Again on the relevance of reverse capital deepening and reswitching
- Autores
- Dvoskin, Ariel; Petri, Fabio
- Año de publicación
- 2015
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Among the recent interventions in the capital controversy, the debate between Paola Potestio and Kurz&Salvadori has raised important issues. We agree with Potestio’s rejection of the legitimacy of a value endowment of capital but we disagree with her dismissal of the relevance of reswitching and reverse capital deepening: these phenomena are very important because they undermine the demand-side role of the conception of capital as a single factor. For the marginal approach to be plausible, this demand-side role had to imply the stability of the savings-investment market even in shorter time frames than those required by a complete adaptation of the ‘form’ of capital; this was taken by Marshall to authorize doing without a given endowment of value capital, which opened the door to the shift to the modern neo-Walrasian versions of the marginal approach. With proof from Hayek, Hicks, Malinvaud and Lucas we argue that a continuing belief in traditional time-consuming marginalist disequilibrium adjustments based on capital-labour substitution is the hidden reason why the claim, often made by contemporary marginalist economists, that the economy can be assumed to be all the time on the equilibrium-growth path is not found patently unacceptable. The true microfoundation of DSGE macromodels is not intertemporal equilibrium theory, but the adjustment mechanisms on whose basis the marginal approach was born and accepted, and on whose basis monetarism was then able to re-assert a pre-Keynesian view of the working of the economy.
Fil: Dvoskin, Ariel. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Petri, Fabio. Università degli Studi di Siena; Italia - Materia
-
Capital
Marshallian Equilibrium
Neowalrasian Equilibrium
Reverse Capital Deepening
Reswtiching
Savings-Investment Market - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/52344
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_5f26f59b2bab37199f68379e1dedd179 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/52344 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Again on the relevance of reverse capital deepening and reswitchingDvoskin, ArielPetri, FabioCapitalMarshallian EquilibriumNeowalrasian EquilibriumReverse Capital DeepeningReswtichingSavings-Investment Markethttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Among the recent interventions in the capital controversy, the debate between Paola Potestio and Kurz&Salvadori has raised important issues. We agree with Potestio’s rejection of the legitimacy of a value endowment of capital but we disagree with her dismissal of the relevance of reswitching and reverse capital deepening: these phenomena are very important because they undermine the demand-side role of the conception of capital as a single factor. For the marginal approach to be plausible, this demand-side role had to imply the stability of the savings-investment market even in shorter time frames than those required by a complete adaptation of the ‘form’ of capital; this was taken by Marshall to authorize doing without a given endowment of value capital, which opened the door to the shift to the modern neo-Walrasian versions of the marginal approach. With proof from Hayek, Hicks, Malinvaud and Lucas we argue that a continuing belief in traditional time-consuming marginalist disequilibrium adjustments based on capital-labour substitution is the hidden reason why the claim, often made by contemporary marginalist economists, that the economy can be assumed to be all the time on the equilibrium-growth path is not found patently unacceptable. The true microfoundation of DSGE macromodels is not intertemporal equilibrium theory, but the adjustment mechanisms on whose basis the marginal approach was born and accepted, and on whose basis monetarism was then able to re-assert a pre-Keynesian view of the working of the economy.Fil: Dvoskin, Ariel. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Petri, Fabio. Università degli Studi di Siena; ItaliaUniversitá degli Studi di Siena. Dipartimento di Economia Politica e Statistica2015-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/52344Dvoskin, Ariel; Petri, Fabio; Again on the relevance of reverse capital deepening and reswitching; Universitá degli Studi di Siena. Dipartimento di Economia Politica e Statistica; Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia Politica e Statistica; 2015; 710; 5-2015; 1-321720-9668CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.deps.unisi.it/it/ricerca/pubblicazioni-deps/quaderni-deps/anno-2015-da-n704-n/710-again-relevance-reverse-capitalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:24:01Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/52344instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:24:01.872CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Again on the relevance of reverse capital deepening and reswitching |
title |
Again on the relevance of reverse capital deepening and reswitching |
spellingShingle |
Again on the relevance of reverse capital deepening and reswitching Dvoskin, Ariel Capital Marshallian Equilibrium Neowalrasian Equilibrium Reverse Capital Deepening Reswtiching Savings-Investment Market |
title_short |
Again on the relevance of reverse capital deepening and reswitching |
title_full |
