Estimating evapotranspiration in a semi-arid catchment: A comparison of hydrological modelling and remote-sensing approaches
- Autores
- Bugan, Richard; García, César Luis; Jovanovic, Nebo; Teich, Ingrid; Fink, Manfred; Dzikiti, Sebinasi
- Año de publicación
- 2020
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Reliable spatial data of evapotranspiration (ET) in support of water resources management are limited. ET is a major component of the water balance, in many regions, and therefore it is critical that it be accurately quantified. To identify a product that accurately estimates spatially distributed ET for application in data-scarce regions, an inter-model comparison was conducted between the MOD16 ET dataset and the ET calculated with the calibrated and validated JAMS/J2000 hydrological model in the Sandspruit catchment (South Africa). Annual JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET data were generally consistent. Monthly JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET dynamics are influenced by the response of vegetation to precipitation as well as the atmospheric evaporative demand. The maximum correlation coefficient between JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET was 0.82 and it was evident at Lag 0, showing that both ET estimates are in phase when evaluated at the basin scale. The maximum correlation coefficients between the ET estimators and precipitation were 0.67 and 0.70 for JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET, respectively, and this was evident at Lag 2 (1 lag is 1 month) for both methods. This suggests that there is a 2-month delay in the maximum response of ET to precipitation. The models did not exhibit significant dependence on the seasonal distribution of precipitation. The complementary use of hydrological modelling and satellite-derived data may be greatly advantageous to water resources management, e.g., water allocation studies, ecological reserve determinations and vegetation water use studies. The results of the inter-model comparison also provide motivation for the use of the MOD16 ET dataset to estimate ET in data-scarce regions. Additionally, this study provides evidence for the potential use of validated satellite-based ET data as inputs in hydrological models. This may facilitate a more realistic representation of the catchment hydrological processes.
Fil: Bugan, Richard. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research. Natural Resources and Environment; Sudáfrica
Fil: García, César Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Inmunología y Enfermedades Infecciosas. Universidad Católica de Córdoba. Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Inmunología y Enfermedades Infecciosas; Argentina
Fil: Jovanovic, Nebo. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research. Natural Resources and Environment; Sudáfrica
Fil: Teich, Ingrid. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigaciones Agropecuarias. Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales; Argentina
Fil: Fink, Manfred. Universitat Jena; Alemania
Fil: Dzikiti, Sebinasi. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research. Natural Resources and Environment; Sudáfrica - Materia
-
EVAPOTRANSPIRATION
HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING
J2000
MOD16-ET
REMOTE SENSING - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/138811
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_5ea025e247b87073a879bc55b5411723 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/138811 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Estimating evapotranspiration in a semi-arid catchment: A comparison of hydrological modelling and remote-sensing approachesBugan, RichardGarcía, César LuisJovanovic, NeboTeich, IngridFink, ManfredDzikiti, SebinasiEVAPOTRANSPIRATIONHYDROLOGICAL MODELLINGJ2000MOD16-ETREMOTE SENSINGhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.7https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Reliable spatial data of evapotranspiration (ET) in support of water resources management are limited. ET is a major component of the water balance, in many regions, and therefore it is critical that it be accurately quantified. To identify a product that accurately estimates spatially distributed ET for application in data-scarce regions, an inter-model comparison was conducted between the MOD16 ET dataset and the ET calculated with the calibrated and validated JAMS/J2000 hydrological model in the Sandspruit catchment (South Africa). Annual JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET data were generally consistent. Monthly JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET dynamics are influenced by the response of vegetation to precipitation as well as the atmospheric evaporative demand. The maximum correlation coefficient between JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET was 0.82 and it was evident at Lag 0, showing that both ET estimates are in phase when evaluated at the basin scale. The maximum correlation coefficients between the ET estimators and precipitation were 0.67 and 0.70 for JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET, respectively, and this was evident at Lag 2 (1 lag is 1 month) for both methods. This suggests that there is a 2-month delay in the maximum response of ET to precipitation. The models did not exhibit significant dependence on the seasonal distribution of precipitation. The complementary use of hydrological modelling and satellite-derived data may be greatly advantageous to water resources management, e.g., water allocation studies, ecological reserve determinations and vegetation water use studies. The results of the inter-model comparison also provide motivation for the use of the MOD16 ET dataset to estimate ET in data-scarce regions. Additionally, this study provides evidence for the potential use of validated satellite-based ET data as inputs in hydrological models. This may facilitate a more realistic representation of the catchment hydrological processes.Fil: Bugan, Richard. