Mountain Cryosphere Landscapes in South America: Value and Protection

Autores
Ruiz Pereira, Sebastián; Alvarado Peterson, Voltaire; Trombotto, Dario Tomas
Año de publicación
2023
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Mountain landscapes support hydric and biodiversity potential under different owner‐ ship and land use perspectives. A focal point justifying their preservation is often the legislation’s ethical endorsement. Yet, when scales for assessment diverge without a common analytical purpose, the protective measures may become either ambiguous or insufficient. By considering that moun‐ tain cryosphere landscapes have both subjective and supply values, we focused on approaches to protect them and examined conceptual dissonances in their assessment. This ambiguity was exam‐ ined by analyzing the hydric storage potential of the mountain cryosphere in semi‐arid regions in the Andes. We reviewed the technical aspects of cryosphere hydrology and how current legislation aims to preserve freshwater supply and non‐instrumental value. The analysis found a clash between instrumental and non‐instrumental values and, most importantly, the neglect of a temporal dimen‐ sion for landscape evolution. Particularly, landscape protection becomes suboptimal as scales of analysis for use and non‐use values diverge. Therefore, we recommend analyzing mountain cry‐ osphere landscapes as overlapped sub‐units bearing a unified potential (future value) as a hydric resource. This analysis should fit the most inclusive scale on which transaction costs reflecting needs and insurance values reflecting management quality are optimal.
Fil: Ruiz Pereira, Sebastián. Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile. Escuela de Ingeniería; Chile
Fil: Alvarado Peterson, Voltaire. Universidad de Concepción; Chile
Fil: Trombotto, Dario Tomas. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales. Provincia de Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales; Argentina
Materia
CRIÓSFERA
HIELO
PERIGLACIAL
PERMAFROST
GLACIAR
RECURSO HÍDRICO
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/230673
Acceder
id CONICETDig_6021314adf99b92e2bd13f065cb957a7
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/230673
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Mountain Cryosphere Landscapes in South America: Value and ProtectionRuiz Pereira, SebastiánAlvarado Peterson, VoltaireTrombotto, Dario TomasCRIÓSFERAHIELOPERIGLACIALPERMAFROSTGLACIARRECURSO HÍDRICOhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Mountain landscapes support hydric and biodiversity potential under different owner‐ ship and land use perspectives. A focal point justifying their preservation is often the legislation’s ethical endorsement. Yet, when scales for assessment diverge without a common analytical purpose, the protective measures may become either ambiguous or insufficient. By considering that moun‐ tain cryosphere landscapes have both subjective and supply values, we focused on approaches to protect them and examined conceptual dissonances in their assessment. This ambiguity was exam‐ ined by analyzing the hydric storage potential of the mountain cryosphere in semi‐arid regions in the Andes. We reviewed the technical aspects of cryosphere hydrology and how current legislation aims to preserve freshwater supply and non‐instrumental value. The analysis found a clash between instrumental and non‐instrumental values and, most importantly, the neglect of a temporal dimen‐ sion for landscape evolution. Particularly, landscape protection becomes suboptimal as scales of analysis for use and non‐use values diverge. Therefore, we recommend analyzing mountain cry‐ osphere landscapes as overlapped sub‐units bearing a unified potential (future value) as a hydric resource. This analysis should fit the most inclusive scale on which transaction costs reflecting needs and insurance values reflecting management quality are optimal.Fil: Ruiz Pereira, Sebastián. Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile. Escuela de Ingeniería; ChileFil: Alvarado Peterson, Voltaire. Universidad de Concepción; ChileFil: Trombotto, Dario Tomas. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales. Provincia de Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales; ArgentinaMDPI2023-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/230673Ruiz Pereira, Sebastián; Alvarado Peterson, Voltaire; Trombotto, Dario Tomas; Mountain Cryosphere Landscapes in South America: Value and Protection; MDPI; Conservation; 3; 1; 3-2023; 232-2462673-7159CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3390/conservation3010017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:07:08Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/230673instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:07:09.061CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Mountain Cryosphere Landscapes in South America: Value and Protection
title Mountain Cryosphere Landscapes in South America: Value and Protection
spellingShingle Mountain Cryosphere Landscapes in South America: Value and Protection
