Die neue Auffassung der Metaphysik als reine Philosophie in der Inauguraldissertation und ihre propädeutische Bedeutung im Rahmen der Entwicklungsgeschichte der Kritik der reinen V...
- Autores
- Moledo, Fernando
- Año de publicación
- 2016
- Idioma
- alemán
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- In the Critique of Pure Reason Kant criticizes Baumgarten´s definition of Metaphysics as the science of the first principles of human knowledge (Metaphysica § 1). He maintains that this definition doesn´t consider the distinction between sensible and pure knowledge. Instead of this definition Kant provides a new one in the first Critique: Metaphysics is the system of pure Reason (A 841 / B 869). This Definition is first anticipated eleven years before in the Inaugural Dissertation, where Metaphysics is defined as pure Philosophy (MSI AA 2: 411). Kant presents this Dissertation as a proof of the propaedeutic which must precede Metaphysics and so anticipates the idea that will be fully accomplished with the Critique of Pure Reason. In this paper I will argue that the new definition of Metaphysics in the Inaugural Dissertation must be seen as the very important result of this text as a propaedeutic to Metaphysics and as a specific step in the development of the Critique of Pure Reason.
Fil: Moledo, Fernando. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Departamento de Filosofía; Argentina - Materia
-
Kant
Metafísica
Disertación
Baumgarten - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/46897
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_523d4da69d1913c91f82369829bfceab |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/46897 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Die neue Auffassung der Metaphysik als reine Philosophie in der Inauguraldissertation und ihre propädeutische Bedeutung im Rahmen der Entwicklungsgeschichte der Kritik der reinen VernunftMoledo, FernandoKantMetafísicaDisertaciónBaumgartenhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6In the Critique of Pure Reason Kant criticizes Baumgarten´s definition of Metaphysics as the science of the first principles of human knowledge (Metaphysica § 1). He maintains that this definition doesn´t consider the distinction between sensible and pure knowledge. Instead of this definition Kant provides a new one in the first Critique: Metaphysics is the system of pure Reason (A 841 / B 869). This Definition is first anticipated eleven years before in the Inaugural Dissertation, where Metaphysics is defined as pure Philosophy (MSI AA 2: 411). Kant presents this Dissertation as a proof of the propaedeutic which must precede Metaphysics and so anticipates the idea that will be fully accomplished with the Critique of Pure Reason. In this paper I will argue that the new definition of Metaphysics in the Inaugural Dissertation must be seen as the very important result of this text as a propaedeutic to Metaphysics and as a specific step in the development of the Critique of Pure Reason.Fil: Moledo, Fernando. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Departamento de Filosofía; ArgentinaDe Gruyter2016-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/46897Moledo, Fernando; Die neue Auffassung der Metaphysik als reine Philosophie in der Inauguraldissertation und ihre propädeutische Bedeutung im Rahmen der Entwicklungsgeschichte der Kritik der reinen Vernunft; De Gruyter; Kant-Studien; 107; 3; 9-2016; 485-4950022-8877CONICET DigitalCONICETdeuinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/kant.2016.107.issue-3/kant-2016-0035/kant-2016-0035.xmlinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1515/kant-2016-0035info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:49:50Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/46897instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:49:50.853CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Die neue Auffassung der Metaphysik als reine Philosophie in der Inauguraldissertation und ihre propädeutische Bedeutung im Rahmen der Entwicklungsgeschichte der Kritik der reinen Vernunft |
title |
Die neue Auffassung der Metaphysik als reine Philosophie in der Inauguraldissertation und ihre propädeutische Bedeutung im Rahmen der Entwicklungsgeschichte der Kritik der reinen Vernunft |
spellingShingle |
Die neue Auffassung der Metaphysik als reine Philosophie in der Inauguraldissertation und ihre propädeutische Bedeutung im Rahmen der Entwicklungsgeschichte der Kritik der reinen Vernunft Moledo, Fernando Kant Metafísica Disertación Baumgarten |
title_short |
