Logical Pluralism and Interpretations of Logical Systems

Autores
Tajer, Diego; Fiore, Camillo Giuliano
Año de publicación
2022
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Logical pluralism is a general idea that there is more than one correct logic. Carnielli and Rodrigues [2019a] defend an epistemic interpretation of the paraconsistent logic N4, according to which an argument is valid in this logic just in case it necessarily preserves evidence. The authors appeal to this epistemic interpretation to briefly motivate a kind of logical pluralism: “different accounts of logical consequence may preserve different properties of propositions”. The aim of this paper is to study the prospect of a logical pluralism based on different interpretations of logical systems. First, we give our analysis of what it means to interpret a logic - and make some hopefully useful distinctions along the way. Second, we present what we call an interpretational logical pluralism: there is more than one correct logic and a logic is correct only if it has some adequate interpretation. We consider four variants of this idea, bring up some possible objections, and try to find plausible solutions on behalf of the pluralist. We will argue that interpretations of logical systems provide a promising - albeit not unproblematic - route to logical pluralism.
Fil: Tajer, Diego. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; Argentina
Fil: Fiore, Camillo Giuliano. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; Argentina
Materia
COLLAPSE ARGUMENT
INTERPRETATIONS OF LOGICAL SYSTEMS
LOGICAL PLURALISM
PURE AND APPLIED LOGICS
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/202687
Acceder
id CONICETDig_3bfef75f73b256744cd92e2b4f2dcaad
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/202687
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Logical Pluralism and Interpretations of Logical SystemsTajer, DiegoFiore, Camillo GiulianoCOLLAPSE ARGUMENTINTERPRETATIONS OF LOGICAL SYSTEMSLOGICAL PLURALISMPURE AND APPLIED LOGICShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6Logical pluralism is a general idea that there is more than one correct logic. Carnielli and Rodrigues [2019a] defend an epistemic interpretation of the paraconsistent logic N4, according to which an argument is valid in this logic just in case it necessarily preserves evidence. The authors appeal to this epistemic interpretation to briefly motivate a kind of logical pluralism: “different accounts of logical consequence may preserve different properties of propositions”. The aim of this paper is to study the prospect of a logical pluralism based on different interpretations of logical systems. First, we give our analysis of what it means to interpret a logic - and make some hopefully useful distinctions along the way. Second, we present what we call an interpretational logical pluralism: there is more than one correct logic and a logic is correct only if it has some adequate interpretation. We consider four variants of this idea, bring up some possible objections, and try to find plausible solutions on behalf of the pluralist. We will argue that interpretations of logical systems provide a promising - albeit not unproblematic - route to logical pluralism.Fil: Tajer, Diego. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; ArgentinaFil: Fiore, Camillo Giuliano. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; ArgentinaAkademicka Platforma Czasopism2022-02-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/202687Tajer, Diego; Fiore, Camillo Giuliano; Logical Pluralism and Interpretations of Logical Systems; Akademicka Platforma Czasopism; Logic And Logical Philosophy; 31; 2; 7-2-2022; 209-2341425-3305CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.12775/LLP.2022.007info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://apcz.umk.pl/LLP/article/view/37081info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:46:47Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/202687instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:46:47.465CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Logical Pluralism and Interpretations of Logical Systems
title Logical Pluralism and Interpretations of Logical Systems
spellingShingle Logical Pluralism and Interpretations of Logical Systems
Tajer, Diego
COLLAPSE ARGUMENT
INTERPRETATIONS OF LOGICAL SYSTEMS
LOGICAL PLURALISM
PURE AND APPLIED LOGICS
title_short Logical Pluralism and Interpretations of Logical Systems
title_full Logical Pluralism and Interpretations of Logical Systems
title_fullStr Logical Pluralism and Interpretations of Logical Systems
title_full_unstemmed Logical Pluralism and Interpretations of Logical Systems
title_sort Logical Pluralism and Interpretations of Logical Systems
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Tajer, Diego
Fiore, Camillo Giuliano
author Tajer, Diego
author_facet Tajer, Diego
Fiore, Camillo Giuliano
author_role author
author2 Fiore, Camillo Giuliano
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv COLLAPSE ARGUMENT
INTERPRETATIONS OF LOGICAL SYSTEMS
LOGICAL PLURALISM
PURE AND APPLIED LOGICS
topic COLLAPSE ARGUMENT
INTERPRETATIONS OF LOGICAL SYSTEMS
LOGICAL PLURALISM
PURE AND APPLIED LOGICS
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Logical pluralism is a general idea that there is more than one correct logic. Carnielli and Rodrigues [2019a] defend an epistemic interpretation of the paraconsistent logic N4, according to which an argument is valid in this logic just in case it necessarily preserves evidence. The authors appeal to this epistemic interpretation to briefly motivate a kind of logical pluralism: “different accounts of logical consequence may preserve different properties of propositions”. The aim of this paper is to study the prospect of a logical pluralism based on different interpretations of logical systems. First, we give our analysis of what it means to interpret a logic - and make some hopefully useful distinctions along the way. Second, we present what we call an interpretational logical pluralism: there is more than one correct logic and a logic is correct only if it has some adequate interpretation. We consider four variants of this idea, bring up some possible objections, and try to find plausible solutions on behalf of the pluralist. We will argue that interpretations of logical systems provide a promising - albeit not unproblematic - route to logical pluralism.
Fil: Tajer, Diego. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; Argentina
Fil: Fiore, Camillo Giuliano. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; Argentina
description Logical pluralism is a general idea that there is more than one correct logic. Carnielli and Rodrigues [2019a] defend an epistemic interpretation of the paraconsistent logic N4, according to which an argument is valid in this logic just in case it necessarily preserves evidence. The authors appeal to this epistemic interpretation to briefly motivate a kind of logical pluralism: “different accounts of logical consequence may preserve different properties of propositions”. The aim of this paper is to study the prospect of a logical pluralism based on different interpretations of logical systems. First, we give our analysis of what it means to interpret a logic - and make some hopefully useful distinctions along the way. Second, we present what we call an interpretational logical pluralism: there is more than one correct logic and a logic is correct only if it has some adequate interpretation. We consider four variants of this idea, bring up some possible objections, and try to find plausible solutions on behalf of the pluralist. We will argue that interpretations of logical systems provide a promising - albeit not unproblematic - route to logical pluralism.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-02-07
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/202687
Tajer, Diego; Fiore, Camillo Giuliano; Logical Pluralism and Interpretations of Logical Systems; Akademicka Platforma Czasopism; Logic And Logical Philosophy; 31; 2; 7-2-2022; 209-234
1425-3305
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/202687
identifier_str_mv Tajer, Diego; Fiore, Camillo Giuliano; Logical Pluralism and Interpretations of Logical Systems; Akademicka Platforma Czasopism; Logic And Logical Philosophy; 31; 2; 7-2-2022; 209-234
1425-3305
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.12775/LLP.2022.007
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://apcz.umk.pl/LLP/article/view/37081
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Akademicka Platforma Czasopism
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Akademicka Platforma Czasopism
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613460118208512
score 13.070432

Publicaciones similares