A mapping approach to assess intangible cultural ecosystem services: The case of agriculture heritage in Southern Chile
- Autores
- Nahuelhual, Laura; Carmona, A.; Laterra, Pedro; Barrena, José; Aguayo, Mauricio
- Año de publicación
- 2014
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Modeling and mapping of cultural ecosystem services (CES) represents a significant gap in ecosystem service research. A GIS-based methodological framework was developed and applied to map agricultural heritage (AH), understood as a non-divisible combination of three cultural services (dimensions, D): the heritage value associated to a culturally significant species (i.e. Chiloé native potato) (D1); the traditional systems of knowledge of AH keepers (D2); and the social relations among them (D3). The final aim of the study was to provide indicators of the “final” service (AHi, measured in a 0–100 point scale) and its benefits (AHB, measured in US$/ha), capable to display areas where high value farmland was located. In essence, AHi comprised a set of biocultural variables validated and weighted by expert opinion. The experts gave the maximum importance to 5 variables: number of native potato varieties cultivated (D1), use of own seed (D1), form in which cultivation knowledge was acquired by the keeper (D2), exchange of own seed (D3), and number of other potato keepers known (D3). In turn, AHB reflected society's willingness to pay for the nonmaterial benefits of AH conservation. Since these benefits “propagate” across space extending from local to unknown and distant beneficiaries, and the aim was to identify the most valuable areas for their capacity to satisfy a potential demand, AHB was spatialized following the approach of “ascribing” the potential benefits to their “point of provision”. Thus the highest values of AHi coincided with the highest values of AHB (US$10.64–8.64 ha−1) a comprised 5608 ha of the landscape, and similarly the lowest values of AHi matched the lowest values of AHB (US$1.69–0.18 ha−1) comprising 13,070 ha of the landscape.
Fil: Nahuelhual, Laura. Universidad Austral de Chile; Chile. Fundación Centro de los Bosques Nativos ; Chile. Center for Climate and Resilience Research; Chile
Fil: Carmona, A.. Universidad Austral de Chile; Chile. Center for Climate and Resilience Research; Chile
Fil: Laterra, Pedro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina
Fil: Barrena, José. Universidad Austral de Chile; Chile. Center for Climate and Resilience Research; Chile
Fil: Aguayo, Mauricio. Universidad de Concepción; Chile - Materia
-
Cultural Landscapes
Mapping Ecosystem Services
Knowledge Systems
Economic Valuation
Economic Benefits - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/25623
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_398ed562420fa16f4ba45640fe93f866 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/25623 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
A mapping approach to assess intangible cultural ecosystem services: The case of agriculture heritage in Southern ChileNahuelhual, LauraCarmona, A.Laterra, PedroBarrena, JoséAguayo, MauricioCultural LandscapesMapping Ecosystem ServicesKnowledge SystemsEconomic ValuationEconomic BenefitsModeling and mapping of cultural ecosystem services (CES) represents a significant gap in ecosystem service research. A GIS-based methodological framework was developed and applied to map agricultural heritage (AH), understood as a non-divisible combination of three cultural services (dimensions, D): the heritage value associated to a culturally significant species (i.e. Chiloé native potato) (D1); the traditional systems of knowledge of AH keepers (D2); and the social relations among them (D3). The final aim of the study was to provide indicators of the “final” service (AHi, measured in a 0–100 point scale) and its benefits (AHB, measured in US$/ha), capable to display areas where high value farmland was located. In essence, AHi comprised a set of biocultural variables validated and weighted by expert opinion. The experts gave the maximum importance to 5 variables: number of native potato varieties cultivated (D1), use of own seed (D1), form in which cultivation knowledge was acquired by the keeper (D2), exchange of own seed (D3), and number of other potato keepers known (D3). In turn, AHB reflected society's willingness to pay for the nonmaterial benefits of AH conservation. Since these benefits “propagate” across space extending from local to unknown and distant beneficiaries, and the aim was to identify the most valuable areas for their capacity to satisfy a potential demand, AHB was spatialized following the approach of “ascribing” the potential benefits to their “point of provision”. Thus the highest values of AHi coincided with the highest values of AHB (US$10.64–8.64 ha−1) a comprised 5608 ha of the landscape, and similarly the lowest values of AHi matched the lowest values of AHB (US$1.69–0.18 ha−1) comprising 13,070 ha of the landscape.Fil: Nahuelhual, Laura. Universidad Austral de Chile; Chile. Fundación Centro de los Bosques Nativos ; Chile. Center for Climate and Resilience Research; ChileFil: Carmona, A.. Universidad Austral de Chile; Chile. Center for Climate and Resilience Research; ChileFil: Laterra, Pedro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; ArgentinaFil: Barrena, José. Universidad Austral de Chile; Chile. Center for Climate and Resilience Research; ChileFil: Aguayo, Mauricio. Universidad de Concepción; ChileElsevier Science2014-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/25623Nahuelhual, Laura; Carmona, A.; Laterra, Pedro; Barrena, José; Aguayo, Mauricio; A mapping approach to assess intangible cultural ecosystem services: The case of agriculture heritage in Southern Chile; Elsevier Science; Ecological Indicators; 40; 1-2014; 90-1011470-160XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X14000077info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.01.005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:34:47Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/25623instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:34:47.594CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A mapping approach to assess intangible cultural ecosystem services: The case of agriculture heritage in Southern Chile |
title |
A mapping approach to assess intangible cultural ecosystem services: The case of agriculture heritage in Southern Chile |
spellingShingle |
A mapping approach to assess intangible cultural ecosystem services: The case of agriculture heritage in Southern Chile Nahuelhual, Laura Cultural Landscapes Mapping Ecosystem Services Knowledge Systems Economic Valuation Economic Benefits |
