Determination of the wind-erodible fraction of soils using different methodologies

Autores
López, M. V.; de Dios Herrero, J. M.; Hevia, Graciela Gloria; Gracia, Ricardo Ivan; Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo
Año de publicación
2007
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The wind-erodible fraction of the soil (EF) (percentage of aggregates < 0.84 mm in diameter) is a key parameter to estimate the soil susceptibility to wind erosion. The standard method for EF determination is the dry sieving by means of a rotary sieve. Flat sieving with a set of sieves and the use of the equation EF = (29.09 + 0.31 sand + 0.17 silt + 0.33 sand/clay - 2.59 organic matter - 0.95 CaCO3) / 100, R2 = 0.67, [Fryrear, D.W., Krammes, C.A., Williamson, D.L., Zobeck, T.M., 1994. Computing the wind erodible fraction of soils. J. Soil Water Conserv. 49: 183-188] are two alternative ways of determining EF. As the flat sieving has still not been contrasted against the standard rotary sieve method nor the Fryrear et al. equation tested for soils other than US soils, we estimated EF with both dry sieving methods and tested the equation for soils of semiarid regions of Central Aragon (NE Spain) and the Semiarid Pampas (centre of Argentina), two regions prone to wind erosion. Results showed that EF values obtained with the flat sieve were comparable with those obtained using the standard rotary sieve, indicating that the flat sieving technique is suitable for EF determinations. The estimation of EF with the model proposed by Fryrear et al. [Fryrear, D.W., Krammes, C.A., Williamson, D.L., Zobeck, T.M., 1994. Computing the wind erodible fraction of soils. J. Soil Water Conserv. 49: 183-188] did not fit with the measured EF values, indicating that this model is not useful for predicting EF in Spanish and Argentinian soils. This was attributed to the high CaCO3 contents of Spanish soils and the low sand/clay ratios and high organic matter contents of some Argentinean soils. The equation EF = 9.98 + 6.91 sand/clay + 14.1/organic matter (r = 0.933; P < 0.001) was proposed to predict EF in the studied soils.
Fil: López, M. V.. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; España
Fil: de Dios Herrero, J. M.. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina
Fil: Hevia, Graciela Gloria. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina
Fil: Gracia, Ricardo Ivan. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; España
Fil: Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional La Pampa-San Luis. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Anguil; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa; Argentina
Materia
Dry Sieving
Flat Sieve
Model Validation
Rotary Sieve
Wind-Erodible Fraction
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/81739
Acceder
id CONICETDig_4344f742a6f6416d519d5edf768508ab
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/81739
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Determination of the wind-erodible fraction of soils using different methodologiesLópez, M. V.de Dios Herrero, J. M.Hevia, Graciela GloriaGracia, Ricardo IvanBuschiazzo, Daniel EduardoDry SievingFlat SieveModel ValidationRotary SieveWind-Erodible Fractionhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4The wind-erodible fraction of the soil (EF) (percentage of aggregates < 0.84 mm in diameter) is a key parameter to estimate the soil susceptibility to wind erosion. The standard method for EF determination is the dry sieving by means of a rotary sieve. Flat sieving with a set of sieves and the use of the equation EF = (29.09 + 0.31 sand + 0.17 silt + 0.33 sand/clay - 2.59 organic matter - 0.95 CaCO3) / 100, R2 = 0.67, [Fryrear, D.W., Krammes, C.A., Williamson, D.L., Zobeck, T.M., 1994. Computing the wind erodible fraction of soils. J. Soil Water Conserv. 49: 183-188] are two alternative ways of determining EF. As the flat sieving has still not been contrasted against the standard rotary sieve method nor the Fryrear et al. equation tested for soils other than US soils, we estimated EF with both dry sieving methods and tested the equation for soils of semiarid regions of Central Aragon (NE Spain) and the Semiarid Pampas (centre of Argentina), two regions prone to wind erosion. Results showed that EF values obtained with the flat sieve were comparable with those obtained using the standard rotary sieve, indicating that the flat sieving technique is suitable for EF determinations. The estimation of EF with the model proposed by Fryrear et al. [Fryrear, D.W., Krammes, C.A., Williamson, D.L., Zobeck, T.M., 1994. Computing the wind erodible fraction of soils. J. Soil Water Conserv. 49: 183-188] did not fit with the measured EF values, indicating that this model is not useful for predicting EF in Spanish and Argentinian soils. This was attributed to the high CaCO3 contents of Spanish soils and the low sand/clay ratios and high organic matter contents of some Argentinean soils. The equation EF = 9.98 + 6.91 sand/clay + 14.1/organic matter (r = 0.933; P < 0.001) was proposed to predict EF in the studied soils.Fil: López, M. V.. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; EspañaFil: de Dios Herrero, J. M.. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Agronomía; ArgentinaFil: Hevia, Graciela Gloria. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Agronomía; ArgentinaFil: Gracia, Ricardo Ivan. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; EspañaFil: Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional La Pampa-San Luis. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Anguil; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa; ArgentinaElsevier Science2007-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/81739López, M. V.; de Dios Herrero, J. M.; Hevia, Graciela Gloria; Gracia, Ricardo Ivan; Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo; Determination of the wind-erodible fraction of soils using different methodologies; Elsevier Science; Geoderma; 139; 3-4; 5-2007; 407-4110016-7061CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706107000717info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.03.006info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:05:40Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/81739instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:05:40.748CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Determination of the wind-erodible fraction of soils using different methodologies
title Determination of the wind-erodible fraction of soils using different methodologies
spellingShingle Determination of the wind-erodible fraction of soils using different methodologies
López, M. V.
