Gas emission and composition measurements at two Andean volcanoes - Copahue and Peteroa

Autores
Bobrowski, Nicole; Kuhn, Jonas; Lamberti, María Clara Isabel; Agusto, Mariano Roberto; García, Sebastian; Velasquez, Gabriela; Bucarey, Claudia; Valderrama, Oscar; Tirpitz, Lucas; Platt., Ulrich
Año de publicación
2019
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Copahue (37.856◦S, 71.159◦W, 2997 m a.s.l.) and Peteroa (35.240oS, 70.570oW, 3603 m a.s.l.) are active strato-volcanos, both located at the border between Argentina and Chile. Copahue volcano is situated on the rim of the large, about 2 Ma old Caviahue caldera. The eastern currently active summit crater hosts a cold melt water lake, a hyperacidic lake and a spattering mud pool (observation March 2018). The crater is surrounded by walls of phreatic debris and glacier ice. Peteroa volcano is part of the NNE-oriented Planchón-Peteroa-Azufre Volcanic Complex. The about 5 km wide caldera at the Peteroa summit is partially covered by glaciers and consists of four craters hosting acidic lakes and one scoria cinder cone. The activity of both volcanos is characterized by phreatic and phreactomagmatic eruptions. During February-March 2018, new emission flux and gas composition measurements at Peteroa and Copahue were undertaken. We performed measurements of SO2 fluxes with a scanning DOAS instrument. The SO2 flux atPeteroa was 188(±28) tSO2/d and the SO2 flux at Copahue was determined to 1294 ± 377 tSO2/d. Both values are similar to earlier reported SO2 fluxes on Peteroa and Copahue, respectively. Simultaneously to the SO2 fluxes, we determined CO2/SO2 ratio inside the plumes with a PITSA instrument by measuring at the crater rim of crater 4, the only significantly degassing crater at Peteroa as well as on the crater rim of Copahue. The CO2/SO2 ratio for Peteroa on all three measurement days varied only slightly between 1,44and 1,81 meaning that the CO2 flux of Peteroa plume was about 300(±72) tCO2/d.At Copahue, the CO2/SO2 ratio lies between around 1 and 60. The large scatter in the CO2/SO2 ratio of Copahue?s plume most likely originates from mixing of emissions from the closely located sources. We assign the lowest values of the CO2/SO2 ratio (CO2/SO2 = 1) to the plume from the spattering mud pool, which has therefore a CO2 flux of 1294 ± 377 tCO2/d. This is however only a lower limit to the CO2 flux of Copahue since the CO2emissions from e.g. the bubbling lake (where most of the SO2 might be scrubbed and therefore cannot be used for tracing plume CO2) are not taken into account.In addition, we evaluated the DOAS spectra for halogen species. We could not detect any BrO or OClO above ourcolumn density detection limits of 2e13 molec cm-2, corresponding to 57 ppt and 8 ppt for Copahue and Peteroa, respectively.Furthermore, a comparison between soil and plume emission was carried out for the first time at Peteroa. This comparison leads to the result that the major emission of CO2 is focused on a ?point source? ? the lake inside crater 4. With the current data available from Peteroa, only about 2 % of the total calculated CO2 output are degassed by diffusive soil degassing in the crater region. Certainly, further studies in the surroundings are still necessary to assure no missing emission source on the flank of the volcano.
