Current forest-related discourses
- Autores
- Pülzl, Helga; Wydra, Doris; Obeng Odoom, Franklin; Arts, Bas; Edwards, Peter; Kleinschmit, Daniela; Giurca, Alexandru; Burns, Sarah Lilian; Nurrochmat, Dodik; Park, Mi Sun; Mijailoff, Julián Daniel
- Año de publicación
- 2024
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- parte de libro
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Discourses about forests matter as they mediate or shape action. Chapter 4 presents an updateto the work of Arts et al. (2010), which used a longitudinal analysis of global forest 1 (-related)discourses and interrelated meta- and regulatory discourses and their prevalence over time takestock of the discursive shifts that emerge from the literature. This is based on a literature searchin Google Scholar, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science for the time from January 2011 to June 2023. Theresults were discussed with experts in the field to understand whether: i) important themes weremissing, and ii) discursive dynamics were misrepresented or misinterpreted. In addition, mainframing devices that have recently appeared were identified.The analysis found that a ´climatization´ of the environmental meta-discourse clearly has takenplace, and has had an impact on how forests are problematized and understood to provide climatesolutions. It identified also a refurbished discourse on ‘ecological modernisation’ with a neoliberaltwist, and several of growth-based discourses that stretch from de-growth to pro-growth, as well astransition discourses that centre around civic environmentalism and justice. Regulatory discourseswere found to not have changed considerably, but new modes of governance based on markets havebecome more common. New and refurbished forest-related discourses were also identified alongseveral framings that impact forests, such as seeing forests as carbon sinks, ecosystem serviceproviders, landscape managers, and suppliers of nature-based solutions in actual political debates.Mechanisms of power are particularly pronounced in procedures of exclusion. Knowing forestsand giving meaning to forest-related activities steers the way we see and use forests. Therefore, thechapter analyses results around frames of ‘constantly better knowledge’ about forests, the com-modification of forests into ‘tradable entities’, as well as silences (i.e., not addressing certain aspectsof forests). These frames are seen as forms of power expression. The Chapter concludes that, whilethe academic literature and debates mostly reflect current dynamics in decision-making, this anal-ysis shows that there is an ongoing polarization between different actor positions, which is likely toincrease as discourses drift apart or confront each other. Therefore, finding common positions andcompromise could become more complex and difficult in the future.
Fil: Pülzl, Helga. European Forest Institute; Alemania
Fil: Wydra, Doris. Lodron University of Salzburg; Austria
Fil: Obeng Odoom, Franklin. University of Helsinki; Finlandia
Fil: Arts, Bas. University of Agriculture Wageningen; Países Bajos
Fil: Edwards, Peter. Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research; Nueva Zelanda
Fil: Kleinschmit, Daniela. Albert Ludwigs University of Freiburg; Alemania
Fil: Giurca, Alexandru. European Forest Institute; Alemania
Fil: Burns, Sarah Lilian. Technische Universität Dresden.; Alemania. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales. Laboratorio de Investigación de Sistemas Ecológicos y Ambientales; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; Argentina
Fil: Nurrochmat, Dodik. Bogor Agricultural University; Indonesia
Fil: Park, Mi Sun. Seoul National University; Corea del Sur
Fil: Mijailoff, Julián Daniel. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales. Laboratorio de Investigación de Sistemas Ecológicos y Ambientales; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; Argentina - Materia
-
Forest-related Discourses
International Forest Governance - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/269199
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_048c22e40aba5c1a292f11ad678f6230 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/269199 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Current forest-related discoursesPülzl, HelgaWydra, DorisObeng Odoom, FranklinArts, BasEdwards, PeterKleinschmit, DanielaGiurca, AlexandruBurns, Sarah LilianNurrochmat, DodikPark, Mi SunMijailoff, Julián DanielForest-related DiscoursesInternational Forest Governancehttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Discourses about forests matter as they mediate or shape action. Chapter 4 presents an updateto the work of Arts et al. (2010), which used a longitudinal analysis of global forest 1 (-related)discourses and interrelated meta- and regulatory discourses and their prevalence over time takestock of the discursive shifts that emerge from the literature. This is based on a literature searchin Google Scholar, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science for the time from January 2011 to June 2023. Theresults were discussed with experts in the field to understand whether: i) important themes weremissing, and ii) discursive dynamics were misrepresented or misinterpreted. In addition, mainframing devices that have recently appeared were identified.The analysis found that a ´climatization´ of the environmental meta-discourse clearly has takenplace, and has had an impact on how forests are problematized and understood to provide climatesolutions. It identified also a refurbished discourse on ‘ecological modernisation’ with a neoliberaltwist, and