The Kantian Critique of Psychoanalysis in Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari's Anti-Oedipus

Autores
Cherniavsky, Axel
Año de publicación
2015
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
"We cannot say they [psychoanalysts] are very jolly people; see the dead look they have, their stiff necks." The tone and register Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari used in Anti-Oedipus, published in 1972, caused an immediate public reaction: it was regarded as a fatal and massive criticism of psychoanalysis. Nevertheless, critique, in philosophy, at least since Kant, is used in certain very technical and precise senses. Almost half a century later, it may possibly be determined whether Anti-Oedipus is indeed a critique of psychoanalysis and, eventually, in which sense it is so. We believe that, technically, it is a delimitation of a Kantian sort, an evaluation of a Nietzschean kind and, finally, a divergence with a Deleuzian slant. In this occasion, we will try to demonstrate how it is a Kantian critique and we will discover that the object of this critique it is not psychoanalysis in general but something much more accurate.
Fil: Cherniavsky, Axel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Materia
Paralogismos
Inconsciente
Deseo
Vida
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/51562

id CONICETDig_3c5faee668158646c2094bf4d661d8bd
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/51562
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling The Kantian Critique of Psychoanalysis in Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari's Anti-OedipusCherniavsky, AxelParalogismosInconscienteDeseoVidahttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6"We cannot say they [psychoanalysts] are very jolly people; see the dead look they have, their stiff necks." The tone and register Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari used in Anti-Oedipus, published in 1972, caused an immediate public reaction: it was regarded as a fatal and massive criticism of psychoanalysis. Nevertheless, critique, in philosophy, at least since Kant, is used in certain very technical and precise senses. Almost half a century later, it may possibly be determined whether Anti-Oedipus is indeed a critique of psychoanalysis and, eventually, in which sense it is so. We believe that, technically, it is a delimitation of a Kantian sort, an evaluation of a Nietzschean kind and, finally, a divergence with a Deleuzian slant. In this occasion, we will try to demonstrate how it is a Kantian critique and we will discover that the object of this critique it is not psychoanalysis in general but something much more accurate.Fil: Cherniavsky, Axel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaSouthern Illinois University. Department of Philosophy2015-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/51562Cherniavsky, Axel; The Kantian Critique of Psychoanalysis in Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari's Anti-Oedipus; Southern Illinois University. Department of Philosophy; Kinesis; 40; 2; 1-2015; 23-330023-1568CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:28:51Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/51562instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:28:51.841CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Kantian Critique of Psychoanalysis in Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari's Anti-Oedipus
title The Kantian Critique of Psychoanalysis in Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari's Anti-Oedipus
spellingShingle The Kantian Critique of Psychoanalysis in Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari's Anti-Oedipus
Cherniavsky, Axel
Paralogismos
Inconsciente
Deseo
Vida
title_short The Kantian Critique of Psychoanalysis in Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari's Anti-Oedipus
title_full The Kantian Critique of Psychoanalysis in Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari's Anti-Oedipus
title_fullStr The Kantian Critique of Psychoanalysis in Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari's Anti-Oedipus
title_full_unstemmed The Kantian Critique of Psychoanalysis in Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari's Anti-Oedipus
title_sort The Kantian Critique of Psychoanalysis in Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari's Anti-Oedipus
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Cherniavsky, Axel
author Cherniavsky, Axel
author_facet Cherniavsky, Axel
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Paralogismos
Inconsciente
Deseo
Vida
topic Paralogismos
Inconsciente
Deseo
Vida
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv "We cannot say they [psychoanalysts] are very jolly people; see the dead look they have, their stiff necks." The tone and register Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari used in Anti-Oedipus, published in 1972, caused an immediate public reaction: it was regarded as a fatal and massive criticism of psychoanalysis. Nevertheless, critique, in philosophy, at least since Kant, is used in certain very technical and precise senses. Almost half a century later, it may possibly be determined whether Anti-Oedipus is indeed a critique of psychoanalysis and, eventually, in which sense it is so. We believe that, technically, it is a delimitation of a Kantian sort, an evaluation of a Nietzschean kind and, finally, a divergence with a Deleuzian slant. In this occasion, we will try to demonstrate how it is a Kantian critique and we will discover that the object of this critique it is not psychoanalysis in general but something much more accurate.
Fil: Cherniavsky, Axel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
description "We cannot say they [psychoanalysts] are very jolly people; see the dead look they have, their stiff necks." The tone and register Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari used in Anti-Oedipus, published in 1972, caused an immediate public reaction: it was regarded as a fatal and massive criticism of psychoanalysis. Nevertheless, critique, in philosophy, at least since Kant, is used in certain very technical and precise senses. Almost half a century later, it may possibly be determined whether Anti-Oedipus is indeed a critique of psychoanalysis and, eventually, in which sense it is so. We believe that, technically, it is a delimitation of a Kantian sort, an evaluation of a Nietzschean kind and, finally, a divergence with a Deleuzian slant. In this occasion, we will try to demonstrate how it is a Kantian critique and we will discover that the object of this critique it is not psychoanalysis in general but something much more accurate.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/51562
Cherniavsky, Axel; The Kantian Critique of Psychoanalysis in Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari's Anti-Oedipus; Southern Illinois University. Department of Philosophy; Kinesis; 40; 2; 1-2015; 23-33
0023-1568
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/51562
identifier_str_mv Cherniavsky, Axel; The Kantian Critique of Psychoanalysis in Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari's Anti-Oedipus; Southern Illinois University. Department of Philosophy; Kinesis; 40; 2; 1-2015; 23-33
0023-1568
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Southern Illinois University. Department of Philosophy
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Southern Illinois University. Department of Philosophy
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846082755179315200
score 13.221938