Plant Uptake of Iron Chelated by Humic Acids of Different Molecular Weights
- Autores
- Bocanegra, M. P.; Lobartini, Juan Carlos; Orioli, Gustavo Adolfo
- Año de publicación
- 2006
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Mobilization of iron (Fe) chelated by humic acids (HA) of low (HA10,000) and high molecular weight (HA100,000) fractions and its uptake by plants were investigated in growth experiments with sunflower seedlings. The iron chelates (labeled with 59Fe) contained in dialysis bags (mw. cutoff=3500) were placed in minus iron Hoagland solutions as the Fe source and at the same time fulvic acid (FA), EDTA, and low and high molecular weight HA fractions were added in the solutions as mobilizators. Characterization of FA, HA10,000, and HA100,000 were performed by infrared spectroscopy and chemical analysis, e.g., total acidity, COOH, and phenolic‐OH content. Roots and leaves were harvested, dried, and ground for Fe activity determination. Iron contents and pH in the nutrient solutions were measured before and after treatments. The supply of Fe to the plants was apparently sufficient, because no Fe deficiency has been detected in the test plants but during the whole absorption period, the pH of the nutrient solution was about 4.5. The Fe contents in leaves indicated that part of the Fe was rapidly transported from roots to leaves. Judging from the Fe contents in leaves, it was assumed that the small size HA10,000 and EDTA were the most efficient in affecting transport of Fe from root to leaf tissue. FA, HA10,000, and especially HA100,000 were unable to penetrate the dialysis bags and, hence, were effective in Fe mobilization only after the Fe, dissociated from the Fe‐HA chelate, has passed the dialysis membrane into the nutrient solutions. In contrast, the small size EDTA was expected to have penetrated the dialysis bags, permitting mobilization of chelated Fe by ligand exchange inside the bags, and transporting the Fe to the roots. The results suggested that the humic substances used in this study were able to form with the Fe3+ ion complexes that maintained the iron available to the sunflower plants. In the chemical form of Fe.L, where L was FA o HA, the iron within the bags or in solution or in the roots free space, was available for exchange reactions with the natural sunflower plant chelators for its transport to the leaves.
Fil: Bocanegra, M. P.. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Agronomía; Argentina
Fil: Lobartini, Juan Carlos. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Agronomía; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Orioli, Gustavo Adolfo. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Agronomía; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida; Argentina - Materia
-
Humic Acids
Iron
Absorbtion
Mobilization
Complexes - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/34469
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_61a3abd310d0b9bff4bd3a467d87f5ff |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/34469 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Plant Uptake of Iron Chelated by Humic Acids of Different Molecular WeightsBocanegra, M. P.Lobartini, Juan CarlosOrioli, Gustavo AdolfoHumic AcidsIronAbsorbtionMobilizationComplexeshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Mobilization of iron (Fe) chelated by humic acids (HA) of low (HA10,000) and high molecular weight (HA100,000) fractions and its uptake by plants were investigated in growth experiments with sunflower seedlings. The iron chelates (labeled with 59Fe) contained in dialysis bags (mw. cutoff=3500) were placed in minus iron Hoagland solutions as the Fe source and at the same time fulvic acid (FA), EDTA, and low and high molecular weight HA fractions were added in the solutions as mobilizators. Characterization of FA, HA10,000, and HA100,000 were performed by infrared spectroscopy and chemical analysis, e.g., total acidity, COOH, and phenolic‐OH content. Roots and leaves were harvested, dried, and ground for Fe activity determination. Iron contents and pH in the nutrient solutions were measured before and after treatments. The supply of Fe to the plants was apparently sufficient, because no Fe deficiency has been detected in the test plants but during the whole absorption period, the pH of the nutrient solution was about 4.5. The Fe contents in leaves indicated that part of the Fe was rapidly transported from roots to leaves. Judging from the Fe contents in leaves, it was assumed that the small size HA10,000 and EDTA were the most efficient in affecting transport of Fe from root to leaf tissue. FA, HA10,000, and especially HA100,000 were unable to penetrate the dialysis bags and, hence, were effective in Fe mobilization only after the Fe, dissociated from the Fe‐HA chelate, has passed the dialysis membrane into the nutrient solutions. In contrast, the small size EDTA was expected to have penetrated the dialysis bags, permitting mobilization of chelated Fe by ligand exchange inside the bags, and transporting the Fe to the roots. The results suggested that the humic substances used in this study were able to form with the Fe3+ ion complexes that maintained the iron available to the sunflower plants. In the chemical form of Fe.L, where L was FA o HA, the iron within the bags or in solution or in the roots free space, was available for exchange reactions with the natural sunflower plant chelators for its transport to the leaves.Fil: Bocanegra, M. P.. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Agronomía; ArgentinaFil: Lobartini, Juan Carlos. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Agronomía; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Orioli, Gustavo Adolfo. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Agronomía; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida; ArgentinaTaylor & Francis2006-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/34469Bocanegra, M. P.; Lobartini, Juan Carlos; Orioli, Gustavo Adolfo; Plant Uptake of Iron Chelated by Humic Acids of Different Molecular Weights; Taylor & Francis; Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis; 37; 1-2; 2-2006; 239-2480010-3624CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00103620500408779info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/00103620500408779info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:32:32Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/34469instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:32:32.4CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Plant Uptake of Iron Chelated by Humic Acids of Different Molecular Weights |
title |
Plant Uptake of Iron Chelated by Humic Acids of Different Molecular Weights |
spellingShingle |
Plant Uptake of Iron Chelated by Humic Acids of Different Molecular Weights Bocanegra, M. P. Humic Acids Iron Absorbtion Mobilization Complexes |