Die neue Auffassung der Metaphysik als reine Philosophie in der Inauguraldissertation und ihre propädeutische Bedeutung im Rahmen der Entwicklungsgeschichte der Kritik der reinen Vernunft |
title_full |
Die neue Auffassung der Metaphysik als reine Philosophie in der Inauguraldissertation und ihre propädeutische Bedeutung im Rahmen der Entwicklungsgeschichte der Kritik der reinen Vernunft |
title_fullStr |
Die neue Auffassung der Metaphysik als reine Philosophie in der Inauguraldissertation und ihre propädeutische Bedeutung im Rahmen der Entwicklungsgeschichte der Kritik der reinen Vernunft |
title_full_unstemmed |
Die neue Auffassung der Metaphysik als reine Philosophie in der Inauguraldissertation und ihre propädeutische Bedeutung im Rahmen der Entwicklungsgeschichte der Kritik der reinen Vernunft |
title_sort |
Die neue Auffassung der Metaphysik als reine Philosophie in der Inauguraldissertation und ihre propädeutische Bedeutung im Rahmen der Entwicklungsgeschichte der Kritik der reinen Vernunft |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Moledo, Fernando |
author |
Moledo, Fernando |
author_facet |
Moledo, Fernando |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Kant Metafísica Disertación Baumgarten |
topic |
Kant Metafísica Disertación Baumgarten |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
In the Critique of Pure Reason Kant criticizes Baumgarten´s definition of Metaphysics as the science of the first principles of human knowledge (Metaphysica § 1). He maintains that this definition doesn´t consider the distinction between sensible and pure knowledge. Instead of this definition Kant provides a new one in the first Critique: Metaphysics is the system of pure Reason (A 841 / B 869). This Definition is first anticipated eleven years before in the Inaugural Dissertation, where Metaphysics is defined as pure Philosophy (MSI AA 2: 411). Kant presents this Dissertation as a proof of the propaedeutic which must precede Metaphysics and so anticipates the idea that will be fully accomplished with the Critique of Pure Reason. In this paper I will argue that the new definition of Metaphysics in the Inaugural Dissertation must be seen as the very important result of this text as a propaedeutic to Metaphysics and as a specific step in the development of the Critique of Pure Reason. Fil: Moledo, Fernando. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Departamento de Filosofía; Argentina |
description |
In the Critique of Pure Reason Kant criticizes Baumgarten´s definition of Metaphysics as the science of the first principles of human knowledge (Metaphysica § 1). He maintains that this definition doesn´t consider the distinction between sensible and pure knowledge. Instead of this definition Kant provides a new one in the first Critique: Metaphysics is the system of pure Reason (A 841 / B 869). This Definition is first anticipated eleven years before in the Inaugural Dissertation, where Metaphysics is defined as pure Philosophy (MSI AA 2: 411). Kant presents this Dissertation as a proof of the propaedeutic which must precede Metaphysics and so anticipates the idea that will be fully accomplished with the Critique of Pure Reason. In this paper I will argue that the new definition of Metaphysics in the Inaugural Dissertation must be seen as the very important result of this text as a propaedeutic to Metaphysics and as a specific step in the development of the Critique of Pure Reason. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-09 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/46897 Moledo, Fernando; Die neue Auffassung der Metaphysik als reine Philosophie in der Inauguraldissertation und ihre propädeutische Bedeutung im Rahmen der Entwicklungsgeschichte der Kritik der reinen Vernunft; De Gruyter; Kant-Studien; 107; 3; 9-2016; 485-495 0022-8877 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/46897 |
identifier_str_mv |
Moledo, Fernando; Die neue Auffassung der Metaphysik als reine Philosophie in der Inauguraldissertation und ihre propädeutische Bedeutung im Rahmen der Entwicklungsgeschichte der Kritik der reinen Vernunft; De Gruyter; Kant-Studien; 107; 3; 9-2016; 485-495 0022-8877 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
deu |
language |
deu |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/kant.2016.107.issue-3/kant-2016-0035/kant-2016-0035.xml info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1515/kant-2016-0035 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
De Gruyter |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
De Gruyter |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842268998681493504 |
score |
13.13397 |