How sowing date affects development and performance of safflower through climate variables

Autores
Franchini, María Clara; Flemmer, Andrea Cecilia; Lindström, Lilia Ivone; Carrin, Maria Elena; Constenla, Diana Teresita; Johnson, Richard Coburn
Año de publicación
2021
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) has unrealized potential as an alternative crop in many semiarid regions including central Argentina. Our objective was to relate how temperature and precipitation conditions with fall (5 June 2012 and 23 Apr. 2013) and winter sowing (13 Aug. 2012 and 20 Aug. 2013) affected phenology, yield, yield components, and oil percent in four winter and eight spring-type safflower accessions in the semiarid region of central Argentina. Fall sowing was associated with lower temperatures, higher precipitation, lower heat/moisture stress indices and precipitation deficits than winter sowing. Rosette period lasted 55 d longer, and stem elongation to anthesis period 30 d longer in fall than in winter sowing. However, anthesis was advanced only few days in fall sowing and duration of postanthesis development was comparable between sowing regimes and years. Fall sowing plants averaged 3,252 filled grains m–2 and a grain yield of 109.8 g m–2, whereas winter sowing plants averaged 1,443 filled grains m–2 and a grain yield of 49.3 g m–2. Grain yield was 35% higher in winter than in spring-type accessions, but winter types had lower oil percent (22.0%) than spring-types (33.3%). In the semiarid region of central Argentina, we recommend fall sowing as it extended the growing season in terms of days preanthesis and presented favorable climatic conditions for safflower development.
Fil: Franchini, María Clara. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Agronomía; Argentina
Fil: Flemmer, Andrea Cecilia. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Agronomía; Argentina
Fil: Lindström, Lilia Ivone. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Agronomía; Argentina
Fil: Carrin, Maria Elena. Universidad Nacional del Sur; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química; Argentina
Fil: Constenla, Diana Teresita. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur; Argentina
Fil: Johnson, Richard Coburn. Washington State University; Estados Unidos
Materia
SAFFLOWER
CLIMATE CONDITIONS
CROP DEVELOPMENT
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso embargado
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/140340
Acceder
id CONICETDig_6644a1ae1944c5e75a297a37588d6c54
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/140340
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling How sowing date affects development and performance of safflower through climate variablesFranchini, María ClaraFlemmer, Andrea CeciliaLindström, Lilia IvoneCarrin, Maria ElenaConstenla, Diana TeresitaJohnson, Richard CoburnSAFFLOWERCLIMATE CONDITIONSCROP DEVELOPMENThttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.7https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) has unrealized potential as an alternative crop in many semiarid regions including central Argentina. Our objective was to relate how temperature and precipitation conditions with fall (5 June 2012 and 23 Apr. 2013) and winter sowing (13 Aug. 2012 and 20 Aug. 2013) affected phenology, yield, yield components, and oil percent in four winter and eight spring-type safflower accessions in the semiarid region of central Argentina. Fall sowing was associated with lower temperatures, higher precipitation, lower heat/moisture stress indices and precipitation deficits than winter sowing. Rosette period lasted 55 d longer, and stem elongation to anthesis period 30 d longer in fall than in winter sowing. However, anthesis was advanced only few days in fall sowing and duration of postanthesis development was comparable between sowing regimes and years. Fall sowing plants averaged 3,252 filled grains m–2 and a grain yield of 109.8 g m–2, whereas winter sowing plants averaged 1,443 filled grains m–2 and a grain yield of 49.3 g m–2. Grain yield was 35% higher in winter than in spring-type accessions, but winter types had lower oil percent (22.0%) than spring-types (33.3%). In the semiarid region of central Argentina, we recommend fall sowing as it extended the growing season in terms of days preanthesis and presented favorable climatic conditions for safflower development.Fil: Franchini, María Clara. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Agronomía; ArgentinaFil: Flemmer, Andrea Cecilia. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Agronomía; ArgentinaFil: Lindström, Lilia Ivone. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Agronomía; ArgentinaFil: Carrin, Maria Elena. Universidad Nacional del Sur; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química; ArgentinaFil: Constenla, Diana Teresita. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur; ArgentinaFil: Johnson, Richard Coburn. Washington State University; Estados UnidosCrop Science Society of America2021-06-15info:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2021-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/140340Franchini, María Clara; Flemmer, Andrea Cecilia; Lindström, Lilia Ivone; Carrin, Maria Elena; Constenla, Diana Teresita; et al.; How sowing date affects development and performance of safflower through climate variables; Crop Science Society of America; Crop Science; 61; 4; 15-6-2021; 2775-27860011-183XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1002/csc2.20548info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csc2.20548info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T11:52:44Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/140340instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 11:52:44.715CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv How sowing date affects development and performance of safflower through climate variables
title How sowing date affects development and performance of safflower through climate variables
spellingShingle How sowing date affects development and performance of safflower through climate variables
