Readers’ selective recall of source features as a function of claim discrepancy and task demands

Autores
Saux, Gaston Ignacio; Ros, Christine; Britt, M. Anne; Stadtler, Marc; Burin, Debora Ines; Rouet, Jean-francois
Año de publicación
2018
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In two experiments, undergraduate students read short texts containing two embedded sources that could either agree or disagree with each other. Participants’ memory for the sources’ identity (i.e., occupation) and features (i.e., the source's access to knowledge and the source’s physical appearance) was examined as a function of the consistency of their assertions. In Experiment 1 (N = 64), sources were described with only one feature (knowledge or appearance), whereas in Experiment 2 (N = 62), each source was described with both features. Experiment 1 additionally tested the influence of two different tasks during reading (an evaluation of sources’ knowledgeability vs. an evaluation of sources’ age). Consistent with our predictions, knowledge evaluations (Experiment 1) and discrepant claims (Experiments 1 and 2) enhanced memory for sources and their features. Experiment 2 also showed that when both types of features were available, discrepant claims selectively benefited memory for a source’s knowledgeability over appearance.
Fil: Saux, Gaston Ignacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina "Santa María de los Buenos Aires". Facultad de Psicología y Psicopedagogía. Centro de Investigaciones en Psicología y Psicopedagogía; Argentina
Fil: Ros, Christine. Université de Poitiers; Francia. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Francia
Fil: Britt, M. Anne. Northern Illinois University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Stadtler, Marc. Ruhr Universität Bochum; Alemania
Fil: Burin, Debora Ines. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Psicología. Instituto de Investigaciones; Argentina
Fil: Rouet, Jean-francois. Université de Poitiers; Francia. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Francia
Materia
COMPREHENSION
MEMORY
DISCREPANCIES
SOURCE FEATURE
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/155519
Acceder
id CONICETDig_3bf3b71783a159ccd5ea59a4012cfb97
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/155519
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Readers’ selective recall of source features as a function of claim discrepancy and task demandsSaux, Gaston IgnacioRos, ChristineBritt, M. AnneStadtler, MarcBurin, Debora InesRouet, Jean-francoisCOMPREHENSIONMEMORYDISCREPANCIESSOURCE FEATUREhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5In two experiments, undergraduate students read short texts containing two embedded sources that could either agree or disagree with each other. Participants’ memory for the sources’ identity (i.e., occupation) and features (i.e., the source's access to knowledge and the source’s physical appearance) was examined as a function of the consistency of their assertions. In Experiment 1 (N = 64), sources were described with only one feature (knowledge or appearance), whereas in Experiment 2 (N = 62), each source was described with both features. Experiment 1 additionally tested the influence of two different tasks during reading (an evaluation of sources’ knowledgeability vs. an evaluation of sources’ age). Consistent with our predictions, knowledge evaluations (Experiment 1) and discrepant claims (Experiments 1 and 2) enhanced memory for sources and their features. Experiment 2 also showed that when both types of features were available, discrepant claims selectively benefited memory for a source’s knowledgeability over appearance.Fil: Saux, Gaston Ignacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina "Santa María de los Buenos Aires". Facultad de Psicología y Psicopedagogía. Centro de Investigaciones en Psicología y Psicopedagogía; ArgentinaFil: Ros, Christine. Université de Poitiers; Francia. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; FranciaFil: Britt, M. Anne. Northern Illinois University; Estados UnidosFil: Stadtler, Marc. Ruhr Universität Bochum; AlemaniaFil: Burin, Debora Ines. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Psicología. Instituto de Investigaciones; ArgentinaFil: Rouet, Jean-francois. Université de Poitiers; Francia. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; FranciaRoutledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd2018-05-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/155519Saux, Gaston Ignacio; Ros, Christine; Britt, M. Anne; Stadtler, Marc; Burin, Debora Ines; et al.; Readers’ selective recall of source features as a function of claim discrepancy and task demands; Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd; Discourse Processe; 55; 5-6; 9-5-2018; 525-5440163-853X1532-6950CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0163853X.2018.1463722info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/0163853X.2018.1463722info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:33:59Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/155519instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:33:59.6CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Readers’ selective recall of source features as a function of claim discrepancy and task demands
