Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in mammals: Sexual or natural selection?

Autores
Cassini, Marcelo Hernan
Año de publicación
2023
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Sexual size dimorphism may have evolved through two processes: sexual or natural selection. The sexual selection theory states that males compete for mate monopolization and larger males can sire more offspring than smaller ones—factors that resulted in the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. An alternative hypothesis suggests that there was a change in ecological conditions (e.g., from close to open habitats that increased predation risk or a climatic change that increased thermoregulation requirements) that favoured an increase in body size that was more significant in males than in females. In the present study, phylogenetic confirmatory path analyses were conducted to test the hypotheses on the causal relationships between five characters: breeding system, sexual size dimorphism, body weight, daily activity (representing the initial change in habitat that induced female grouping), and mating system (monogamy and polygyny) or variance in genetic paternity (measures of intensity of sexual selection). The best-fit models in the path analyses assumed that dimorphism evolved through natural selection following the evolution of large body size, which in turn influenced the evolution of breeding groups and polygyny.
Fil: Cassini, Marcelo Hernan. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina
Materia
PATH ANALYSIS
BODY SIZE
MATING SYSTEM
GENETIC PATERNITY
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/238231

id CONICETDig_2c935a66715d94d37962115db88ac616
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/238231
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in mammals: Sexual or natural selection?Cassini, Marcelo HernanPATH ANALYSISBODY SIZEMATING SYSTEMGENETIC PATERNITYhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Sexual size dimorphism may have evolved through two processes: sexual or natural selection. The sexual selection theory states that males compete for mate monopolization and larger males can sire more offspring than smaller ones—factors that resulted in the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. An alternative hypothesis suggests that there was a change in ecological conditions (e.g., from close to open habitats that increased predation risk or a climatic change that increased thermoregulation requirements) that favoured an increase in body size that was more significant in males than in females. In the present study, phylogenetic confirmatory path analyses were conducted to test the hypotheses on the causal relationships between five characters: breeding system, sexual size dimorphism, body weight, daily activity (representing the initial change in habitat that induced female grouping), and mating system (monogamy and polygyny) or variance in genetic paternity (measures of intensity of sexual selection). The best-fit models in the path analyses assumed that dimorphism evolved through natural selection following the evolution of large body size, which in turn influenced the evolution of breeding groups and polygyny.Fil: Cassini, Marcelo Hernan. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; ArgentinaAssociazione Teriologica Italiana2023info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/238231Cassini, Marcelo Hernan; Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in mammals: Sexual or natural selection?; Associazione Teriologica Italiana; Hystrix; 34; 2; 2023; 127-1320394-19141825-5272CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.4404/hystrix-00631-2023info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.italian-journal-of-mammalogy.it/Evolution-of-sexual-size-dimorphism-in-mammals-sexual-or-natural-selection-,175386,0,2.htmlinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-17T10:48:29Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/238231instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-17 10:48:29.51CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in mammals: Sexual or natural selection?
title Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in mammals: Sexual or natural selection?
spellingShingle Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in mammals: Sexual or natural selection?
Cassini, Marcelo Hernan
PATH ANALYSIS
BODY SIZE
MATING SYSTEM
GENETIC PATERNITY
title_short Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in mammals: Sexual or natural selection?
title_full Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in mammals: Sexual or natural selection?
title_fullStr Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in mammals: Sexual or natural selection?
title_full_unstemmed Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in mammals: Sexual or natural selection?
title_sort Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in mammals: Sexual or natural selection?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Cassini, Marcelo Hernan
author Cassini, Marcelo Hernan
author_facet Cassini, Marcelo Hernan
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv PATH ANALYSIS
BODY SIZE
MATING SYSTEM
GENETIC PATERNITY
topic PATH ANALYSIS
BODY SIZE
MATING SYSTEM
GENETIC PATERNITY
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Sexual size dimorphism may have evolved through two processes: sexual or natural selection. The sexual selection theory states that males compete for mate monopolization and larger males can sire more offspring than smaller ones—factors that resulted in the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. An alternative hypothesis suggests that there was a change in ecological conditions (e.g., from close to open habitats that increased predation risk or a climatic change that increased thermoregulation requirements) that favoured an increase in body size that was more significant in males than in females. In the present study, phylogenetic confirmatory path analyses were conducted to test the hypotheses on the causal relationships between five characters: breeding system, sexual size dimorphism, body weight, daily activity (representing the initial change in habitat that induced female grouping), and mating system (monogamy and polygyny) or variance in genetic paternity (measures of intensity of sexual selection). The best-fit models in the path analyses assumed that dimorphism evolved through natural selection following the evolution of large body size, which in turn influenced the evolution of breeding groups and polygyny.
Fil: Cassini, Marcelo Hernan. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina
description Sexual size dimorphism may have evolved through two processes: sexual or natural selection. The sexual selection theory states that males compete for mate monopolization and larger males can sire more offspring than smaller ones—factors that resulted in the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. An alternative hypothesis suggests that there was a change in ecological conditions (e.g., from close to open habitats that increased predation risk or a climatic change that increased thermoregulation requirements) that favoured an increase in body size that was more significant in males than in females. In the present study, phylogenetic confirmatory path analyses were conducted to test the hypotheses on the causal relationships between five characters: breeding system, sexual size dimorphism, body weight, daily activity (representing the initial change in habitat that induced female grouping), and mating system (monogamy and polygyny) or variance in genetic paternity (measures of intensity of sexual selection). The best-fit models in the path analyses assumed that dimorphism evolved through natural selection following the evolution of large body size, which in turn influenced the evolution of breeding groups and polygyny.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/238231
Cassini, Marcelo Hernan; Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in mammals: Sexual or natural selection?; Associazione Teriologica Italiana; Hystrix; 34; 2; 2023; 127-132
0394-1914
1825-5272
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/238231
identifier_str_mv Cassini, Marcelo Hernan; Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in mammals: Sexual or natural selection?; Associazione Teriologica Italiana; Hystrix; 34; 2; 2023; 127-132
0394-1914
1825-5272
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.4404/hystrix-00631-2023
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.italian-journal-of-mammalogy.it/Evolution-of-sexual-size-dimorphism-in-mammals-sexual-or-natural-selection-,175386,0,2.html
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associazione Teriologica Italiana
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associazione Teriologica Italiana
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1843606084080631808
score 13.001348