Franchini, María Clara
SAFFLOWER
CLIMATE CONDITIONS
CROP DEVELOPMENT
title_short How sowing date affects development and performance of safflower through climate variables
title_full How sowing date affects development and performance of safflower through climate variables
title_fullStr How sowing date affects development and performance of safflower through climate variables
title_full_unstemmed How sowing date affects development and performance of safflower through climate variables
title_sort How sowing date affects development and performance of safflower through climate variables
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Franchini, María Clara
Flemmer, Andrea Cecilia
Lindström, Lilia Ivone
Carrin, Maria Elena
Constenla, Diana Teresita
Johnson, Richard Coburn
author Franchini, María Clara
author_facet Franchini, María Clara
Flemmer, Andrea Cecilia
Lindström, Lilia Ivone
Carrin, Maria Elena
Constenla, Diana Teresita
Johnson, Richard Coburn
author_role author
author2 Flemmer, Andrea Cecilia
Lindström, Lilia Ivone
Carrin, Maria Elena
Constenla, Diana Teresita
Johnson, Richard Coburn
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv SAFFLOWER
CLIMATE CONDITIONS
CROP DEVELOPMENT
topic SAFFLOWER
CLIMATE CONDITIONS
CROP DEVELOPMENT
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.7
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) has unrealized potential as an alternative crop in many semiarid regions including central Argentina. Our objective was to relate how temperature and precipitation conditions with fall (5 June 2012 and 23 Apr. 2013) and winter sowing (13 Aug. 2012 and 20 Aug. 2013) affected phenology, yield, yield components, and oil percent in four winter and eight spring-type safflower accessions in the semiarid region of central Argentina. Fall sowing was associated with lower temperatures, higher precipitation, lower heat/moisture stress indices and precipitation deficits than winter sowing. Rosette period lasted 55 d longer, and stem elongation to anthesis period 30 d longer in fall than in winter sowing. However, anthesis was advanced only few days in fall sowing and duration of postanthesis development was comparable between sowing regimes and years. Fall sowing plants averaged 3,252 filled grains m–2 and a grain yield of 109.8 g m–2, whereas winter sowing plants averaged 1,443 filled grains m–2 and a grain yield of 49.3 g m–2. Grain yield was 35% higher in winter than in spring-type accessions, but winter types had lower oil percent (22.0%) than spring-types (33.3%). In the semiarid region of central Argentina, we recommend fall sowing as it extended the growing season in terms of days preanthesis and presented favorable climatic conditions for safflower development.
Fil: Franchini, María Clara. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Agronomía; Argentina
Fil: Flemmer, Andrea Cecilia. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Agronomía; Argentina
Fil: Lindström, Lilia Ivone. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Agronomía; Argentina
Fil: Carrin, Maria Elena. Universidad Nacional del Sur; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química; Argentina
Fil: Constenla, Diana Teresita. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur; Argentina
Fil: Johnson, Richard Coburn. Washington State University; Estados Unidos
description Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) has unrealized potential as an alternative crop in many semiarid regions including central Argentina. Our objective was to relate how temperature and precipitation conditions with fall (5 June 2012 and 23 Apr. 2013) and winter sowing (13 Aug. 2012 and 20 Aug. 2013) affected phenology, yield, yield components, and oil percent in four winter and eight spring-type safflower accessions in the semiarid region of central Argentina. Fall sowing was associated with lower temperatures, higher precipitation, lower heat/moisture stress indices and precipitation deficits than winter sowing. Rosette period lasted 55 d longer, and stem elongation to anthesis period 30 d longer in fall than in winter sowing. However, anthesis was advanced only few days in fall sowing and duration of postanthesis development was comparable between sowing regimes and years. Fall sowing plants averaged 3,252 filled grains m–2 and a grain yield of 109.8 g m–2, whereas winter sowing plants averaged 1,443 filled grains m–2 and a grain yield of 49.3 g m–2. Grain yield was 35% higher in winter than in spring-type accessions, but winter types had lower oil percent (22.0%) than spring-types (33.3%). In the semiarid region of central Argentina, we recommend fall sowing as it extended the growing season in terms of days preanthesis and presented favorable climatic conditions for safflower development.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-15
info:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2021-12-20
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/140340
Franchini, María Clara; Flemmer, Andrea Cecilia; Lindström, Lilia Ivone; Carrin, Maria Elena; Constenla, Diana Teresita; et al.; How sowing date affects development and performance of safflower through climate variables; Crop Science Society of America; Crop Science; 61; 4; 15-6-2021; 2775-2786
0011-183X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/140340
identifier_str_mv Franchini, María Clara; Flemmer, Andrea Cecilia; Lindström, Lilia Ivone; Carrin, Maria Elena; Constenla, Diana Teresita; et al.; How sowing date affects development and performance of safflower through climate variables; Crop Science Society of America; Crop Science; 61; 4; 15-6-2021; 2775-2786
0011-183X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1002/csc2.20548
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csc2.20548
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv embargoedAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Crop Science Society of America
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Crop Science Society of America
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846782221023707136
score 12.982451

Publicaciones similares