Again on the relevance of reverse capital deepening and reswitching |
title_fullStr |
Again on the relevance of reverse capital deepening and reswitching |
title_full_unstemmed |
Again on the relevance of reverse capital deepening and reswitching |
title_sort |
Again on the relevance of reverse capital deepening and reswitching |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Dvoskin, Ariel Petri, Fabio |
author |
Dvoskin, Ariel |
author_facet |
Dvoskin, Ariel Petri, Fabio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Petri, Fabio |
author2_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Capital Marshallian Equilibrium Neowalrasian Equilibrium Reverse Capital Deepening Reswtiching Savings-Investment Market |
topic |
Capital Marshallian Equilibrium Neowalrasian Equilibrium Reverse Capital Deepening Reswtiching Savings-Investment Market |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.2 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Among the recent interventions in the capital controversy, the debate between Paola Potestio and Kurz&Salvadori has raised important issues. We agree with Potestio’s rejection of the legitimacy of a value endowment of capital but we disagree with her dismissal of the relevance of reswitching and reverse capital deepening: these phenomena are very important because they undermine the demand-side role of the conception of capital as a single factor. For the marginal approach to be plausible, this demand-side role had to imply the stability of the savings-investment market even in shorter time frames than those required by a complete adaptation of the ‘form’ of capital; this was taken by Marshall to authorize doing without a given endowment of value capital, which opened the door to the shift to the modern neo-Walrasian versions of the marginal approach. With proof from Hayek, Hicks, Malinvaud and Lucas we argue that a continuing belief in traditional time-consuming marginalist disequilibrium adjustments based on capital-labour substitution is the hidden reason why the claim, often made by contemporary marginalist economists, that the economy can be assumed to be all the time on the equilibrium-growth path is not found patently unacceptable. The true microfoundation of DSGE macromodels is not intertemporal equilibrium theory, but the adjustment mechanisms on whose basis the marginal approach was born and accepted, and on whose basis monetarism was then able to re-assert a pre-Keynesian view of the working of the economy. Fil: Dvoskin, Ariel. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Petri, Fabio. Università degli Studi di Siena; Italia |
description |
Among the recent interventions in the capital controversy, the debate between Paola Potestio and Kurz&Salvadori has raised important issues. We agree with Potestio’s rejection of the legitimacy of a value endowment of capital but we disagree with her dismissal of the relevance of reswitching and reverse capital deepening: these phenomena are very important because they undermine the demand-side role of the conception of capital as a single factor. For the marginal approach to be plausible, this demand-side role had to imply the stability of the savings-investment market even in shorter time frames than those required by a complete adaptation of the ‘form’ of capital; this was taken by Marshall to authorize doing without a given endowment of value capital, which opened the door to the shift to the modern neo-Walrasian versions of the marginal approach. With proof from Hayek, Hicks, Malinvaud and Lucas we argue that a continuing belief in traditional time-consuming marginalist disequilibrium adjustments based on capital-labour substitution is the hidden reason why the claim, often made by contemporary marginalist economists, that the economy can be assumed to be all the time on the equilibrium-growth path is not found patently unacceptable. The true microfoundation of DSGE macromodels is not intertemporal equilibrium theory, but the adjustment mechanisms on whose basis the marginal approach was born and accepted, and on whose basis monetarism was then able to re-assert a pre-Keynesian view of the working of the economy. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-05 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/52344 Dvoskin, Ariel; Petri, Fabio; Again on the relevance of reverse capital deepening and reswitching; Universitá degli Studi di Siena. Dipartimento di Economia Politica e Statistica; Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia Politica e Statistica; 2015; 710; 5-2015; 1-32 1720-9668 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/52344 |
identifier_str_mv |
Dvoskin, Ariel; Petri, Fabio; Again on the relevance of reverse capital deepening and reswitching; Universitá degli Studi di Siena. Dipartimento di Economia Politica e Statistica; Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia Politica e Statistica; 2015; 710; 5-2015; 1-32 1720-9668 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.deps.unisi.it/it/ricerca/pubblicazioni-deps/quaderni-deps/anno-2015-da-n704-n/710-again-relevance-reverse-capital |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universitá degli Studi di Siena. Dipartimento di Economia Politica e Statistica |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universitá degli Studi di Siena. Dipartimento di Economia Politica e Statistica |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844614236273115136 |
score |
13.070432 |