Such fictitious evil spirits: Adriaan koerbagh’s rejection of biblical demons and demonic possession in a light shining in dark places (1668)
- Autores
- del Olmo, Ismael
- Año de publicación
- 2019
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- This paper traces Adriaan Koerbagh’s interpretation of biblical devils and scriptural instances of demonic possession in his 1668 Een Ligt Schijnende in Duystere Plaatsen (A light shining in dark places). Koerbagh’s book is a radical exponent of the early Dutch Enlightenment, and its views on demonology are of importance if we want to assess the extent to which traditional scholastic pneumatology was challenged in the second half of the XVIIth century. This paper will also address Thomas Hobbes’ positions regarding demons and demonic possession in Leviathan (1651), given that Hobbes’ interpretations were fundamental to Koerbagh’s own positions. We will focus on the Hobbesian exegetical strategies of etymology, naturalization, and metaphorization, which helped Koerbagh to point at diseases, evil thoughts, figures of speech, or human enemies as plausible explanations for scriptural passages concerning devils and possession. But we will also see that Koerbagh’s Cartesian definition of spirits led him to a more radical stance than that of Hobbes: Demons do not exist at all. This paper will end by claiming that Koerbagh’s interpretation of Christian demonology both as a remnant of Pagan and Jewish superstitions, and a knowledge indi_erent to salvation—themselves Hobbesian principles—went hand in hand with his attempt to secularize the biblical text. Thus, the devil, once a part of the sacred truth, could now be seen as a fragment of a human cultural heritage.
Fil: del Olmo, Ismael. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Historia y Ciencias Humanas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Departamento de Historia; Argentina - Materia
-
ADRIAAN KOERBAGH
BIBLICAL EXEGESIS
DEMONIC POSSESSION
DEMONOLOGY
THOMAS HOBBES - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/119843
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_3950d91b311e5d71970d9a6a858625aa |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/119843 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Such fictitious evil spirits: Adriaan koerbagh’s rejection of biblical demons and demonic possession in a light shining in dark places (1668)del Olmo, IsmaelADRIAAN KOERBAGHBIBLICAL EXEGESISDEMONIC POSSESSIONDEMONOLOGYTHOMAS HOBBEShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6This paper traces Adriaan Koerbagh’s interpretation of biblical devils and scriptural instances of demonic possession in his 1668 Een Ligt Schijnende in Duystere Plaatsen (A light shining in dark places). Koerbagh’s book is a radical exponent of the early Dutch Enlightenment, and its views on demonology are of importance if we want to assess the extent to which traditional scholastic pneumatology was challenged in the second half of the XVIIth century. This paper will also address Thomas Hobbes’ positions regarding demons and demonic possession in Leviathan (1651), given that Hobbes’ interpretations were fundamental to Koerbagh’s own positions. We will focus on the Hobbesian exegetical strategies of etymology, naturalization, and metaphorization, which helped Koerbagh to point at diseases, evil thoughts, figures of speech, or human enemies as plausible explanations for scriptural passages concerning devils and possession. But we will also see that Koerbagh’s Cartesian definition of spirits led him to a more radical stance than that of Hobbes: Demons do not exist at all. This paper will end by claiming that Koerbagh’s interpretation of Christian demonology both as a remnant of Pagan and Jewish superstitions, and a knowledge indi_erent to salvation—themselves Hobbesian principles—went hand in hand with his attempt to secularize the biblical text. Thus, the devil, once a part of the sacred truth, could now be seen as a fragment of a human cultural heritage.Fil: del Olmo, Ismael. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Historia y Ciencias Humanas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Departamento de Historia; ArgentinaMDPI AG2019-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/119843del Olmo, Ismael; Such fictitious evil spirits: Adriaan koerbagh’s rejection of biblical demons and demonic possession in a light shining in dark places (1668); MDPI AG; Religions; 10; 4; 4-2019; 1-152077-1444CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/4/280info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3390/rel10040280info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:36:23Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/119843instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:36:23.363CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Such fictitious evil spirits: Adriaan koerbagh’s rejection of biblical demons and demonic possession in a light shining in dark places (1668) |
title |
Such fictitious evil spirits: Adriaan koerbagh’s rejection of biblical demons and demonic possession in a light shining in dark places (1668) |
spellingShingle |
Such fictitious evil spirits: Adriaan koerbagh’s rejection of biblical demons and demonic possession in a light shining in dark places (1668) del Olmo, Ismael ADRIAAN KOERBAGH BIBLICAL EXEGESIS DEMONIC POSSESSION DEMONOLOGY THOMAS HOBBES |
