Why are MoS2 monolayers not a good catalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction?
- Autores
- German, Estefania; Gebauer, Ralph
- Año de publicación
- 2020
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- We use density functional theory based calculations to study the energetics of the oxygen evolution reaction on a monolayer of MoS2. This material, a prototypical example of a layered transition metal dichalcogenide, is intensely studied in the context of many important catalytical applications, in particular for the hydrogen evolution reaction. The second half-reaction of the water-splitting process, the oxygen evolution reaction, is almost never considered on this material, due to its low activity. Based on our calculations, we explain this experimentally observed poor catalytic activity for the oxygen evolution by the weak binding of two key reaction intermediates (hydroxyl and hydroperoxyl) to the substrate. We explore substitutional doping with oxygen and phosphorous as means to facilitate the oxygen evolution on MoS2 layers. The oxygen substitution slightly increases the reaction´s overpotential, but does not significantly change the energetics. The doping with phosphorous, on the other hand, is not a promising way to promote the oxygen evolution on MoS2 layers. We also explore the role of the edges of MoS2 layers. We find that while the adsorption energies of reaction intermediates are strongly influenced by the presence of an edge, the final reaction overpotential remains nearly the same as on a pristine monolayer, meaning that the presence of edges is not favoring the OER.
Fil: German, Estefania. Universidad de Valladolid; España. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Física del Sur. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Física. Instituto de Física del Sur; Argentina
Fil: Gebauer, Ralph. The Abdus Salam. International Centre for Theoretical Physics; Italia - Materia
-
DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY
MOS2
OXYGEN EVOLUTION REACTION
TRANSITION METAL DICHALCOGENIDE
WATER SPLITTING - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/144076
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_54ad1027aeac70d4841215c2e46bb164 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/144076 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Why are MoS2 monolayers not a good catalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction?German, EstefaniaGebauer, RalphDENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORYMOS2OXYGEN EVOLUTION REACTIONTRANSITION METAL DICHALCOGENIDEWATER SPLITTINGhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1We use density functional theory based calculations to study the energetics of the oxygen evolution reaction on a monolayer of MoS2. This material, a prototypical example of a layered transition metal dichalcogenide, is intensely studied in the context of many important catalytical applications, in particular for the hydrogen evolution reaction. The second half-reaction of the water-splitting process, the oxygen evolution reaction, is almost never considered on this material, due to its low activity. Based on our calculations, we explain this experimentally observed poor catalytic activity for the oxygen evolution by the weak binding of two key reaction intermediates (hydroxyl and hydroperoxyl) to the substrate. We explore substitutional doping with oxygen and phosphorous as means to facilitate the oxygen evolution on MoS2 layers. The oxygen substitution slightly increases the reaction´s overpotential, but does not significantly change the energetics. The doping with phosphorous, on the other hand, is not a promising way to promote the oxygen evolution on MoS2 layers. We also explore the role of the edges of MoS2 layers. We find that while the adsorption energies of reaction intermediates are strongly influenced by the presence of an edge, the final reaction overpotential remains nearly the same as on a pristine monolayer, meaning that the presence of edges is not favoring the OER.Fil: German, Estefania. Universidad de Valladolid; España. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Física del Sur. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Física. Instituto de Física del Sur; ArgentinaFil: Gebauer, Ralph. The Abdus Salam. International Centre for Theoretical Physics; ItaliaElsevier Science2020-10-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/144076German, Estefania; Gebauer, Ralph; Why are MoS2 monolayers not a good catalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction?; Elsevier Science; Applied Surface Science; 528; 30-10-2020; 1-7; 1465910169-4332CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146591info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169433220313489info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:25:43Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/144076instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:25:44.19CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Why are MoS2 monolayers not a good catalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction? |
title |
Why are MoS2 monolayers not a good catalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction? |
spellingShingle |