Ruiz Pereira, Sebastián
CRIÓSFERA
HIELO
PERIGLACIAL
PERMAFROST
GLACIAR
RECURSO HÍDRICO
title_short Mountain Cryosphere Landscapes in South America: Value and Protection
title_full Mountain Cryosphere Landscapes in South America: Value and Protection
title_fullStr Mountain Cryosphere Landscapes in South America: Value and Protection
title_full_unstemmed Mountain Cryosphere Landscapes in South America: Value and Protection
title_sort Mountain Cryosphere Landscapes in South America: Value and Protection
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ruiz Pereira, Sebastián
Alvarado Peterson, Voltaire
Trombotto, Dario Tomas
author Ruiz Pereira, Sebastián
author_facet Ruiz Pereira, Sebastián
Alvarado Peterson, Voltaire
Trombotto, Dario Tomas
author_role author
author2 Alvarado Peterson, Voltaire
Trombotto, Dario Tomas
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv CRIÓSFERA
HIELO
PERIGLACIAL
PERMAFROST
GLACIAR
RECURSO HÍDRICO
topic CRIÓSFERA
HIELO
PERIGLACIAL
PERMAFROST
GLACIAR
RECURSO HÍDRICO
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Mountain landscapes support hydric and biodiversity potential under different owner‐ ship and land use perspectives. A focal point justifying their preservation is often the legislation’s ethical endorsement. Yet, when scales for assessment diverge without a common analytical purpose, the protective measures may become either ambiguous or insufficient. By considering that moun‐ tain cryosphere landscapes have both subjective and supply values, we focused on approaches to protect them and examined conceptual dissonances in their assessment. This ambiguity was exam‐ ined by analyzing the hydric storage potential of the mountain cryosphere in semi‐arid regions in the Andes. We reviewed the technical aspects of cryosphere hydrology and how current legislation aims to preserve freshwater supply and non‐instrumental value. The analysis found a clash between instrumental and non‐instrumental values and, most importantly, the neglect of a temporal dimen‐ sion for landscape evolution. Particularly, landscape protection becomes suboptimal as scales of analysis for use and non‐use values diverge. Therefore, we recommend analyzing mountain cry‐ osphere landscapes as overlapped sub‐units bearing a unified potential (future value) as a hydric resource. This analysis should fit the most inclusive scale on which transaction costs reflecting needs and insurance values reflecting management quality are optimal.
Fil: Ruiz Pereira, Sebastián. Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile. Escuela de Ingeniería; Chile
Fil: Alvarado Peterson, Voltaire. Universidad de Concepción; Chile
Fil: Trombotto, Dario Tomas. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales. Provincia de Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales; Argentina
description Mountain landscapes support hydric and biodiversity potential under different owner‐ ship and land use perspectives. A focal point justifying their preservation is often the legislation’s ethical endorsement. Yet, when scales for assessment diverge without a common analytical purpose, the protective measures may become either ambiguous or insufficient. By considering that moun‐ tain cryosphere landscapes have both subjective and supply values, we focused on approaches to protect them and examined conceptual dissonances in their assessment. This ambiguity was exam‐ ined by analyzing the hydric storage potential of the mountain cryosphere in semi‐arid regions in the Andes. We reviewed the technical aspects of cryosphere hydrology and how current legislation aims to preserve freshwater supply and non‐instrumental value. The analysis found a clash between instrumental and non‐instrumental values and, most importantly, the neglect of a temporal dimen‐ sion for landscape evolution. Particularly, landscape protection becomes suboptimal as scales of analysis for use and non‐use values diverge. Therefore, we recommend analyzing mountain cry‐ osphere landscapes as overlapped sub‐units bearing a unified potential (future value) as a hydric resource. This analysis should fit the most inclusive scale on which transaction costs reflecting needs and insurance values reflecting management quality are optimal.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-03
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/230673
Ruiz Pereira, Sebastián; Alvarado Peterson, Voltaire; Trombotto, Dario Tomas; Mountain Cryosphere Landscapes in South America: Value and Protection; MDPI; Conservation; 3; 1; 3-2023; 232-246
2673-7159
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/230673
identifier_str_mv Ruiz Pereira, Sebastián; Alvarado Peterson, Voltaire; Trombotto, Dario Tomas; Mountain Cryosphere Landscapes in South America: Value and Protection; MDPI; Conservation; 3; 1; 3-2023; 232-246
2673-7159
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3390/conservation3010017
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269991220543488
score 13.13397

Publicaciones similares