Finite and Infinite Intellect: Salomon Maimon’s Resolution to Kantian Antinomies

Autores
Pelegrin, Laura Alejandra
Año de publicación
2025
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This paper examines the central role of antinomies in Salomon Maimon’s philosophy. The problem of antinomies occupies a prominent place in the philosophy of Maimon. Historically, the antinomies of reason constitute a problem to which Maimon must give an answer, since it is one of the nuclei of discussion that is generated in his correspondence with Kant. In relation to the systematic perspective, Maimon has modified the way in which several of the dichotomous pairs proper to Kantian philosophy are related, i.e., intuition-concept, formmatter, sensibility-understanding. The antinomies were one of the arguments that led Kant to conclude that intuitive and conceptual representations come from heterogeneous sources. Maimon accepts that there are antinomies of reason. Then, Maimon has to explain how, even with the suppression of the heterogeneity of faculties, the antinomic conflict can be resolved. Within the framework of this problem, the general aim of this paper is to analyse the way in which Maimon reformulates the Kantian antinomies. In particular, we aim to study the new formulation and resolution of the antinomies. We will argue that the distinction between finite and infinite intellect, which provides a resolution to the antinomy, must be interpreted in relation to the distinction between reason and imagination.
Fil: Pelegrin, Laura Alejandra. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Filosofía "Dr. Alejandro Korn"; Argentina
Materia
Maimon
Kant
Antinomies
Idealism
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/279130

id CONICETDig_335099efd56b685af51f10405ec450a1
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/279130
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Finite and Infinite Intellect: Salomon Maimon’s Resolution to Kantian AntinomiesPelegrin, Laura AlejandraMaimonKantAntinomiesIdealismhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6This paper examines the central role of antinomies in Salomon Maimon’s philosophy. The problem of antinomies occupies a prominent place in the philosophy of Maimon. Historically, the antinomies of reason constitute a problem to which Maimon must give an answer, since it is one of the nuclei of discussion that is generated in his correspondence with Kant. In relation to the systematic perspective, Maimon has modified the way in which several of the dichotomous pairs proper to Kantian philosophy are related, i.e., intuition-concept, formmatter, sensibility-understanding. The antinomies were one of the arguments that led Kant to conclude that intuitive and conceptual representations come from heterogeneous sources. Maimon accepts that there are antinomies of reason. Then, Maimon has to explain how, even with the suppression of the heterogeneity of faculties, the antinomic conflict can be resolved. Within the framework of this problem, the general aim of this paper is to analyse the way in which Maimon reformulates the Kantian antinomies. In particular, we aim to study the new formulation and resolution of the antinomies. We will argue that the distinction between finite and infinite intellect, which provides a resolution to the antinomy, must be interpreted in relation to the distinction between reason and imagination.Fil: Pelegrin, Laura Alejandra. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Filosofía "Dr. Alejandro Korn"; ArgentinaUniversidade de Lisboa2025-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/279130Pelegrin, Laura Alejandra; Finite and Infinite Intellect: Salomon Maimon’s Resolution to Kantian Antinomies; Universidade de Lisboa; Philosophica; 33; 2; 12-2025; 123-1370872-4784CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.pdcnet.org/oom/service?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=&rft.imuse_id=philosophica_2025_0033_0002_0123_0137&svc_id=info:www.pdcnet.org/collectioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5840/philosophica2025101331info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2026-01-14T11:43:39Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/279130instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982026-01-14 11:43:39.775CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Finite and Infinite Intellect: Salomon Maimon’s Resolution to Kantian Antinomies
title Finite and Infinite Intellect: Salomon Maimon’s Resolution to Kantian Antinomies
spellingShingle Finite and Infinite Intellect: Salomon Maimon’s Resolution to Kantian Antinomies
Pelegrin, Laura Alejandra
Maimon
Kant
Antinomies
Idealism
title_short Finite and Infinite Intellect: Salomon Maimon’s Resolution to Kantian Antinomies
title_full Finite and Infinite Intellect: Salomon Maimon’s Resolution to Kantian Antinomies
title_fullStr Finite and Infinite Intellect: Salomon Maimon’s Resolution to Kantian Antinomies
title_full_unstemmed Finite and Infinite Intellect: Salomon Maimon’s Resolution to Kantian Antinomies
title_sort Finite and Infinite Intellect: Salomon Maimon’s Resolution to Kantian Antinomies
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Pelegrin, Laura Alejandra
author Pelegrin, Laura Alejandra
author_facet Pelegrin, Laura Alejandra
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Maimon
Kant
Antinomies
Idealism
topic Maimon
Kant
Antinomies
Idealism
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This paper examines the central role of antinomies in Salomon Maimon’s philosophy. The problem of antinomies occupies a prominent place in the philosophy of Maimon. Historically, the antinomies of reason constitute a problem to which Maimon must give an answer, since it is one of the nuclei of discussion that is generated in his correspondence with Kant. In relation to the systematic perspective, Maimon has modified the way in which several of the dichotomous pairs proper to Kantian philosophy are related, i.e., intuition-concept, formmatter, sensibility-understanding. The antinomies were one of the arguments that led Kant to conclude that intuitive and conceptual representations come from heterogeneous sources. Maimon accepts that there are antinomies of reason. Then, Maimon has to explain how, even with the suppression of the heterogeneity of faculties, the antinomic conflict can be resolved. Within the framework of this problem, the general aim of this paper is to analyse the way in which Maimon reformulates the Kantian antinomies. In particular, we aim to study the new formulation and resolution of the antinomies. We will argue that the distinction between finite and infinite intellect, which provides a resolution to the antinomy, must be interpreted in relation to the distinction between reason and imagination.
Fil: Pelegrin, Laura Alejandra. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Filosofía "Dr. Alejandro Korn"; Argentina
description This paper examines the central role of antinomies in Salomon Maimon’s philosophy. The problem of antinomies occupies a prominent place in the philosophy of Maimon. Historically, the antinomies of reason constitute a problem to which Maimon must give an answer, since it is one of the nuclei of discussion that is generated in his correspondence with Kant. In relation to the systematic perspective, Maimon has modified the way in which several of the dichotomous pairs proper to Kantian philosophy are related, i.e., intuition-concept, formmatter, sensibility-understanding. The antinomies were one of the arguments that led Kant to conclude that intuitive and conceptual representations come from heterogeneous sources. Maimon accepts that there are antinomies of reason. Then, Maimon has to explain how, even with the suppression of the heterogeneity of faculties, the antinomic conflict can be resolved. Within the framework of this problem, the general aim of this paper is to analyse the way in which Maimon reformulates the Kantian antinomies. In particular, we aim to study the new formulation and resolution of the antinomies. We will argue that the distinction between finite and infinite intellect, which provides a resolution to the antinomy, must be interpreted in relation to the distinction between reason and imagination.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/279130
Pelegrin, Laura Alejandra; Finite and Infinite Intellect: Salomon Maimon’s Resolution to Kantian Antinomies; Universidade de Lisboa; Philosophica; 33; 2; 12-2025; 123-137
0872-4784
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/279130
identifier_str_mv Pelegrin, Laura Alejandra; Finite and Infinite Intellect: Salomon Maimon’s Resolution to Kantian Antinomies; Universidade de Lisboa; Philosophica; 33; 2; 12-2025; 123-137
0872-4784
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.pdcnet.org/oom/service?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=&rft.imuse_id=philosophica_2025_0033_0002_0123_0137&svc_id=info:www.pdcnet.org/collection
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5840/philosophica2025101331
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Lisboa
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Lisboa
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1854320784456024064
score 13.113929