Fil: Bobrowski, Nicole. Instituto Max Planck Institut für Chemische Okologie; Alemania
Fil: Kuhn, Jonas. Johannes Gutenberg Universitat Mainz; Alemania
Fil: Lamberti, María Clara Isabel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; Argentina
Fil: Agusto, Mariano Roberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; Argentina
Fil: García, Sebastian. Secretaría de Industria y Minería. Servicio Geológico Minero Argentino; Argentina
Fil: Velasquez, Gabriela. Observatorio Volcanologico de los Andes del Sur; Chile
Fil: Bucarey, Claudia. Observatorio Volcanologico de los Andes del Sur; Chile
Fil: Valderrama, Oscar. Observatorio Volcanologico de los Andes del Sur; Chile
Fil: Tirpitz, Lucas. Johannes Gutenberg Universitat Mainz; Alemania
Fil: Platt., Ulrich. Johannes Gutenberg Universitat Mainz; Alemania
EGU General Assembly
Viena
Austria
European Geosciences Union
Materia
PLUME
GAS
VOLCANOES
REMOTE
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/189464

id CONICETDig_3c7c71ba11ce196d6b9ed2120ed9df24
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/189464
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Gas emission and composition measurements at two Andean volcanoes - Copahue and PeteroaBobrowski, NicoleKuhn, JonasLamberti, María Clara IsabelAgusto, Mariano RobertoGarcía, SebastianVelasquez, GabrielaBucarey, ClaudiaValderrama, OscarTirpitz, LucasPlatt., UlrichPLUMEGASVOLCANOESREMOTEhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Copahue (37.856◦S, 71.159◦W, 2997 m a.s.l.) and Peteroa (35.240oS, 70.570oW, 3603 m a.s.l.) are active strato-volcanos, both located at the border between Argentina and Chile. Copahue volcano is situated on the rim of the large, about 2 Ma old Caviahue caldera. The eastern currently active summit crater hosts a cold melt water lake, a hyperacidic lake and a spattering mud pool (observation March 2018). The crater is surrounded by walls of phreatic debris and glacier ice. Peteroa volcano is part of the NNE-oriented Planchón-Peteroa-Azufre Volcanic Complex. The about 5 km wide caldera at the Peteroa summit is partially covered by glaciers and consists of four craters hosting acidic lakes and one scoria cinder cone. The activity of both volcanos is characterized by phreatic and phreactomagmatic eruptions. During February-March 2018, new emission flux and gas composition measurements at Peteroa and Copahue were undertaken. We performed measurements of SO2 fluxes with a scanning DOAS instrument. The SO2 flux atPeteroa was 188(±28) tSO2/d and the SO2 flux at Copahue was determined to 1294 ± 377 tSO2/d. Both values are similar to earlier reported SO2 fluxes on Peteroa and Copahue, respectively. Simultaneously to the SO2 fluxes, we determined CO2/SO2 ratio inside the plumes with a PITSA instrument by measuring at the crater rim of crater 4, the only significantly degassing crater at Peteroa as well as on the crater rim of Copahue. The CO2/SO2 ratio for Peteroa on all three measurement days varied only slightly between 1,44and 1,81 meaning that the CO2 flux of Peteroa plume was about 300(±72) tCO2/d.At Copahue, the CO2/SO2 ratio lies between around 1 and 60. The large scatter in the CO2/SO2 ratio of Copahue?s plume most likely originates from mixing of emissions from the closely located sources. We assign the lowest values of the CO2/SO2 ratio (CO2/SO2 = 1) to the plume from the spattering mud pool, which has therefore a CO2 flux of 1294 ± 377 tCO2/d. This is however only a lower limit to the CO2 flux of Copahue since the CO2emissions from e.g. the bubbling lake (where most of the SO2 might be scrubbed and therefore cannot be used for tracing plume CO2) are not taken into account.In addition, we evaluated the DOAS spectra for halogen species. We could not detect any BrO or OClO above ourcolumn density detection limits of 2e13 molec cm-2, corresponding to 57 ppt and 8 ppt for Copahue and Peteroa, respectively.Furthermore, a comparison between soil and plume emission was carried out for the first time at Peteroa. This comparison leads to the result that the major emission of CO2 is focused on a ?point source? ? the lake inside crater 4. With the current data available from Peteroa, only about 2 % of the total calculated CO2 output are degassed by diffusive soil degassing in the crater region. Certainly, further studies in the surroundings are still necessary to assure no missing emission source on the flank of the volcano.Fil: Bobrowski, Nicole. Instituto Max Planck Institut für Chemische Okologie; AlemaniaFil: Kuhn, Jonas. Johannes Gutenberg Universitat Mainz; AlemaniaFil: Lamberti, María Clara Isabel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; ArgentinaFil: Agusto, Mariano Roberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; ArgentinaFil: García, Sebastian. Secretaría de Industria y Minería. Servicio Geológico Minero Argentino; ArgentinaFil: Velasquez, Gabriela. Observatorio Volcanologico de los Andes del Sur; ChileFil: Bucarey, Claudia. Observatorio Volcanologico de los Andes del Sur; ChileFil: Valderrama, Oscar. Observatorio Volcanologico de los Andes del Sur; ChileFil: Tirpitz, Lucas. Johannes Gutenberg Universitat Mainz; AlemaniaFil: Platt., Ulrich. Johannes Gutenberg Universitat Mainz; AlemaniaEGU General AssemblyVienaAustriaEuropean Geosciences UnionCopernicus Publications2019info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectCongresoJournalhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/189464Gas emission and composition measurements at two Andean volcanoes - Copahue and Peteroa; EGU General Assembly; Viena; Austria; 2019; 1-1CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.egu2019.eu/info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2019/sessionprogramme/MALInternacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T11:00:28Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/189464instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 11:00:28.7CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Gas emission and composition measurements at two Andean volcanoes - Copahue and Peteroa
