The subnational government power influence in the management of forest protected areas in Patagonia

Autores
Garcia, Rocío Melina; Yapura, Pablo Fernando
Año de publicación
2024
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Protected forests are territories of power struggles between different private and state actors at different levels of governance with increasingly land use pressures. In federal countries, where forests are under a subnational jurisdiction, subnational actors have a strategic role in the management of forests, resulting in power distributions. In Argentina, the aesthetic attractiveness and environmental value of the Andean Patagonian Forests resulted in the protection of the ecosystem under different features, turning the ecological region into one of the most protected with both national and subnational protected areas. Against this background, the aim of this study was to analyse and compare the power balance of the actors involved and define the role of the subnational government in two protected areas with different jurisdictions. In order to do so two protected areas in the Andean Patagonian region were selected, in the first case the subnational government is the main authority and in the second case the subnational government shares the administration of a forest territory with the national government and indigenous communities. By applying the Actor Centred Power approach that considers the power expression into three elements: information, incentives and coercion we compared the governance structure in both areas. Our results showed that in both cases the subnational government was one of the actors with most coercive and incentive power, although the information power remained with other actors. However, subnational governments did not show enough coercive capacity to develop effective regulations to prevent the appearance of conflicts of interest.
Fil: Garcia, Rocío Melina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Centro Cientifico Tecnologico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones En Recursos Naturales, Agroecologia y Desarrollo Rural. - Universidad Nacional de Rio Negro. Instituto de Investigaciones En Recursos Naturales, Agroecologia y Desarrollo Rural.; Argentina
Fil: Yapura, Pablo Fernando. Universidad Nacional de la Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales. Laboratorio de Investigacion de Sistemas Ecologicos y Ambientales; Argentina
26th International Union of Forest Research Organizations World Congress
Estocolmo
Suecia
International Union of Forest Research Organizations
Materia
FOREST GOVERNANCE
PROTECTED AREAS
SOCIAL NETWORKS
ACTORS POWER
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/253233

id CONICETDig_303e70ad892805c5f537819cf40a75a1
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/253233
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling The subnational government power influence in the management of forest protected areas in PatagoniaGarcia, Rocío MelinaYapura, Pablo FernandoFOREST GOVERNANCEPROTECTED AREASSOCIAL NETWORKSACTORS POWERhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.7https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Protected forests are territories of power struggles between different private and state actors at different levels of governance with increasingly land use pressures. In federal countries, where forests are under a subnational jurisdiction, subnational actors have a strategic role in the management of forests, resulting in power distributions. In Argentina, the aesthetic attractiveness and environmental value of the Andean Patagonian Forests resulted in the protection of the ecosystem under different features, turning the ecological region into one of the most protected with both national and subnational protected areas. Against this background, the aim of this study was to analyse and compare the power balance of the actors involved and define the role of the subnational government in two protected areas with different jurisdictions. In order to do so two protected areas in the Andean Patagonian region were selected, in the first case the subnational government is the main authority and in the second case the subnational government shares the administration of a forest territory with the national government and indigenous communities. By applying the Actor Centred Power approach that considers the power expression into three elements: information, incentives and coercion we compared the governance structure in both areas. Our results showed that in both cases the subnational government was one of the actors with most coercive and incentive power, although the information power remained with other actors. However, subnational governments did not show enough coercive capacity to develop effective regulations to prevent the appearance of conflicts of interest.Fil: Garcia, Rocío Melina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Centro Cientifico Tecnologico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones En Recursos Naturales, Agroecologia y Desarrollo Rural. - Universidad Nacional de Rio Negro. Instituto de Investigaciones En Recursos Naturales, Agroecologia y Desarrollo Rural.; ArgentinaFil: Yapura, Pablo Fernando. Universidad Nacional de la Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales. Laboratorio de Investigacion de Sistemas Ecologicos y Ambientales; Argentina26th International Union of Forest Research Organizations World CongressEstocolmoSueciaInternational Union of Forest Research OrganizationsInternational Union of Forest Research Organizations2024info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectCongresoBookhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/253233The subnational government power influence in the management of forest protected areas in Patagonia; 26th International Union of Forest Research Organizations World Congress; Estocolmo; Suecia; 2024; 3125-3125CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://iufro2024.com/wp-content/uploads/iufro2024abstracts.pdfInternacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:44:09Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/253233instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:44:09.776CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The subnational government power influence in the management of forest protected areas in Patagonia
title The subnational government power influence in the management of forest protected areas in Patagonia