Dry Sieving
Flat Sieve
Model Validation
Rotary Sieve
Wind-Erodible Fraction
title_short Determination of the wind-erodible fraction of soils using different methodologies
title_full Determination of the wind-erodible fraction of soils using different methodologies
title_fullStr Determination of the wind-erodible fraction of soils using different methodologies
title_full_unstemmed Determination of the wind-erodible fraction of soils using different methodologies
title_sort Determination of the wind-erodible fraction of soils using different methodologies
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv López, M. V.
de Dios Herrero, J. M.
Hevia, Graciela Gloria
Gracia, Ricardo Ivan
Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo
author López, M. V.
author_facet López, M. V.
de Dios Herrero, J. M.
Hevia, Graciela Gloria
Gracia, Ricardo Ivan
Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo
author_role author
author2 de Dios Herrero, J. M.
Hevia, Graciela Gloria
Gracia, Ricardo Ivan
Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Dry Sieving
Flat Sieve
Model Validation
Rotary Sieve
Wind-Erodible Fraction
topic Dry Sieving
Flat Sieve
Model Validation
Rotary Sieve
Wind-Erodible Fraction
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The wind-erodible fraction of the soil (EF) (percentage of aggregates < 0.84 mm in diameter) is a key parameter to estimate the soil susceptibility to wind erosion. The standard method for EF determination is the dry sieving by means of a rotary sieve. Flat sieving with a set of sieves and the use of the equation EF = (29.09 + 0.31 sand + 0.17 silt + 0.33 sand/clay - 2.59 organic matter - 0.95 CaCO3) / 100, R2 = 0.67, [Fryrear, D.W., Krammes, C.A., Williamson, D.L., Zobeck, T.M., 1994. Computing the wind erodible fraction of soils. J. Soil Water Conserv. 49: 183-188] are two alternative ways of determining EF. As the flat sieving has still not been contrasted against the standard rotary sieve method nor the Fryrear et al. equation tested for soils other than US soils, we estimated EF with both dry sieving methods and tested the equation for soils of semiarid regions of Central Aragon (NE Spain) and the Semiarid Pampas (centre of Argentina), two regions prone to wind erosion. Results showed that EF values obtained with the flat sieve were comparable with those obtained using the standard rotary sieve, indicating that the flat sieving technique is suitable for EF determinations. The estimation of EF with the model proposed by Fryrear et al. [Fryrear, D.W., Krammes, C.A., Williamson, D.L., Zobeck, T.M., 1994. Computing the wind erodible fraction of soils. J. Soil Water Conserv. 49: 183-188] did not fit with the measured EF values, indicating that this model is not useful for predicting EF in Spanish and Argentinian soils. This was attributed to the high CaCO3 contents of Spanish soils and the low sand/clay ratios and high organic matter contents of some Argentinean soils. The equation EF = 9.98 + 6.91 sand/clay + 14.1/organic matter (r = 0.933; P < 0.001) was proposed to predict EF in the studied soils.
Fil: López, M. V.. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; España
Fil: de Dios Herrero, J. M.. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina
Fil: Hevia, Graciela Gloria. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina
Fil: Gracia, Ricardo Ivan. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; España
Fil: Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional La Pampa-San Luis. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Anguil; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa; Argentina
description The wind-erodible fraction of the soil (EF) (percentage of aggregates < 0.84 mm in diameter) is a key parameter to estimate the soil susceptibility to wind erosion. The standard method for EF determination is the dry sieving by means of a rotary sieve. Flat sieving with a set of sieves and the use of the equation EF = (29.09 + 0.31 sand + 0.17 silt + 0.33 sand/clay - 2.59 organic matter - 0.95 CaCO3) / 100, R2 = 0.67, [Fryrear, D.W., Krammes, C.A., Williamson, D.L., Zobeck, T.M., 1994. Computing the wind erodible fraction of soils. J. Soil Water Conserv. 49: 183-188] are two alternative ways of determining EF. As the flat sieving has still not been contrasted against the standard rotary sieve method nor the Fryrear et al. equation tested for soils other than US soils, we estimated EF with both dry sieving methods and tested the equation for soils of semiarid regions of Central Aragon (NE Spain) and the Semiarid Pampas (centre of Argentina), two regions prone to wind erosion. Results showed that EF values obtained with the flat sieve were comparable with those obtained using the standard rotary sieve, indicating that the flat sieving technique is suitable for EF determinations. The estimation of EF with the model proposed by Fryrear et al. [Fryrear, D.W., Krammes, C.A., Williamson, D.L., Zobeck, T.M., 1994. Computing the wind erodible fraction of soils. J. Soil Water Conserv. 49: 183-188] did not fit with the measured EF values, indicating that this model is not useful for predicting EF in Spanish and Argentinian soils. This was attributed to the high CaCO3 contents of Spanish soils and the low sand/clay ratios and high organic matter contents of some Argentinean soils. The equation EF = 9.98 + 6.91 sand/clay + 14.1/organic matter (r = 0.933; P < 0.001) was proposed to predict EF in the studied soils.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/81739
López, M. V.; de Dios Herrero, J. M.; Hevia, Graciela Gloria; Gracia, Ricardo Ivan; Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo; Determination of the wind-erodible fraction of soils using different methodologies; Elsevier Science; Geoderma; 139; 3-4; 5-2007; 407-411
0016-7061
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/81739
identifier_str_mv López, M. V.; de Dios Herrero, J. M.; Hevia, Graciela Gloria; Gracia, Ricardo Ivan; Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo; Determination of the wind-erodible fraction of soils using different methodologies; Elsevier Science; Geoderma; 139; 3-4; 5-2007; 407-411
0016-7061
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706107000717
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.03.006
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613896129740800
score 13.070432

Publicaciones similares