Comparación in vitro de filtración marginal entre ionómeros vítreos como selladores de fisura

Autores
Sly, Gabriela; Missana, Liliana Raquel; Nieva, Nadia Yanina; Kaplan, Andrea Edith
Año de publicación
2011
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The aim of this study was evaluate in vitro the marginal microleakage of two glass ionomer materials used as pit-and-fissure sealants. Thirty healthy premolars, extracted for orthodontic treatment were randomly assigned in to II groups (n=15) and sealant by two glass ionomer (Group I: Fuji VII and Group II: Fuji IX). All teeth conserved in artificial saliva (NAF) for 10 days, were thermocycled (250 cycles; 5ºC, 37ºC and 60ºC), isolated, immersed in 2% alcohol solution gentian violet blue dye for 4 h. After washed, they were included in acrylic resin and sectioned longitudinally in buccolingual direction by cutting device (Miniton de Struers). Samples were analyzed for leakage using light microscope (Olympus BX-60M).  A semi-quantitative ranked scale from Williams & Winter was used to score dye penetration. Results: Group I was distributed as follows Grade 1: 1 and Grade 3: 14 (Mean 2.87 Median 3, SD 0.52). Group II was distributed: Grade 0: 4, Grade 1: 3 Grade 2: 2 and Grade 3: 6. (Mean 1.67, Median 2, SD 1.29). Fisher Exact Test showed statistically significant differences between materials (p = 0.006). From these results, we concluded that Fuji IX showed better marginal seal than Fuji VII, when used as pit- fissure sealant. The aim of this study was evaluate in vitro the marginal microleakage of two glass ionomer materials used as pit-and-fissure sealants. Thirty healthy premolars, extracted for orthodontic treatment were randomly assigned in to II groups (n=15) and sealant by two glass ionomer (Group I: Fuji VII and Group II: Fuji IX). All teeth conserved in artificial saliva (NAF) for 10 days, were thermocycled (250 cycles; 5ºC, 37ºC and 60ºC), isolated, immersed in 2% alcohol solution gentian violet blue dye for 4 h. After washed, they were included in acrylic resin and sectioned longitudinally in buccolingual direction by cutting device (Miniton de Struers). Samples were analyzed for leakage using light microscope (Olympus BX-60M).  A semi-quantitative ranked scale from Williams & Winter was used to score dye penetration. Results: Group I was distributed as follows Grade 1: 1 and Grade 3: 14 (Mean 2.87 Median 3, SD 0.52). Group II was distributed: Grade 0: 4, Grade 1: 3 Grade 2: 2 and Grade 3: 6. (Mean 1.67, Median 2, SD 1.29). Fisher Exact Test showed statistically significant differences between materials (p = 0.006). From these results, we concluded that Fuji IX showed better marginal seal than Fuji VII, when used as pit- fissure sealant. The aim of this study was evaluate in vitro the marginal microleakage of two glass ionomer materials used as pit-and-fissure sealants. Thirty healthy premolars, extracted for orthodontic treatment were randomly assigned in to II groups (n=15) and sealant by two glass ionomer (Group I: Fuji VII and Group II: Fuji IX). All teeth conserved in artificial saliva (NAF) for 10 days, were thermocycled (250 cycles; 5ºC, 37ºC and 60ºC), isolated, immersed in 2% alcohol solution gentian violet blue dye for 4 h. After washed, they were included in acrylic resin and sectioned longitudinally in buccolingual direction by cutting device (Miniton de Struers). Samples were analyzed for leakage using light microscope (Olympus BX-60M).  A semi-quantitative ranked scale from Williams & Winter was used to score dye penetration. Results: Group I was distributed as follows Grade 1: 1 and Grade 3: 14 (Mean 2.87 Median 3, SD 0.52). Group II was distributed: Grade 0: 4, Grade 1: 3 Grade 2: 2 and Grade 3: 6. (Mean 1.67, Median 2, SD 1.29). Fisher Exact Test showed statistically significant differences between materials (p = 0.006). From these results, we concluded that Fuji IX showed better marginal seal than Fuji VII, when used as pit- fissure sealant.
