Comment analysis of consumer's likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping: A case study on apples

Autores
Symoneaux, Ronan; Galmarini, Mara Virginia; Mehinagic, Emira
Año de publicación
2012
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This study compares the analysis of consumer's comments resulting from a hedonic test as an alternative to the traditional internal preference mapping. During a consumer test, 87 apple consumers first evaluated six different Golden apple batches on a hedonic scale and then answered to the non-mandatory open-ended questions stating separately what they liked and disliked from each batch. In parallel, an expert panel described the sensory profiles of the studied products. To compare the results obtained by the two studied methods the RV coefficient was calculated and was found to be 0.8656 (p= 0.011). Therefore, the information obtained by the comment analysis of likes and dislikes was similar to that resulting from sensory characterization done by the trained panel. With both methods, crunchiness and sweetness appeared as main sensory preference key drivers, while mealiness was not appreciated. At the same time, some characteristics such as juiciness appeared important for consumers but it was not a significant discriminant attribute for the trained panel. A new method, the Chi-square per cell, was used to deeply analyze the contingency table of the main modalities used by consumers allowing the identification of the significant modalities which described each apple liking. Finally, the distinction between likes and dislikes made the transcription of consumers' opinions easier, without a need of interpretation on behalf of the transcoder.
Fil: Symoneaux, Ronan. No especifíca;
Fil: Galmarini, Mara Virginia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina "Santa María de los Buenos Aires". Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina
Fil: Mehinagic, Emira. No especifíca;
Materia
APPLE
CHI-SQUARE PER CELL
COMMENT ANALYSIS
INTERNAL PREFERENCE MAPPING
PREFERENCE SENSORY KEY DRIVERS
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/189697

id CONICETDig_64eae2614c0471174405d0e556d7a4d4
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/189697
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Comment analysis of consumer's likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping: A case study on applesSymoneaux, RonanGalmarini, Mara VirginiaMehinagic, EmiraAPPLECHI-SQUARE PER CELLCOMMENT ANALYSISINTERNAL PREFERENCE MAPPINGPREFERENCE SENSORY KEY DRIVERShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.11https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2This study compares the analysis of consumer's comments resulting from a hedonic test as an alternative to the traditional internal preference mapping. During a consumer test, 87 apple consumers first evaluated six different Golden apple batches on a hedonic scale and then answered to the non-mandatory open-ended questions stating separately what they liked and disliked from each batch. In parallel, an expert panel described the sensory profiles of the studied products. To compare the results obtained by the two studied methods the RV coefficient was calculated and was found to be 0.8656 (p= 0.011). Therefore, the information obtained by the comment analysis of likes and dislikes was similar to that resulting from sensory characterization done by the trained panel. With both methods, crunchiness and sweetness appeared as main sensory preference key drivers, while mealiness was not appreciated. At the same time, some characteristics such as juiciness appeared important for consumers but it was not a significant discriminant attribute for the trained panel. A new method, the Chi-square per cell, was used to deeply analyze the contingency table of the main modalities used by consumers allowing the identification of the significant modalities which described each apple liking. Finally, the distinction between likes and dislikes made the transcription of consumers' opinions easier, without a need of interpretation on behalf of the transcoder.Fil: Symoneaux, Ronan. No especifíca;Fil: Galmarini, Mara Virginia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina "Santa María de los Buenos Aires". Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; ArgentinaFil: Mehinagic, Emira. No especifíca;Elsevier2012-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/189697Symoneaux, Ronan; Galmarini, Mara Virginia; Mehinagic, Emira; Comment analysis of consumer's likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping: A case study on apples; Elsevier; Food Quality and Preference; 24; 1; 4-2012; 59-660950-3293CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329311002047info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.08.013info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:53:11Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/189697instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:53:12.025CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comment analysis of consumer's likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping: A case study on apples
title Comment analysis of consumer's likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping: A case study on apples
spellingShingle Comment analysis of consumer's likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping: A case study on apples
Symoneaux, Ronan
