Ex Vivo Microleakage Comparison between Glass Ionomers used as Pit and Fissure Sealant

Autores
Sly, Gabriela Edith; Missana, Liliana Raquel; Nieva, Enrique Nicolás; Kaplan, Andrea Edith
Año de publicación
2015
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro the marginal microleakage of two glass ionomer materials used as pit and fissure sealants. Thirty healthy premolars extracted for orthodontic treatment were randomly assigned to two groups (n=15) and respectively sealed with two glass ionomers (Group I, Fuji VII and Group II, Fuji IX). All teeth were preserved in artificial saliva (NAF) for 10 days, thermocycled (250 cycles; 5oC, 37oC and 60oC), isolated, and immersed in 2% alcohol gentian violet blue solution for 24 h. After washing, teeth were included in acrylic resin and sectioned longitudinally in a bucco-lingual direction with a Struers-Minitom cutting device. Samples were analyzed for leakage using an optical microscope (Olympus BX- 60M). TheWilliams and Winter semi-quantitative ranked scale was used to score dye penetration. In Group I the grades were distributedasfollows:Grade1,1sampleandGrade3,14samples (Mean 2.87 Median 3, SD 0.52). In Group II: Grade 0: 4 samples, Grade 1, 3 samples, Grade 2, 2 samples and Grade 3, 6 samples (Mean 1.67, Median 2, SD 1.29). Fisher’s exact test showed statistically significant differences between materials (p=0.006). From these results, we conclude that Fuji IX had better marginal sealing than Fuji VII when used as a pit and fissure sealant.
El objetivo del trabajo fue comparar la eficacia como sellador de dos ionomeros vitreos. Se emplearon 30 premolares sanos extraidos por razones ortodoncicas. Se dividieron en dos grupos iguales (n=15) .Grupo I: Fuji VII y Grupo II: Fuji IX. Los dientes, fueron conservados en saliva artificial (NAF) durante 10 dias. Luego, fueron termociclados (250 ciclos) a 5oC, 37oC y 60oC. Posteriormente se sumergieron en violeta de genciana durante 24 hs. Una vez lavadas las muestras se seccionaron y evaluaron con el criterio de Williams y Winter, utilizando un microscopio optico (Olympus BX-60M) para valorar la penetracion del colorante. Los grados obtenidos para cada grupo fueron: en Grupo I (Fuji VII), Grado 1, 1 muestra y Grado 3, 14 muestras (Media 2,87, Mediana 3 y SD 0.52). En el Grupo II (Fuji IX) los grados se distribuyeron asi: Grado 0, 4 muestras, Grado 1, 3 muestras, Grado 2, 2 muestras y Grado 3, 6 muestras. (Media 1.67, Mediana 2 y SD 1.29). La Prueba exacta de Fisher (p=0,006) demostro diferencias estadisticamente significativa entre materiales. Se concluyo que el mejor sellado marginal fue obtenido utilizando el material Fuji IX comparado con Fuji VII cuando es utilizado como sellador.
Fil: Sly, Gabriela Edith. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Odontología; Argentina
Fil: Missana, Liliana Raquel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Tucumán. Planta Piloto de Procesos Industriales Microbiológicos (i); Argentina
Fil: Nieva, Enrique Nicolás. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnologia; Argentina
Fil: Kaplan, Andrea Edith. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Odontología; Argentina
Materia
MICROLEAKAGE
FISSURE SEALANTS
GLASS IONOMER
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/16877

id CONICETDig_3169f9d979285c104b8a78e7b071c3e1
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/16877
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Ex Vivo Microleakage Comparison between Glass Ionomers used as Pit and Fissure SealantComparación in vitro de filtración marginal entre ionómeros vítreos selladoresSly, Gabriela EdithMissana, Liliana RaquelNieva, Enrique NicolásKaplan, Andrea EdithMICROLEAKAGEFISSURE SEALANTSGLASS IONOMERhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro the marginal microleakage of two glass ionomer materials used as pit and fissure sealants. Thirty healthy premolars extracted for orthodontic treatment were randomly assigned to two groups (n=15) and respectively sealed with two glass ionomers (Group I, Fuji VII and Group II, Fuji IX). All teeth were preserved in artificial saliva (NAF) for 10 days, thermocycled (250 cycles; 5oC, 37oC and 60oC), isolated, and immersed in 2% alcohol gentian violet blue solution for 24 h. After washing, teeth were included in acrylic resin and sectioned longitudinally in a bucco-lingual direction with a Struers-Minitom cutting device. Samples were analyzed for leakage using an optical microscope (Olympus BX- 60M). TheWilliams and Winter semi-quantitative ranked scale was used to score dye penetration. In Group I the grades were distributedasfollows:Grade1,1sampleandGrade3,14samples (Mean 2.87 Median 3, SD 0.52). In Group II: Grade 0: 4 samples, Grade 1, 3 samples, Grade 2, 2 samples and Grade 3, 6 samples (Mean 1.67, Median 2, SD 1.29). Fisher’s exact test showed statistically significant differences between materials (p=0.006). From these results, we conclude that Fuji IX had better marginal sealing than Fuji VII when used as a pit and fissure