There is no 'universal' knowledge, intercultural collaboration is indispensable
- Autores
- Mato, Daniel Alejandro
- Año de publicación
- 2011
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Within some significant circles, where hegemonic representations of the idea of 'science' are produced, certain orientations of scientific research are carried out, and science and higher education policies are made and applied, references to the alleged existence of two kinds of knowledge, one of which would have 'universal' validity, and 'the other' (in fact the several others) would not, are frequent and do have crucial effects over our academic work. Although some outstanding authors within the very Western tradition have criticized from varied perspectives such universalist ambitions/assumptions, and although many colleagues have reached convergent conclusions from diverse kinds of practices and experiences, such hegemonic representations of the idea of science are still current. The acknowledgment of this situation calls for a deep debate. This article responds to such a purpose by attempting to integrate into the debate a reflection on the shortcomings of hegemonic academic knowledge to understand social processes profoundly marked by cultural differences, historical conflicts and inequalities, as well as significant perspectives formulated by some outstanding intellectuals who self-identify as indigenous, and the experiences of some indigenous intercultural universities from several Latin American countries.
Fil: Mato, Daniel Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero; Argentina - Materia
-
INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
INTERCULTURAL COLLABORATION
KNOWLEDGE
POLITICS OF KNOWLEDGE
SCIENCE - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/193517
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_60de8eccc3ebd30914431a332523e18f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/193517 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
There is no 'universal' knowledge, intercultural collaboration is indispensableMato, Daniel AlejandroINDIGENOUS PEOPLESINTERCULTURAL COLLABORATIONKNOWLEDGEPOLITICS OF KNOWLEDGESCIENCEhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Within some significant circles, where hegemonic representations of the idea of 'science' are produced, certain orientations of scientific research are carried out, and science and higher education policies are made and applied, references to the alleged existence of two kinds of knowledge, one of which would have 'universal' validity, and 'the other' (in fact the several others) would not, are frequent and do have crucial effects over our academic work. Although some outstanding authors within the very Western tradition have criticized from varied perspectives such universalist ambitions/assumptions, and although many colleagues have reached convergent conclusions from diverse kinds of practices and experiences, such hegemonic representations of the idea of science are still current. The acknowledgment of this situation calls for a deep debate. This article responds to such a purpose by attempting to integrate into the debate a reflection on the shortcomings of hegemonic academic knowledge to understand social processes profoundly marked by cultural differences, historical conflicts and inequalities, as well as significant perspectives formulated by some outstanding intellectuals who self-identify as indigenous, and the experiences of some indigenous intercultural universities from several Latin American countries.Fil: Mato, Daniel Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero; ArgentinaRoutledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd2011-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/193517Mato, Daniel Alejandro; There is no 'universal' knowledge, intercultural collaboration is indispensable; Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd; Social Identities; 17; 3; 5-2011; 409-4211350-4630CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13504630.2011.570978info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/13504630.2011.570978info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:02:30Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/193517instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:02:30.98CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
There is no 'universal' knowledge, intercultural collaboration is indispensable |
title |
There is no 'universal' knowledge, intercultural collaboration is indispensable |
spellingShingle |
There is no 'universal' knowledge, intercultural collaboration is indispensable Mato, Daniel Alejandro INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INTERCULTURAL COLLABORATION KNOWLEDGE POLITICS OF KNOWLEDGE SCIENCE |
title_short |
There is no 'universal' knowledge, intercultural collaboration is indispensable |
title_full |
There is no 'universal' knowledge, intercultural collaboration is indispensable |
title_fullStr |
There is no 'universal' knowledge, intercultural collaboration is indispensable |
title_full_unstemmed |
There is no 'universal' knowledge, intercultural collaboration is indispensable |
title_sort |
There is no 'universal' knowledge, intercultural collaboration is indispensable |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Mato, Daniel Alejandro |
author |
Mato, Daniel Alejandro |
author_facet |
Mato, Daniel Alejandro |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INTERCULTURAL COLLABORATION KNOWLEDGE POLITICS OF KNOWLEDGE SCIENCE |
topic |
INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INTERCULTURAL COLLABORATION KNOWLEDGE POLITICS OF KNOWLEDGE SCIENCE |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Within some significant circles, where hegemonic representations of the idea of 'science' are produced, certain orientations of scientific research are carried out, and science and higher education policies are made and applied, references to the alleged existence of two kinds of knowledge, one of which would have 'universal' validity, and 'the other' (in fact the several others) would not, are frequent and do have crucial effects over our academic work. Although some outstanding authors within the very Western tradition have criticized from varied perspectives such universalist ambitions/assumptions, and although many colleagues have reached convergent conclusions from diverse kinds of practices and experiences, such hegemonic representations of the idea of science are still current. The acknowledgment of this situation calls for a deep debate. This article responds to such a purpose by attempting to integrate into the debate a reflection on the shortcomings of hegemonic academic knowledge to understand social processes profoundly marked by cultural differences, historical conflicts and inequalities, as well as significant perspectives formulated by some outstanding intellectuals who self-identify as indigenous, and the experiences of some indigenous intercultural universities from several Latin American countries. Fil: Mato, Daniel Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero; Argentina |
description |
Within some significant circles, where hegemonic representations of the idea of 'science' are produced, certain orientations of scientific research are carried out, and science and higher education policies are made and applied, references to the alleged existence of two kinds of knowledge, one of which would have 'universal' validity, and 'the other' (in fact the several others) would not, are frequent and do have crucial effects over our academic work. Although some outstanding authors within the very Western tradition have criticized from varied perspectives such universalist ambitions/assumptions, and although many colleagues have reached convergent conclusions from diverse kinds of practices and experiences, such hegemonic representations of the idea of science are still current. The acknowledgment of this situation calls for a deep debate. This article responds to such a purpose by attempting to integrate into the debate a reflection on the shortcomings of hegemonic academic knowledge to understand social processes profoundly marked by cultural differences, historical conflicts and inequalities, as well as significant perspectives formulated by some outstanding intellectuals who self-identify as indigenous, and the experiences of some indigenous intercultural universities from several Latin American countries. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-05 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/193517 Mato, Daniel Alejandro; There is no 'universal' knowledge, intercultural collaboration is indispensable; Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd; Social Identities; 17; 3; 5-2011; 409-421 1350-4630 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/193517 |
identifier_str_mv |
Mato, Daniel Alejandro; There is no 'universal' knowledge, intercultural collaboration is indispensable; Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd; Social Identities; 17; 3; 5-2011; 409-421 1350-4630 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13504630.2011.570978 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/13504630.2011.570978 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842269759580667904 |
score |
13.13397 |