Argentina’s Constituent Genocide: Challenging the Hegemonic National Narrative and Laying the Foundation for Reparations to Indigenous Peoples

Autores
Lenton, Diana Isabel; Delrio, Walter Mario; Pérez, Pilar María Victoria; Papazian, Alexis Esteban Roberto; Nagy, Mariano Ariel; Musante, Marcelo
Año de publicación
2012
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
For more than a century, there has been little discussion of the Argentinean genocide perpetrated against indigenous peoples. As a result, presently a majority of Argentines perceive their identity and society as the outcome of a “European melting pot” process, not the result of genocide. In this view, sixteenth century European colonization of a territory imagined as a “desert” and the expansion of the nation-state by the late 19th Century are the historical processes that account for this melting pot. This article deals with the events and effects of the last period of territorial annexation and subjugation of the indigenous peoples perpetrated by the Argentinean national armed forces between 1876 and 1917, focusing on the state’s genocidal policies and the support from civil society. Paradoxically, these actions as a whole have been named in the hegemonic national history of Argentina’s “Campaigns to the Desert.”1 This formulation and the national narratives it names minimize or deny completely the existence of indigenous peoples in the areas annexed. The aim of this paper is to examine the construction and effects of the genocide of the indigenous population as an event excluded from the national narrative and literally “unthinkable” by average Argentines. In the present, different groups –such as indigenous peoples’ organizations, academic researchers, and alternative media– have started to make visible this genocidal process that is constitutive of the Argentinean nation state. The exposure of the facts of history has generated a growing debate on the historical processes. In this context, a series of specific but related processes of violence and conquest can be identified and described. We term these “genocide-prints,” through which we will consider not only the genocide but also the current debates on reparations to indigenous peoples.
Fil: Lenton, Diana Isabel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Delrio, Walter Mario. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Pérez, Pilar María Victoria. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Papazian, Alexis Esteban Roberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Nagy, Mariano Ariel. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Musante, Marcelo. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Materia
Politicas Indigenistas
Genocide
Indigenous Agency
Reparations
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/11494

id CONICETDig_3302d5bb23a751833f85a4f641c5255a
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/11494
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Argentina’s Constituent Genocide: Challenging the Hegemonic National Narrative and Laying the Foundation for Reparations to Indigenous PeoplesLenton, Diana IsabelDelrio, Walter MarioPérez, Pilar María VictoriaPapazian, Alexis Esteban RobertoNagy, Mariano ArielMusante, MarceloPoliticas IndigenistasGenocideIndigenous AgencyReparationshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6For more than a century, there has been little discussion of the Argentinean genocide perpetrated against indigenous peoples. As a result, presently a majority of Argentines perceive their identity and society as the outcome of a “European melting pot” process, not the result of genocide. In this view, sixteenth century European colonization of a territory imagined as a “desert” and the expansion of the nation-state by the late 19th Century are the historical processes that account for this melting pot. This article deals with the events and effects of the last period of territorial annexation and subjugation of the indigenous peoples perpetrated by the Argentinean national armed forces between 1876 and 1917, focusing on the state’s genocidal policies and the support from civil society. Paradoxically, these actions as a whole have been named in the hegemonic national history of Argentina’s “Campaigns to the Desert.”1 This formulation and the national narratives it names minimize or deny completely the existence of indigenous peoples in the areas annexed. The aim of this paper is to examine the construction and effects of the genocide of the indigenous population as an event excluded from the national narrative and literally “unthinkable” by average Argentines. In the present, different groups –such as indigenous peoples’ organizations, academic researchers, and alternative media– have started to make visible this genocidal process that is constitutive of the Argentinean nation state. The exposure of the facts of history has generated a growing debate on the historical processes. In this context, a series of specific but related processes of violence and conquest can be identified and described. We term these “genocide-prints,” through which we will consider not only the genocide but also the current debates on reparations to indigenous peoples.Fil: Lenton, Diana Isabel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Delrio, Walter Mario. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Pérez, Pilar María Victoria. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Papazian, Alexis Esteban Roberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Nagy, Mariano Ariel. Universidad de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Musante, Marcelo. Universidad de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaArmenian Review Org2012-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/11494Lenton, Diana Isabel; Delrio, Walter Mario; Pérez, Pilar María Victoria; Papazian, Alexis Esteban Roberto; Nagy, Mariano Ariel; et al.; Argentina’s Constituent Genocide: Challenging the Hegemonic National Narrative and Laying the Foundation for Reparations to Indigenous Peoples; Armenian Review Org; Armenian Review; 53; 1-4; 3-2012; 63-840004-2366enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.armenianreview.org/recent.htminfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:02:27Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/11494instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:02:27.941CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Argentina’s Constituent Genocide: Challenging the Hegemonic National Narrative and Laying the Foundation for Reparations to Indigenous Peoples
title Argentina’s Constituent Genocide: Challenging the Hegemonic National Narrative and Laying the Foundation for Reparations to Indigenous Peoples
spellingShingle Argentina’s Constituent Genocide: Challenging the Hegemonic National Narrative and Laying the Foundation for Reparations to Indigenous Peoples
Lenton, Diana Isabel
Politicas Indigenistas