title_short |
A mapping approach to assess intangible cultural ecosystem services: The case of agriculture heritage in Southern Chile |
title_full |
A mapping approach to assess intangible cultural ecosystem services: The case of agriculture heritage in Southern Chile |
title_fullStr |
A mapping approach to assess intangible cultural ecosystem services: The case of agriculture heritage in Southern Chile |
title_full_unstemmed |
A mapping approach to assess intangible cultural ecosystem services: The case of agriculture heritage in Southern Chile |
title_sort |
A mapping approach to assess intangible cultural ecosystem services: The case of agriculture heritage in Southern Chile |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Nahuelhual, Laura Carmona, A. Laterra, Pedro Barrena, José Aguayo, Mauricio |
author |
Nahuelhual, Laura |
author_facet |
Nahuelhual, Laura Carmona, A. Laterra, Pedro Barrena, José Aguayo, Mauricio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Carmona, A. Laterra, Pedro Barrena, José Aguayo, Mauricio |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Cultural Landscapes Mapping Ecosystem Services Knowledge Systems Economic Valuation Economic Benefits |
topic |
Cultural Landscapes Mapping Ecosystem Services Knowledge Systems Economic Valuation Economic Benefits |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Modeling and mapping of cultural ecosystem services (CES) represents a significant gap in ecosystem service research. A GIS-based methodological framework was developed and applied to map agricultural heritage (AH), understood as a non-divisible combination of three cultural services (dimensions, D): the heritage value associated to a culturally significant species (i.e. Chiloé native potato) (D1); the traditional systems of knowledge of AH keepers (D2); and the social relations among them (D3). The final aim of the study was to provide indicators of the “final” service (AHi, measured in a 0–100 point scale) and its benefits (AHB, measured in US$/ha), capable to display areas where high value farmland was located. In essence, AHi comprised a set of biocultural variables validated and weighted by expert opinion. The experts gave the maximum importance to 5 variables: number of native potato varieties cultivated (D1), use of own seed (D1), form in which cultivation knowledge was acquired by the keeper (D2), exchange of own seed (D3), and number of other potato keepers known (D3). In turn, AHB reflected society's willingness to pay for the nonmaterial benefits of AH conservation. Since these benefits “propagate” across space extending from local to unknown and distant beneficiaries, and the aim was to identify the most valuable areas for their capacity to satisfy a potential demand, AHB was spatialized following the approach of “ascribing” the potential benefits to their “point of provision”. Thus the highest values of AHi coincided with the highest values of AHB (US$10.64–8.64 ha−1) a comprised 5608 ha of the landscape, and similarly the lowest values of AHi matched the lowest values of AHB (US$1.69–0.18 ha−1) comprising 13,070 ha of the landscape. Fil: Nahuelhual, Laura. Universidad Austral de Chile; Chile. Fundación Centro de los Bosques Nativos ; Chile. Center for Climate and Resilience Research; Chile Fil: Carmona, A.. Universidad Austral de Chile; Chile. Center for Climate and Resilience Research; Chile Fil: Laterra, Pedro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina Fil: Barrena, José. Universidad Austral de Chile; Chile. Center for Climate and Resilience Research; Chile Fil: Aguayo, Mauricio. Universidad de Concepción; Chile |
description |
Modeling and mapping of cultural ecosystem services (CES) represents a significant gap in ecosystem service research. A GIS-based methodological framework was developed and applied to map agricultural heritage (AH), understood as a non-divisible combination of three cultural services (dimensions, D): the heritage value associated to a culturally significant species (i.e. Chiloé native potato) (D1); the traditional systems of knowledge of AH keepers (D2); and the social relations among them (D3). The final aim of the study was to provide indicators of the “final” service (AHi, measured in a 0–100 point scale) and its benefits (AHB, measured in US$/ha), capable to display areas where high value farmland was located. In essence, AHi comprised a set of biocultural variables validated and weighted by expert opinion. The experts gave the maximum importance to 5 variables: number of native potato varieties cultivated (D1), use of own seed (D1), form in which cultivation knowledge was acquired by the keeper (D2), exchange of own seed (D3), and number of other potato keepers known (D3). In turn, AHB reflected society's willingness to pay for the nonmaterial benefits of AH conservation. Since these benefits “propagate” across space extending from local to unknown and distant beneficiaries, and the aim was to identify the most valuable areas for their capacity to satisfy a potential demand, AHB was spatialized following the approach of “ascribing” the potential benefits to their “point of provision”. Thus the highest values of AHi coincided with the highest values of AHB (US$10.64–8.64 ha−1) a comprised 5608 ha of the landscape, and similarly the lowest values of AHi matched the lowest values of AHB (US$1.69–0.18 ha−1) comprising 13,070 ha of the landscape. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-01 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/25623 Nahuelhual, Laura; Carmona, A.; Laterra, Pedro; Barrena, José; Aguayo, Mauricio; A mapping approach to assess intangible cultural ecosystem services: The case of agriculture heritage in Southern Chile; Elsevier Science; Ecological Indicators; 40; 1-2014; 90-101 1470-160X CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/25623 |
identifier_str_mv |
Nahuelhual, Laura; Carmona, A.; Laterra, Pedro; Barrena, José; Aguayo, Mauricio; A mapping approach to assess intangible cultural ecosystem services: The case of agriculture heritage in Southern Chile; Elsevier Science; Ecological Indicators; 40; 1-2014; 90-101 1470-160X CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X14000077 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.01.005 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier Science |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier Science |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844614365107453952 |
score |
13.070432 |