Current forest-related discourses

Autores
Pülzl, Helga; Wydra, Doris; Obeng Odoom, Franklin; Arts, Bas; Edwards, Peter; Kleinschmit, Daniela; Giurca, Alexandru; Burns, Sarah Lilian; Nurrochmat, Dodik; Park, Mi Sun; Mijailoff, Julián Daniel
Año de publicación
2024
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
parte de libro
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Discourses about forests matter as they mediate or shape action. Chapter 4 presents an updateto the work of Arts et al. (2010), which used a longitudinal analysis of global forest 1 (-related)discourses and interrelated meta- and regulatory discourses and their prevalence over time takestock of the discursive shifts that emerge from the literature. This is based on a literature searchin Google Scholar, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science for the time from January 2011 to June 2023. Theresults were discussed with experts in the field to understand whether: i) important themes weremissing, and ii) discursive dynamics were misrepresented or misinterpreted. In addition, mainframing devices that have recently appeared were identified.The analysis found that a ´climatization´ of the environmental meta-discourse clearly has takenplace, and has had an impact on how forests are problematized and understood to provide climatesolutions. It identified also a refurbished discourse on ‘ecological modernisation’ with a neoliberaltwist, and several of growth-based discourses that stretch from de-growth to pro-growth, as well astransition discourses that centre around civic environmentalism and justice. Regulatory discourseswere found to not have changed considerably, but new modes of governance based on markets havebecome more common. New and refurbished forest-related discourses were also identified alongseveral framings that impact forests, such as seeing forests as carbon sinks, ecosystem serviceproviders, landscape managers, and suppliers of nature-based solutions in actual political debates.Mechanisms of power are particularly pronounced in procedures of exclusion. Knowing forestsand giving meaning to forest-related activities steers the way we see and use forests. Therefore, thechapter analyses results around frames of ‘constantly better knowledge’ about forests, the com-modification of forests into ‘tradable entities’, as well as silences (i.e., not addressing certain aspectsof forests). These frames are seen as forms of power expression. The Chapter concludes that, whilethe academic literature and debates mostly reflect current dynamics in decision-making, this anal-ysis shows that there is an ongoing polarization between different actor positions, which is likely toincrease as discourses drift apart or confront each other. Therefore, finding common positions andcompromise could become more complex and difficult in the future.
Fil: Pülzl, Helga. European Forest Institute; Alemania
Fil: Wydra, Doris. Lodron University of Salzburg; Austria
Fil: Obeng Odoom, Franklin. University of Helsinki; Finlandia
Fil: Arts, Bas. University of Agriculture Wageningen; Países Bajos
Fil: Edwards, Peter. Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research; Nueva Zelanda
Fil: Kleinschmit, Daniela. Albert Ludwigs University of Freiburg; Alemania
Fil: Giurca, Alexandru. European Forest Institute; Alemania
Fil: Burns, Sarah Lilian. Technische Universität Dresden.; Alemania. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales. Laboratorio de Investigación de Sistemas Ecológicos y Ambientales; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; Argentina
Fil: Nurrochmat, Dodik. Bogor Agricultural University; Indonesia
Fil: Park, Mi Sun. Seoul National University; Corea del Sur
Fil: Mijailoff, Julián Daniel. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales. Laboratorio de Investigación de Sistemas Ecológicos y Ambientales; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; Argentina
Materia
Forest-related Discourses
International Forest Governance
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/269199

id CONICETDig_048c22e40aba5c1a292f11ad678f6230
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/269199
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Current forest-related discoursesPülzl, HelgaWydra, DorisObeng Odoom, FranklinArts, BasEdwards, PeterKleinschmit, DanielaGiurca, AlexandruBurns, Sarah LilianNurrochmat, DodikPark, Mi SunMijailoff, Julián DanielForest-related DiscoursesInternational Forest Governancehttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Discourses about forests matter as they mediate or shape action. Chapter 4 presents an updateto the work of Arts et al. (2010), which used a longitudinal analysis of global forest 1 (-related)discourses and interrelated meta- and regulatory discourses and their prevalence over time takestock of the discursive shifts that emerge from the literature. This is based on a literature searchin Google Scholar, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science for the time from January 2011 to June 2023. Theresults were discussed with experts in the field to understand whether: i) important themes weremissing, and ii) discursive dynamics were misrepresented or misinterpreted. In addition, mainframing devices that have recently appeared were identified.The analysis found that a ´climatization´ of the environmental meta-discourse clearly has takenplace, and has had an impact on how forests are problematized and understood to provide climatesolutions. It identified also a refurbished discourse on ‘ecological modernisation’ with a neoliberaltwist, and several of growth-based discourses that stretch from de-growth to pro-growth, as well astransition discourses that centre around civic environmentalism and justice. Regulatory discourseswere found to not have changed considerably, but new modes of governance based on markets havebecome more common. New and refurbished forest-related discourses were also identified alongseveral framings that impact forests, such as seeing forests as carbon sinks, ecosystem serviceproviders, landscape managers, and suppliers of nature-based solutions in actual political debates.Mechanisms of power are particularly pronounced in procedures of exclusion. Knowing forestsand giving meaning to forest-related activities steers the way we see and use forests. Therefore, thechapter analyses results around frames of ‘constantly better knowledge’ about forests, the com-modification of forests into ‘tradable entities’, as well as silences (i.e., not addressing certain aspectsof forests). These frames are seen as forms of power expression. The Chapter concludes that, whilethe academic literature and debates mostly reflect current dynamics in decision-making, this anal-ysis shows that there is an ongoing polarization between different actor positions, which is likely toincrease as discourses drift apart or confront each other. Therefore, finding common positions andcompromise could become more complex and difficult in the future.Fil: Pülzl, Helga. European Forest Institute; AlemaniaFil: Wydra, Doris. Lodron University of Salzburg; AustriaFil: Obeng Odoom, Franklin. University of Helsinki; FinlandiaFil: Arts, Bas. University of Agriculture Wageningen; Países BajosFil: Edwards, Peter. Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research; Nueva ZelandaFil: Kleinschmit, Daniela. Albert Ludwigs University of Freiburg; AlemaniaFil: Giurca, Alexandru. European Forest Institute; AlemaniaFil: Burns, Sarah Lilian. Technische Universität Dresden.; Alemania. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales. Laboratorio de Investigación de Sistemas Ecológicos y Ambientales; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; ArgentinaFil: Nurrochmat, Dodik. Bogor Agricultural University; IndonesiaFil: Park, Mi Sun. Seoul National University; Corea del SurFil: Mijailoff, Julián Daniel. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales. Laboratorio de Investigación de Sistemas Ecológicos y Ambientales; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; ArgentinaInternational Union of Forest Research OrganizationsKleinschmit, DanielaWildburger, ChristophGrima, NelsonFisher, Brendan2024info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookParthttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248info:ar-repo/semantics/parteDeLibroapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/269199Pülzl, Helga; Wydra, Doris; Obeng Odoom, Franklin; Arts, Bas; Edwards, Peter; et al.; Current forest-related discourses; International Union of Forest Research Organizations; 2024; 83-117978-3-903345-25-6CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.iufro.org/publications/world-series-vol-43-international-forests-governance-a-critical-review-of-trends-drawbacks-and-new-approachesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:06:33Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/269199instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:06:34.134CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Current forest-related discourses
title Current forest-related discourses
spellingShingle Current forest-related discourses
Pülzl, Helga
Forest-related Discourses
International Forest Governance
title_short Current forest-related discourses
title_full Current forest-related discourses
title_fullStr Current forest-related discourses
title_full_unstemmed Current forest-related discourses
title_sort Current forest-related discourses
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Pülzl, Helga
Wydra, Doris
Obeng Odoom, Franklin
Arts, Bas
Edwards, Peter
Kleinschmit, Daniela
Giurca, Alexandru
Burns, Sarah Lilian
Nurrochmat, Dodik
Park, Mi Sun
Mijailoff, Julián Daniel
author Pülzl, Helga
author_facet Pülzl, Helga
Wydra, Doris
Obeng Odoom, Franklin
Arts, Bas
Edwards, Peter
Kleinschmit, Daniela
Giurca, Alexandru
Burns, Sarah Lilian
Nurrochmat, Dodik
Park, Mi Sun
Mijailoff, Julián Daniel
author_role author
author2 Wydra, Doris
Obeng Odoom, Franklin
Arts, Bas
Edwards, Peter
Kleinschmit, Daniela
Giurca, Alexandru
Burns, Sarah Lilian
Nurrochmat, Dodik
Park, Mi Sun
Mijailoff, Julián Daniel
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Kleinschmit, Daniela
Wildburger, Christoph
Grima, Nelson
Fisher, Brendan
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Forest-related Discourses
International Forest Governance
topic Forest-related Discourses
International Forest Governance
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Discourses about forests matter as they mediate or shape action. Chapter 4 presents an updateto the work of Arts et al. (2010), which used a longitudinal analysis of global forest 1 (-related)discourses and interrelated meta- and regulatory discourses and their prevalence over time takestock of the discursive shifts that emerge from the literature. This is based on a literature searchin Google Scholar, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science for the time from January 2011 to June 2023. Theresults were discussed with experts in the field to understand whether: i) important themes weremissing, and ii) discursive dynamics were misrepresented or misinterpreted. In addition, mainframing devices that have recently appeared were identified.The analysis found that a ´climatization´ of the environmental meta-discourse clearly has takenplace, and has had an impact on how forests are problematized and understood to provide climatesolutions. It identified also a refurbished discourse on ‘ecological modernisation’ with a neoliberaltwist, and several of growth-based discourses that stretch from de-growth to pro-growth, as well astransition discourses that centre around civic environmentalism and justice. Regulatory discourseswere found to not have changed considerably, but new modes of governance based on markets havebecome more common. New and refurbished forest-related discourses were also identified alongseveral framings that impact forests, such as seeing forests as carbon sinks, ecosystem serviceproviders, landscape managers, and suppliers of nature-based solutions in actual political debates.Mechanisms of power are particularly pronounced in procedures of exclusion. Knowing forestsand giving meaning to forest-related activities steers the way we see and use forests. Therefore, thechapter analyses results around frames of ‘constantly better knowledge’ about forests, the com-modification of forests into ‘tradable entities’, as well as silences (i.e., not addressing certain aspectsof forests). These frames are seen as forms of power expression. The Chapter concludes that, whilethe academic literature and debates mostly reflect current dynamics in decision-making, this anal-ysis shows that there is an ongoing polarization between different actor positions, which is likely toincrease as discourses drift apart or confront each other. Therefore, finding common positions andcompromise could become more complex and difficult in the future.
