Case study: Exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons at the sea in Argentina – Is knowledge co-created or only a non-binding formal requirement?

Autores
Radovich, Violeta Soledad; Lohse, Eva Julia; Poto, Margherita Paola
Año de publicación
2023
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
parte de libro
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The objective of this case study is to introduce environmental law in Argentina andfocus on the role of coproduction of knowledge regarding the new permits to explore and exploithydrocarbons at the sea granted in 2021. The methodology is based on analysis of laws, deeds ofpublic hearings, interdisciplinary scientific articles and judicial decisions.In Argentina, the right to a healthy environment is guaranteed by the Constitution. Moreover, asregards participatory processes in environmental matters, the Escazú Agreement (EA) also hasconstitutional status in the country.Results show that in Argentina, public hearings shall be carried out previous to authorizingactivities that may cause negative effects over the environment; however, the results of thesepublic hearings are not legally binding. This means that public hearings are a mere proceduralguarantee, a uni-directional administrative procedure governed by States that have the last wordon the final decision.Social movements and organizations, as well as scientists oppose to these permits and claim thatthis activity needs a “social license”, which was not granted during the public hearing becauseonly four percent of the participants voted in favor of granting the permits. One of the mostrepeated claim in the hearing was that results should be binding. People have established NGOs,such as Asamblea por un mar libre de petroleras, and express their concern in social media andby organizing rallies in the streets.Although only four per cent voted in favour of granting the permits, six months after the hearingthe permits were granted. However, a federal judge suspended this permit after an amparo actionwas filed by affected citizens.
Fil: Radovich, Violeta Soledad. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales "Dr. Ambrosio L. Gioja"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Lohse, Eva Julia. University of Bayreuth; Alemania
Fil: Poto, Margherita Paola. Universidad de Tromsø; Noruega
Materia
COPRODUCTION
KNOWLEDGE
ARGENTINA
HYDROCARBONS
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/246621

id CONICETDig_36a08d5b550b87c03e7d245602d3bdc0
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/246621
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Case study: Exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons at the sea in Argentina – Is knowledge co-created or only a non-binding formal requirement?Radovich, Violeta SoledadLohse, Eva JuliaPoto, Margherita PaolaCOPRODUCTIONKNOWLEDGEARGENTINAHYDROCARBONShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5The objective of this case study is to introduce environmental law in Argentina andfocus on the role of coproduction of knowledge regarding the new permits to explore and exploithydrocarbons at the sea granted in 2021. The methodology is based on analysis of laws, deeds ofpublic hearings, interdisciplinary scientific articles and judicial decisions.In Argentina, the right to a healthy environment is guaranteed by the Constitution. Moreover, asregards participatory processes in environmental matters, the Escazú Agreement (EA) also hasconstitutional status in the country.Results show that in Argentina, public hearings shall be carried out previous to authorizingactivities that may cause negative effects over the environment; however, the results of thesepublic hearings are not legally binding. This means that public hearings are a mere proceduralguarantee, a uni-directional administrative procedure governed by States that have the last wordon the final decision.Social movements and organizations, as well as scientists oppose to these permits and claim thatthis activity needs a “social license”, which was not granted during the public hearing becauseonly four percent of the participants voted in favor of granting the permits. One of the mostrepeated claim in the hearing was that results should be binding. People have established NGOs,such as Asamblea por un mar libre de petroleras, and express their concern in social media andby organizing rallies in the streets.Although only four per cent voted in favour of granting the permits, six months after the hearingthe permits were granted. However, a federal judge suspended this permit after an amparo actionwas filed by affected citizens.Fil: Radovich, Violeta Soledad. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales "Dr. Ambrosio L. Gioja"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Lohse, Eva Julia. University of Bayreuth; AlemaniaFil: Poto, Margherita Paola. Universidad de Tromsø; NoruegaBerliner Wissenschafts-VerlagLohse, Eva JuliaPoto, Margherita Paola2023info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookParthttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248info:ar-repo/semantics/parteDeLibroapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/246621Radovich, Violeta Soledad; Lohse, Eva Julia; Poto, Margherita Paola; Case study: Exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons at the sea in Argentina – Is knowledge co-created or only a non-binding formal requirement?; Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag; 2023; 173-182978-3-8305-5538-4CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://biblioscout.net/book/10.35998/9783830555582info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.35998/9783830555582-009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:48:25Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/246621instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:48:25.912CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Case study: Exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons at the sea in Argentina – Is knowledge co-created or only a non-binding formal requirement?
title Case study: Exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons at the sea in Argentina – Is knowledge co-created or only a non-binding formal requirement?
spellingShingle Case study: Exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons at the sea in Argentina – Is knowledge co-created or only a non-binding formal requirement?