sealant.El objetivo del trabajo fue comparar la eficacia como sellador de dos ionomeros vitreos. Se emplearon 30 premolares sanos extraidos por razones ortodoncicas. Se dividieron en dos grupos iguales (n=15) .Grupo I: Fuji VII y Grupo II: Fuji IX. Los dientes, fueron conservados en saliva artificial (NAF) durante 10 dias. Luego, fueron termociclados (250 ciclos) a 5oC, 37oC y 60oC. Posteriormente se sumergieron en violeta de genciana durante 24 hs. Una vez lavadas las muestras se seccionaron y evaluaron con el criterio de Williams y Winter, utilizando un microscopio optico (Olympus BX-60M) para valorar la penetracion del colorante. Los grados obtenidos para cada grupo fueron: en Grupo I (Fuji VII), Grado 1, 1 muestra y Grado 3, 14 muestras (Media 2,87, Mediana 3 y SD 0.52). En el Grupo II (Fuji IX) los grados se distribuyeron asi: Grado 0, 4 muestras, Grado 1, 3 muestras, Grado 2, 2 muestras y Grado 3, 6 muestras. (Media 1.67, Mediana 2 y SD 1.29). La Prueba exacta de Fisher (p=0,006) demostro diferencias estadisticamente significativa entre materiales. Se concluyo que el mejor sellado marginal fue obtenido utilizando el material Fuji IX comparado con Fuji VII cuando es utilizado como sellador.Fil: Sly, Gabriela Edith. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Odontología; ArgentinaFil: Missana, Liliana Raquel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Tucumán. Planta Piloto de Procesos Industriales Microbiológicos (i); ArgentinaFil: Nieva, Enrique Nicolás. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnologia; ArgentinaFil: Kaplan, Andrea Edith. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Odontología; Argentina2015-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/16877Sly, Gabriela Edith; Missana, Liliana Raquel; Nieva, Enrique Nicolás; Kaplan, Andrea Edith; Ex Vivo Microleakage Comparison between Glass Ionomers used as Pit and Fissure Sealant; Acta Odontológica Latinoamericana; 28; 2; 8-2015; 132-1370326-4815enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://ref.scielo.org/jpdy3hinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T12:12:59Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/16877instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 12:12:59.862CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ex Vivo Microleakage Comparison between Glass Ionomers used as Pit and Fissure Sealant
Comparación in vitro de filtración marginal entre ionómeros vítreos selladores
title Ex Vivo Microleakage Comparison between Glass Ionomers used as Pit and Fissure Sealant
spellingShingle Ex Vivo Microleakage Comparison between Glass Ionomers used as Pit and Fissure Sealant
Sly, Gabriela Edith
MICROLEAKAGE
FISSURE SEALANTS
GLASS IONOMER
title_short Ex Vivo Microleakage Comparison between Glass Ionomers used as Pit and Fissure Sealant
title_full Ex Vivo Microleakage Comparison between Glass Ionomers used as Pit and Fissure Sealant
title_fullStr Ex Vivo Microleakage Comparison between Glass Ionomers used as Pit and Fissure Sealant
title_full_unstemmed Ex Vivo Microleakage Comparison between Glass Ionomers used as Pit and Fissure Sealant
title_sort Ex Vivo Microleakage Comparison between Glass Ionomers used as Pit and Fissure Sealant
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Sly, Gabriela Edith
Missana, Liliana Raquel
Nieva, Enrique Nicolás
Kaplan, Andrea Edith
author Sly, Gabriela Edith
author_facet Sly, Gabriela Edith
Missana, Liliana Raquel
Nieva, Enrique Nicolás
Kaplan, Andrea Edith
author_role author
author2 Missana, Liliana Raquel
Nieva, Enrique Nicolás
Kaplan, Andrea Edith
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv MICROLEAKAGE
FISSURE SEALANTS
GLASS IONOMER
topic MICROLEAKAGE
FISSURE SEALANTS
GLASS IONOMER
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro the marginal microleakage of two glass ionomer materials used as pit and fissure sealants. Thirty healthy premolars extracted for orthodontic treatment were randomly assigned to two groups (n=15) and respectively sealed with two glass ionomers (Group I, Fuji VII and Group II, Fuji IX). All teeth were preserved in artificial saliva (NAF) for 10 days, thermocycled (250 cycles; 5oC, 37oC and 60oC), isolated, and immersed in 2% alcohol gentian violet blue solution for 24 h. After washing, teeth were included in acrylic resin and sectioned longitudinally in a bucco-lingual direction with a Struers-Minitom cutting device. Samples were analyzed for leakage using an optical microscope (Olympus BX- 60M). TheWilliams and Winter semi-quantitative ranked scale was used to score dye penetration. In Group I the grades were distributedasfollows:Grade1,1sampleandGrade3,14samples (Mean 2.87 Median 3, SD 0.52). In Group II: Grade 0: 4 samples, Grade 1, 3 samples, Grade 2, 2 samples and Grade 3, 6 samples (Mean 1.67, Median 2, SD 1.29). Fisher’s exact test showed statistically significant differences between materials (p=0.006). From these results, we conclude that Fuji IX had better marginal sealing than Fuji VII when used as a pit and fissure sealant.