Why are MoS2 monolayers not a good catalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction? German, Estefania DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY MOS2 OXYGEN EVOLUTION REACTION TRANSITION METAL DICHALCOGENIDE WATER SPLITTING |
title_short |
Why are MoS2 monolayers not a good catalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction? |
title_full |
Why are MoS2 monolayers not a good catalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction? |
title_fullStr |
Why are MoS2 monolayers not a good catalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Why are MoS2 monolayers not a good catalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction? |
title_sort |
Why are MoS2 monolayers not a good catalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction? |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
German, Estefania Gebauer, Ralph |
author |
German, Estefania |
author_facet |
German, Estefania Gebauer, Ralph |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gebauer, Ralph |
author2_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY MOS2 OXYGEN EVOLUTION REACTION TRANSITION METAL DICHALCOGENIDE WATER SPLITTING |
topic |
DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY MOS2 OXYGEN EVOLUTION REACTION TRANSITION METAL DICHALCOGENIDE WATER SPLITTING |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
We use density functional theory based calculations to study the energetics of the oxygen evolution reaction on a monolayer of MoS2. This material, a prototypical example of a layered transition metal dichalcogenide, is intensely studied in the context of many important catalytical applications, in particular for the hydrogen evolution reaction. The second half-reaction of the water-splitting process, the oxygen evolution reaction, is almost never considered on this material, due to its low activity. Based on our calculations, we explain this experimentally observed poor catalytic activity for the oxygen evolution by the weak binding of two key reaction intermediates (hydroxyl and hydroperoxyl) to the substrate. We explore substitutional doping with oxygen and phosphorous as means to facilitate the oxygen evolution on MoS2 layers. The oxygen substitution slightly increases the reaction´s overpotential, but does not significantly change the energetics. The doping with phosphorous, on the other hand, is not a promising way to promote the oxygen evolution on MoS2 layers. We also explore the role of the edges of MoS2 layers. We find that while the adsorption energies of reaction intermediates are strongly influenced by the presence of an edge, the final reaction overpotential remains nearly the same as on a pristine monolayer, meaning that the presence of edges is not favoring the OER. Fil: German, Estefania. Universidad de Valladolid; España. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Física del Sur. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Física. Instituto de Física del Sur; Argentina Fil: Gebauer, Ralph. The Abdus Salam. International Centre for Theoretical Physics; Italia |
description |
We use density functional theory based calculations to study the energetics of the oxygen evolution reaction on a monolayer of MoS2. This material, a prototypical example of a layered transition metal dichalcogenide, is intensely studied in the context of many important catalytical applications, in particular for the hydrogen evolution reaction. The second half-reaction of the water-splitting process, the oxygen evolution reaction, is almost never considered on this material, due to its low activity. Based on our calculations, we explain this experimentally observed poor catalytic activity for the oxygen evolution by the weak binding of two key reaction intermediates (hydroxyl and hydroperoxyl) to the substrate. We explore substitutional doping with oxygen and phosphorous as means to facilitate the oxygen evolution on MoS2 layers. The oxygen substitution slightly increases the reaction´s overpotential, but does not significantly change the energetics. The doping with phosphorous, on the other hand, is not a promising way to promote the oxygen evolution on MoS2 layers. We also explore the role of the edges of MoS2 layers. We find that while the adsorption energies of reaction intermediates are strongly influenced by the presence of an edge, the final reaction overpotential remains nearly the same as on a pristine monolayer, meaning that the presence of edges is not favoring the OER. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-10-30 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/144076 German, Estefania; Gebauer, Ralph; Why are MoS2 monolayers not a good catalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction?; Elsevier Science; Applied Surface Science; 528; 30-10-2020; 1-7; 146591 0169-4332 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/144076 |
identifier_str_mv |
German, Estefania; Gebauer, Ralph; Why are MoS2 monolayers not a good catalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction?; Elsevier Science; Applied Surface Science; 528; 30-10-2020; 1-7; 146591 0169-4332 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146591 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169433220313489 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier Science |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier Science |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844614256576692224 |
score |
13.070432 |