title Gas emission and composition measurements at two Andean volcanoes - Copahue and Peteroa
spellingShingle Gas emission and composition measurements at two Andean volcanoes - Copahue and Peteroa
Bobrowski, Nicole
PLUME
GAS
VOLCANOES
REMOTE
title_short Gas emission and composition measurements at two Andean volcanoes - Copahue and Peteroa
title_full Gas emission and composition measurements at two Andean volcanoes - Copahue and Peteroa
title_fullStr Gas emission and composition measurements at two Andean volcanoes - Copahue and Peteroa
title_full_unstemmed Gas emission and composition measurements at two Andean volcanoes - Copahue and Peteroa
title_sort Gas emission and composition measurements at two Andean volcanoes - Copahue and Peteroa
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Bobrowski, Nicole
Kuhn, Jonas
Lamberti, María Clara Isabel
Agusto, Mariano Roberto
García, Sebastian
Velasquez, Gabriela
Bucarey, Claudia
Valderrama, Oscar
Tirpitz, Lucas
Platt., Ulrich
author Bobrowski, Nicole
author_facet Bobrowski, Nicole
Kuhn, Jonas
Lamberti, María Clara Isabel
Agusto, Mariano Roberto
García, Sebastian
Velasquez, Gabriela
Bucarey, Claudia
Valderrama, Oscar
Tirpitz, Lucas
Platt., Ulrich
author_role author
author2 Kuhn, Jonas
Lamberti, María Clara Isabel
Agusto, Mariano Roberto
García, Sebastian
Velasquez, Gabriela
Bucarey, Claudia
Valderrama, Oscar
Tirpitz, Lucas
Platt., Ulrich
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv PLUME
GAS
VOLCANOES
REMOTE
topic PLUME
GAS
VOLCANOES
REMOTE
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Copahue (37.856◦S, 71.159◦W, 2997 m a.s.l.) and Peteroa (35.240oS, 70.570oW, 3603 m a.s.l.) are active strato-volcanos, both located at the border between Argentina and Chile. Copahue volcano is situated on the rim of the large, about 2 Ma old Caviahue caldera. The eastern currently active summit crater hosts a cold melt water lake, a hyperacidic lake and a spattering mud pool (observation March 2018). The crater is surrounded by walls of phreatic debris and glacier ice. Peteroa volcano is part of the NNE-oriented Planchón-Peteroa-Azufre Volcanic Complex. The about 5 km wide caldera at the Peteroa summit is partially covered by glaciers and consists of four craters hosting acidic lakes and one scoria cinder cone. The activity of both volcanos is characterized by phreatic and phreactomagmatic eruptions. During February-March 2018, new emission flux and gas composition measurements at Peteroa and Copahue were undertaken. We performed measurements of SO2 fluxes with a scanning DOAS instrument. The SO2 flux atPeteroa was 188(±28) tSO2/d and the SO2 flux at Copahue was determined to 1294 ± 377 tSO2/d. Both values are similar to earlier reported SO2 fluxes on Peteroa and Copahue, respectively. Simultaneously to the SO2 fluxes, we determined CO2/SO2 ratio inside the plumes with a PITSA instrument by measuring at the crater rim of crater 4, the only significantly degassing crater at Peteroa as well as on the crater rim of Copahue. The CO2/SO2 ratio for Peteroa on all three measurement days varied only slightly between 1,44and 1,81 meaning that the CO2 flux of Peteroa plume was about 300(±72) tCO2/d.At Copahue, the CO2/SO2 ratio lies between around 1 and 60. The large scatter in the CO2/SO2 ratio of Copahue?s plume most likely originates from mixing of emissions from the closely located sources. We assign the lowest values of the CO2/SO2 ratio (CO2/SO2 = 1) to the plume from the spattering mud pool, which has therefore a CO2 flux of 1294 ± 377 tCO2/d. This is however only a lower limit to the CO2 flux of Copahue since the CO2emissions from e.g. the bubbling lake (where most of the SO2 might be scrubbed and therefore cannot be used for tracing plume CO2) are not taken into account.In addition, we evaluated the DOAS spectra for halogen species. We could not detect any BrO or OClO above ourcolumn density detection limits of 2e13 molec cm-2, corresponding to 57 ppt and 8 ppt for Copahue and Peteroa, respectively.Furthermore, a comparison between soil and plume emission was carried out for the first time at Peteroa. This comparison leads to the result that the major emission of CO2 is focused on a ?point source? ? the lake inside crater 4. With the current data available from Peteroa, only about 2 % of the total calculated CO2 output are degassed by diffusive soil degassing in the crater region. Certainly, further studies in the surroundings are still necessary to assure no missing emission source on the flank of the volcano.
