Ex Vivo Microleakage Comparison between Glass Ionomers used as Pit and Fissure Sealant
- Autores
- Sly, Gabriela Edith; Missana, Liliana Raquel; Nieva, Enrique Nicolás; Kaplan, Andrea Edith
- Año de publicación
- 2015
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro the marginal microleakage of two glass ionomer materials used as pit and fissure sealants. Thirty healthy premolars extracted for orthodontic treatment were randomly assigned to two groups (n=15) and respectively sealed with two glass ionomers (Group I, Fuji VII and Group II, Fuji IX). All teeth were preserved in artificial saliva (NAF) for 10 days, thermocycled (250 cycles; 5oC, 37oC and 60oC), isolated, and immersed in 2% alcohol gentian violet blue solution for 24 h. After washing, teeth were included in acrylic resin and sectioned longitudinally in a bucco-lingual direction with a Struers-Minitom cutting device. Samples were analyzed for leakage using an optical microscope (Olympus BX- 60M). TheWilliams and Winter semi-quantitative ranked scale was used to score dye penetration. In Group I the grades were distributedasfollows:Grade1,1sampleandGrade3,14samples (Mean 2.87 Median 3, SD 0.52). In Group II: Grade 0: 4 samples, Grade 1, 3 samples, Grade 2, 2 samples and Grade 3, 6 samples (Mean 1.67, Median 2, SD 1.29). Fisher’s exact test showed statistically significant differences between materials (p=0.006). From these results, we conclude that Fuji IX had better marginal sealing than Fuji VII when used as a pit and fissure sealant.
El objetivo del trabajo fue comparar la eficacia como sellador de dos ionomeros vitreos. Se emplearon 30 premolares sanos extraidos por razones ortodoncicas. Se dividieron en dos grupos iguales (n=15) .Grupo I: Fuji VII y Grupo II: Fuji IX. Los dientes, fueron conservados en saliva artificial (NAF) durante 10 dias. Luego, fueron termociclados (250 ciclos) a 5oC, 37oC y 60oC. Posteriormente se sumergieron en violeta de genciana durante 24 hs. Una vez lavadas las muestras se seccionaron y evaluaron con el criterio de Williams y Winter, utilizando un microscopio optico (Olympus BX-60M) para valorar la penetracion del colorante. Los grados obtenidos para cada grupo fueron: en Grupo I (Fuji VII), Grado 1, 1 muestra y Grado 3, 14 muestras (Media 2,87, Mediana 3 y SD 0.52). En el Grupo II (Fuji IX) los grados se distribuyeron asi: Grado 0, 4 muestras, Grado 1, 3 muestras, Grado 2, 2 muestras y Grado 3, 6 muestras. (Media 1.67, Mediana 2 y SD 1.29). La Prueba exacta de Fisher (p=0,006) demostro diferencias estadisticamente significativa entre materiales. Se concluyo que el mejor sellado marginal fue obtenido utilizando el material Fuji IX comparado con Fuji VII cuando es utilizado como sellador.
Fil: Sly, Gabriela Edith. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Odontología; Argentina
Fil: Missana, Liliana Raquel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Tucumán. Planta Piloto de Procesos Industriales Microbiológicos (i); Argentina
Fil: Nieva, Enrique Nicolás. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnologia; Argentina
Fil: Kaplan, Andrea Edith. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Odontología; Argentina - Materia
-
MICROLEAKAGE
FISSURE SEALANTS
GLASS IONOMER - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/16877
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_3169f9d979285c104b8a78e7b071c3e1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/16877 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Ex Vivo Microleakage Comparison between Glass Ionomers used as Pit and Fissure SealantComparación in vitro de filtración marginal entre ionómeros vítreos selladoresSly, Gabriela EdithMissana, Liliana RaquelNieva, Enrique NicolásKaplan, Andrea EdithMICROLEAKAGEFISSURE SEALANTSGLASS IONOMERhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro the marginal microleakage of two glass ionomer materials used as pit and fissure sealants. Thirty healthy premolars extracted for orthodontic treatment were randomly assigned to two groups (n=15) and respectively sealed with two glass ionomers (Group I, Fuji VII and Group II, Fuji IX). All teeth were preserved in artificial saliva (NAF) for 10 days, thermocycled (250 cycles; 5oC, 37oC and 60oC), isolated, and immersed in 2% alcohol gentian violet blue solution for 24 h. After washing, teeth were included in acrylic resin and sectioned longitudinally in a bucco-lingual direction with a Struers-Minitom cutting device. Samples were analyzed for leakage using an optical microscope (Olympus BX- 60M). TheWilliams and Winter semi-quantitative ranked scale was used to score dye penetration. In Group I the grades were distributedasfollows:Grade1,1sampleandGrade3,14samples (Mean 2.87 Median 3, SD 0.52). In Group II: Grade 0: 4 samples, Grade 1, 3 samples, Grade 2, 2 samples and Grade 3, 6 samples (Mean 1.67, Median 2, SD 1.29). Fisher’s exact test showed statistically significant differences between materials (p=0.006). From these results, we conclude that Fuji IX had better marginal sealing than Fuji VII when used as a pit and fissure sealant.El objetivo del trabajo fue comparar la eficacia como sellador de dos ionomeros vitreos. Se emplearon 30 premolares sanos extraidos por razones ortodoncicas. Se dividieron en dos grupos iguales (n=15) .Grupo I: Fuji VII y Grupo II: Fuji IX. Los dientes, fueron conservados en saliva artificial (NAF) durante 10 dias. Luego, fueron termociclados (250 ciclos) a 5oC, 37oC y 60oC. Posteriormente se sumergieron en violeta de genciana durante 24 hs. Una vez lavadas las muestras se seccionaron y evaluaron con el criterio de Williams y Winter, utilizando un microscopio optico (Olympus BX-60M) para valorar la penetracion del colorante. Los grados obtenidos para cada grupo fueron: en Grupo I (Fuji VII), Grado 1, 1 muestra y Grado 3, 14 muestras (Media 2,87, Mediana 3 y SD 0.52). En el Grupo II (Fuji IX) los grados se distribuyeron asi: Grado 0, 4 muestras, Grado 1, 3 muestras, Grado 2, 2 muestras y Grado 3, 6 muestras. (Media 1.67, Mediana 2 y SD 1.29). La Prueba exacta de Fisher (p=0,006) demostro diferencias estadisticamente significativa entre materiales. Se concluyo que el mejor sellado marginal fue obtenido utilizando el material Fuji IX comparado con Fuji VII cuando es utilizado como sellador.Fil: Sly, Gabriela Edith. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Odontología; ArgentinaFil: Missana, Liliana Raquel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Tucumán. Planta Piloto de Procesos Industriales Microbiológicos (i); ArgentinaFil: Nieva, Enrique Nicolás. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnologia; ArgentinaFil: Kaplan, Andrea Edith. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Odontología; Argentina2015-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/16877Sly, Gabriela Edith; Missana, Liliana Raquel; Nieva, Enrique Nicolás; Kaplan, Andrea Edith; Ex Vivo Microleakage Comparison between Glass Ionomers used as Pit and Fissure Sealant; Acta Odontológica Latinoamericana; 28; 2; 8-2015; 132-1370326-4815enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://ref.scielo.org/jpdy3hinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T12:12:59Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/16877instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 12:12:59.862CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Ex Vivo Microleakage Comparison between Glass Ionomers used as Pit and Fissure Sealant Comparación in vitro de filtración marginal entre ionómeros vítreos selladores |
title |
Ex Vivo Microleakage Comparison between Glass Ionomers used as Pit and Fissure Sealant |
spellingShingle |
Ex Vivo Microleakage Comparison between Glass Ionomers used as Pit and Fissure Sealant Sly, Gabriela Edith MICROLEAKAGE FISSURE SEALANTS GLASS IONOMER |
title_short |
Ex Vivo Microleakage Comparison between Glass Ionomers used as Pit and Fissure Sealant |
title_full |
Ex Vivo Microleakage Comparison between Glass Ionomers used as Pit and Fissure Sealant |
title_fullStr |
Ex Vivo Microleakage Comparison between Glass Ionomers used as Pit and Fissure Sealant |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ex Vivo Microleakage Comparison between Glass Ionomers used as Pit and Fissure Sealant |
title_sort |
Ex Vivo Microleakage Comparison between Glass Ionomers used as Pit and Fissure Sealant |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Sly, Gabriela Edith Missana, Liliana Raquel Nieva, Enrique Nicolás Kaplan, Andrea Edith |
author |
Sly, Gabriela Edith |
author_facet |
Sly, Gabriela Edith Missana, Liliana Raquel Nieva, Enrique Nicolás Kaplan, Andrea Edith |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Missana, Liliana Raquel Nieva, Enrique Nicolás Kaplan, Andrea Edith |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
MICROLEAKAGE FISSURE SEALANTS GLASS IONOMER |
topic |