Fil: Sly, Gabriela. Universidad Nacional de Tucuman. Facultad de Odontologia. Cat.de Anatomia Patologica/laboratorio de Patologia Molecular; Argentina
Fil: Missana, Liliana Raquel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Planta Piloto de Procesos Industriales Microbiológicos; Argentina
Fil: Nieva, Nadia Yanina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnología; Argentina
Fil: Kaplan, Andrea Edith. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Odontología. Departamento de Materiales Dentales; Argentina
XLIV Reunión Anual de la Sociedad Argentina de Investigación Odontológica
Tucumán
Argentina
Sociedad Argentina de Investigación Odontológica
Materia
glass ionomer
fissure sealants
microleakage
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/192047

id CONICETDig_1dc053e0a59a00eb66a450678f0925d5
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/192047
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Comparación in vitro de filtración marginal entre ionómeros vítreos como selladores de fisuraSly, GabrielaMissana, Liliana RaquelNieva, Nadia YaninaKaplan, Andrea Edithglass ionomerfissure sealantsmicroleakagehttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3The aim of this study was evaluate in vitro the marginal microleakage of two glass ionomer materials used as pit-and-fissure sealants. Thirty healthy premolars, extracted for orthodontic treatment were randomly assigned in to II groups (n=15) and sealant by two glass ionomer (Group I: Fuji VII and Group II: Fuji IX). All teeth conserved in artificial saliva (NAF) for 10 days, were thermocycled (250 cycles; 5ºC, 37ºC and 60ºC), isolated, immersed in 2% alcohol solution gentian violet blue dye for 4 h. After washed, they were included in acrylic resin and sectioned longitudinally in buccolingual direction by cutting device (Miniton de Struers). Samples were analyzed for leakage using light microscope (Olympus BX-60M).  A semi-quantitative ranked scale from Williams & Winter was used to score dye penetration. Results: Group I was distributed as follows Grade 1: 1 and Grade 3: 14 (Mean 2.87 Median 3, SD 0.52). Group II was distributed: Grade 0: 4, Grade 1: 3 Grade 2: 2 and Grade 3: 6. (Mean 1.67, Median 2, SD 1.29). Fisher Exact Test showed statistically significant differences between materials (p = 0.006). From these results, we concluded that Fuji IX showed better marginal seal than Fuji VII, when used as pit- fissure sealant. The aim of this study was evaluate in vitro the marginal microleakage of two glass ionomer materials used as pit-and-fissure sealants. Thirty healthy premolars, extracted for orthodontic treatment were randomly assigned in to II groups (n=15) and sealant by two glass ionomer (Group I: Fuji VII and Group II: Fuji IX). All teeth conserved in artificial saliva (NAF) for 10 days, were thermocycled (250 cycles; 5ºC, 37ºC and 60ºC), isolated, immersed in 2% alcohol solution gentian violet blue dye for 4 h. After washed, they were included in acrylic resin and sectioned longitudinally in buccolingual direction by cutting device (Miniton de Struers). Samples were analyzed for leakage using light microscope (Olympus BX-60M).  A semi-quantitative ranked scale from Williams & Winter was used to score dye penetration. Results: Group I was distributed as follows Grade 1: 1 and Grade 3: 14 (Mean 2.87 Median 3, SD 0.52). Group II was distributed: Grade 0: 4, Grade 1: 3 Grade 2: 2 and Grade 3: 6. (Mean 1.67, Median 2, SD 1.29). Fisher Exact Test showed statistically significant differences between materials (p = 0.006). From these results, we concluded that Fuji IX showed better marginal seal than Fuji VII, when used as pit- fissure sealant. The aim of this study was evaluate in vitro the marginal microleakage of two glass ionomer materials used as pit-and-fissure sealants. Thirty healthy premolars, extracted for orthodontic treatment were randomly assigned in to II groups (n=15) and sealant by two glass ionomer (Group I: Fuji VII and Group II: Fuji IX). All teeth conserved in artificial saliva (NAF) for 10 days, were thermocycled (250 cycles; 5ºC, 37ºC and 60ºC), isolated, immersed in 2% alcohol solution gentian violet blue dye for 4 h. After washed, they were included in acrylic resin and sectioned longitudinally in buccolingual direction by cutting device (Miniton de Struers). Samples were analyzed for leakage using light microscope (Olympus BX-60M).  