several of growth-based discourses that stretch from de-growth to pro-growth, as well astransition discourses that centre around civic environmentalism and justice. Regulatory discourseswere found to not have changed considerably, but new modes of governance based on markets havebecome more common. New and refurbished forest-related discourses were also identified alongseveral framings that impact forests, such as seeing forests as carbon sinks, ecosystem serviceproviders, landscape managers, and suppliers of nature-based solutions in actual political debates.Mechanisms of power are particularly pronounced in procedures of exclusion. Knowing forestsand giving meaning to forest-related activities steers the way we see and use forests. Therefore, thechapter analyses results around frames of ‘constantly better knowledge’ about forests, the com-modification of forests into ‘tradable entities’, as well as silences (i.e., not addressing certain aspectsof forests). These frames are seen as forms of power expression. The Chapter concludes that, whilethe academic literature and debates mostly reflect current dynamics in decision-making, this anal-ysis shows that there is an ongoing polarization between different actor positions, which is likely toincrease as discourses drift apart or confront each other. Therefore, finding common positions andcompromise could become more complex and difficult in the future.Fil: Pülzl, Helga. European Forest Institute; AlemaniaFil: Wydra, Doris. Lodron University of Salzburg; AustriaFil: Obeng Odoom, Franklin. University of Helsinki; FinlandiaFil: Arts, Bas. University of Agriculture Wageningen; Países BajosFil: Edwards, Peter. Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research; Nueva ZelandaFil: Kleinschmit, Daniela. Albert Ludwigs University of Freiburg; AlemaniaFil: Giurca, Alexandru. European Forest Institute; AlemaniaFil: Burns, Sarah Lilian. Technische Universität Dresden.; Alemania. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales. Laboratorio de Investigación de Sistemas Ecológicos y Ambientales; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; ArgentinaFil: Nurrochmat, Dodik. Bogor Agricultural University; IndonesiaFil: Park, Mi Sun. Seoul National University; Corea del SurFil: Mijailoff, Julián Daniel. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales. Laboratorio de Investigación de Sistemas Ecológicos y Ambientales; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; ArgentinaInternational Union of Forest Research OrganizationsKleinschmit, DanielaWildburger, ChristophGrima, NelsonFisher, Brendan2024info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookParthttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248info:ar-repo/semantics/parteDeLibroapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/269199Pülzl, Helga; Wydra, Doris; Obeng Odoom, Franklin; Arts, Bas; Edwards, Peter; et al.; Current forest-related discourses; International Union of Forest Research Organizations; 2024; 83-117978-3-903345-25-6CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.iufro.org/publications/world-series-vol-43-international-forests-governance-a-critical-review-of-trends-drawbacks-and-new-approachesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:06:33Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/269199instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:06:34.134CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Current forest-related discourses |
title |
Current forest-related discourses |
spellingShingle |
Current forest-related discourses Pülzl, Helga Forest-related Discourses International Forest Governance |
title_short |
Current forest-related discourses |
title_full |
Current forest-related discourses |
title_fullStr |
Current forest-related discourses |
title_full_unstemmed |
Current forest-related discourses |
title_sort |
Current forest-related discourses |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Pülzl, Helga Wydra, Doris Obeng Odoom, Franklin Arts, Bas Edwards, Peter Kleinschmit, Daniela Giurca, Alexandru Burns, Sarah Lilian Nurrochmat, Dodik Park, Mi Sun Mijailoff, Julián Daniel |
author |
Pülzl, Helga |
author_facet |
Pülzl, Helga Wydra, Doris Obeng Odoom, Franklin Arts, Bas Edwards, Peter Kleinschmit, Daniela Giurca, Alexandru Burns, Sarah Lilian Nurrochmat, Dodik Park, Mi Sun Mijailoff, Julián Daniel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Wydra, Doris Obeng Odoom, Franklin Arts, Bas Edwards, Peter Kleinschmit, Daniela Giurca, Alexandru Burns, Sarah Lilian Nurrochmat, Dodik Park, Mi Sun Mijailoff, Julián Daniel |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Kleinschmit, Daniela Wildburger, Christoph Grima, Nelson Fisher, Brendan |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Forest-related Discourses International Forest Governance |
topic |
