The precautionary approach and risk management: Can they increase the probability of successes in fishery management?

Autores
Hilborn, Ray; Maguire, Jean Jacques; Parma, Ana María; Rosenberg, Andrew
Año de publicación
2001
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Considerable progress has been made in the implementation of the Precautionary Approach to the protection of fish stocks, but applying the Precautionary Approach to the protection of fishing communities lags considerably. The principle of intergenerational equity, one of the main tenets of the Precautionary Approach, and the principle of sustainable utilization both imply that the Precautionary Approach should explicitly incorporate the protection of fishing communities, not only the resources they depend on. Risk assessment aims primarily at evaluating the consequences of various harvest strategies in terms of probabilistic statements about future trends in yields, biomass, and dangers to the stock, while risk management involves finding and implementing management policies, strategies, and tactics that reduce the risk to the communities exploiting them. Not all fishery management approaches deal equally well with risk, with some compounding rather than reducing risk. Portfolio management, whereby fishing enterprises have the ability to choose among a diverse portfolio of harvestable resources, would mitigate against the risk of fluctuations in the abundance, availability, or price of individual species. Although much remains to be achieved in better assessing risk, fishery management agencies should immediately implement risk management.
Des progrès considérables ont été réalisés dans la mise en œuvre de l’Approche de Précaution pour la protection des stocks de poissons, mais son application à la protection des communautés de pêche traîne considérablement. Le principe d’équité entre les génération, un des fondements de l’Approche de Précaution, et le principe d’utilisation soutenue impliquent tous les deux que l’Approche de Précaution doive incorporer de manière explicite la protection des communautés de pêche, pas seulement les ressources dont elles dépendent. Les évaluations de risque visent principalement à estimer les conséquences de diverses stratégies d’exploitation en terme de probabilité de l’évolution future des rendements, de la biomasse, et des dangers pour le stock. La gestion du risque, d’autre part, consiste à trouver et à mettre en œuvre des politiques, stratégies, et tactiques qui réduisent le risque pour les communautés qui exploitent les ressources halieutiques. Les approches de gestion des pêches ne sont pas toutes équivalentes en terme de gestion du risque, certaines l’augmentant même plutôt que le diminuer. La gestion par portefeuille, grâce à laquelle les entreprises de pêche auraient la possibilité de choisir à même un portefeuille diversifié de ressources, atténuerait le risque qu’entraînent les fluctuations d’abondance, de disponibilité et du prix de l’une ou l’autre espèce. Bien qu’il reste beaucoup à faire pour mieux évaluer le risque, les agences de gestion des pêches devraient immédiatement mettre en œuvre la gestion du risque.
Fil: Hilborn, Ray. University of Washington; Estados Unidos
Fil: Maguire, Jean Jacques. Halieutikos; Canadá
Fil: Parma, Ana María. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina
Fil: Rosenberg, Andrew. University of New Hampshire; Estados Unidos
Materia
PRECAUTIONARY APPROACH
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/100687

id CONICETDig_3501381186ee54f8169243b4217bda79
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/100687
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling The precautionary approach and risk management: Can they increase the probability of successes in fishery management?Hilborn, RayMaguire, Jean JacquesParma, Ana MaríaRosenberg, AndrewPRECAUTIONARY APPROACHhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Considerable progress has been made in the implementation of the Precautionary Approach to the protection of fish stocks, but applying the Precautionary Approach to the protection of fishing communities lags considerably. The principle of intergenerational equity, one of the main tenets of the Precautionary Approach, and the principle of sustainable utilization both imply that the Precautionary Approach should explicitly incorporate the protection of fishing communities, not only the resources they depend on. Risk assessment aims primarily at evaluating the consequences of various harvest strategies in terms of probabilistic statements about future trends in yields, biomass, and dangers to the stock, while risk management involves finding and implementing management policies, strategies, and tactics that reduce the risk to the communities exploiting them. Not all fishery management approaches deal equally well with risk, with some compounding rather than reducing risk. Portfolio management, whereby fishing enterprises have the ability to choose among a diverse portfolio of harvestable resources, would mitigate against the risk of fluctuations in the abundance, availability, or price of individual species. Although much remains to be achieved in better assessing risk, fishery management agencies should immediately implement risk management.Des progrès considérables ont été réalisés dans la mise en œuvre de l’Approche de Précaution pour la protection des