A semi-quantitative ranked scale from Williams & Winter was used to score dye penetration. Results: Group I was distributed as follows Grade 1: 1 and Grade 3: 14 (Mean 2.87 Median 3, SD 0.52). Group II was distributed: Grade 0: 4, Grade 1: 3 Grade 2: 2 and Grade 3: 6. (Mean 1.67, Median 2, SD 1.29). Fisher Exact Test showed statistically significant differences between materials (p = 0.006). From these results, we concluded that Fuji IX showed better marginal seal than Fuji VII, when used as pit- fissure sealant.Fil: Sly, Gabriela. Universidad Nacional de Tucuman. Facultad de Odontologia. Cat.de Anatomia Patologica/laboratorio de Patologia Molecular; ArgentinaFil: Missana, Liliana Raquel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Planta Piloto de Procesos Industriales Microbiológicos; ArgentinaFil: Nieva, Nadia Yanina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnología; ArgentinaFil: Kaplan, Andrea Edith. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Odontología. Departamento de Materiales Dentales; ArgentinaXLIV Reunión Anual de la Sociedad Argentina de Investigación OdontológicaTucumánArgentinaSociedad Argentina de Investigación OdontológicaSociedad Argentina de Investigación Odontológica2011info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectReuniónBookhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.rarapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/192047Comparación in vitro de filtración marginal entre ionómeros vítreos como selladores de fisura; XLIV Reunión Anual de la Sociedad Argentina de Investigación Odontológica; Tucumán; Argentina; 2011; 1-2CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://saio.org.ar/institucional/libros-resumenes-reuniones-anuales/Internacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:10:58Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/192047instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:10:58.857CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparación in vitro de filtración marginal entre ionómeros vítreos como selladores de fisura
title Comparación in vitro de filtración marginal entre ionómeros vítreos como selladores de fisura
spellingShingle Comparación in vitro de filtración marginal entre ionómeros vítreos como selladores de fisura
Sly, Gabriela
glass ionomer
fissure sealants
microleakage
title_short Comparación in vitro de filtración marginal entre ionómeros vítreos como selladores de fisura
title_full Comparación in vitro de filtración marginal entre ionómeros vítreos como selladores de fisura
title_fullStr Comparación in vitro de filtración marginal entre ionómeros vítreos como selladores de fisura
title_full_unstemmed Comparación in vitro de filtración marginal entre ionómeros vítreos como selladores de fisura
title_sort Comparación in vitro de filtración marginal entre ionómeros vítreos como selladores de fisura
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Sly, Gabriela
Missana, Liliana Raquel
Nieva, Nadia Yanina
Kaplan, Andrea Edith
author Sly, Gabriela
author_facet Sly, Gabriela
Missana, Liliana Raquel
Nieva, Nadia Yanina
Kaplan, Andrea Edith
author_role author
author2 Missana, Liliana Raquel
Nieva, Nadia Yanina
Kaplan, Andrea Edith
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv glass ionomer
