Case study: Exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons at the sea in Argentina – Is knowledge co-created or only a non-binding formal requirement?
- Autores
- Radovich, Violeta Soledad; Lohse, Eva Julia; Poto, Margherita Paola
- Año de publicación
- 2023
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- parte de libro
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The objective of this case study is to introduce environmental law in Argentina andfocus on the role of coproduction of knowledge regarding the new permits to explore and exploithydrocarbons at the sea granted in 2021. The methodology is based on analysis of laws, deeds ofpublic hearings, interdisciplinary scientific articles and judicial decisions.In Argentina, the right to a healthy environment is guaranteed by the Constitution. Moreover, asregards participatory processes in environmental matters, the Escazú Agreement (EA) also hasconstitutional status in the country.Results show that in Argentina, public hearings shall be carried out previous to authorizingactivities that may cause negative effects over the environment; however, the results of thesepublic hearings are not legally binding. This means that public hearings are a mere proceduralguarantee, a uni-directional administrative procedure governed by States that have the last wordon the final decision.Social movements and organizations, as well as scientists oppose to these permits and claim thatthis activity needs a “social license”, which was not granted during the public hearing becauseonly four percent of the participants voted in favor of granting the permits. One of the mostrepeated claim in the hearing was that results should be binding. People have established NGOs,such as Asamblea por un mar libre de petroleras, and express their concern in social media andby organizing rallies in the streets.Although only four per cent voted in favour of granting the permits, six months after the hearingthe permits were granted. However, a federal judge suspended this permit after an amparo actionwas filed by affected citizens.
Fil: Radovich, Violeta Soledad. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales "Dr. Ambrosio L. Gioja"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Lohse, Eva Julia. University of Bayreuth; Alemania
Fil: Poto, Margherita Paola. Universidad de Tromsø; Noruega - Materia
-
COPRODUCTION
KNOWLEDGE
ARGENTINA
HYDROCARBONS - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/246621
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_36a08d5b550b87c03e7d245602d3bdc0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/246621 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Case study: Exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons at the sea in Argentina – Is knowledge co-created or only a non-binding formal requirement?Radovich, Violeta SoledadLohse, Eva JuliaPoto, Margherita PaolaCOPRODUCTIONKNOWLEDGEARGENTINAHYDROCARBONShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5The objective of this case study is to introduce environmental law in Argentina andfocus on the role of coproduction of knowledge regarding the new permits to explore and exploithydrocarbons at the sea granted in 2021. The methodology is based on analysis of laws, deeds ofpublic hearings, interdisciplinary scientific articles and judicial decisions.In Argentina, the right to a healthy environment is guaranteed by the Constitution. Moreover, asregards participatory processes in environmental matters, the Escazú Agreement (EA) also hasconstitutional status in the country.Results show that in Argentina, public hearings shall be carried out previous to authorizingactivities that may cause negative effects over the environment; however, the results of thesepublic hearings are not legally binding. This means that public hearings are a mere proceduralguarantee, a uni-directional administrative procedure governed by States that have the last wordon the final decision.Social movements and organizations, as well as scientists oppose to these permits and claim thatthis activity needs a “social license”, which was not granted during the public hearing becauseonly four percent of the participants voted in favor of granting the permits. One of the mostrepeated claim in the hearing was that results should be binding. People have established NGOs,such as Asamblea por un mar libre de petroleras, and express their concern in social media andby organizing rallies in the streets.Although only four per cent voted in favour of granting the permits, six months after the hearingthe permits were granted. However, a federal judge suspended this permit after an amparo actionwas filed by affected citizens.Fil: Radovich, Violeta Soledad. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales "Dr. Ambrosio L. Gioja"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Lohse, Eva Julia. University of Bayreuth; AlemaniaFil: Poto, Margherita Paola. Universidad de Tromsø; NoruegaBerliner Wissenschafts-VerlagLohse, Eva JuliaPoto, Margherita Paola2023info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookParthttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248info:ar-repo/semantics/parteDeLibroapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/246621Radovich, Violeta Soledad; Lohse, Eva Julia; Poto, Margherita Paola; Case study: Exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons at the sea in Argentina – Is knowledge co-created or only a non-binding formal requirement?; Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag; 2023; 173-182978-3-8305-5538-4CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://biblioscout.net/book/10.35998/9783830555582info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.35998/9783830555582-009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:48:25Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/246621instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:48:25.912CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Case study: Exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons at the sea in Argentina – Is knowledge co-created or only a non-binding formal requirement? |
title |
Case study: Exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons at the sea in Argentina – Is knowledge co-created or only a non-binding formal requirement? |
spellingShingle |
Case study: Exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons at the sea in Argentina – Is knowledge co-created or only a non-binding formal requirement? Radovich, Violeta Soledad COPRODUCTION KNOWLEDGE ARGENTINA HYDROCARBONS |