title_short |
Such fictitious evil spirits: Adriaan koerbagh’s rejection of biblical demons and demonic possession in a light shining in dark places (1668) |
title_full |
Such fictitious evil spirits: Adriaan koerbagh’s rejection of biblical demons and demonic possession in a light shining in dark places (1668) |
title_fullStr |
Such fictitious evil spirits: Adriaan koerbagh’s rejection of biblical demons and demonic possession in a light shining in dark places (1668) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Such fictitious evil spirits: Adriaan koerbagh’s rejection of biblical demons and demonic possession in a light shining in dark places (1668) |
title_sort |
Such fictitious evil spirits: Adriaan koerbagh’s rejection of biblical demons and demonic possession in a light shining in dark places (1668) |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
del Olmo, Ismael |
author |
del Olmo, Ismael |
author_facet |
del Olmo, Ismael |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
ADRIAAN KOERBAGH BIBLICAL EXEGESIS DEMONIC POSSESSION DEMONOLOGY THOMAS HOBBES |
topic |
ADRIAAN KOERBAGH BIBLICAL EXEGESIS DEMONIC POSSESSION DEMONOLOGY THOMAS HOBBES |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
This paper traces Adriaan Koerbagh’s interpretation of biblical devils and scriptural instances of demonic possession in his 1668 Een Ligt Schijnende in Duystere Plaatsen (A light shining in dark places). Koerbagh’s book is a radical exponent of the early Dutch Enlightenment, and its views on demonology are of importance if we want to assess the extent to which traditional scholastic pneumatology was challenged in the second half of the XVIIth century. This paper will also address Thomas Hobbes’ positions regarding demons and demonic possession in Leviathan (1651), given that Hobbes’ interpretations were fundamental to Koerbagh’s own positions. We will focus on the Hobbesian exegetical strategies of etymology, naturalization, and metaphorization, which helped Koerbagh to point at diseases, evil thoughts, figures of speech, or human enemies as plausible explanations for scriptural passages concerning devils and possession. But we will also see that Koerbagh’s Cartesian definition of spirits led him to a more radical stance than that of Hobbes: Demons do not exist at all. This paper will end by claiming that Koerbagh’s interpretation of Christian demonology both as a remnant of Pagan and Jewish superstitions, and a knowledge indi_erent to salvation—themselves Hobbesian principles—went hand in hand with his attempt to secularize the biblical text. Thus, the devil, once a part of the sacred truth, could now be seen as a fragment of a human cultural heritage. Fil: del Olmo, Ismael. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Historia y Ciencias Humanas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Departamento de Historia; Argentina |
description |
This paper traces Adriaan Koerbagh’s interpretation of biblical devils and scriptural instances of demonic possession in his 1668 Een Ligt Schijnende in Duystere Plaatsen (A light shining in dark places). Koerbagh’s book is a radical exponent of the early Dutch Enlightenment, and its views on demonology are of importance if we want to assess the extent to which traditional scholastic pneumatology was challenged in the second half of the XVIIth century. This paper will also address Thomas Hobbes’ positions regarding demons and demonic possession in Leviathan (1651), given that Hobbes’ interpretations were fundamental to Koerbagh’s own positions. We will focus on the Hobbesian exegetical strategies of etymology, naturalization, and metaphorization, which helped Koerbagh to point at diseases, evil thoughts, figures of speech, or human enemies as plausible explanations for scriptural passages concerning devils and possession. But we will also see that Koerbagh’s Cartesian definition of spirits led him to a more radical stance than that of Hobbes: Demons do not exist at all. This paper will end by claiming that Koerbagh’s interpretation of Christian demonology both as a remnant of Pagan and Jewish superstitions, and a knowledge indi_erent to salvation—themselves Hobbesian principles—went hand in hand with his attempt to secularize the biblical text. Thus, the devil, once a part of the sacred truth, could now be seen as a fragment of a human cultural heritage. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-04 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/119843 del Olmo, Ismael; Such fictitious evil spirits: Adriaan koerbagh’s rejection of biblical demons and demonic possession in a light shining in dark places (1668); MDPI AG; Religions; 10; 4; 4-2019; 1-15 2077-1444 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/119843 |
identifier_str_mv |
del Olmo, Ismael; Such fictitious evil spirits: Adriaan koerbagh’s rejection of biblical demons and demonic possession in a light shining in dark places (1668); MDPI AG; Religions; 10; 4; 4-2019; 1-15 2077-1444 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/4/280 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3390/rel10040280 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MDPI AG |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MDPI AG |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613140904411136 |
score |
13.070432 |