stocks de poissons, mais son application à la protection des communautés de pêche traîne considérablement. Le principe d’équité entre les génération, un des fondements de l’Approche de Précaution, et le principe d’utilisation soutenue impliquent tous les deux que l’Approche de Précaution doive incorporer de manière explicite la protection des communautés de pêche, pas seulement les ressources dont elles dépendent. Les évaluations de risque visent principalement à estimer les conséquences de diverses stratégies d’exploitation en terme de probabilité de l’évolution future des rendements, de la biomasse, et des dangers pour le stock. La gestion du risque, d’autre part, consiste à trouver et à mettre en œuvre des politiques, stratégies, et tactiques qui réduisent le risque pour les communautés qui exploitent les ressources halieutiques. Les approches de gestion des pêches ne sont pas toutes équivalentes en terme de gestion du risque, certaines l’augmentant même plutôt que le diminuer. La gestion par portefeuille, grâce à laquelle les entreprises de pêche auraient la possibilité de choisir à même un portefeuille diversifié de ressources, atténuerait le risque qu’entraînent les fluctuations d’abondance, de disponibilité et du prix de l’une ou l’autre espèce. Bien qu’il reste beaucoup à faire pour mieux évaluer le risque, les agences de gestion des pêches devraient immédiatement mettre en œuvre la gestion du risque.Fil: Hilborn, Ray. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Maguire, Jean Jacques. Halieutikos; CanadáFil: Parma, Ana María. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico; ArgentinaFil: Rosenberg, Andrew. University of New Hampshire; Estados UnidosNational Research Council Canada-NRC Research Press2001-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/100687Hilborn, Ray; Maguire, Jean Jacques; Parma, Ana María; Rosenberg, Andrew; The precautionary approach and risk management: Can they increase the probability of successes in fishery management?; National Research Council Canada-NRC Research Press; Canadian Journal Of Fisheries And Aquatic Sciences; 58; 1; 12-2001; 99-1070706-652XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1139/f00-225info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/10.1139/f00-225#.Xnt1E-pKiM8info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:27:47Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/100687instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:27:47.878CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The precautionary approach and risk management: Can they increase the probability of successes in fishery management?
title The precautionary approach and risk management: Can they increase the probability of successes in fishery management?
spellingShingle The precautionary approach and risk management: Can they increase the probability of successes in fishery management?
Hilborn, Ray
PRECAUTIONARY APPROACH
title_short The precautionary approach and risk management: Can they increase the probability of successes in fishery management?
title_full The precautionary approach and risk management: Can they increase the probability of successes in fishery management?
title_fullStr The precautionary approach and risk management: Can they increase the probability of successes in fishery management?
title_full_unstemmed The precautionary approach and risk management: Can they increase the probability of successes in fishery management?
title_sort The precautionary approach and risk management: Can they increase the probability of successes in fishery management?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Hilborn, Ray
Maguire, Jean Jacques
Parma, Ana María
Rosenberg, Andrew
author Hilborn, Ray
author_facet Hilborn, Ray
Maguire, Jean Jacques
Parma, Ana María
Rosenberg, Andrew
author_role author
author2 Maguire, Jean Jacques
Parma, Ana María
Rosenberg, Andrew
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv PRECAUTIONARY APPROACH
topic PRECAUTIONARY APPROACH
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Considerable progress has been made in the implementation of the Precautionary Approach to the protection of fish stocks, but applying the Precautionary Approach to the protection of fishing communities lags considerably. The principle of intergenerational equity, one of the main tenets of the Precautionary Approach, and the principle of sustainable utilization both imply that the Precautionary Approach should explicitly incorporate the protection of fishing communities, not only the resources they depend on. Risk assessment aims primarily at evaluating the consequences of various harvest strategies in terms of probabilistic statements about future trends in yields, biomass, and dangers to the stock, while risk management involves finding and implementing management policies, strategies, and tactics that reduce the risk to the communities exploiting them. Not all fishery management approaches deal equally well with risk, with some compounding rather than reducing risk. Portfolio management, whereby fishing enterprises have the ability to choose among a diverse portfolio of harvestable resources, would mitigate against the risk of fluctuations in the abundance, availability, or price of individual species. Although much remains to be achieved in better assessing risk, fishery management agencies should immediately implement risk management.
