Such fictitious evil spirits: Adriaan koerbagh’s rejection of biblical demons and demonic possession in a light shining in dark places (1668)

Autores
del Olmo, Ismael
Año de publicación
2019
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This paper traces Adriaan Koerbagh’s interpretation of biblical devils and scriptural instances of demonic possession in his 1668 Een Ligt Schijnende in Duystere Plaatsen (A light shining in dark places). Koerbagh’s book is a radical exponent of the early Dutch Enlightenment, and its views on demonology are of importance if we want to assess the extent to which traditional scholastic pneumatology was challenged in the second half of the XVIIth century. This paper will also address Thomas Hobbes’ positions regarding demons and demonic possession in Leviathan (1651), given that Hobbes’ interpretations were fundamental to Koerbagh’s own positions. We will focus on the Hobbesian exegetical strategies of etymology, naturalization, and metaphorization, which helped Koerbagh to point at diseases, evil thoughts, figures of speech, or human enemies as plausible explanations for scriptural passages concerning devils and possession. But we will also see that Koerbagh’s Cartesian definition of spirits led him to a more radical stance than that of Hobbes: Demons do not exist at all. This paper will end by claiming that Koerbagh’s interpretation of Christian demonology both as a remnant of Pagan and Jewish superstitions, and a knowledge indi_erent to salvation—themselves Hobbesian principles—went hand in hand with his attempt to secularize the biblical text. Thus, the devil, once a part of the sacred truth, could now be seen as a fragment of a human cultural heritage.
Fil: del Olmo, Ismael. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Historia y Ciencias Humanas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Departamento de Historia; Argentina
Materia
ADRIAAN KOERBAGH
BIBLICAL EXEGESIS
DEMONIC POSSESSION
DEMONOLOGY
THOMAS HOBBES
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/119843

id CONICETDig_3950d91b311e5d71970d9a6a858625aa
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/119843
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Such fictitious evil spirits: Adriaan koerbagh’s rejection of biblical demons and demonic possession in a light shining in dark places (1668)del Olmo, IsmaelADRIAAN KOERBAGHBIBLICAL EXEGESISDEMONIC POSSESSIONDEMONOLOGYTHOMAS HOBBEShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6This paper traces Adriaan Koerbagh’s interpretation of biblical devils and scriptural instances of demonic possession in his 1668 Een Ligt Schijnende in Duystere Plaatsen (A light shining in dark places). Koerbagh’s book is a radical exponent of the early Dutch Enlightenment, and its views on demonology are of importance if we want to assess the extent to which traditional scholastic pneumatology was challenged in the second half of the XVIIth century. This paper will also address Thomas Hobbes’ positions regarding demons and demonic possession in Leviathan (1651), given that Hobbes’ interpretations were fundamental to Koerbagh’s own positions. We will focus on the Hobbesian exegetical strategies of etymology, naturalization, and metaphorization, which helped Koerbagh to point at diseases, evil thoughts, figures of speech, or human enemies as plausible explanations for scriptural passages concerning devils and possession. But we will also see that Koerbagh’s Cartesian definition of spirits led him to a more radical stance than that of Hobbes: Demons do not exist at all. This paper will end by claiming that Koerbagh’s interpretation of Christian demonology both as a remnant of Pagan and Jewish superstitions, and a knowledge indi_erent to salvation—themselves Hobbesian principles—went hand in hand with his attempt to secularize the biblical text. Thus, the devil, once a part of the sacred truth, could now be seen as a fragment of a human cultural heritage.Fil: del Olmo, Ismael. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Historia y Ciencias Humanas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Departamento de Historia; ArgentinaMDPI AG2019-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/119843del Olmo, Ismael; Such fictitious evil spirits: Adriaan koerbagh’s rejection of biblical demons and demonic possession in a light shining in dark places (1668); MDPI AG; Religions; 10; 4; 4-2019; 1-152077-1444CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/4/280info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3390/rel10040280info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:36:23Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/119843instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:36:23.363CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Such fictitious evil spirits: Adriaan koerbagh’s rejection of biblical demons and demonic possession in a light shining in dark places (1668)
title Such fictitious evil spirits: Adriaan koerbagh’s rejection of biblical demons and demonic possession in a light shining in dark places (1668)
spellingShingle Such fictitious evil spirits: Adriaan koerbagh’s rejection of biblical demons and demonic possession in a light shining in dark places (1668)
del Olmo, Ismael
ADRIAAN KOERBAGH
BIBLICAL EXEGESIS