spellingShingle The subnational government power influence in the management of forest protected areas in Patagonia
Garcia, Rocío Melina
FOREST GOVERNANCE
PROTECTED AREAS
SOCIAL NETWORKS
ACTORS POWER
title_short The subnational government power influence in the management of forest protected areas in Patagonia
title_full The subnational government power influence in the management of forest protected areas in Patagonia
title_fullStr The subnational government power influence in the management of forest protected areas in Patagonia
title_full_unstemmed The subnational government power influence in the management of forest protected areas in Patagonia
title_sort The subnational government power influence in the management of forest protected areas in Patagonia
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Garcia, Rocío Melina
Yapura, Pablo Fernando
author Garcia, Rocío Melina
author_facet Garcia, Rocío Melina
Yapura, Pablo Fernando
author_role author
author2 Yapura, Pablo Fernando
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv FOREST GOVERNANCE
PROTECTED AREAS
SOCIAL NETWORKS
ACTORS POWER
topic FOREST GOVERNANCE
PROTECTED AREAS
SOCIAL NETWORKS
ACTORS POWER
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.7
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Protected forests are territories of power struggles between different private and state actors at different levels of governance with increasingly land use pressures. In federal countries, where forests are under a subnational jurisdiction, subnational actors have a strategic role in the management of forests, resulting in power distributions. In Argentina, the aesthetic attractiveness and environmental value of the Andean Patagonian Forests resulted in the protection of the ecosystem under different features, turning the ecological region into one of the most protected with both national and subnational protected areas. Against this background, the aim of this study was to analyse and compare the power balance of the actors involved and define the role of the subnational government in two protected areas with different jurisdictions. In order to do so two protected areas in the Andean Patagonian region were selected, in the first case the subnational government is the main authority and in the second case the subnational government shares the administration of a forest territory with the national government and indigenous communities. By applying the Actor Centred Power approach that considers the power expression into three elements: information, incentives and coercion we compared the governance structure in both areas. Our results showed that in both cases the subnational government was one of the actors with most coercive and incentive power, although the information power remained with other actors. However, subnational governments did not show enough coercive capacity to develop effective regulations to prevent the appearance of conflicts of interest.
Fil: Garcia, Rocío Melina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Centro Cientifico Tecnologico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones En Recursos Naturales, Agroecologia y Desarrollo Rural. - Universidad Nacional de Rio Negro. Instituto de Investigaciones En Recursos Naturales, Agroecologia y Desarrollo Rural.; Argentina
Fil: Yapura, Pablo Fernando. Universidad Nacional de la Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales. Laboratorio de Investigacion de Sistemas Ecologicos y Ambientales; Argentina
26th International Union of Forest Research Organizations World Congress
Estocolmo
Suecia
International Union of Forest Research Organizations
description Protected forests are territories of power struggles between different private and state actors at different levels of governance with increasingly land use pressures. In federal countries, where forests are under a subnational jurisdiction, subnational actors have a strategic role in the management of forests, resulting in power distributions. In Argentina, the aesthetic attractiveness and environmental value of the Andean Patagonian Forests resulted in the protection of the ecosystem under different features, turning the ecological region into one of the most protected with both national and subnational protected areas. Against this background, the aim of this study was to analyse and compare the power balance of the actors involved and define the role of the subnational government in two protected areas with different jurisdictions. In order to do so two protected areas in the Andean Patagonian region were selected, in the first case the subnational government is the main authority and in the second case the subnational government shares the administration of a forest territory with the national government and indigenous communities. By applying the Actor Centred Power approach that considers the power expression into three elements: information, incentives and coercion we compared the governance structure in both areas. Our results showed that in both cases the subnational government was one of the actors with most coercive and incentive power, although the information power remained with other actors. However, subnational governments did not show enough coercive capacity to develop effective regulations to prevent the appearance of conflicts of interest.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
Congreso
Book
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
status_str publishedVersion
format conferenceObject
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/253233
The subnational government power influence in the management of forest protected areas in Patagonia; 26th International Union of Forest Research Organizations World Congress; Estocolmo; Suecia; 2024; 3125-3125
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/253233
identifier_str_mv The subnational government power influence in the management of forest protected areas in Patagonia; 26th International Union of Forest Research Organizations World Congress; Estocolmo; Suecia; 2024; 3125-3125
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://iufro2024.com/wp-content/uploads/iufro2024abstracts.pdf
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Internacional
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv International Union of Forest Research Organizations
publisher.none.fl_str_mv International Union of Forest Research Organizations
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613389813284864
score 13.070432