The precautionary approach and risk management: Can they increase the probability of successes in fishery management?
- Autores
- Hilborn, Ray; Maguire, Jean Jacques; Parma, Ana María; Rosenberg, Andrew
- Año de publicación
- 2001
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Considerable progress has been made in the implementation of the Precautionary Approach to the protection of fish stocks, but applying the Precautionary Approach to the protection of fishing communities lags considerably. The principle of intergenerational equity, one of the main tenets of the Precautionary Approach, and the principle of sustainable utilization both imply that the Precautionary Approach should explicitly incorporate the protection of fishing communities, not only the resources they depend on. Risk assessment aims primarily at evaluating the consequences of various harvest strategies in terms of probabilistic statements about future trends in yields, biomass, and dangers to the stock, while risk management involves finding and implementing management policies, strategies, and tactics that reduce the risk to the communities exploiting them. Not all fishery management approaches deal equally well with risk, with some compounding rather than reducing risk. Portfolio management, whereby fishing enterprises have the ability to choose among a diverse portfolio of harvestable resources, would mitigate against the risk of fluctuations in the abundance, availability, or price of individual species. Although much remains to be achieved in better assessing risk, fishery management agencies should immediately implement risk management.
Des progrès considérables ont été réalisés dans la mise en œuvre de l’Approche de Précaution pour la protection des stocks de poissons, mais son application à la protection des communautés de pêche traîne considérablement. Le principe d’équité entre les génération, un des fondements de l’Approche de Précaution, et le principe d’utilisation soutenue impliquent tous les deux que l’Approche de Précaution doive incorporer de manière explicite la protection des communautés de pêche, pas seulement les ressources dont elles dépendent. Les évaluations de risque visent principalement à estimer les conséquences de diverses stratégies d’exploitation en terme de probabilité de l’évolution future des rendements, de la biomasse, et des dangers pour le stock. La gestion du risque, d’autre part, consiste à trouver et à mettre en œuvre des politiques, stratégies, et tactiques qui réduisent le risque pour les communautés qui exploitent les ressources halieutiques. Les approches de gestion des pêches ne sont pas toutes équivalentes en terme de gestion du risque, certaines l’augmentant même plutôt que le diminuer. La gestion par portefeuille, grâce à laquelle les entreprises de pêche auraient la possibilité de choisir à même un portefeuille diversifié de ressources, atténuerait le risque qu’entraînent les fluctuations d’abondance, de disponibilité et du prix de l’une ou l’autre espèce. Bien qu’il reste beaucoup à faire pour mieux évaluer le risque, les agences de gestion des pêches devraient immédiatement mettre en œuvre la gestion du risque.
Fil: Hilborn, Ray. University of Washington; Estados Unidos
Fil: Maguire, Jean Jacques. Halieutikos; Canadá
Fil: Parma, Ana María. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina
Fil: Rosenberg, Andrew. University of New Hampshire; Estados Unidos - Materia
- PRECAUTIONARY APPROACH
- Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/100687
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_3501381186ee54f8169243b4217bda79 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/100687 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
The precautionary approach and risk management: Can they increase the probability of successes in fishery management?Hilborn, RayMaguire, Jean JacquesParma, Ana MaríaRosenberg, AndrewPRECAUTIONARY APPROACHhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Considerable progress has been made in the implementation of the Precautionary Approach to the protection of fish stocks, but applying the Precautionary Approach to the protection of fishing communities lags considerably. The principle of intergenerational equity, one of the main tenets of the Precautionary Approach, and the principle of sustainable utilization both imply that the Precautionary Approach should explicitly incorporate the protection of fishing communities, not only the resources they depend on. Risk assessment aims primarily at evaluating the consequences of various harvest strategies in terms of probabilistic statements about future trends in yields, biomass, and dangers to the stock, while risk management involves finding and implementing management policies, strategies, and tactics that reduce the risk to the communities exploiting them. Not all fishery management approaches deal equally well with risk, with some compounding rather than reducing risk. Portfolio management, whereby fishing enterprises have the ability to choose among a diverse portfolio of harvestable resources, would mitigate against the risk of fluctuations