MICROLEAKAGE FISSURE SEALANTS GLASS IONOMER |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro the marginal microleakage of two glass ionomer materials used as pit and fissure sealants. Thirty healthy premolars extracted for orthodontic treatment were randomly assigned to two groups (n=15) and respectively sealed with two glass ionomers (Group I, Fuji VII and Group II, Fuji IX). All teeth were preserved in artificial saliva (NAF) for 10 days, thermocycled (250 cycles; 5oC, 37oC and 60oC), isolated, and immersed in 2% alcohol gentian violet blue solution for 24 h. After washing, teeth were included in acrylic resin and sectioned longitudinally in a bucco-lingual direction with a Struers-Minitom cutting device. Samples were analyzed for leakage using an optical microscope (Olympus BX- 60M). TheWilliams and Winter semi-quantitative ranked scale was used to score dye penetration. In Group I the grades were distributedasfollows:Grade1,1sampleandGrade3,14samples (Mean 2.87 Median 3, SD 0.52). In Group II: Grade 0: 4 samples, Grade 1, 3 samples, Grade 2, 2 samples and Grade 3, 6 samples (Mean 1.67, Median 2, SD 1.29). Fisher’s exact test showed statistically significant differences between materials (p=0.006). From these results, we conclude that Fuji IX had better marginal sealing than Fuji VII when used as a pit and fissure sealant. El objetivo del trabajo fue comparar la eficacia como sellador de dos ionomeros vitreos. Se emplearon 30 premolares sanos extraidos por razones ortodoncicas. Se dividieron en dos grupos iguales (n=15) .Grupo I: Fuji VII y Grupo II: Fuji IX. Los dientes, fueron conservados en saliva artificial (NAF) durante 10 dias. Luego, fueron termociclados (250 ciclos) a 5oC, 37oC y 60oC. Posteriormente se sumergieron en violeta de genciana durante 24 hs. Una vez lavadas las muestras se seccionaron y evaluaron con el criterio de Williams y Winter, utilizando un microscopio optico (Olympus BX-60M) para valorar la penetracion del colorante. Los grados obtenidos para cada grupo fueron: en Grupo I (Fuji VII), Grado 1, 1 muestra y Grado 3, 14 muestras (Media 2,87, Mediana 3 y SD 0.52). En el Grupo II (Fuji IX) los grados se distribuyeron asi: Grado 0, 4 muestras, Grado 1, 3 muestras, Grado 2, 2 muestras y Grado 3, 6 muestras. (Media 1.67, Mediana 2 y SD 1.29). La Prueba exacta de Fisher (p=0,006) demostro diferencias estadisticamente significativa entre materiales. Se concluyo que el mejor sellado marginal fue obtenido utilizando el material Fuji IX comparado con Fuji VII cuando es utilizado como sellador. Fil: Sly, Gabriela Edith. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Odontología; Argentina Fil: Missana, Liliana Raquel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Tucumán. Planta Piloto de Procesos Industriales Microbiológicos (i); Argentina Fil: Nieva, Enrique Nicolás. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnologia; Argentina Fil: Kaplan, Andrea Edith. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Odontología; Argentina |
description |
The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro the marginal microleakage of two glass ionomer materials used as pit and fissure sealants. Thirty healthy premolars extracted for orthodontic treatment were randomly assigned to two groups (n=15) and respectively sealed with two glass ionomers (Group I, Fuji VII and Group II, Fuji IX). All teeth were preserved in artificial saliva (NAF) for 10 days, thermocycled (250 cycles; 5oC, 37oC and 60oC), isolated, and immersed in 2% alcohol gentian violet blue solution for 24 h. After washing, teeth were included in acrylic resin and sectioned longitudinally in a bucco-lingual direction with a Struers-Minitom cutting device. Samples were analyzed for leakage using an optical microscope (Olympus BX- 60M). TheWilliams and Winter semi-quantitative ranked scale was used to score dye penetration. In Group I the grades were distributedasfollows:Grade1,1sampleandGrade3,14samples (Mean 2.87 Median 3, SD 0.52). In Group II: Grade 0: 4 samples, Grade 1, 3 samples, Grade 2, 2 samples and Grade 3, 6 samples (Mean 1.67, Median 2, SD 1.29). Fisher’s exact test showed statistically significant differences between materials (p=0.006). From these results, we conclude that Fuji IX had better marginal sealing than Fuji VII when used as a pit and fissure sealant. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-08 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/16877 Sly, Gabriela Edith; Missana, Liliana Raquel; Nieva, Enrique Nicolás; Kaplan, Andrea Edith; Ex Vivo Microleakage Comparison between Glass Ionomers used as Pit and Fissure Sealant; Acta Odontológica Latinoamericana; 28; 2; 8-2015; 132-137 0326-4815 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/16877 |
identifier_str_mv |
Sly, Gabriela Edith; Missana, Liliana Raquel; Nieva, Enrique Nicolás; Kaplan, Andrea Edith; Ex Vivo Microleakage Comparison between Glass Ionomers used as Pit and Fissure Sealant; Acta Odontológica Latinoamericana; 28; 2; 8-2015; 132-137 0326-4815 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://ref.scielo.org/jpdy3h |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1846782529603895296 |
score |
13.229304 |