Radovich, Violeta Soledad
COPRODUCTION
KNOWLEDGE
ARGENTINA
HYDROCARBONS
title_short Case study: Exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons at the sea in Argentina – Is knowledge co-created or only a non-binding formal requirement?
title_full Case study: Exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons at the sea in Argentina – Is knowledge co-created or only a non-binding formal requirement?
title_fullStr Case study: Exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons at the sea in Argentina – Is knowledge co-created or only a non-binding formal requirement?
title_full_unstemmed Case study: Exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons at the sea in Argentina – Is knowledge co-created or only a non-binding formal requirement?
title_sort Case study: Exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons at the sea in Argentina – Is knowledge co-created or only a non-binding formal requirement?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Radovich, Violeta Soledad
Lohse, Eva Julia
Poto, Margherita Paola
author Radovich, Violeta Soledad
author_facet Radovich, Violeta Soledad
Lohse, Eva Julia
Poto, Margherita Paola
author_role author
author2 Lohse, Eva Julia
Poto, Margherita Paola
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Lohse, Eva Julia
Poto, Margherita Paola
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv COPRODUCTION
KNOWLEDGE
ARGENTINA
HYDROCARBONS
topic COPRODUCTION
KNOWLEDGE
ARGENTINA
HYDROCARBONS
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The objective of this case study is to introduce environmental law in Argentina andfocus on the role of coproduction of knowledge regarding the new permits to explore and exploithydrocarbons at the sea granted in 2021. The methodology is based on analysis of laws, deeds ofpublic hearings, interdisciplinary scientific articles and judicial decisions.In Argentina, the right to a healthy environment is guaranteed by the Constitution. Moreover, asregards participatory processes in environmental matters, the Escazú Agreement (EA) also hasconstitutional status in the country.Results show that in Argentina, public hearings shall be carried out previous to authorizingactivities that may cause negative effects over the environment; however, the results of thesepublic hearings are not legally binding. This means that public hearings are a mere proceduralguarantee, a uni-directional administrative procedure governed by States that have the last wordon the final decision.Social movements and organizations, as well as scientists oppose to these permits and claim thatthis activity needs a “social license”, which was not granted during the public hearing becauseonly four percent of the participants voted in favor of granting the permits. One of the mostrepeated claim in the hearing was that results should be binding. People have established NGOs,such as Asamblea por un mar libre de petroleras, and express their concern in social media andby organizing rallies in the streets.Although only four per cent voted in favour of granting the permits, six months after the hearingthe permits were granted. However, a federal judge suspended this permit after an amparo actionwas filed by affected citizens.
Fil: Radovich, Violeta Soledad. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales "Dr. Ambrosio L. Gioja"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Lohse, Eva Julia. University of Bayreuth; Alemania
Fil: Poto, Margherita Paola. Universidad de Tromsø; Noruega
description The objective of this case study is to introduce environmental law in Argentina andfocus on the role of coproduction of knowledge regarding the new permits to explore and exploithydrocarbons at the sea granted in 2021. The methodology is based on analysis of laws, deeds ofpublic hearings, interdisciplinary scientific articles and judicial decisions.In Argentina, the right to a healthy environment is guaranteed by the Constitution. Moreover, asregards participatory processes in environmental matters, the Escazú Agreement (EA) also hasconstitutional status in the country.Results show that in Argentina, public hearings shall be carried out previous to authorizingactivities that may cause negative effects over the environment; however, the results of thesepublic hearings are not legally binding. This means that public hearings are a mere proceduralguarantee, a uni-directional administrative procedure governed by States that have the last wordon the final decision.Social movements and organizations, as well as scientists oppose to these permits and claim thatthis activity needs a “social license”, which was not granted during the public hearing becauseonly four percent of the participants voted in favor of granting the permits. One of the mostrepeated claim in the hearing was that results should be binding. People have established NGOs,such as Asamblea por un mar libre de petroleras, and express their concern in social media andby organizing rallies in the streets.Although only four per cent voted in favour of granting the permits, six months after the hearingthe permits were granted. However, a federal judge suspended this permit after an amparo actionwas filed by affected citizens.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248
info:ar-repo/semantics/parteDeLibro
status_str publishedVersion
format bookPart
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/246621
Radovich, Violeta Soledad; Lohse, Eva Julia; Poto, Margherita Paola; Case study: Exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons at the sea in Argentina – Is knowledge co-created or only a non-binding formal requirement?; Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag; 2023; 173-182
978-3-8305-5538-4
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/246621
identifier_str_mv Radovich, Violeta Soledad; Lohse, Eva Julia; Poto, Margherita Paola; Case study: Exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons at the sea in Argentina – Is knowledge co-created or only a non-binding formal requirement?; Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag; 2023; 173-182
978-3-8305-5538-4
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://biblioscout.net/book/10.35998/9783830555582
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.35998/9783830555582-009
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842268923737669632
score 13.13397