Fil: Bobrowski, Nicole. Instituto Max Planck Institut für Chemische Okologie; Alemania
Fil: Kuhn, Jonas. Johannes Gutenberg Universitat Mainz; Alemania
Fil: Lamberti, María Clara Isabel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; Argentina
Fil: Agusto, Mariano Roberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; Argentina
Fil: García, Sebastian. Secretaría de Industria y Minería. Servicio Geológico Minero Argentino; Argentina
Fil: Velasquez, Gabriela. Observatorio Volcanologico de los Andes del Sur; Chile
Fil: Bucarey, Claudia. Observatorio Volcanologico de los Andes del Sur; Chile
Fil: Valderrama, Oscar. Observatorio Volcanologico de los Andes del Sur; Chile
Fil: Tirpitz, Lucas. Johannes Gutenberg Universitat Mainz; Alemania
Fil: Platt., Ulrich. Johannes Gutenberg Universitat Mainz; Alemania
EGU General Assembly
Viena
Austria
European Geosciences Union
description Copahue (37.856◦S, 71.159◦W, 2997 m a.s.l.) and Peteroa (35.240oS, 70.570oW, 3603 m a.s.l.) are active strato-volcanos, both located at the border between Argentina and Chile. Copahue volcano is situated on the rim of the large, about 2 Ma old Caviahue caldera. The eastern currently active summit crater hosts a cold melt water lake, a hyperacidic lake and a spattering mud pool (observation March 2018). The crater is surrounded by walls of phreatic debris and glacier ice. Peteroa volcano is part of the NNE-oriented Planchón-Peteroa-Azufre Volcanic Complex. The about 5 km wide caldera at the Peteroa summit is partially covered by glaciers and consists of four craters hosting acidic lakes and one scoria cinder cone. The activity of both volcanos is characterized by phreatic and phreactomagmatic eruptions. During February-March 2018, new emission flux and gas composition measurements at Peteroa and Copahue were undertaken. We performed measurements of SO2 fluxes with a scanning DOAS instrument. The SO2 flux atPeteroa was 188(±28) tSO2/d and the SO2 flux at Copahue was determined to 1294 ± 377 tSO2/d. Both values are similar to earlier reported SO2 fluxes on Peteroa and Copahue, respectively. Simultaneously to the SO2 fluxes, we determined CO2/SO2 ratio inside the plumes with a PITSA instrument by measuring at the crater rim of crater 4, the only significantly degassing crater at Peteroa as well as on the crater rim of Copahue. The CO2/SO2 ratio for Peteroa on all three measurement days varied only slightly between 1,44and 1,81 meaning that the CO2 flux of Peteroa plume was about 300(±72) tCO2/d.At Copahue, the CO2/SO2 ratio lies between around 1 and 60. The large scatter in the CO2/SO2 ratio of Copahue?s plume most likely originates from mixing of emissions from the closely located sources. We assign the lowest values of the CO2/SO2 ratio (CO2/SO2 = 1) to the plume from the spattering mud pool, which has therefore a CO2 flux of 1294 ± 377 tCO2/d. This is however only a lower limit to the CO2 flux of Copahue since the CO2emissions from e.g. the bubbling lake (where most of the SO2 might be scrubbed and therefore cannot be used for tracing plume CO2) are not taken into account.In addition, we evaluated the DOAS spectra for halogen species. We could not detect any BrO or OClO above ourcolumn density detection limits of 2e13 molec cm-2, corresponding to 57 ppt and 8 ppt for Copahue and Peteroa, respectively.Furthermore, a comparison between soil and plume emission was carried out for the first time at Peteroa. This comparison leads to the result that the major emission of CO2 is focused on a ?point source? ? the lake inside crater 4. With the current data available from Peteroa, only about 2 % of the total calculated CO2 output are degassed by diffusive soil degassing in the crater region. Certainly, further studies in the surroundings are still necessary to assure no missing emission source on the flank of the volcano.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
Congreso
Journal
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
status_str publishedVersion
format conferenceObject
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/189464
Gas emission and composition measurements at two Andean volcanoes - Copahue and Peteroa; EGU General Assembly; Viena; Austria; 2019; 1-1
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/189464
identifier_str_mv Gas emission and composition measurements at two Andean volcanoes - Copahue and Peteroa; EGU General Assembly; Viena; Austria; 2019; 1-1
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.egu2019.eu/
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2019/sessionprogramme/MAL
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Internacional
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Copernicus Publications
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Copernicus Publications
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846781165625671680
score 12.982451