changed over time. On the other hand, it describes the repercussions of these processes in Latin America, particularly for the emergence of a “scientific” sociology, and how the accumulation of experiences related to the methodological field led to the establishment of specialized institutions in the region, such as the Latin American Network of Social Science Methodology (RedMet). With regard to the methodological interests of Latin American academics, the article focuses on those that have been put forward in the regional congresses of social science methodology (ELMECS) organized biannually by RedMet and, in particular, on the problem of the teaching and learning of research methods, that has been a core concern in all the different countries and institutions. Within this broad interest related to the teaching of methodology, special attention is paid to the results of empirical research conducted on how methods are actually taught in various PhD programs of different Latin American universities from Argentina, Brazil and Mexico.
Fil: Piovani, Juan Ignacio. Universidad Nacional de La Plata; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description This article analyzes a series of historical processes related to the development of shared methodological interests within the community of Latin American social scientists. First, it illustrates how a specific methodological field emerged as part of the institutionalization and professionalization of the social sciences, especially in the US, and how the methodological concerns and debates changed over time. On the other hand, it describes the repercussions of these processes in Latin America, particularly for the emergence of a “scientific” sociology, and how the accumulation of experiences related to the methodological field led to the establishment of specialized institutions in the region, such as the Latin American Network of Social Science Methodology (RedMet). With regard to the methodological interests of Latin American academics, the article focuses on those that have been put forward in the regional congresses of social science methodology (ELMECS) organized biannually by RedMet and, in particular, on the problem of the teaching and learning of research methods, that has been a core concern in all the different countries and institutions. Within this broad interest related to the teaching of methodology, special attention is paid to the results of empirical research conducted on how methods are actually taught in various PhD programs of different Latin American universities from Argentina, Brazil and Mexico.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/71117
Piovani, Juan Ignacio; Methodological interests and the teaching of research methods in Latin America; Sociedade Brasileira de Sociologia; Sociologies in Dialogue; 1; 1; 9-2015; 106-118
2447-2670
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/71117
identifier_str_mv Piovani, Juan Ignacio; Methodological interests and the teaching of research methods in Latin America; Sociedade Brasileira de Sociologia; Sociologies in Dialogue; 1; 1; 9-2015; 106-118
2447-2670
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sbsociologia.com.br/sid/index.php/sid/article/view/15
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.20336/sid.v1i1.15
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Sociologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Sociologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1848598295177330688
score 13.24909