Variance in male reproductive success and sexual size dimorphism in pinnipeds: testing an assumption of sexual selection theory

Autores
González Suárez, Manuela; Cassini, Marcelo Hernan
Año de publicación
2014
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The theory of evolution by sexual selection for sexual size dimorphism (SSD) postulates that SSD primarily reflects the adaptation of males and females to their different reproductive roles. For example, competition among males for access to females increases male body size because larger males are better able to maintain dominant status than smaller males. Larger dominant males sire most offspring while smaller subordinate males are unsuccessful, leading to skew in reproductive success. Therefore, species with male-biased SSD are predicted to have greater variance in male reproductive success than those in which both sexes are similar in size. We tested this prediction among the Pinnipedia, a mammalian group with a great variation in SSD. From a literature review, we identified genetic estimates of male reproductive success for 10 pinniped taxa (eight unique species and two subspecies of a ninth species) that range from seals with similarly sized males and females to species in which males are more than four times as large as females. We found no support for a positive relationship between variance in reproductive success and SSD among pinnipeds after excluding the elephant seals Mirounga leonina and Mirounga angustirostris, which we discuss as distinctive cases. Several explanations for these results are presented, including the revival of one of Darwin's original ideas. Darwin proposed that natural selection may explain SSD based on differences in energetic requirements between sexes and the potential for sexual niche segregation. Males may develop larger bodies to exploit resources that remain unavailable to females due to the energetic constraints imposed on female mammals by gestation and lactation. The importance of this alternative explanation remains to be tested.
Fil: González Suárez, Manuela. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas; España;
Fil: Cassini, Marcelo Hernan. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Luján; Argentina
Materia
BIOENERGETICS
GENETIC PATERNITY
HABITAT DIFFERENTIATION
MARINE MAMMALS
MATING BEHAVIOUR
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/2199

id CONICETDig_4057244e257f1200b0bfd621679a7116
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/2199
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Variance in male reproductive success and sexual size dimorphism in pinnipeds: testing an assumption of sexual selection theoryGonzález Suárez, ManuelaCassini, Marcelo HernanBIOENERGETICSGENETIC PATERNITYHABITAT DIFFERENTIATIONMARINE MAMMALSMATING BEHAVIOURhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1The theory of evolution by sexual selection for sexual size dimorphism (SSD) postulates that SSD primarily reflects the adaptation of males and females to their different reproductive roles. For example, competition among males for access to females increases male body size because larger males are better able to maintain dominant status than smaller males. Larger dominant males sire most offspring while smaller subordinate males are unsuccessful, leading to skew in reproductive success. Therefore, species with male-biased SSD are predicted to have greater variance in male reproductive success than those in which both sexes are similar in size. We tested this prediction among the Pinnipedia, a mammalian group with a great variation in SSD. From a literature review, we identified genetic estimates of male reproductive success for 10 pinniped taxa (eight unique species and two subspecies of a ninth species) that range from seals with similarly sized males and females to species in which males are more than four times as large as females. We found no support for a positive relationship between variance in reproductive success and SSD among pinnipeds after excluding the elephant seals Mirounga leonina and Mirounga angustirostris, which we discuss as distinctive cases. Several explanations for these results are presented, including the revival of one of Darwin's original ideas. Darwin proposed that natural selection may explain SSD based on differences in energetic requirements between sexes and the potential for sexual niche segregation. Males may develop larger bodies to exploit resources that remain unavailable to females due to the energetic constraints imposed on female mammals by gestation and lactation. The importance of this alternative explanation remains to be tested.Fil: González Suárez, Manuela. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas; España;Fil: Cassini, Marcelo Hernan. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Luján; ArgentinaWiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc2014-03-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/2199González Suárez, Manuela; Cassini, Marcelo Hernan; Variance in male reproductive success and sexual size dimorphism in pinnipeds: testing an assumption of sexual selection theory; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Mammal Review; 44; 2; 4-3-2014; 88-930305-18381365-2907enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/mam.12012info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mam.12012/abstractinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:57:44Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/2199instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:57:45.273CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Variance in male reproductive success and sexual size dimorphism in pinnipeds: testing an assumption of sexual selection theory
title Variance in male reproductive success and sexual size dimorphism in pinnipeds: testing an assumption of sexual selection theory
spellingShingle Variance in male reproductive success and sexual size dimorphism in pinnipeds: testing an assumption of sexual selection theory
González Suárez, Manuela
BIOENERGETICS