fissure sealants
microleakage
topic glass ionomer
fissure sealants
microleakage
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The aim of this study was evaluate in vitro the marginal microleakage of two glass ionomer materials used as pit-and-fissure sealants. Thirty healthy premolars, extracted for orthodontic treatment were randomly assigned in to II groups (n=15) and sealant by two glass ionomer (Group I: Fuji VII and Group II: Fuji IX). All teeth conserved in artificial saliva (NAF) for 10 days, were thermocycled (250 cycles; 5ºC, 37ºC and 60ºC), isolated, immersed in 2% alcohol solution gentian violet blue dye for 4 h. After washed, they were included in acrylic resin and sectioned longitudinally in buccolingual direction by cutting device (Miniton de Struers). Samples were analyzed for leakage using light microscope (Olympus BX-60M).  A semi-quantitative ranked scale from Williams & Winter was used to score dye penetration. Results: Group I was distributed as follows Grade 1: 1 and Grade 3: 14 (Mean 2.87 Median 3, SD 0.52). Group II was distributed: Grade 0: 4, Grade 1: 3 Grade 2: 2 and Grade 3: 6. (Mean 1.67, Median 2, SD 1.29). Fisher Exact Test showed statistically significant differences between materials (p = 0.006). From these results, we concluded that Fuji IX showed better marginal seal than Fuji VII, when used as pit- fissure sealant. The aim of this study was evaluate in vitro the marginal microleakage of two glass ionomer materials used as pit-and-fissure sealants. Thirty healthy premolars, extracted for orthodontic treatment were randomly assigned in to II groups (n=15) and sealant by two glass ionomer (Group I: Fuji VII and Group II: Fuji IX). All teeth conserved in artificial saliva (NAF) for 10 days, were thermocycled (250 cycles; 5ºC, 37ºC and 60ºC), isolated, immersed in 2% alcohol solution gentian violet blue dye for 4 h. After washed, they were included in acrylic resin and sectioned longitudinally in buccolingual direction by cutting device (Miniton de Struers). Samples were analyzed for leakage using light microscope (Olympus BX-60M).  A semi-quantitative ranked scale from Williams & Winter was used to score dye penetration. Results: Group I was distributed as follows Grade 1: 1 and Grade 3: 14 (Mean 2.87 Median 3, SD 0.52). Group II was distributed: Grade 0: 4, Grade 1: 3 Grade 2: 2 and Grade 3: 6. (Mean 1.67, Median 2, SD 1.29). Fisher Exact Test showed statistically significant differences between materials (p = 0.006). From these results, we concluded that Fuji IX showed better marginal seal than Fuji VII, when used as pit- fissure sealant. The aim of this study was evaluate in vitro the marginal microleakage of two glass ionomer materials used as pit-and-fissure sealants. Thirty healthy premolars, extracted for orthodontic treatment were randomly assigned in to II groups (n=15) and sealant by two glass ionomer (Group I: Fuji VII and Group II: Fuji IX). All teeth conserved in artificial saliva (NAF) for 10 days, were thermocycled (250 cycles; 5ºC, 37ºC and 60ºC), isolated, immersed in 2% alcohol solution gentian violet blue dye for 4 h. After washed, they were included in acrylic resin and sectioned longitudinally in buccolingual direction by cutting device (Miniton de Struers). Samples were analyzed for leakage using light microscope (Olympus BX-60M).  A semi-quantitative ranked scale from Williams & Winter was used to score dye penetration. Results: Group I was distributed as follows Grade 1: 1 and Grade 3: 14 (Mean 2.87 Median 3, SD 0.52). Group II was distributed: Grade 0: 4, Grade 1: 3 Grade 2: 2 and Grade 3: 6. (Mean 1.67, Median 2, SD 1.29). Fisher Exact Test showed statistically significant differences between materials (p = 0.006). From these results, we concluded that Fuji IX showed better marginal seal than Fuji VII, when used as pit- fissure sealant.