in the abundance, availability, or price of individual species. Although much remains to be achieved in better assessing risk, fishery management agencies should immediately implement risk management.Des progrès considérables ont été réalisés dans la mise en œuvre de l’Approche de Précaution pour la protection des stocks de poissons, mais son application à la protection des communautés de pêche traîne considérablement. Le principe d’équité entre les génération, un des fondements de l’Approche de Précaution, et le principe d’utilisation soutenue impliquent tous les deux que l’Approche de Précaution doive incorporer de manière explicite la protection des communautés de pêche, pas seulement les ressources dont elles dépendent. Les évaluations de risque visent principalement à estimer les conséquences de diverses stratégies d’exploitation en terme de probabilité de l’évolution future des rendements, de la biomasse, et des dangers pour le stock. La gestion du risque, d’autre part, consiste à trouver et à mettre en œuvre des politiques, stratégies, et tactiques qui réduisent le risque pour les communautés qui exploitent les ressources halieutiques. Les approches de gestion des pêches ne sont pas toutes équivalentes en terme de gestion du risque, certaines l’augmentant même plutôt que le diminuer. La gestion par portefeuille, grâce à laquelle les entreprises de pêche auraient la possibilité de choisir à même un portefeuille diversifié de ressources, atténuerait le risque qu’entraînent les fluctuations d’abondance, de disponibilité et du prix de l’une ou l’autre espèce. Bien qu’il reste beaucoup à faire pour mieux évaluer le risque, les agences de gestion des pêches devraient immédiatement mettre en œuvre la gestion du risque.Fil: Hilborn, Ray. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Maguire, Jean Jacques. Halieutikos; CanadáFil: Parma, Ana María. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico; ArgentinaFil: Rosenberg, Andrew. University of New Hampshire; Estados UnidosNational Research Council Canada-NRC Research Press2001-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/100687Hilborn, Ray; Maguire, Jean Jacques; Parma, Ana María; Rosenberg, Andrew; The precautionary approach and risk management: Can they increase the probability of successes in fishery management?; National Research Council Canada-NRC Research Press; Canadian Journal Of Fisheries And Aquatic Sciences; 58; 1; 12-2001; 99-1070706-652XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1139/f00-225info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/10.1139/f00-225#.Xnt1E-pKiM8info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:27:47Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/100687instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:27:47.878CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The precautionary approach and risk management: Can they increase the probability of successes in fishery management? |
title |
The precautionary approach and risk management: Can they increase the probability of successes in fishery management? |
spellingShingle |
The precautionary approach and risk management: Can they increase the probability of successes in fishery management? Hilborn, Ray PRECAUTIONARY APPROACH |
title_short |
The precautionary approach and risk management: Can they increase the probability of successes in fishery management? |
title_full |
The precautionary approach and risk management: Can they increase the probability of successes in fishery management? |
title_fullStr |
The precautionary approach and risk management: Can they increase the probability of successes in fishery management? |
title_full_unstemmed |
The precautionary approach and risk management: Can they increase the probability of successes in fishery management? |
title_sort |
The precautionary approach and risk management: Can they increase the probability of successes in fishery management? |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Hilborn, Ray Maguire, Jean Jacques Parma, Ana María Rosenberg, Andrew |
author |
Hilborn, Ray |
author_facet |
Hilborn, Ray Maguire, Jean Jacques Parma, Ana María Rosenberg, Andrew |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Maguire, Jean Jacques Parma, Ana María Rosenberg, Andrew |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
PRECAUTIONARY APPROACH |
topic |
PRECAUTIONARY APPROACH |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Considerable progress has been made in the implementation of the Precautionary Approach to the protection of fish stocks, but applying the Precautionary Approach to the protection of fishing communities lags considerably. The principle of intergenerational equity, one of the main tenets of the Precautionary Approach, and the principle of sustainable utilization both imply that the Precautionary Approach should explicitly incorporate the protection of fishing communities, not only the resources they depend on. Risk assessment aims primarily at evaluating the consequences of various harvest strategies in terms of probabilistic statements about future trends in yields, biomass, and dangers to the