GENETIC PATERNITY
HABITAT DIFFERENTIATION
MARINE MAMMALS
MATING BEHAVIOUR
title_short Variance in male reproductive success and sexual size dimorphism in pinnipeds: testing an assumption of sexual selection theory
title_full Variance in male reproductive success and sexual size dimorphism in pinnipeds: testing an assumption of sexual selection theory
title_fullStr Variance in male reproductive success and sexual size dimorphism in pinnipeds: testing an assumption of sexual selection theory
title_full_unstemmed Variance in male reproductive success and sexual size dimorphism in pinnipeds: testing an assumption of sexual selection theory
title_sort Variance in male reproductive success and sexual size dimorphism in pinnipeds: testing an assumption of sexual selection theory
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv González Suárez, Manuela
Cassini, Marcelo Hernan
author González Suárez, Manuela
author_facet González Suárez, Manuela
Cassini, Marcelo Hernan
author_role author
author2 Cassini, Marcelo Hernan
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv BIOENERGETICS
GENETIC PATERNITY
HABITAT DIFFERENTIATION
MARINE MAMMALS
MATING BEHAVIOUR
topic BIOENERGETICS
GENETIC PATERNITY
HABITAT DIFFERENTIATION
MARINE MAMMALS
MATING BEHAVIOUR
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The theory of evolution by sexual selection for sexual size dimorphism (SSD) postulates that SSD primarily reflects the adaptation of males and females to their different reproductive roles. For example, competition among males for access to females increases male body size because larger males are better able to maintain dominant status than smaller males. Larger dominant males sire most offspring while smaller subordinate males are unsuccessful, leading to skew in reproductive success. Therefore, species with male-biased SSD are predicted to have greater variance in male reproductive success than those in which both sexes are similar in size. We tested this prediction among the Pinnipedia, a mammalian group with a great variation in SSD. From a literature review, we identified genetic estimates of male reproductive success for 10 pinniped taxa (eight unique species and two subspecies of a ninth species) that range from seals with similarly sized males and females to species in which males are more than four times as large as females. We found no support for a positive relationship between variance in reproductive success and SSD among pinnipeds after excluding the elephant seals Mirounga leonina and Mirounga angustirostris, which we discuss as distinctive cases. Several explanations for these results are presented, including the revival of one of Darwin's original ideas. Darwin proposed that natural selection may explain SSD based on differences in energetic requirements between sexes and the potential for sexual niche segregation. Males may develop larger bodies to exploit resources that remain unavailable to females due to the energetic constraints imposed on female mammals by gestation and lactation. The importance of this alternative explanation remains to be tested.
Fil: González Suárez, Manuela. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas; España;
Fil: Cassini, Marcelo Hernan. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Luján; Argentina
description The theory of evolution by sexual selection for sexual size dimorphism (SSD) postulates that SSD primarily reflects the adaptation of males and females to their different reproductive roles. For example, competition among males for access to females increases male body size because larger males are better able to maintain dominant status than smaller males. Larger dominant males sire most offspring while smaller subordinate males are unsuccessful, leading to skew in reproductive success. Therefore, species with male-biased SSD are predicted to have greater variance in male reproductive success than those in which both sexes are similar in size. We tested this prediction among the Pinnipedia, a mammalian group with a great variation in SSD. From a literature review, we identified genetic estimates of male reproductive success for 10 pinniped taxa (eight unique species and two subspecies of a ninth species) that range from seals with similarly sized males and females to species in which males are more than four times as large as females. We found no support for a positive relationship between variance in reproductive success and SSD among pinnipeds after excluding the elephant seals Mirounga leonina and Mirounga angustirostris, which we discuss as distinctive cases. Several explanations for these results are presented, including the revival of one of Darwin's original ideas. Darwin proposed that natural selection may explain SSD based on differences in energetic requirements between sexes and the potential for sexual niche segregation. Males may develop larger bodies to exploit resources that remain unavailable to females due to the energetic constraints imposed on female mammals by gestation and lactation. The importance of this alternative explanation remains to be tested.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-03-04
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/2199
González Suárez, Manuela; Cassini, Marcelo Hernan; Variance in male reproductive success and sexual size dimorphism in pinnipeds: testing an assumption of sexual selection theory; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Mammal Review; 44; 2; 4-3-2014; 88-93
0305-1838
1365-2907
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/2199
identifier_str_mv González Suárez, Manuela; Cassini, Marcelo Hernan; Variance in male reproductive success and sexual size dimorphism in pinnipeds: testing an assumption of sexual selection theory; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Mammal Review; 44; 2; 4-3-2014; 88-93
0305-1838
1365-2907
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/mam.12012
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mam.12012/abstract
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269482199810048
score 13.13397