Fil: Sly, Gabriela. Universidad Nacional de Tucuman. Facultad de Odontologia. Cat.de Anatomia Patologica/laboratorio de Patologia Molecular; Argentina
Fil: Missana, Liliana Raquel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Planta Piloto de Procesos Industriales Microbiológicos; Argentina
Fil: Nieva, Nadia Yanina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnología; Argentina
Fil: Kaplan, Andrea Edith. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Odontología. Departamento de Materiales Dentales; Argentina
XLIV Reunión Anual de la Sociedad Argentina de Investigación Odontológica
Tucumán
Argentina
Sociedad Argentina de Investigación Odontológica
description The aim of this study was evaluate in vitro the marginal microleakage of two glass ionomer materials used as pit-and-fissure sealants. Thirty healthy premolars, extracted for orthodontic treatment were randomly assigned in to II groups (n=15) and sealant by two glass ionomer (Group I: Fuji VII and Group II: Fuji IX). All teeth conserved in artificial saliva (NAF) for 10 days, were thermocycled (250 cycles; 5ºC, 37ºC and 60ºC), isolated, immersed in 2% alcohol solution gentian violet blue dye for 4 h. After washed, they were included in acrylic resin and sectioned longitudinally in buccolingual direction by cutting device (Miniton de Struers). Samples were analyzed for leakage using light microscope (Olympus BX-60M).  A semi-quantitative ranked scale from Williams & Winter was used to score dye penetration. Results: Group I was distributed as follows Grade 1: 1 and Grade 3: 14 (Mean 2.87 Median 3, SD 0.52). Group II was distributed: Grade 0: 4, Grade 1: 3 Grade 2: 2 and Grade 3: 6. (Mean 1.67, Median 2, SD 1.29). Fisher Exact Test showed statistically significant differences between materials (p = 0.006). From these results, we concluded that Fuji IX showed better marginal seal than Fuji VII, when used as pit- fissure sealant. The aim of this study was evaluate in vitro the marginal microleakage of two glass ionomer materials used as pit-and-fissure sealants. Thirty healthy premolars, extracted for orthodontic treatment were randomly assigned in to II groups (n=15) and sealant by two glass ionomer (Group I: Fuji VII and Group II: Fuji IX). All teeth conserved in artificial saliva (NAF) for 10 days, were thermocycled (250 cycles; 5ºC, 37ºC and 60ºC), isolated, immersed in 2% alcohol solution gentian violet blue dye for 4 h. After washed, they were included in acrylic resin and sectioned longitudinally in buccolingual direction by cutting device (Miniton de Struers). Samples were analyzed for leakage using light microscope (Olympus BX-60M).  A semi-quantitative ranked scale from Williams & Winter was used to score dye penetration. Results: Group I was distributed as follows Grade 1: 1 and Grade 3: 14 (Mean 2.87 Median 3, SD 0.52). Group II was distributed: Grade 0: 4, Grade 1: 3 Grade 2: 2 and Grade 3: 6. (Mean 1.67, Median 2, SD 1.29). Fisher Exact Test showed statistically significant differences between materials (p = 0.006). From these results, we concluded that Fuji IX showed better marginal seal than Fuji VII, when used as pit- fissure sealant. The aim of this study was evaluate in vitro the marginal microleakage of two glass ionomer materials used as pit-and-fissure sealants. Thirty healthy premolars, extracted for orthodontic treatment were randomly assigned in to II groups (n=15) and sealant by two glass ionomer (Group I: Fuji VII and Group II: Fuji IX). All teeth conserved in artificial saliva (NAF) for 10 days, were thermocycled (250 cycles; 5ºC, 37ºC and 60ºC), isolated, immersed in 2% alcohol solution gentian violet blue dye for 4 h. After washed, they were included in acrylic resin and sectioned longitudinally in buccolingual direction by cutting device (Miniton de Struers). Samples were analyzed for leakage using light microscope (Olympus BX-60M).  A semi-quantitative ranked scale from Williams & Winter was used to score dye penetration. Results: Group I was distributed as follows Grade 1: 1 and Grade 3: 14 (Mean 2.87 Median 3, SD 0.52). Group II was distributed: Grade 0: 4, Grade 1: 3 Grade 2: 2 and Grade 3: 6. (Mean 1.67, Median 2, SD 1.29). Fisher Exact Test showed statistically significant differences between materials (p = 0.006). From these results, we concluded that Fuji IX showed better marginal seal than Fuji VII, when used as pit- fissure sealant.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
Reunión
Book
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
status_str publishedVersion
format conferenceObject
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/192047
Comparación in vitro de filtración marginal entre ionómeros vítreos como selladores de fisura; XLIV Reunión Anual de la Sociedad Argentina de Investigación Odontológica; Tucumán; Argentina; 2011; 1-2
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/192047
identifier_str_mv Comparación in vitro de filtración marginal entre ionómeros vítreos como selladores de fisura; XLIV Reunión Anual de la Sociedad Argentina de Investigación Odontológica; Tucumán; Argentina; 2011; 1-2
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://saio.org.ar/institucional/libros-resumenes-reuniones-anuales/
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/vnd.rar
application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Internacional
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Argentina de Investigación Odontológica
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Argentina de Investigación Odontológica
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842270140007186432
score 13.13397