title Readers’ selective recall of source features as a function of claim discrepancy and task demands
spellingShingle Readers’ selective recall of source features as a function of claim discrepancy and task demands
Saux, Gaston Ignacio
COMPREHENSION
MEMORY
DISCREPANCIES
SOURCE FEATURE
title_short Readers’ selective recall of source features as a function of claim discrepancy and task demands
title_full Readers’ selective recall of source features as a function of claim discrepancy and task demands
title_fullStr Readers’ selective recall of source features as a function of claim discrepancy and task demands
title_full_unstemmed Readers’ selective recall of source features as a function of claim discrepancy and task demands
title_sort Readers’ selective recall of source features as a function of claim discrepancy and task demands
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Saux, Gaston Ignacio
Ros, Christine
Britt, M. Anne
Stadtler, Marc
Burin, Debora Ines
Rouet, Jean-francois
author Saux, Gaston Ignacio
author_facet Saux, Gaston Ignacio
Ros, Christine
Britt, M. Anne
Stadtler, Marc
Burin, Debora Ines
Rouet, Jean-francois
author_role author
author2 Ros, Christine
Britt, M. Anne
Stadtler, Marc
Burin, Debora Ines
Rouet, Jean-francois
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv COMPREHENSION
MEMORY
DISCREPANCIES
SOURCE FEATURE
topic COMPREHENSION
MEMORY
DISCREPANCIES
SOURCE FEATURE
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In two experiments, undergraduate students read short texts containing two embedded sources that could either agree or disagree with each other. Participants’ memory for the sources’ identity (i.e., occupation) and features (i.e., the source's access to knowledge and the source’s physical appearance) was examined as a function of the consistency of their assertions. In Experiment 1 (N = 64), sources were described with only one feature (knowledge or appearance), whereas in Experiment 2 (N = 62), each source was described with both features. Experiment 1 additionally tested the influence of two different tasks during reading (an evaluation of sources’ knowledgeability vs. an evaluation of sources’ age). Consistent with our predictions, knowledge evaluations (Experiment 1) and discrepant claims (Experiments 1 and 2) enhanced memory for sources and their features. Experiment 2 also showed that when both types of features were available, discrepant claims selectively benefited memory for a source’s knowledgeability over appearance.
Fil: Saux, Gaston Ignacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina "Santa María de los Buenos Aires". Facultad de Psicología y Psicopedagogía. Centro de Investigaciones en Psicología y Psicopedagogía; Argentina
Fil: Ros, Christine. Université de Poitiers; Francia. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Francia
Fil: Britt, M. Anne. Northern Illinois University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Stadtler, Marc. Ruhr Universität Bochum; Alemania
Fil: Burin, Debora Ines. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Psicología. Instituto de Investigaciones; Argentina
Fil: Rouet, Jean-francois. Université de Poitiers; Francia. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Francia
description In two experiments, undergraduate students read short texts containing two embedded sources that could either agree or disagree with each other. Participants’ memory for the sources’ identity (i.e., occupation) and features (i.e., the source's access to knowledge and the source’s physical appearance) was examined as a function of the consistency of their assertions. In Experiment 1 (N = 64), sources were described with only one feature (knowledge or appearance), whereas in Experiment 2 (N = 62), each source was described with both features. Experiment 1 additionally tested the influence of two different tasks during reading (an evaluation of sources’ knowledgeability vs. an evaluation of sources’ age). Consistent with our predictions, knowledge evaluations (Experiment 1) and discrepant claims (Experiments 1 and 2) enhanced memory for sources and their features. Experiment 2 also showed that when both types of features were available, discrepant claims selectively benefited memory for a source’s knowledgeability over appearance.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-05-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/155519
Saux, Gaston Ignacio; Ros, Christine; Britt, M. Anne; Stadtler, Marc; Burin, Debora Ines; et al.; Readers’ selective recall of source features as a function of claim discrepancy and task demands; Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd; Discourse Processe; 55; 5-6; 9-5-2018; 525-544
0163-853X
1532-6950
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/155519
identifier_str_mv Saux, Gaston Ignacio; Ros, Christine; Britt, M. Anne; Stadtler, Marc; Burin, Debora Ines; et al.; Readers’ selective recall of source features as a function of claim discrepancy and task demands; Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd; Discourse Processe; 55; 5-6; 9-5-2018; 525-544
0163-853X
1532-6950
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0163853X.2018.1463722
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/0163853X.2018.1463722
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613048686346240
score 13.070432

Publicaciones similares