Comment analysis of consumer's likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping: A case study on apples
- Autores
- Symoneaux, Ronan; Galmarini, Mara Virginia; Mehinagic, Emira
- Año de publicación
- 2012
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- This study compares the analysis of consumer's comments resulting from a hedonic test as an alternative to the traditional internal preference mapping. During a consumer test, 87 apple consumers first evaluated six different Golden apple batches on a hedonic scale and then answered to the non-mandatory open-ended questions stating separately what they liked and disliked from each batch. In parallel, an expert panel described the sensory profiles of the studied products. To compare the results obtained by the two studied methods the RV coefficient was calculated and was found to be 0.8656 (p= 0.011). Therefore, the information obtained by the comment analysis of likes and dislikes was similar to that resulting from sensory characterization done by the trained panel. With both methods, crunchiness and sweetness appeared as main sensory preference key drivers, while mealiness was not appreciated. At the same time, some characteristics such as juiciness appeared important for consumers but it was not a significant discriminant attribute for the trained panel. A new method, the Chi-square per cell, was used to deeply analyze the contingency table of the main modalities used by consumers allowing the identification of the significant modalities which described each apple liking. Finally, the distinction between likes and dislikes made the transcription of consumers' opinions easier, without a need of interpretation on behalf of the transcoder.
Fil: Symoneaux, Ronan. No especifíca;
Fil: Galmarini, Mara Virginia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina "Santa María de los Buenos Aires". Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina
Fil: Mehinagic, Emira. No especifíca; - Materia
-
APPLE
CHI-SQUARE PER CELL
COMMENT ANALYSIS
INTERNAL PREFERENCE MAPPING
PREFERENCE SENSORY KEY DRIVERS - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/189697
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_64eae2614c0471174405d0e556d7a4d4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/189697 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Comment analysis of consumer's likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping: A case study on applesSymoneaux, RonanGalmarini, Mara VirginiaMehinagic, EmiraAPPLECHI-SQUARE PER CELLCOMMENT ANALYSISINTERNAL PREFERENCE MAPPINGPREFERENCE SENSORY KEY DRIVERShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.11https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2This study compares the analysis of consumer's comments resulting from a hedonic test as an alternative to the traditional internal preference mapping. During a consumer test, 87 apple consumers first evaluated six different Golden apple batches on a hedonic scale and then answered to the non-mandatory open-ended questions stating separately what they liked and disliked from each batch. In parallel, an expert panel described the sensory profiles of the studied products. To compare the results obtained by the two studied methods the RV coefficient was calculated and was found to be 0.8656 (p= 0.011). Therefore, the information obtained by the comment analysis of likes and dislikes was similar to that resulting from sensory characterization done by the trained panel. With both methods, crunchiness and sweetness appeared as main sensory preference key drivers, while mealiness was not appreciated. At the same time, some characteristics such as juiciness appeared important for consumers but it was not a significant discriminant attribute for the trained panel. A new method, the Chi-square per cell, was used to deeply analyze the contingency table of the main modalities used by consumers allowing the identification of the significant modalities which described each apple liking. Finally, the distinction between likes and dislikes made the transcription of consumers' opinions easier, without a need of interpretation on behalf of the transcoder.Fil: Symoneaux, Ronan. No especifíca;Fil: Galmarini, Mara Virginia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina "Santa María de los Buenos Aires". Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; ArgentinaFil: Mehinagic, Emira. No especifíca;Elsevier2012-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/189697Symoneaux, Ronan; Galmarini, Mara Virginia; Mehinagic, Emira; Comment analysis of consumer's likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping: A case study on apples; Elsevier; Food Quality and Preference; 24; 1; 4-2012; 59-660950-3293CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329311002047info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.08.013info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:53:11Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/189697instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:53:12.025CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comment analysis of consumer's likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping: A case study on apples |
title |
Comment analysis of consumer's likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping: A case study on apples |
spellingShingle |
Comment analysis of consumer's likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping: A case study on apples Symoneaux, Ronan APPLE CHI-SQUARE PER CELL COMMENT ANALYSIS INTERNAL PREFERENCE MAPPING PREFERENCE SENSORY KEY DRIVERS |