title_short |
Plant Uptake of Iron Chelated by Humic Acids of Different Molecular Weights |
title_full |
Plant Uptake of Iron Chelated by Humic Acids of Different Molecular Weights |
title_fullStr |
Plant Uptake of Iron Chelated by Humic Acids of Different Molecular Weights |
title_full_unstemmed |
Plant Uptake of Iron Chelated by Humic Acids of Different Molecular Weights |
title_sort |
Plant Uptake of Iron Chelated by Humic Acids of Different Molecular Weights |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Bocanegra, M. P. Lobartini, Juan Carlos Orioli, Gustavo Adolfo |
author |
Bocanegra, M. P. |
author_facet |
Bocanegra, M. P. Lobartini, Juan Carlos Orioli, Gustavo Adolfo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lobartini, Juan Carlos Orioli, Gustavo Adolfo |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Humic Acids Iron Absorbtion Mobilization Complexes |
topic |
Humic Acids Iron Absorbtion Mobilization Complexes |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.5 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Mobilization of iron (Fe) chelated by humic acids (HA) of low (HA10,000) and high molecular weight (HA100,000) fractions and its uptake by plants were investigated in growth experiments with sunflower seedlings. The iron chelates (labeled with 59Fe) contained in dialysis bags (mw. cutoff=3500) were placed in minus iron Hoagland solutions as the Fe source and at the same time fulvic acid (FA), EDTA, and low and high molecular weight HA fractions were added in the solutions as mobilizators. Characterization of FA, HA10,000, and HA100,000 were performed by infrared spectroscopy and chemical analysis, e.g., total acidity, COOH, and phenolic‐OH content. Roots and leaves were harvested, dried, and ground for Fe activity determination. Iron contents and pH in the nutrient solutions were measured before and after treatments. The supply of Fe to the plants was apparently sufficient, because no Fe deficiency has been detected in the test plants but during the whole absorption period, the pH of the nutrient solution was about 4.5. The Fe contents in leaves indicated that part of the Fe was rapidly transported from roots to leaves. Judging from the Fe contents in leaves, it was assumed that the small size HA10,000 and EDTA were the most efficient in affecting transport of Fe from root to leaf tissue. FA, HA10,000, and especially HA100,000 were unable to penetrate the dialysis bags and, hence, were effective in Fe mobilization only after the Fe, dissociated from the Fe‐HA chelate, has passed the dialysis membrane into the nutrient solutions. In contrast, the small size EDTA was expected to have penetrated the dialysis bags, permitting mobilization of chelated Fe by ligand exchange inside the bags, and transporting the Fe to the roots. The results suggested that the humic substances used in this study were able to form with the Fe3+ ion complexes that maintained the iron available to the sunflower plants. In the chemical form of Fe.L, where L was FA o HA, the iron within the bags or in solution or in the roots free space, was available for exchange reactions with the natural sunflower plant chelators for its transport to the leaves. Fil: Bocanegra, M. P.. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Agronomía; Argentina Fil: Lobartini, Juan Carlos. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Agronomía; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Orioli, Gustavo Adolfo. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Agronomía; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida; Argentina |
description |
Mobilization of iron (Fe) chelated by humic acids (HA) of low (HA10,000) and high molecular weight (HA100,000) fractions and its uptake by plants were investigated in growth experiments with sunflower seedlings. The iron chelates (labeled with 59Fe) contained in dialysis bags (mw. cutoff=3500) were placed in minus iron Hoagland solutions as the Fe source and at the same time fulvic acid (FA), EDTA, and low and high molecular weight HA fractions were added in the solutions as mobilizators. Characterization of FA, HA10,000, and HA100,000 were performed by infrared spectroscopy and chemical analysis, e.g., total acidity, COOH, and phenolic‐OH content. Roots and leaves were harvested, dried, and ground for Fe activity determination. Iron contents and pH in the nutrient solutions were measured before and after treatments. The supply of Fe to the plants was apparently sufficient, because no Fe deficiency has been detected in the test plants but during the whole absorption period, the pH of the nutrient solution was about 4.5. The Fe contents in leaves indicated that part of the Fe was rapidly transported from roots to leaves. Judging from the Fe contents in leaves, it was assumed that the small size HA10,000 and EDTA were the most efficient in affecting transport of Fe from root to leaf tissue. FA, HA10,000, and especially HA100,000 were unable to penetrate the dialysis bags and, hence, were effective in Fe mobilization only after the Fe, dissociated from the Fe‐HA chelate, has passed the dialysis membrane into the nutrient solutions. In contrast, the small size EDTA was expected to have penetrated the dialysis bags, permitting mobilization of chelated Fe by ligand exchange inside the bags, and transporting the Fe to the roots. The results suggested that the humic substances used in this study were able to form with the Fe3+ ion complexes that maintained the iron available to the sunflower plants. In the chemical form of Fe.L, where L was FA o HA, the iron within the bags or in solution or in the roots free space, was available for exchange reactions with the natural sunflower plant chelators for its transport to the leaves. |
publishDate |
2006 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2006-02 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/34469 Bocanegra, M. P.; Lobartini, Juan Carlos; Orioli, Gustavo Adolfo; Plant Uptake of Iron Chelated by Humic Acids of Different Molecular Weights; Taylor & Francis; Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis; 37; 1-2; 2-2006; 239-248 0010-3624 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/34469 |
identifier_str_mv |
Bocanegra, M. P.; Lobartini, Juan Carlos; Orioli, Gustavo Adolfo; Plant Uptake of Iron Chelated by Humic Acids of Different Molecular Weights; Taylor & Francis; Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis; 37; 1-2; 2-2006; 239-248 0010-3624 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00103620500408779 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/00103620500408779 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Taylor & Francis |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Taylor & Francis |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844612992883228672 |
score |
13.070432 |