El objetivo del trabajo fue comparar la eficacia como sellador de dos ionomeros vitreos. Se emplearon 30 premolares sanos extraidos por razones ortodoncicas. Se dividieron en dos grupos iguales (n=15) .Grupo I: Fuji VII y Grupo II: Fuji IX. Los dientes, fueron conservados en saliva artificial (NAF) durante 10 dias. Luego, fueron termociclados (250 ciclos) a 5oC, 37oC y 60oC. Posteriormente se sumergieron en violeta de genciana durante 24 hs. Una vez lavadas las muestras se seccionaron y evaluaron con el criterio de Williams y Winter, utilizando un microscopio optico (Olympus BX-60M) para valorar la penetracion del colorante. Los grados obtenidos para cada grupo fueron: en Grupo I (Fuji VII), Grado 1, 1 muestra y Grado 3, 14 muestras (Media 2,87, Mediana 3 y SD 0.52). En el Grupo II (Fuji IX) los grados se distribuyeron asi: Grado 0, 4 muestras, Grado 1, 3 muestras, Grado 2, 2 muestras y Grado 3, 6 muestras. (Media 1.67, Mediana 2 y SD 1.29). La Prueba exacta de Fisher (p=0,006) demostro diferencias estadisticamente significativa entre materiales. Se concluyo que el mejor sellado marginal fue obtenido utilizando el material Fuji IX comparado con Fuji VII cuando es utilizado como sellador.
Fil: Sly, Gabriela Edith. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Odontología; Argentina
Fil: Missana, Liliana Raquel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Tucumán. Planta Piloto de Procesos Industriales Microbiológicos (i); Argentina
Fil: Nieva, Enrique Nicolás. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnologia; Argentina
Fil: Kaplan, Andrea Edith. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Odontología; Argentina
description The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro the marginal microleakage of two glass ionomer materials used as pit and fissure sealants. Thirty healthy premolars extracted for orthodontic treatment were randomly assigned to two groups (n=15) and respectively sealed with two glass ionomers (Group I, Fuji VII and Group II, Fuji IX). All teeth were preserved in artificial saliva (NAF) for 10 days, thermocycled (250 cycles; 5oC, 37oC and 60oC), isolated, and immersed in 2% alcohol gentian violet blue solution for 24 h. After washing, teeth were included in acrylic resin and sectioned longitudinally in a bucco-lingual direction with a Struers-Minitom cutting device. Samples were analyzed for leakage using an optical microscope (Olympus BX- 60M). TheWilliams and Winter semi-quantitative ranked scale was used to score dye penetration. In Group I the grades were distributedasfollows:Grade1,1sampleandGrade3,14samples (Mean 2.87 Median 3, SD 0.52). In Group II: Grade 0: 4 samples, Grade 1, 3 samples, Grade 2, 2 samples and Grade 3, 6 samples (Mean 1.67, Median 2, SD 1.29). Fisher’s exact test showed statistically significant differences between materials (p=0.006). From these results, we conclude that Fuji IX had better marginal sealing than Fuji VII when used as a pit and fissure sealant.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/16877
Sly, Gabriela Edith; Missana, Liliana Raquel; Nieva, Enrique Nicolás; Kaplan, Andrea Edith; Ex Vivo Microleakage Comparison between Glass Ionomers used as Pit and Fissure Sealant; Acta Odontológica Latinoamericana; 28; 2; 8-2015; 132-137
0326-4815
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/16877
identifier_str_mv Sly, Gabriela Edith; Missana, Liliana Raquel; Nieva, Enrique Nicolás; Kaplan, Andrea Edith; Ex Vivo Microleakage Comparison between Glass Ionomers used as Pit and Fissure Sealant; Acta Odontológica Latinoamericana; 28; 2; 8-2015; 132-137
0326-4815
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://ref.scielo.org/jpdy3h
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846782529603895296
score 13.229304