DEMONIC POSSESSION
DEMONOLOGY
THOMAS HOBBES
title_short Such fictitious evil spirits: Adriaan koerbagh’s rejection of biblical demons and demonic possession in a light shining in dark places (1668)
title_full Such fictitious evil spirits: Adriaan koerbagh’s rejection of biblical demons and demonic possession in a light shining in dark places (1668)
title_fullStr Such fictitious evil spirits: Adriaan koerbagh’s rejection of biblical demons and demonic possession in a light shining in dark places (1668)
title_full_unstemmed Such fictitious evil spirits: Adriaan koerbagh’s rejection of biblical demons and demonic possession in a light shining in dark places (1668)
title_sort Such fictitious evil spirits: Adriaan koerbagh’s rejection of biblical demons and demonic possession in a light shining in dark places (1668)
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv del Olmo, Ismael
author del Olmo, Ismael
author_facet del Olmo, Ismael
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv ADRIAAN KOERBAGH
BIBLICAL EXEGESIS
DEMONIC POSSESSION
DEMONOLOGY
THOMAS HOBBES
topic ADRIAAN KOERBAGH
BIBLICAL EXEGESIS
DEMONIC POSSESSION
DEMONOLOGY
THOMAS HOBBES
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This paper traces Adriaan Koerbagh’s interpretation of biblical devils and scriptural instances of demonic possession in his 1668 Een Ligt Schijnende in Duystere Plaatsen (A light shining in dark places). Koerbagh’s book is a radical exponent of the early Dutch Enlightenment, and its views on demonology are of importance if we want to assess the extent to which traditional scholastic pneumatology was challenged in the second half of the XVIIth century. This paper will also address Thomas Hobbes’ positions regarding demons and demonic possession in Leviathan (1651), given that Hobbes’ interpretations were fundamental to Koerbagh’s own positions. We will focus on the Hobbesian exegetical strategies of etymology, naturalization, and metaphorization, which helped Koerbagh to point at diseases, evil thoughts, figures of speech, or human enemies as plausible explanations for scriptural passages concerning devils and possession. But we will also see that Koerbagh’s Cartesian definition of spirits led him to a more radical stance than that of Hobbes: Demons do not exist at all. This paper will end by claiming that Koerbagh’s interpretation of Christian demonology both as a remnant of Pagan and Jewish superstitions, and a knowledge indi_erent to salvation—themselves Hobbesian principles—went hand in hand with his attempt to secularize the biblical text. Thus, the devil, once a part of the sacred truth, could now be seen as a fragment of a human cultural heritage.
Fil: del Olmo, Ismael. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Historia y Ciencias Humanas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Departamento de Historia; Argentina
description This paper traces Adriaan Koerbagh’s interpretation of biblical devils and scriptural instances of demonic possession in his 1668 Een Ligt Schijnende in Duystere Plaatsen (A light shining in dark places). Koerbagh’s book is a radical exponent of the early Dutch Enlightenment, and its views on demonology are of importance if we want to assess the extent to which traditional scholastic pneumatology was challenged in the second half of the XVIIth century. This paper will also address Thomas Hobbes’ positions regarding demons and demonic possession in Leviathan (1651), given that Hobbes’ interpretations were fundamental to Koerbagh’s own positions. We will focus on the Hobbesian exegetical strategies of etymology, naturalization, and metaphorization, which helped Koerbagh to point at diseases, evil thoughts, figures of speech, or human enemies as plausible explanations for scriptural passages concerning devils and possession. But we will also see that Koerbagh’s Cartesian definition of spirits led him to a more radical stance than that of Hobbes: Demons do not exist at all. This paper will end by claiming that Koerbagh’s interpretation of Christian demonology both as a remnant of Pagan and Jewish superstitions, and a knowledge indi_erent to salvation—themselves Hobbesian principles—went hand in hand with his attempt to secularize the biblical text. Thus, the devil, once a part of the sacred truth, could now be seen as a fragment of a human cultural heritage.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-04
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/119843
del Olmo, Ismael; Such fictitious evil spirits: Adriaan koerbagh’s rejection of biblical demons and demonic possession in a light shining in dark places (1668); MDPI AG; Religions; 10; 4; 4-2019; 1-15
2077-1444
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/119843
identifier_str_mv del Olmo, Ismael; Such fictitious evil spirits: Adriaan koerbagh’s rejection of biblical demons and demonic possession in a light shining in dark places (1668); MDPI AG; Religions; 10; 4; 4-2019; 1-15
2077-1444
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/4/280
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3390/rel10040280
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI AG
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI AG
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613140904411136
score 13.070432