There is no 'universal' knowledge, intercultural collaboration is indispensable

Autores
Mato, Daniel Alejandro
Año de publicación
2011
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Within some significant circles, where hegemonic representations of the idea of 'science' are produced, certain orientations of scientific research are carried out, and science and higher education policies are made and applied, references to the alleged existence of two kinds of knowledge, one of which would have 'universal' validity, and 'the other' (in fact the several others) would not, are frequent and do have crucial effects over our academic work. Although some outstanding authors within the very Western tradition have criticized from varied perspectives such universalist ambitions/assumptions, and although many colleagues have reached convergent conclusions from diverse kinds of practices and experiences, such hegemonic representations of the idea of science are still current. The acknowledgment of this situation calls for a deep debate. This article responds to such a purpose by attempting to integrate into the debate a reflection on the shortcomings of hegemonic academic knowledge to understand social processes profoundly marked by cultural differences, historical conflicts and inequalities, as well as significant perspectives formulated by some outstanding intellectuals who self-identify as indigenous, and the experiences of some indigenous intercultural universities from several Latin American countries.
Fil: Mato, Daniel Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero; Argentina
Materia
INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
INTERCULTURAL COLLABORATION
KNOWLEDGE
POLITICS OF KNOWLEDGE
SCIENCE
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/193517

id CONICETDig_60de8eccc3ebd30914431a332523e18f
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/193517
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling There is no 'universal' knowledge, intercultural collaboration is indispensableMato, Daniel AlejandroINDIGENOUS PEOPLESINTERCULTURAL COLLABORATIONKNOWLEDGEPOLITICS OF KNOWLEDGESCIENCEhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Within some significant circles, where hegemonic representations of the idea of 'science' are produced, certain orientations of scientific research are carried out, and science and higher education policies are made and applied, references to the alleged existence of two kinds of knowledge, one of which would have 'universal' validity, and 'the other' (in fact the several others) would not, are frequent and do have crucial effects over our academic work. Although some outstanding authors within the very Western tradition have criticized from varied perspectives such universalist ambitions/assumptions, and although many colleagues have reached convergent conclusions from diverse kinds of practices and experiences, such hegemonic representations of the idea of science are still current. The acknowledgment of this situation calls for a deep debate. This article responds to such a purpose by attempting to integrate into the debate a reflection on the shortcomings of hegemonic academic knowledge to understand social processes profoundly marked by cultural differences, historical conflicts and inequalities, as well as significant perspectives formulated by some outstanding intellectuals who self-identify as indigenous, and the experiences of some indigenous intercultural universities from several Latin American countries.Fil: Mato, Daniel Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero; ArgentinaRoutledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd2011-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/193517Mato, Daniel Alejandro; There is no 'universal' knowledge, intercultural collaboration is indispensable; Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd; Social Identities; 17; 3; 5-2011; 409-4211350-4630CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13504630.2011.570978info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/13504630.2011.570978info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:02:30Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/193517instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:02:30.98CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv There is no 'universal' knowledge, intercultural collaboration is indispensable
title There is no 'universal' knowledge, intercultural collaboration is indispensable
spellingShingle There is no 'universal' knowledge, intercultural collaboration is indispensable
Mato, Daniel Alejandro
INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
INTERCULTURAL COLLABORATION
KNOWLEDGE
POLITICS OF KNOWLEDGE
SCIENCE
title_short There is no 'universal' knowledge, intercultural collaboration is indispensable
title_full There is no 'universal' knowledge, intercultural collaboration is indispensable
title_fullStr There is no 'universal' knowledge, intercultural collaboration is indispensable
title_full_unstemmed There is no 'universal' knowledge, intercultural collaboration is indispensable
title_sort There is no 'universal' knowledge, intercultural collaboration is indispensable
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Mato, Daniel Alejandro
author Mato, Daniel Alejandro
author_facet Mato, Daniel Alejandro
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
INTERCULTURAL COLLABORATION
KNOWLEDGE
POLITICS OF KNOWLEDGE
SCIENCE
topic INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
INTERCULTURAL COLLABORATION
KNOWLEDGE
POLITICS OF KNOWLEDGE
SCIENCE
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Within some significant circles, where hegemonic representations of the idea of 'science' are produced, certain orientations of scientific research are carried out, and science and higher education policies are made and applied, references to the alleged existence of two kinds of knowledge, one of which would have 'universal' validity, and 'the other' (in fact the several others) would not, are frequent and do have crucial effects over our academic work. Although some outstanding authors within the very Western tradition have criticized from varied perspectives such universalist ambitions/assumptions, and although many colleagues have reached convergent conclusions from diverse kinds of practices and experiences, such hegemonic representations of the idea of science are still current. The acknowledgment of this situation calls for a deep debate. This article responds to such a purpose by attempting to integrate into the debate a reflection on the shortcomings of hegemonic academic knowledge to understand social processes profoundly marked by cultural differences, historical conflicts and inequalities, as well as significant perspectives formulated by some outstanding intellectuals who self-identify as indigenous, and the experiences of some indigenous intercultural universities from several Latin American countries.
Fil: Mato, Daniel Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero; Argentina
description Within some significant circles, where hegemonic representations of the idea of 'science' are produced, certain orientations of scientific research are carried out, and science and higher education policies are made and applied, references to the alleged existence of two kinds of knowledge, one of which would have 'universal' validity, and 'the other' (in fact the several others) would not, are frequent and do have crucial effects over our academic work. Although some outstanding authors within the very Western tradition have criticized from varied perspectives such universalist ambitions/assumptions, and although many colleagues have reached convergent conclusions from diverse kinds of practices and experiences, such hegemonic representations of the idea of science are still current. The acknowledgment of this situation calls for a deep debate. This article responds to such a purpose by attempting to integrate into the debate a reflection on the shortcomings of hegemonic academic knowledge to understand social processes profoundly marked by cultural differences, historical conflicts and inequalities, as well as significant perspectives formulated by some outstanding intellectuals who self-identify as indigenous, and the experiences of some indigenous intercultural universities from several Latin American countries.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/193517
Mato, Daniel Alejandro; There is no 'universal' knowledge, intercultural collaboration is indispensable; Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd; Social Identities; 17; 3; 5-2011; 409-421
1350-4630
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/193517
identifier_str_mv Mato, Daniel Alejandro; There is no 'universal' knowledge, intercultural collaboration is indispensable; Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd; Social Identities; 17; 3; 5-2011; 409-421
1350-4630
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13504630.2011.570978
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/13504630.2011.570978
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269759580667904
score 13.13397