Des progrès considérables ont été réalisés dans la mise en œuvre de l’Approche de Précaution pour la protection des stocks de poissons, mais son application à la protection des communautés de pêche traîne considérablement. Le principe d’équité entre les génération, un des fondements de l’Approche de Précaution, et le principe d’utilisation soutenue impliquent tous les deux que l’Approche de Précaution doive incorporer de manière explicite la protection des communautés de pêche, pas seulement les ressources dont elles dépendent. Les évaluations de risque visent principalement à estimer les conséquences de diverses stratégies d’exploitation en terme de probabilité de l’évolution future des rendements, de la biomasse, et des dangers pour le stock. La gestion du risque, d’autre part, consiste à trouver et à mettre en œuvre des politiques, stratégies, et tactiques qui réduisent le risque pour les communautés qui exploitent les ressources halieutiques. Les approches de gestion des pêches ne sont pas toutes équivalentes en terme de gestion du risque, certaines l’augmentant même plutôt que le diminuer. La gestion par portefeuille, grâce à laquelle les entreprises de pêche auraient la possibilité de choisir à même un portefeuille diversifié de ressources, atténuerait le risque qu’entraînent les fluctuations d’abondance, de disponibilité et du prix de l’une ou l’autre espèce. Bien qu’il reste beaucoup à faire pour mieux évaluer le risque, les agences de gestion des pêches devraient immédiatement mettre en œuvre la gestion du risque.
Fil: Hilborn, Ray. University of Washington; Estados Unidos
Fil: Maguire, Jean Jacques. Halieutikos; Canadá
Fil: Parma, Ana María. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina
Fil: Rosenberg, Andrew. University of New Hampshire; Estados Unidos
description Considerable progress has been made in the implementation of the Precautionary Approach to the protection of fish stocks, but applying the Precautionary Approach to the protection of fishing communities lags considerably. The principle of intergenerational equity, one of the main tenets of the Precautionary Approach, and the principle of sustainable utilization both imply that the Precautionary Approach should explicitly incorporate the protection of fishing communities, not only the resources they depend on. Risk assessment aims primarily at evaluating the consequences of various harvest strategies in terms of probabilistic statements about future trends in yields, biomass, and dangers to the stock, while risk management involves finding and implementing management policies, strategies, and tactics that reduce the risk to the communities exploiting them. Not all fishery management approaches deal equally well with risk, with some compounding rather than reducing risk. Portfolio management, whereby fishing enterprises have the ability to choose among a diverse portfolio of harvestable resources, would mitigate against the risk of fluctuations in the abundance, availability, or price of individual species. Although much remains to be achieved in better assessing risk, fishery management agencies should immediately implement risk management.
publishDate 2001
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2001-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/100687
Hilborn, Ray; Maguire, Jean Jacques; Parma, Ana María; Rosenberg, Andrew; The precautionary approach and risk management: Can they increase the probability of successes in fishery management?; National Research Council Canada-NRC Research Press; Canadian Journal Of Fisheries And Aquatic Sciences; 58; 1; 12-2001; 99-107
0706-652X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/100687
identifier_str_mv Hilborn, Ray; Maguire, Jean Jacques; Parma, Ana María; Rosenberg, Andrew; The precautionary approach and risk management: Can they increase the probability of successes in fishery management?; National Research Council Canada-NRC Research Press; Canadian Journal Of Fisheries And Aquatic Sciences; 58; 1; 12-2001; 99-107
0706-652X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1139/f00-225
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/10.1139/f00-225#.Xnt1E-pKiM8
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv National Research Council Canada-NRC Research Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv National Research Council Canada-NRC Research Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844614280312258560
score 13.070432