Relativism in context
- Autores
- Laera, Rodrigo Fabián
- Año de publicación
- 2019
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The present paper introduces four fundamental issues within the framework of epistemic relativism: (a) the lack of precisión in the concept of knowing; (b) the changes in demands between context of use and of evaluation; (c) te violation of the real disagreement intuition; and (d) the incommensurability of epistemic frameworks. The answer to these problems should revolve around the idea that knowledge is subject to the interests and intentions of individuals in everyday life. The main tesis thus consists in that it is necesary to avoid the impression that epistemic frameworks are some sort of watertight compartment. In this way, relativism may be defended from the viewpoint that epistemic frameworks are artificial generalizations that may be relevant to the attribution of knowledge. In this respect, it must be borne in mind that some norms are shared by different epistemic frameworks, and that each time a given context or circumstance takes place, the same norm may be applied.
Fil: Laera, Rodrigo Fabián. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; Argentina. Universidad de Barcelona; España - Materia
-
RELATIVISM
CONTEXTUALISM
EPISTEME FRAMEWORKS
FACTIVE REASON - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/124465
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_4287240ee054bc4607163b2b40cf8cee |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/124465 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Relativism in contextRelativismo em contextoLaera, Rodrigo FabiánRELATIVISMCONTEXTUALISMEPISTEME FRAMEWORKSFACTIVE REASONhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6The present paper introduces four fundamental issues within the framework of epistemic relativism: (a) the lack of precisión in the concept of knowing; (b) the changes in demands between context of use and of evaluation; (c) te violation of the real disagreement intuition; and (d) the incommensurability of epistemic frameworks. The answer to these problems should revolve around the idea that knowledge is subject to the interests and intentions of individuals in everyday life. The main tesis thus consists in that it is necesary to avoid the impression that epistemic frameworks are some sort of watertight compartment. In this way, relativism may be defended from the viewpoint that epistemic frameworks are artificial generalizations that may be relevant to the attribution of knowledge. In this respect, it must be borne in mind that some norms are shared by different epistemic frameworks, and that each time a given context or circumstance takes place, the same norm may be applied.Fil: Laera, Rodrigo Fabián. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; Argentina. Universidad de Barcelona; EspañaUniversidade Federal Da Paraiba2019-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/124465Laera, Rodrigo Fabián; Relativism in context; Universidade Federal Da Paraiba; Aufklärung; 6; 1; 3-2019; 11-242358-8470CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-17T10:50:56Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/124465instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-17 10:50:56.781CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Relativism in context Relativismo em contexto |
title |
Relativism in context |
spellingShingle |
Relativism in context Laera, Rodrigo Fabián RELATIVISM CONTEXTUALISM EPISTEME FRAMEWORKS FACTIVE REASON |
title_short |
Relativism in context |
title_full |
Relativism in context |
title_fullStr |
Relativism in context |
title_full_unstemmed |
Relativism in context |
title_sort |
Relativism in context |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Laera, Rodrigo Fabián |
author |
Laera, Rodrigo Fabián |
author_facet |
Laera, Rodrigo Fabián |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
RELATIVISM CONTEXTUALISM EPISTEME FRAMEWORKS FACTIVE REASON |
topic |
RELATIVISM CONTEXTUALISM EPISTEME FRAMEWORKS FACTIVE REASON |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The present paper introduces four fundamental issues within the framework of epistemic relativism: (a) the lack of precisión in the concept of knowing; (b) the changes in demands between context of use and of evaluation; (c) te violation of the real disagreement intuition; and (d) the incommensurability of epistemic frameworks. The answer to these problems should revolve around the idea that knowledge is subject to the interests and intentions of individuals in everyday life. The main tesis thus consists in that it is necesary to avoid the impression that epistemic frameworks are some sort of watertight compartment. In this way, relativism may be defended from the viewpoint that epistemic frameworks are artificial generalizations that may be relevant to the attribution of knowledge. In this respect, it must be borne in mind that some norms are shared by different epistemic frameworks, and that each time a given context or circumstance takes place, the same norm may be applied. Fil: Laera, Rodrigo Fabián. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; Argentina. Universidad de Barcelona; España |
description |
The present paper introduces four fundamental issues within the framework of epistemic relativism: (a) the lack of precisión in the concept of knowing; (b) the changes in demands between context of use and of evaluation; (c) te violation of the real disagreement intuition; and (d) the incommensurability of epistemic frameworks. The answer to these problems should revolve around the idea that knowledge is subject to the interests and intentions of individuals in everyday life. The main tesis thus consists in that it is necesary to avoid the impression that epistemic frameworks are some sort of watertight compartment. In this way, relativism may be defended from the viewpoint that epistemic frameworks are artificial generalizations that may be relevant to the attribution of knowledge. In this respect, it must be borne in mind that some norms are shared by different epistemic frameworks, and that each time a given context or circumstance takes place, the same norm may be applied. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-03 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/124465 Laera, Rodrigo Fabián; Relativism in context; Universidade Federal Da Paraiba; Aufklärung; 6; 1; 3-2019; 11-24 2358-8470 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/124465 |
identifier_str_mv |
Laera, Rodrigo Fabián; Relativism in context; Universidade Federal Da Paraiba; Aufklärung; 6; 1; 3-2019; 11-24 2358-8470 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/ |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Da Paraiba |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Da Paraiba |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1843606132038303744 |
score |
13.001348 |