Relativism in context

Autores
Laera, Rodrigo Fabián
Año de publicación
2019
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The present paper introduces four fundamental issues within the framework of epistemic relativism: (a) the lack of precisión in the concept of knowing; (b) the changes in demands between context of use and of evaluation; (c) te violation of the real disagreement intuition; and (d) the incommensurability of epistemic frameworks. The answer to these problems should revolve around the idea that knowledge is subject to the interests and intentions of individuals in everyday life. The main tesis thus consists in that it is necesary to avoid the impression that epistemic frameworks are some sort of watertight compartment. In this way, relativism may be defended from the viewpoint that epistemic frameworks are artificial generalizations that may be relevant to the attribution of knowledge. In this respect, it must be borne in mind that some norms are shared by different epistemic frameworks, and that each time a given context or circumstance takes place, the same norm may be applied.
Fil: Laera, Rodrigo Fabián. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; Argentina. Universidad de Barcelona; España
Materia
RELATIVISM
CONTEXTUALISM
EPISTEME FRAMEWORKS
FACTIVE REASON
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/124465

id CONICETDig_4287240ee054bc4607163b2b40cf8cee
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/124465
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Relativism in contextRelativismo em contextoLaera, Rodrigo FabiánRELATIVISMCONTEXTUALISMEPISTEME FRAMEWORKSFACTIVE REASONhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6The present paper introduces four fundamental issues within the framework of epistemic relativism: (a) the lack of precisión in the concept of knowing; (b) the changes in demands between context of use and of evaluation; (c) te violation of the real disagreement intuition; and (d) the incommensurability of epistemic frameworks. The answer to these problems should revolve around the idea that knowledge is subject to the interests and intentions of individuals in everyday life. The main tesis thus consists in that it is necesary to avoid the impression that epistemic frameworks are some sort of watertight compartment. In this way, relativism may be defended from the viewpoint that epistemic frameworks are artificial generalizations that may be relevant to the attribution of knowledge. In this respect, it must be borne in mind that some norms are shared by different epistemic frameworks, and that each time a given context or circumstance takes place, the same norm may be applied.Fil: Laera, Rodrigo Fabián. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; Argentina. Universidad de Barcelona; EspañaUniversidade Federal Da Paraiba2019-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/124465Laera, Rodrigo Fabián; Relativism in context; Universidade Federal Da Paraiba; Aufklärung; 6; 1; 3-2019; 11-242358-8470CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-17T10:50:56Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/124465instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-17 10:50:56.781CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Relativism in context
Relativismo em contexto
title Relativism in context
spellingShingle Relativism in context
Laera, Rodrigo Fabián
RELATIVISM
CONTEXTUALISM
EPISTEME FRAMEWORKS
FACTIVE REASON
title_short Relativism in context
title_full Relativism in context
title_fullStr Relativism in context
title_full_unstemmed Relativism in context
title_sort Relativism in context
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Laera, Rodrigo Fabián
author Laera, Rodrigo Fabián
author_facet Laera, Rodrigo Fabián
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv RELATIVISM
CONTEXTUALISM
EPISTEME FRAMEWORKS
FACTIVE REASON
topic RELATIVISM
CONTEXTUALISM
EPISTEME FRAMEWORKS
FACTIVE REASON
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The present paper introduces four fundamental issues within the framework of epistemic relativism: (a) the lack of precisión in the concept of knowing; (b) the changes in demands between context of use and of evaluation; (c) te violation of the real disagreement intuition; and (d) the incommensurability of epistemic frameworks. The answer to these problems should revolve around the idea that knowledge is subject to the interests and intentions of individuals in everyday life. The main tesis thus consists in that it is necesary to avoid the impression that epistemic frameworks are some sort of watertight compartment. In this way, relativism may be defended from the viewpoint that epistemic frameworks are artificial generalizations that may be relevant to the attribution of knowledge. In this respect, it must be borne in mind that some norms are shared by different epistemic frameworks, and that each time a given context or circumstance takes place, the same norm may be applied.
Fil: Laera, Rodrigo Fabián. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; Argentina. Universidad de Barcelona; España
description The present paper introduces four fundamental issues within the framework of epistemic relativism: (a) the lack of precisión in the concept of knowing; (b) the changes in demands between context of use and of evaluation; (c) te violation of the real disagreement intuition; and (d) the incommensurability of epistemic frameworks. The answer to these problems should revolve around the idea that knowledge is subject to the interests and intentions of individuals in everyday life. The main tesis thus consists in that it is necesary to avoid the impression that epistemic frameworks are some sort of watertight compartment. In this way, relativism may be defended from the viewpoint that epistemic frameworks are artificial generalizations that may be relevant to the attribution of knowledge. In this respect, it must be borne in mind that some norms are shared by different epistemic frameworks, and that each time a given context or circumstance takes place, the same norm may be applied.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-03
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/124465
Laera, Rodrigo Fabián; Relativism in context; Universidade Federal Da Paraiba; Aufklärung; 6; 1; 3-2019; 11-24
2358-8470
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/124465
identifier_str_mv Laera, Rodrigo Fabián; Relativism in context; Universidade Federal Da Paraiba; Aufklärung; 6; 1; 3-2019; 11-24
2358-8470
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Da Paraiba
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Da Paraiba
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1843606132038303744
score 13.001348