APPLE
CHI-SQUARE PER CELL
COMMENT ANALYSIS
INTERNAL PREFERENCE MAPPING
PREFERENCE SENSORY KEY DRIVERS
title_short Comment analysis of consumer's likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping: A case study on apples
title_full Comment analysis of consumer's likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping: A case study on apples
title_fullStr Comment analysis of consumer's likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping: A case study on apples
title_full_unstemmed Comment analysis of consumer's likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping: A case study on apples
title_sort Comment analysis of consumer's likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping: A case study on apples
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Symoneaux, Ronan
Galmarini, Mara Virginia
Mehinagic, Emira
author Symoneaux, Ronan
author_facet Symoneaux, Ronan
Galmarini, Mara Virginia
Mehinagic, Emira
author_role author
author2 Galmarini, Mara Virginia
Mehinagic, Emira
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv APPLE
CHI-SQUARE PER CELL
COMMENT ANALYSIS
INTERNAL PREFERENCE MAPPING
PREFERENCE SENSORY KEY DRIVERS
topic APPLE
CHI-SQUARE PER CELL
COMMENT ANALYSIS
INTERNAL PREFERENCE MAPPING
PREFERENCE SENSORY KEY DRIVERS
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.11
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This study compares the analysis of consumer's comments resulting from a hedonic test as an alternative to the traditional internal preference mapping. During a consumer test, 87 apple consumers first evaluated six different Golden apple batches on a hedonic scale and then answered to the non-mandatory open-ended questions stating separately what they liked and disliked from each batch. In parallel, an expert panel described the sensory profiles of the studied products. To compare the results obtained by the two studied methods the RV coefficient was calculated and was found to be 0.8656 (p= 0.011). Therefore, the information obtained by the comment analysis of likes and dislikes was similar to that resulting from sensory characterization done by the trained panel. With both methods, crunchiness and sweetness appeared as main sensory preference key drivers, while mealiness was not appreciated. At the same time, some characteristics such as juiciness appeared important for consumers but it was not a significant discriminant attribute for the trained panel. A new method, the Chi-square per cell, was used to deeply analyze the contingency table of the main modalities used by consumers allowing the identification of the significant modalities which described each apple liking. Finally, the distinction between likes and dislikes made the transcription of consumers' opinions easier, without a need of interpretation on behalf of the transcoder.
Fil: Symoneaux, Ronan. No especifíca;
Fil: Galmarini, Mara Virginia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina "Santa María de los Buenos Aires". Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina
Fil: Mehinagic, Emira. No especifíca;
description This study compares the analysis of consumer's comments resulting from a hedonic test as an alternative to the traditional internal preference mapping. During a consumer test, 87 apple consumers first evaluated six different Golden apple batches on a hedonic scale and then answered to the non-mandatory open-ended questions stating separately what they liked and disliked from each batch. In parallel, an expert panel described the sensory profiles of the studied products. To compare the results obtained by the two studied methods the RV coefficient was calculated and was found to be 0.8656 (p= 0.011). Therefore, the information obtained by the comment analysis of likes and dislikes was similar to that resulting from sensory characterization done by the trained panel. With both methods, crunchiness and sweetness appeared as main sensory preference key drivers, while mealiness was not appreciated. At the same time, some characteristics such as juiciness appeared important for consumers but it was not a significant discriminant attribute for the trained panel. A new method, the Chi-square per cell, was used to deeply analyze the contingency table of the main modalities used by consumers allowing the identification of the significant modalities which described each apple liking. Finally, the distinction between likes and dislikes made the transcription of consumers' opinions easier, without a need of interpretation on behalf of the transcoder.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-04
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/189697
Symoneaux, Ronan; Galmarini, Mara Virginia; Mehinagic, Emira; Comment analysis of consumer's likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping: A case study on apples; Elsevier; Food Quality and Preference; 24; 1; 4-2012; 59-66
0950-3293
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/189697
identifier_str_mv Symoneaux, Ronan; Galmarini, Mara Virginia; Mehinagic, Emira; Comment analysis of consumer's likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping: A case study on apples; Elsevier; Food Quality and Preference; 24; 1; 4-2012; 59-66
0950-3293
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329311002047
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.08.013
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269207627038720
score 13.13397