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research. Natural Resources and Environment; SudáfricaFil: García, César Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Inmunología y Enfermedades Infecciosas. Universidad Católica de Córdoba. Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Inmunología y Enfermedades Infecciosas; ArgentinaFil: Jovanovic, Nebo. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research. Natural Resources and Environment; SudáfricaFil: Teich, Ingrid. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigaciones Agropecuarias. Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales; ArgentinaFil: Fink, Manfred. Universitat Jena; AlemaniaFil: Dzikiti, Sebinasi. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research. Natural Resources and Environment; SudáfricaWater Research Commission2020-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/138811Bugan, Richard; García, César Luis; Jovanovic, Nebo; Teich, Ingrid; Fink, Manfred; et al.; Estimating evapotranspiration in a semi-arid catchment: A comparison of hydrological modelling and remote-sensing approaches; Water Research Commission; Water S.A.; 46; 2; 4-2020; 158-1700378-47381816-7950CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.watersa.net/article/view/8231info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.17159/wsa/2020.v46.i2.8231info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:31:08Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/138811instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:31:08.729CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Estimating evapotranspiration in a semi-arid catchment: A comparison of hydrological modelling and remote-sensing approaches |
title |
Estimating evapotranspiration in a semi-arid catchment: A comparison of hydrological modelling and remote-sensing approaches |
spellingShingle |
Estimating evapotranspiration in a semi-arid catchment: A comparison of hydrological modelling and remote-sensing approaches Bugan, Richard EVAPOTRANSPIRATION HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING J2000 MOD16-ET REMOTE SENSING |
title_short |
Estimating evapotranspiration in a semi-arid catchment: A comparison of hydrological modelling and remote-sensing approaches |
title_full |
Estimating evapotranspiration in a semi-arid catchment: A comparison of hydrological modelling and remote-sensing approaches |
title_fullStr |
Estimating evapotranspiration in a semi-arid catchment: A comparison of hydrological modelling and remote-sensing approaches |
title_full_unstemmed |
Estimating evapotranspiration in a semi-arid catchment: A comparison of hydrological modelling and remote-sensing approaches |
title_sort |
Estimating evapotranspiration in a semi-arid catchment: A comparison of hydrological modelling and remote-sensing approaches |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Bugan, Richard García, César Luis Jovanovic, Nebo Teich, Ingrid Fink, Manfred Dzikiti, Sebinasi |
author |
Bugan, Richard |
author_facet |
Bugan, Richard García, César Luis Jovanovic, Nebo Teich, Ingrid Fink, Manfred Dzikiti, Sebinasi |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
García, César Luis Jovanovic, Nebo Teich, Ingrid Fink, Manfred Dzikiti, Sebinasi |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
EVAPOTRANSPIRATION HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING J2000 MOD16-ET REMOTE SENSING |
topic |
EVAPOTRANSPIRATION HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING J2000 MOD16-ET REMOTE SENSING |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.7 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Reliable spatial data of evapotranspiration (ET) in support of water resources management are limited. ET is a major component of the water balance, in many regions, and therefore it is critical that it be accurately quantified. To identify a product that accurately estimates spatially distributed ET for application in data-scarce regions, an inter-model comparison was conducted between the MOD16 ET dataset and the ET calculated with the calibrated and validated JAMS/J2000 hydrological model in the Sandspruit catchment (South Africa). Annual JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET data were generally consistent. Monthly JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET dynamics are influenced by the response of vegetation to precipitation as well as the atmospheric evaporative demand. The maximum correlation coefficient between JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET was 0.82 and it was evident at Lag 0, showing that both ET estimates are in phase when evaluated at the basin scale. The maximum correlation coefficients between the ET estimators and precipitation were 0.67 and 0.70 for JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET, respectively, and this was evident at Lag 2 (1 lag is 1 month) for both methods. This suggests that there is a 2-month delay in the maximum response of ET to precipitation. The models did not exhibit significant dependence on the seasonal distribution of precipitation. The complementary use of hydrological modelling and satellite-derived data may be greatly advantageous to water resources management, e.g., water allocation studies, ecological reserve determinations and vegetation water use studies. The results of the inter-model comparison also provide motivation for the use of the MOD16 ET dataset to estimate ET in data-scarce regions. Additionally, this study provides evidence for the potential use of validated satellite-based ET data as inputs in hydrological models. This may facilitate a more realistic representation of the catchment hydrological processes. Fil: Bugan, Richard. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research. Natural Resources and Environment; Sudáfrica Fil: García, César Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Inmunología y Enfermedades Infecciosas. Universidad Católica de Córdoba. Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Inmunología y Enfermedades Infecciosas; Argentina Fil: Jovanovic, Nebo. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research. Natural Resources and Environment; Sudáfrica Fil: Teich, Ingrid. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigaciones Agropecuarias. Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales; Argentina Fil: Fink, Manfred. Universitat Jena; Alemania Fil: Dzikiti, Sebinasi. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research. Natural Resources and Environment; Sudáfrica |
description |
Reliable spatial data of evapotranspiration (ET) in support of water resources management are limited. ET is a major component of the water balance, in many regions, and therefore it is critical that it be accurately quantified. To identify a product that accurately estimates spatially distributed ET for application in data-scarce regions, an inter-model comparison was conducted between the MOD16 ET dataset and the ET calculated with the calibrated and validated JAMS/J2000 hydrological model in the Sandspruit catchment (South Africa). Annual JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET data were generally consistent. Monthly JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET dynamics are influenced by the response of vegetation to precipitation as well as the atmospheric evaporative demand. The maximum correlation coefficient between JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET was 0.82 and it was evident at Lag 0, showing that both ET estimates are in phase when evaluated at the basin scale. The maximum correlation coefficients between the ET estimators and precipitation were 0.67 and 0.70 for JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET, respectively, and this was evident at Lag 2 (1 lag is 1 month) for both methods. This suggests that there is a 2-month delay in the maximum response of ET to precipitation. The models did not exhibit significant dependence on the seasonal distribution of precipitation. The complementary use of hydrological modelling and satellite-derived data may be greatly advantageous to water resources management, e.g., water allocation studies, ecological reserve determinations and vegetation water use studies. The results of the inter-model comparison also provide motivation for the use of the MOD16 ET dataset to estimate ET in data-scarce regions. Additionally, this study provides evidence for the potential use of validated satellite-based ET data as inputs in hydrological models. This may facilitate a more realistic representation of the catchment hydrological processes. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-04 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/138811 Bugan, Richard; García, César Luis; Jovanovic, Nebo; Teich, Ingrid; Fink, Manfred; et al.; Estimating evapotranspiration in a semi-arid catchment: A comparison of hydrological modelling and remote-sensing approaches; Water Research Commission; Water S.A.; 46; 2; 4-2020; 158-170 0378-4738 1816-7950 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/138811 |
identifier_str_mv |
Bugan, Richard; García, César Luis; Jovanovic, Nebo; Teich, Ingrid; Fink, Manfred; et al.; Estimating evapotranspiration in a semi-arid catchment: A comparison of hydrological modelling and remote-sensing approaches; Water Research Commission; Water S.A.; 46; 2; 4-2020; 158-170 0378-4738 1816-7950 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.watersa.net/article/view/8231 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.17159/wsa/2020.v46.i2.8231 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Water Research Commission |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Water Research Commission |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844614321038950400 |
score |
13.070432 |