title_short |
Case study: Exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons at the sea in Argentina – Is knowledge co-created or only a non-binding formal requirement? |
title_full |
Case study: Exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons at the sea in Argentina – Is knowledge co-created or only a non-binding formal requirement? |
title_fullStr |
Case study: Exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons at the sea in Argentina – Is knowledge co-created or only a non-binding formal requirement? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Case study: Exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons at the sea in Argentina – Is knowledge co-created or only a non-binding formal requirement? |
title_sort |
Case study: Exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons at the sea in Argentina – Is knowledge co-created or only a non-binding formal requirement? |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Radovich, Violeta Soledad Lohse, Eva Julia Poto, Margherita Paola |
author |
Radovich, Violeta Soledad |
author_facet |
Radovich, Violeta Soledad Lohse, Eva Julia Poto, Margherita Paola |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lohse, Eva Julia Poto, Margherita Paola |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Lohse, Eva Julia Poto, Margherita Paola |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
COPRODUCTION KNOWLEDGE ARGENTINA HYDROCARBONS |
topic |
COPRODUCTION KNOWLEDGE ARGENTINA HYDROCARBONS |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.5 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The objective of this case study is to introduce environmental law in Argentina andfocus on the role of coproduction of knowledge regarding the new permits to explore and exploithydrocarbons at the sea granted in 2021. The methodology is based on analysis of laws, deeds ofpublic hearings, interdisciplinary scientific articles and judicial decisions.In Argentina, the right to a healthy environment is guaranteed by the Constitution. Moreover, asregards participatory processes in environmental matters, the Escazú Agreement (EA) also hasconstitutional status in the country.Results show that in Argentina, public hearings shall be carried out previous to authorizingactivities that may cause negative effects over the environment; however, the results of thesepublic hearings are not legally binding. This means that public hearings are a mere proceduralguarantee, a uni-directional administrative procedure governed by States that have the last wordon the final decision.Social movements and organizations, as well as scientists oppose to these permits and claim thatthis activity needs a “social license”, which was not granted during the public hearing becauseonly four percent of the participants voted in favor of granting the permits. One of the mostrepeated claim in the hearing was that results should be binding. People have established NGOs,such as Asamblea por un mar libre de petroleras, and express their concern in social media andby organizing rallies in the streets.Although only four per cent voted in favour of granting the permits, six months after the hearingthe permits were granted. However, a federal judge suspended this permit after an amparo actionwas filed by affected citizens. Fil: Radovich, Violeta Soledad. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales "Dr. Ambrosio L. Gioja"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Lohse, Eva Julia. University of Bayreuth; Alemania Fil: Poto, Margherita Paola. Universidad de Tromsø; Noruega |
description |
The objective of this case study is to introduce environmental law in Argentina andfocus on the role of coproduction of knowledge regarding the new permits to explore and exploithydrocarbons at the sea granted in 2021. The methodology is based on analysis of laws, deeds ofpublic hearings, interdisciplinary scientific articles and judicial decisions.In Argentina, the right to a healthy environment is guaranteed by the Constitution. Moreover, asregards participatory processes in environmental matters, the Escazú Agreement (EA) also hasconstitutional status in the country.Results show that in Argentina, public hearings shall be carried out previous to authorizingactivities that may cause negative effects over the environment; however, the results of thesepublic hearings are not legally binding. This means that public hearings are a mere proceduralguarantee, a uni-directional administrative procedure governed by States that have the last wordon the final decision.Social movements and organizations, as well as scientists oppose to these permits and claim thatthis activity needs a “social license”, which was not granted during the public hearing becauseonly four percent of the participants voted in favor of granting the permits. One of the mostrepeated claim in the hearing was that results should be binding. People have established NGOs,such as Asamblea por un mar libre de petroleras, and express their concern in social media andby organizing rallies in the streets.Although only four per cent voted in favour of granting the permits, six months after the hearingthe permits were granted. However, a federal judge suspended this permit after an amparo actionwas filed by affected citizens. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248 info:ar-repo/semantics/parteDeLibro |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
format |
bookPart |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/246621 Radovich, Violeta Soledad; Lohse, Eva Julia; Poto, Margherita Paola; Case study: Exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons at the sea in Argentina – Is knowledge co-created or only a non-binding formal requirement?; Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag; 2023; 173-182 978-3-8305-5538-4 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/246621 |
identifier_str_mv |
Radovich, Violeta Soledad; Lohse, Eva Julia; Poto, Margherita Paola; Case study: Exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons at the sea in Argentina – Is knowledge co-created or only a non-binding formal requirement?; Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag; 2023; 173-182 978-3-8305-5538-4 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://biblioscout.net/book/10.35998/9783830555582 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.35998/9783830555582-009 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842268923737669632 |
score |
13.13397 |