stock, while risk management involves finding and implementing management policies, strategies, and tactics that reduce the risk to the communities exploiting them. Not all fishery management approaches deal equally well with risk, with some compounding rather than reducing risk. Portfolio management, whereby fishing enterprises have the ability to choose among a diverse portfolio of harvestable resources, would mitigate against the risk of fluctuations in the abundance, availability, or price of individual species. Although much remains to be achieved in better assessing risk, fishery management agencies should immediately implement risk management. Des progrès considérables ont été réalisés dans la mise en œuvre de l’Approche de Précaution pour la protection des stocks de poissons, mais son application à la protection des communautés de pêche traîne considérablement. Le principe d’équité entre les génération, un des fondements de l’Approche de Précaution, et le principe d’utilisation soutenue impliquent tous les deux que l’Approche de Précaution doive incorporer de manière explicite la protection des communautés de pêche, pas seulement les ressources dont elles dépendent. Les évaluations de risque visent principalement à estimer les conséquences de diverses stratégies d’exploitation en terme de probabilité de l’évolution future des rendements, de la biomasse, et des dangers pour le stock. La gestion du risque, d’autre part, consiste à trouver et à mettre en œuvre des politiques, stratégies, et tactiques qui réduisent le risque pour les communautés qui exploitent les ressources halieutiques. Les approches de gestion des pêches ne sont pas toutes équivalentes en terme de gestion du risque, certaines l’augmentant même plutôt que le diminuer. La gestion par portefeuille, grâce à laquelle les entreprises de pêche auraient la possibilité de choisir à même un portefeuille diversifié de ressources, atténuerait le risque qu’entraînent les fluctuations d’abondance, de disponibilité et du prix de l’une ou l’autre espèce. Bien qu’il reste beaucoup à faire pour mieux évaluer le risque, les agences de gestion des pêches devraient immédiatement mettre en œuvre la gestion du risque. Fil: Hilborn, Ray. University of Washington; Estados Unidos Fil: Maguire, Jean Jacques. Halieutikos; Canadá Fil: Parma, Ana María. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina Fil: Rosenberg, Andrew. University of New Hampshire; Estados Unidos |
description |
Considerable progress has been made in the implementation of the Precautionary Approach to the protection of fish stocks, but applying the Precautionary Approach to the protection of fishing communities lags considerably. The principle of intergenerational equity, one of the main tenets of the Precautionary Approach, and the principle of sustainable utilization both imply that the Precautionary Approach should explicitly incorporate the protection of fishing communities, not only the resources they depend on. Risk assessment aims primarily at evaluating the consequences of various harvest strategies in terms of probabilistic statements about future trends in yields, biomass, and dangers to the stock, while risk management involves finding and implementing management policies, strategies, and tactics that reduce the risk to the communities exploiting them. Not all fishery management approaches deal equally well with risk, with some compounding rather than reducing risk. Portfolio management, whereby fishing enterprises have the ability to choose among a diverse portfolio of harvestable resources, would mitigate against the risk of fluctuations in the abundance, availability, or price of individual species. Although much remains to be achieved in better assessing risk, fishery management agencies should immediately implement risk management. |
publishDate |
2001 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2001-12 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/100687 Hilborn, Ray; Maguire, Jean Jacques; Parma, Ana María; Rosenberg, Andrew; The precautionary approach and risk management: Can they increase the probability of successes in fishery management?; National Research Council Canada-NRC Research Press; Canadian Journal Of Fisheries And Aquatic Sciences; 58; 1; 12-2001; 99-107 0706-652X CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/100687 |
identifier_str_mv |
Hilborn, Ray; Maguire, Jean Jacques; Parma, Ana María; Rosenberg, Andrew; The precautionary approach and risk management: Can they increase the probability of successes in fishery management?; National Research Council Canada-NRC Research Press; Canadian Journal Of Fisheries And Aquatic Sciences; 58; 1; 12-2001; 99-107 0706-652X CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1139/f00-225 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/10.1139/f00-225#.Xnt1E-pKiM8 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
National Research Council Canada-NRC Research Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
National Research Council Canada-NRC Research Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844614280312258560 |
score |
13.070432 |