Fil: Pülzl, Helga. European Forest Institute; Alemania
Fil: Wydra, Doris. Lodron University of Salzburg; Austria
Fil: Obeng Odoom, Franklin. University of Helsinki; Finlandia
Fil: Arts, Bas. University of Agriculture Wageningen; Países Bajos
Fil: Edwards, Peter. Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research; Nueva Zelanda
Fil: Kleinschmit, Daniela. Albert Ludwigs University of Freiburg; Alemania
Fil: Giurca, Alexandru. European Forest Institute; Alemania
Fil: Burns, Sarah Lilian. Technische Universität Dresden.; Alemania. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales. Laboratorio de Investigación de Sistemas Ecológicos y Ambientales; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; Argentina
Fil: Nurrochmat, Dodik. Bogor Agricultural University; Indonesia
Fil: Park, Mi Sun. Seoul National University; Corea del Sur
Fil: Mijailoff, Julián Daniel. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales. Laboratorio de Investigación de Sistemas Ecológicos y Ambientales; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; Argentina
description Discourses about forests matter as they mediate or shape action. Chapter 4 presents an updateto the work of Arts et al. (2010), which used a longitudinal analysis of global forest 1 (-related)discourses and interrelated meta- and regulatory discourses and their prevalence over time takestock of the discursive shifts that emerge from the literature. This is based on a literature searchin Google Scholar, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science for the time from January 2011 to June 2023. Theresults were discussed with experts in the field to understand whether: i) important themes weremissing, and ii) discursive dynamics were misrepresented or misinterpreted. In addition, mainframing devices that have recently appeared were identified.The analysis found that a ´climatization´ of the environmental meta-discourse clearly has takenplace, and has had an impact on how forests are problematized and understood to provide climatesolutions. It identified also a refurbished discourse on ‘ecological modernisation’ with a neoliberaltwist, and several of growth-based discourses that stretch from de-growth to pro-growth, as well astransition discourses that centre around civic environmentalism and justice. Regulatory discourseswere found to not have changed considerably, but new modes of governance based on markets havebecome more common. New and refurbished forest-related discourses were also identified alongseveral framings that impact forests, such as seeing forests as carbon sinks, ecosystem serviceproviders, landscape managers, and suppliers of nature-based solutions in actual political debates.Mechanisms of power are particularly pronounced in procedures of exclusion. Knowing forestsand giving meaning to forest-related activities steers the way we see and use forests. Therefore, thechapter analyses results around frames of ‘constantly better knowledge’ about forests, the com-modification of forests into ‘tradable entities’, as well as silences (i.e., not addressing certain aspectsof forests). These frames are seen as forms of power expression. The Chapter concludes that, whilethe academic literature and debates mostly reflect current dynamics in decision-making, this anal-ysis shows that there is an ongoing polarization between different actor positions, which is likely toincrease as discourses drift apart or confront each other. Therefore, finding common positions andcompromise could become more complex and difficult in the future.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248
info:ar-repo/semantics/parteDeLibro
status_str publishedVersion
format bookPart
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/269199
Pülzl, Helga; Wydra, Doris; Obeng Odoom, Franklin; Arts, Bas; Edwards, Peter; et al.; Current forest-related discourses; International Union of Forest Research Organizations; 2024; 83-117
978-3-903345-25-6
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/269199
identifier_str_mv Pülzl, Helga; Wydra, Doris; Obeng Odoom, Franklin; Arts, Bas; Edwards, Peter; et al.; Current forest-related discourses; International Union of Forest Research Organizations; 2024; 83-117
978-3-903345-25-6
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.iufro.org/publications/world-series-vol-43-international-forests-governance-a-critical-review-of-trends-drawbacks-and-new-approaches
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv International Union of Forest Research Organizations
publisher.none.fl_str_mv International Union of Forest Research Organizations
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613915680440320
score 13.070432