title_short |
Comment analysis of consumer's likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping: A case study on apples |
title_full |
Comment analysis of consumer's likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping: A case study on apples |
title_fullStr |
Comment analysis of consumer's likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping: A case study on apples |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comment analysis of consumer's likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping: A case study on apples |
title_sort |
Comment analysis of consumer's likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping: A case study on apples |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Symoneaux, Ronan Galmarini, Mara Virginia Mehinagic, Emira |
author |
Symoneaux, Ronan |
author_facet |
Symoneaux, Ronan Galmarini, Mara Virginia Mehinagic, Emira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Galmarini, Mara Virginia Mehinagic, Emira |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
APPLE CHI-SQUARE PER CELL COMMENT ANALYSIS INTERNAL PREFERENCE MAPPING PREFERENCE SENSORY KEY DRIVERS |
topic |
APPLE CHI-SQUARE PER CELL COMMENT ANALYSIS INTERNAL PREFERENCE MAPPING PREFERENCE SENSORY KEY DRIVERS |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.11 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
This study compares the analysis of consumer's comments resulting from a hedonic test as an alternative to the traditional internal preference mapping. During a consumer test, 87 apple consumers first evaluated six different Golden apple batches on a hedonic scale and then answered to the non-mandatory open-ended questions stating separately what they liked and disliked from each batch. In parallel, an expert panel described the sensory profiles of the studied products. To compare the results obtained by the two studied methods the RV coefficient was calculated and was found to be 0.8656 (p= 0.011). Therefore, the information obtained by the comment analysis of likes and dislikes was similar to that resulting from sensory characterization done by the trained panel. With both methods, crunchiness and sweetness appeared as main sensory preference key drivers, while mealiness was not appreciated. At the same time, some characteristics such as juiciness appeared important for consumers but it was not a significant discriminant attribute for the trained panel. A new method, the Chi-square per cell, was used to deeply analyze the contingency table of the main modalities used by consumers allowing the identification of the significant modalities which described each apple liking. Finally, the distinction between likes and dislikes made the transcription of consumers' opinions easier, without a need of interpretation on behalf of the transcoder. Fil: Symoneaux, Ronan. No especifíca; Fil: Galmarini, Mara Virginia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina "Santa María de los Buenos Aires". Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina Fil: Mehinagic, Emira. No especifíca; |
description |
This study compares the analysis of consumer's comments resulting from a hedonic test as an alternative to the traditional internal preference mapping. During a consumer test, 87 apple consumers first evaluated six different Golden apple batches on a hedonic scale and then answered to the non-mandatory open-ended questions stating separately what they liked and disliked from each batch. In parallel, an expert panel described the sensory profiles of the studied products. To compare the results obtained by the two studied methods the RV coefficient was calculated and was found to be 0.8656 (p= 0.011). Therefore, the information obtained by the comment analysis of likes and dislikes was similar to that resulting from sensory characterization done by the trained panel. With both methods, crunchiness and sweetness appeared as main sensory preference key drivers, while mealiness was not appreciated. At the same time, some characteristics such as juiciness appeared important for consumers but it was not a significant discriminant attribute for the trained panel. A new method, the Chi-square per cell, was used to deeply analyze the contingency table of the main modalities used by consumers allowing the identification of the significant modalities which described each apple liking. Finally, the distinction between likes and dislikes made the transcription of consumers' opinions easier, without a need of interpretation on behalf of the transcoder. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-04 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/189697 Symoneaux, Ronan; Galmarini, Mara Virginia; Mehinagic, Emira; Comment analysis of consumer's likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping: A case study on apples; Elsevier; Food Quality and Preference; 24; 1; 4-2012; 59-66 0950-3293 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/189697 |
identifier_str_mv |
Symoneaux, Ronan; Galmarini, Mara Virginia; Mehinagic, Emira; Comment analysis of consumer's likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping: A case study on apples; Elsevier; Food Quality and Preference; 24; 1; 4-2012; 59-66 0950-3293 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329311002047 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.08.013 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842269207627038720 |
score |
13.13397 |