Ethics in Practice and Ethnography: Faux pas During Fieldwork with Structurally Vulnerable Groups
- Autores
- Luxardo, Natalia
- Año de publicación
- 2022
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Ethical issues are an essential part of research and need to be considered throughout the process and in its aftermath, especially when including vulnerable groups. This Field Notes revisits some ethical tensions that emerged during fieldwork with a ‘vulnerable population’—a group of waste-pickers and their families—and links these to specific avenues for further thinking within ethical frameworks. I reflect on mistakes, omissions, and blunders committed over 5 years working with this social group affected by many different forms of injustices, part of my 25 years of wider research into social inequalities and health disparities within marginalised communities. I remark upon three emerging ethical tensionsrelating to: the exclusion of certain narratives; the layers of vulnerabilities and danger of harm; and the risk of stereotyping vulnerable groups. I conclude that, more than just considering ethical issues within the context of our own work as researchers on moral solipsism, decisions in applied ethics must be integrated into broader models that offer a connected rationale for the infinite situations that can emerge from research. Alternative ethical models—such as anti-racist, feminist, communitarian, and transformative approaches—provide chances for collective decision making and promote social justice, equity, and democracy.
Fil: Luxardo, Natalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina - Materia
-
Antropología
Ética
Vulnerabilidad
Investigación - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/202624
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_3df4783403cb6a724b6ce3bb4631013e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/202624 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Ethics in Practice and Ethnography: Faux pas During Fieldwork with Structurally Vulnerable GroupsLuxardo, NataliaAntropologíaÉticaVulnerabilidadInvestigaciónhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.9https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Ethical issues are an essential part of research and need to be considered throughout the process and in its aftermath, especially when including vulnerable groups. This Field Notes revisits some ethical tensions that emerged during fieldwork with a ‘vulnerable population’—a group of waste-pickers and their families—and links these to specific avenues for further thinking within ethical frameworks. I reflect on mistakes, omissions, and blunders committed over 5 years working with this social group affected by many different forms of injustices, part of my 25 years of wider research into social inequalities and health disparities within marginalised communities. I remark upon three emerging ethical tensionsrelating to: the exclusion of certain narratives; the layers of vulnerabilities and danger of harm; and the risk of stereotyping vulnerable groups. I conclude that, more than just considering ethical issues within the context of our own work as researchers on moral solipsism, decisions in applied ethics must be integrated into broader models that offer a connected rationale for the infinite situations that can emerge from research. Alternative ethical models—such as anti-racist, feminist, communitarian, and transformative approaches—provide chances for collective decision making and promote social justice, equity, and democracy.Fil: Luxardo, Natalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaUniversity of Edinburgh2022-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/202624Luxardo, Natalia; Ethics in Practice and Ethnography: Faux pas During Fieldwork with Structurally Vulnerable Groups; University of Edinburgh; Medicine Anthropology Theory; 9; 3; 9-2022; 1-132405-691XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.medanthrotheory.org/article/view/5747info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.17157/mat.9.3.5747info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-17T10:45:07Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/202624instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-17 10:45:07.81CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Ethics in Practice and Ethnography: Faux pas During Fieldwork with Structurally Vulnerable Groups |
title |
Ethics in Practice and Ethnography: Faux pas During Fieldwork with Structurally Vulnerable Groups |
spellingShingle |
Ethics in Practice and Ethnography: Faux pas During Fieldwork with Structurally Vulnerable Groups Luxardo, Natalia Antropología Ética Vulnerabilidad Investigación |
title_short |
Ethics in Practice and Ethnography: Faux pas During Fieldwork with Structurally Vulnerable Groups |
title_full |
Ethics in Practice and Ethnography: Faux pas During Fieldwork with Structurally Vulnerable Groups |
title_fullStr |
Ethics in Practice and Ethnography: Faux pas During Fieldwork with Structurally Vulnerable Groups |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ethics in Practice and Ethnography: Faux pas During Fieldwork with Structurally Vulnerable Groups |
title_sort |
Ethics in Practice and Ethnography: Faux pas During Fieldwork with Structurally Vulnerable Groups |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Luxardo, Natalia |
author |
Luxardo, Natalia |
author_facet |
Luxardo, Natalia |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Antropología Ética Vulnerabilidad Investigación |
topic |
Antropología Ética Vulnerabilidad Investigación |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.9 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Ethical issues are an essential part of research and need to be considered throughout the process and in its aftermath, especially when including vulnerable groups. This Field Notes revisits some ethical tensions that emerged during fieldwork with a ‘vulnerable population’—a group of waste-pickers and their families—and links these to specific avenues for further thinking within ethical frameworks. I reflect on mistakes, omissions, and blunders committed over 5 years working with this social group affected by many different forms of injustices, part of my 25 years of wider research into social inequalities and health disparities within marginalised communities. I remark upon three emerging ethical tensionsrelating to: the exclusion of certain narratives; the layers of vulnerabilities and danger of harm; and the risk of stereotyping vulnerable groups. I conclude that, more than just considering ethical issues within the context of our own work as researchers on moral solipsism, decisions in applied ethics must be integrated into broader models that offer a connected rationale for the infinite situations that can emerge from research. Alternative ethical models—such as anti-racist, feminist, communitarian, and transformative approaches—provide chances for collective decision making and promote social justice, equity, and democracy. Fil: Luxardo, Natalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina |
description |
Ethical issues are an essential part of research and need to be considered throughout the process and in its aftermath, especially when including vulnerable groups. This Field Notes revisits some ethical tensions that emerged during fieldwork with a ‘vulnerable population’—a group of waste-pickers and their families—and links these to specific avenues for further thinking within ethical frameworks. I reflect on mistakes, omissions, and blunders committed over 5 years working with this social group affected by many different forms of injustices, part of my 25 years of wider research into social inequalities and health disparities within marginalised communities. I remark upon three emerging ethical tensionsrelating to: the exclusion of certain narratives; the layers of vulnerabilities and danger of harm; and the risk of stereotyping vulnerable groups. I conclude that, more than just considering ethical issues within the context of our own work as researchers on moral solipsism, decisions in applied ethics must be integrated into broader models that offer a connected rationale for the infinite situations that can emerge from research. Alternative ethical models—such as anti-racist, feminist, communitarian, and transformative approaches—provide chances for collective decision making and promote social justice, equity, and democracy. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-09 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/202624 Luxardo, Natalia; Ethics in Practice and Ethnography: Faux pas During Fieldwork with Structurally Vulnerable Groups; University of Edinburgh; Medicine Anthropology Theory; 9; 3; 9-2022; 1-13 2405-691X CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/202624 |
identifier_str_mv |
Luxardo, Natalia; Ethics in Practice and Ethnography: Faux pas During Fieldwork with Structurally Vulnerable Groups; University of Edinburgh; Medicine Anthropology Theory; 9; 3; 9-2022; 1-13 2405-691X CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.medanthrotheory.org/article/view/5747 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.17157/mat.9.3.5747 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
University of Edinburgh |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
University of Edinburgh |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1843605994771316736 |
score |
13.001348 |