Ethics in Practice and Ethnography: Faux pas During Fieldwork with Structurally Vulnerable Groups

Autores
Luxardo, Natalia
Año de publicación
2022
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Ethical issues are an essential part of research and need to be considered throughout the process and in its aftermath, especially when including vulnerable groups. This Field Notes revisits some ethical tensions that emerged during fieldwork with a ‘vulnerable population’—a group of waste-pickers and their families—and links these to specific avenues for further thinking within ethical frameworks. I reflect on mistakes, omissions, and blunders committed over 5 years working with this social group affected by many different forms of injustices, part of my 25 years of wider research into social inequalities and health disparities within marginalised communities. I remark upon three emerging ethical tensionsrelating to: the exclusion of certain narratives; the layers of vulnerabilities and danger of harm; and the risk of stereotyping vulnerable groups. I conclude that, more than just considering ethical issues within the context of our own work as researchers on moral solipsism, decisions in applied ethics must be integrated into broader models that offer a connected rationale for the infinite situations that can emerge from research. Alternative ethical models—such as anti-racist, feminist, communitarian, and transformative approaches—provide chances for collective decision making and promote social justice, equity, and democracy.
Fil: Luxardo, Natalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Materia
Antropología
Ética
Vulnerabilidad
Investigación
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/202624

id CONICETDig_3df4783403cb6a724b6ce3bb4631013e
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/202624
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Ethics in Practice and Ethnography: Faux pas During Fieldwork with Structurally Vulnerable GroupsLuxardo, NataliaAntropologíaÉticaVulnerabilidadInvestigaciónhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.9https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Ethical issues are an essential part of research and need to be considered throughout the process and in its aftermath, especially when including vulnerable groups. This Field Notes revisits some ethical tensions that emerged during fieldwork with a ‘vulnerable population’—a group of waste-pickers and their families—and links these to specific avenues for further thinking within ethical frameworks. I reflect on mistakes, omissions, and blunders committed over 5 years working with this social group affected by many different forms of injustices, part of my 25 years of wider research into social inequalities and health disparities within marginalised communities. I remark upon three emerging ethical tensionsrelating to: the exclusion of certain narratives; the layers of vulnerabilities and danger of harm; and the risk of stereotyping vulnerable groups. I conclude that, more than just considering ethical issues within the context of our own work as researchers on moral solipsism, decisions in applied ethics must be integrated into broader models that offer a connected rationale for the infinite situations that can emerge from research. Alternative ethical models—such as anti-racist, feminist, communitarian, and transformative approaches—provide chances for collective decision making and promote social justice, equity, and democracy.Fil: Luxardo, Natalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaUniversity of Edinburgh2022-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/202624Luxardo, Natalia; Ethics in Practice and Ethnography: Faux pas During Fieldwork with Structurally Vulnerable Groups; University of Edinburgh; Medicine Anthropology Theory; 9; 3; 9-2022; 1-132405-691XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.medanthrotheory.org/article/view/5747info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.17157/mat.9.3.5747info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-17T10:45:07Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/202624instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-17 10:45:07.81CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ethics in Practice and Ethnography: Faux pas During Fieldwork with Structurally Vulnerable Groups
title Ethics in Practice and Ethnography: Faux pas During Fieldwork with Structurally Vulnerable Groups
spellingShingle Ethics in Practice and Ethnography: Faux pas During Fieldwork with Structurally Vulnerable Groups
Luxardo, Natalia
Antropología
Ética
Vulnerabilidad
Investigación
title_short Ethics in Practice and Ethnography: Faux pas During Fieldwork with Structurally Vulnerable Groups
title_full Ethics in Practice and Ethnography: Faux pas During Fieldwork with Structurally Vulnerable Groups
title_fullStr Ethics in Practice and Ethnography: Faux pas During Fieldwork with Structurally Vulnerable Groups
title_full_unstemmed Ethics in Practice and Ethnography: Faux pas During Fieldwork with Structurally Vulnerable Groups
title_sort Ethics in Practice and Ethnography: Faux pas During Fieldwork with Structurally Vulnerable Groups
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Luxardo, Natalia
author Luxardo, Natalia
author_facet Luxardo, Natalia
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Antropología
Ética
Vulnerabilidad
Investigación
topic Antropología
Ética
Vulnerabilidad
Investigación
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.9
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Ethical issues are an essential part of research and need to be considered throughout the process and in its aftermath, especially when including vulnerable groups. This Field Notes revisits some ethical tensions that emerged during fieldwork with a ‘vulnerable population’—a group of waste-pickers and their families—and links these to specific avenues for further thinking within ethical frameworks. I reflect on mistakes, omissions, and blunders committed over 5 years working with this social group affected by many different forms of injustices, part of my 25 years of wider research into social inequalities and health disparities within marginalised communities. I remark upon three emerging ethical tensionsrelating to: the exclusion of certain narratives; the layers of vulnerabilities and danger of harm; and the risk of stereotyping vulnerable groups. I conclude that, more than just considering ethical issues within the context of our own work as researchers on moral solipsism, decisions in applied ethics must be integrated into broader models that offer a connected rationale for the infinite situations that can emerge from research. Alternative ethical models—such as anti-racist, feminist, communitarian, and transformative approaches—provide chances for collective decision making and promote social justice, equity, and democracy.
Fil: Luxardo, Natalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
description Ethical issues are an essential part of research and need to be considered throughout the process and in its aftermath, especially when including vulnerable groups. This Field Notes revisits some ethical tensions that emerged during fieldwork with a ‘vulnerable population’—a group of waste-pickers and their families—and links these to specific avenues for further thinking within ethical frameworks. I reflect on mistakes, omissions, and blunders committed over 5 years working with this social group affected by many different forms of injustices, part of my 25 years of wider research into social inequalities and health disparities within marginalised communities. I remark upon three emerging ethical tensionsrelating to: the exclusion of certain narratives; the layers of vulnerabilities and danger of harm; and the risk of stereotyping vulnerable groups. I conclude that, more than just considering ethical issues within the context of our own work as researchers on moral solipsism, decisions in applied ethics must be integrated into broader models that offer a connected rationale for the infinite situations that can emerge from research. Alternative ethical models—such as anti-racist, feminist, communitarian, and transformative approaches—provide chances for collective decision making and promote social justice, equity, and democracy.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/202624
Luxardo, Natalia; Ethics in Practice and Ethnography: Faux pas During Fieldwork with Structurally Vulnerable Groups; University of Edinburgh; Medicine Anthropology Theory; 9; 3; 9-2022; 1-13
2405-691X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/202624
identifier_str_mv Luxardo, Natalia; Ethics in Practice and Ethnography: Faux pas During Fieldwork with Structurally Vulnerable Groups; University of Edinburgh; Medicine Anthropology Theory; 9; 3; 9-2022; 1-13
2405-691X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.medanthrotheory.org/article/view/5747
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.17157/mat.9.3.5747
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv University of Edinburgh
publisher.none.fl_str_mv University of Edinburgh
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1843605994771316736
score 13.001348