Genocide
Indigenous Agency
Reparations
title_short Argentina’s Constituent Genocide: Challenging the Hegemonic National Narrative and Laying the Foundation for Reparations to Indigenous Peoples
title_full Argentina’s Constituent Genocide: Challenging the Hegemonic National Narrative and Laying the Foundation for Reparations to Indigenous Peoples
title_fullStr Argentina’s Constituent Genocide: Challenging the Hegemonic National Narrative and Laying the Foundation for Reparations to Indigenous Peoples
title_full_unstemmed Argentina’s Constituent Genocide: Challenging the Hegemonic National Narrative and Laying the Foundation for Reparations to Indigenous Peoples
title_sort Argentina’s Constituent Genocide: Challenging the Hegemonic National Narrative and Laying the Foundation for Reparations to Indigenous Peoples
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Lenton, Diana Isabel
Delrio, Walter Mario
Pérez, Pilar María Victoria
Papazian, Alexis Esteban Roberto
Nagy, Mariano Ariel
Musante, Marcelo
author Lenton, Diana Isabel
author_facet Lenton, Diana Isabel
Delrio, Walter Mario
Pérez, Pilar María Victoria
Papazian, Alexis Esteban Roberto
Nagy, Mariano Ariel
Musante, Marcelo
author_role author
author2 Delrio, Walter Mario
Pérez, Pilar María Victoria
Papazian, Alexis Esteban Roberto
Nagy, Mariano Ariel
Musante, Marcelo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Politicas Indigenistas
Genocide
Indigenous Agency
Reparations
topic Politicas Indigenistas
Genocide
Indigenous Agency
Reparations
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv For more than a century, there has been little discussion of the Argentinean genocide perpetrated against indigenous peoples. As a result, presently a majority of Argentines perceive their identity and society as the outcome of a “European melting pot” process, not the result of genocide. In this view, sixteenth century European colonization of a territory imagined as a “desert” and the expansion of the nation-state by the late 19th Century are the historical processes that account for this melting pot. This article deals with the events and effects of the last period of territorial annexation and subjugation of the indigenous peoples perpetrated by the Argentinean national armed forces between 1876 and 1917, focusing on the state’s genocidal policies and the support from civil society. Paradoxically, these actions as a whole have been named in the hegemonic national history of Argentina’s “Campaigns to the Desert.”1 This formulation and the national narratives it names minimize or deny completely the existence of indigenous peoples in the areas annexed. The aim of this paper is to examine the construction and effects of the genocide of the indigenous population as an event excluded from the national narrative and literally “unthinkable” by average Argentines. In the present, different groups –such as indigenous peoples’ organizations, academic researchers, and alternative media– have started to make visible this genocidal process that is constitutive of the Argentinean nation state. The exposure of the facts of history has generated a growing debate on the historical processes. In this context, a series of specific but related processes of violence and conquest can be identified and described. We term these “genocide-prints,” through which we will consider not only the genocide but also the current debates on reparations to indigenous peoples.
Fil: Lenton, Diana Isabel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Delrio, Walter Mario. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Pérez, Pilar María Victoria. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Papazian, Alexis Esteban Roberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Nagy, Mariano Ariel. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Musante, Marcelo. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
description For more than a century, there has been little discussion of the Argentinean genocide perpetrated against indigenous peoples. As a result, presently a majority of Argentines perceive their identity and society as the outcome of a “European melting pot” process, not the result of genocide. In this view, sixteenth century European colonization of a territory imagined as a “desert” and the expansion of the nation-state by the late 19th Century are the historical processes that account for this melting pot. This article deals with the events and effects of the last period of territorial annexation and subjugation of the indigenous peoples perpetrated by the Argentinean national armed forces between 1876 and 1917, focusing on the state’s genocidal policies and the support from civil society. Paradoxically, these actions as a whole have been named in the hegemonic national history of Argentina’s “Campaigns to the Desert.”1 This formulation and the national narratives it names minimize or deny completely the existence of indigenous peoples in the areas annexed. The aim of this paper is to examine the construction and effects of the genocide of the indigenous population as an event excluded from the national narrative and literally “unthinkable” by average Argentines. In the present, different groups –such as indigenous peoples’ organizations, academic researchers, and alternative media– have started to make visible this genocidal process that is constitutive of the Argentinean nation state. The exposure of the facts of history has generated a growing debate on the historical processes. In this context, a series of specific but related processes of violence and conquest can be identified and described. We term these “genocide-prints,” through which we will consider not only the genocide but also the current debates on reparations to indigenous peoples.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-03
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/11494
Lenton, Diana Isabel; Delrio, Walter Mario; Pérez, Pilar María Victoria; Papazian, Alexis Esteban Roberto; Nagy, Mariano Ariel; et al.; Argentina’s Constituent Genocide: Challenging the Hegemonic National Narrative and Laying the Foundation for Reparations to Indigenous Peoples; Armenian Review Org; Armenian Review; 53; 1-4; 3-2012; 63-84
0004-2366
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/11494
identifier_str_mv Lenton, Diana Isabel; Delrio, Walter Mario; Pérez, Pilar María Victoria; Papazian, Alexis Esteban Roberto; Nagy, Mariano Ariel; et al.; Argentina’s Constituent Genocide: Challenging the Hegemonic National Narrative and Laying the Foundation for Reparations to Indigenous Peoples; Armenian Review Org; Armenian Review; 53; 1-4; 3-2012; 63-84
0004-2366
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.armenianreview.org/recent.htm
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Armenian Review Org
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Armenian Review Org
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269756923576320
score 13.13397