Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in mammals: Sexual or natural selection?
- Autores
- Cassini, Marcelo Hernan
- Año de publicación
- 2023
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Sexual size dimorphism may have evolved through two processes: sexual or natural selection. The sexual selection theory states that males compete for mate monopolization and larger males can sire more offspring than smaller ones—factors that resulted in the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. An alternative hypothesis suggests that there was a change in ecological conditions (e.g., from close to open habitats that increased predation risk or a climatic change that increased thermoregulation requirements) that favoured an increase in body size that was more significant in males than in females. In the present study, phylogenetic confirmatory path analyses were conducted to test the hypotheses on the causal relationships between five characters: breeding system, sexual size dimorphism, body weight, daily activity (representing the initial change in habitat that induced female grouping), and mating system (monogamy and polygyny) or variance in genetic paternity (measures of intensity of sexual selection). The best-fit models in the path analyses assumed that dimorphism evolved through natural selection following the evolution of large body size, which in turn influenced the evolution of breeding groups and polygyny.
Fil: Cassini, Marcelo Hernan. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina - Materia
-
PATH ANALYSIS
BODY SIZE
MATING SYSTEM
GENETIC PATERNITY - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/238231
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_2c935a66715d94d37962115db88ac616 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/238231 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in mammals: Sexual or natural selection?Cassini, Marcelo HernanPATH ANALYSISBODY SIZEMATING SYSTEMGENETIC PATERNITYhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Sexual size dimorphism may have evolved through two processes: sexual or natural selection. The sexual selection theory states that males compete for mate monopolization and larger males can sire more offspring than smaller ones—factors that resulted in the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. An alternative hypothesis suggests that there was a change in ecological conditions (e.g., from close to open habitats that increased predation risk or a climatic change that increased thermoregulation requirements) that favoured an increase in body size that was more significant in males than in females. In the present study, phylogenetic confirmatory path analyses were conducted to test the hypotheses on the causal relationships between five characters: breeding system, sexual size dimorphism, body weight, daily activity (representing the initial change in habitat that induced female grouping), and mating system (monogamy and polygyny) or variance in genetic paternity (measures of intensity of sexual selection). The best-fit models in the path analyses assumed that dimorphism evolved through natural selection following the evolution of large body size, which in turn influenced the evolution of breeding groups and polygyny.Fil: Cassini, Marcelo Hernan. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; ArgentinaAssociazione Teriologica Italiana2023info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/238231Cassini, Marcelo Hernan; Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in mammals: Sexual or natural selection?; Associazione Teriologica Italiana; Hystrix; 34; 2; 2023; 127-1320394-19141825-5272CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.4404/hystrix-00631-2023info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.italian-journal-of-mammalogy.it/Evolution-of-sexual-size-dimorphism-in-mammals-sexual-or-natural-selection-,175386,0,2.htmlinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-17T10:48:29Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/238231instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-17 10:48:29.51CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in mammals: Sexual or natural selection? |
title |
Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in mammals: Sexual or natural selection? |
spellingShingle |
Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in mammals: Sexual or natural selection? Cassini, Marcelo Hernan PATH ANALYSIS BODY SIZE MATING SYSTEM GENETIC PATERNITY |
title_short |
Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in mammals: Sexual or natural selection? |
title_full |
Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in mammals: Sexual or natural selection? |
title_fullStr |
Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in mammals: Sexual or natural selection? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in mammals: Sexual or natural selection? |
title_sort |
Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in mammals: Sexual or natural selection? |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Cassini, Marcelo Hernan |
author |
Cassini, Marcelo Hernan |
author_facet |
Cassini, Marcelo Hernan |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
PATH ANALYSIS BODY SIZE MATING SYSTEM GENETIC PATERNITY |
topic |
PATH ANALYSIS BODY SIZE MATING SYSTEM GENETIC PATERNITY |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Sexual size dimorphism may have evolved through two processes: sexual or natural selection. The sexual selection theory states that males compete for mate monopolization and larger males can sire more offspring than smaller ones—factors that resulted in the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. An alternative hypothesis suggests that there was a change in ecological conditions (e.g., from close to open habitats that increased predation risk or a climatic change that increased thermoregulation requirements) that favoured an increase in body size that was more significant in males than in females. In the present study, phylogenetic confirmatory path analyses were conducted to test the hypotheses on the causal relationships between five characters: breeding system, sexual size dimorphism, body weight, daily activity (representing the initial change in habitat that induced female grouping), and mating system (monogamy and polygyny) or variance in genetic paternity (measures of intensity of sexual selection). The best-fit models in the path analyses assumed that dimorphism evolved through natural selection following the evolution of large body size, which in turn influenced the evolution of breeding groups and polygyny. Fil: Cassini, Marcelo Hernan. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina |
description |
Sexual size dimorphism may have evolved through two processes: sexual or natural selection. The sexual selection theory states that males compete for mate monopolization and larger males can sire more offspring than smaller ones—factors that resulted in the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. An alternative hypothesis suggests that there was a change in ecological conditions (e.g., from close to open habitats that increased predation risk or a climatic change that increased thermoregulation requirements) that favoured an increase in body size that was more significant in males than in females. In the present study, phylogenetic confirmatory path analyses were conducted to test the hypotheses on the causal relationships between five characters: breeding system, sexual size dimorphism, body weight, daily activity (representing the initial change in habitat that induced female grouping), and mating system (monogamy and polygyny) or variance in genetic paternity (measures of intensity of sexual selection). The best-fit models in the path analyses assumed that dimorphism evolved through natural selection following the evolution of large body size, which in turn influenced the evolution of breeding groups and polygyny. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/238231 Cassini, Marcelo Hernan; Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in mammals: Sexual or natural selection?; Associazione Teriologica Italiana; Hystrix; 34; 2; 2023; 127-132 0394-1914 1825-5272 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/238231 |
identifier_str_mv |
Cassini, Marcelo Hernan; Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in mammals: Sexual or natural selection?; Associazione Teriologica Italiana; Hystrix; 34; 2; 2023; 127-132 0394-1914 1825-5272 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.4404/hystrix-00631-2023 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.italian-journal-of-mammalogy.it/Evolution-of-sexual-size-dimorphism-in-mammals-sexual-or-natural-selection-,175386,0,2.html |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associazione Teriologica Italiana |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associazione Teriologica Italiana |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1843606084080631808 |
score |
13.001348 |