Forest-related Discourses International Forest Governance |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.5 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Discourses about forests matter as they mediate or shape action. Chapter 4 presents an updateto the work of Arts et al. (2010), which used a longitudinal analysis of global forest 1 (-related)discourses and interrelated meta- and regulatory discourses and their prevalence over time takestock of the discursive shifts that emerge from the literature. This is based on a literature searchin Google Scholar, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science for the time from January 2011 to June 2023. Theresults were discussed with experts in the field to understand whether: i) important themes weremissing, and ii) discursive dynamics were misrepresented or misinterpreted. In addition, mainframing devices that have recently appeared were identified.The analysis found that a ´climatization´ of the environmental meta-discourse clearly has takenplace, and has had an impact on how forests are problematized and understood to provide climatesolutions. It identified also a refurbished discourse on ‘ecological modernisation’ with a neoliberaltwist, and several of growth-based discourses that stretch from de-growth to pro-growth, as well astransition discourses that centre around civic environmentalism and justice. Regulatory discourseswere found to not have changed considerably, but new modes of governance based on markets havebecome more common. New and refurbished forest-related discourses were also identified alongseveral framings that impact forests, such as seeing forests as carbon sinks, ecosystem serviceproviders, landscape managers, and suppliers of nature-based solutions in actual political debates.Mechanisms of power are particularly pronounced in procedures of exclusion. Knowing forestsand giving meaning to forest-related activities steers the way we see and use forests. Therefore, thechapter analyses results around frames of ‘constantly better knowledge’ about forests, the com-modification of forests into ‘tradable entities’, as well as silences (i.e., not addressing certain aspectsof forests). These frames are seen as forms of power expression. The Chapter concludes that, whilethe academic literature and debates mostly reflect current dynamics in decision-making, this anal-ysis shows that there is an ongoing polarization between different actor positions, which is likely toincrease as discourses drift apart or confront each other. Therefore, finding common positions andcompromise could become more complex and difficult in the future. Fil: Pülzl, Helga. European Forest Institute; Alemania Fil: Wydra, Doris. Lodron University of Salzburg; Austria Fil: Obeng Odoom, Franklin. University of Helsinki; Finlandia Fil: Arts, Bas. University of Agriculture Wageningen; Países Bajos Fil: Edwards, Peter. Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research; Nueva Zelanda Fil: Kleinschmit, Daniela. Albert Ludwigs University of Freiburg; Alemania Fil: Giurca, Alexandru. European Forest Institute; Alemania Fil: Burns, Sarah Lilian. Technische Universität Dresden.; Alemania. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales. Laboratorio de Investigación de Sistemas Ecológicos y Ambientales; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; Argentina Fil: Nurrochmat, Dodik. Bogor Agricultural University; Indonesia Fil: Park, Mi Sun. Seoul National University; Corea del Sur Fil: Mijailoff, Julián Daniel. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales. Laboratorio de Investigación de Sistemas Ecológicos y Ambientales; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; Argentina |
description |
Discourses about forests matter as they mediate or shape action. Chapter 4 presents an updateto the work of Arts et al. (2010), which used a longitudinal analysis of global forest 1 (-related)discourses and interrelated meta- and regulatory discourses and their prevalence over time takestock of the discursive shifts that emerge from the literature. This is based on a literature searchin Google Scholar, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science for the time from January 2011 to June 2023. Theresults were discussed with experts in the field to understand whether: i) important themes weremissing, and ii) discursive dynamics were misrepresented or misinterpreted. In addition, mainframing devices that have recently appeared were identified.The analysis found that a ´climatization´ of the environmental meta-discourse clearly has takenplace, and has had an impact on how forests are problematized and understood to provide climatesolutions. It identified also a refurbished discourse on ‘ecological modernisation’ with a neoliberaltwist, and several of growth-based discourses that stretch from de-growth to pro-growth, as well astransition discourses that centre around civic environmentalism and justice. Regulatory discourseswere found to not have changed considerably, but new modes of governance based on markets havebecome more common. New and refurbished forest-related discourses were also identified alongseveral framings that impact forests, such as seeing forests as carbon sinks, ecosystem serviceproviders, landscape managers, and suppliers of nature-based solutions in actual political debates.Mechanisms of power are particularly pronounced in procedures of exclusion. Knowing forestsand giving meaning to forest-related activities steers the way we see and use forests. Therefore, thechapter analyses results around frames of ‘constantly better knowledge’ about forests, the com-modification of forests into ‘tradable entities’, as well as silences (i.e., not addressing certain aspectsof forests). These frames are seen as forms of power expression. The Chapter concludes that, whilethe academic literature and debates mostly reflect current dynamics in decision-making, this anal-ysis shows that there is an ongoing polarization between different actor positions, which is likely toincrease as discourses drift apart or confront each other. Therefore, finding common positions andcompromise could become more complex and difficult in the future. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248 info:ar-repo/semantics/parteDeLibro |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
format |
bookPart |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/269199 Pülzl, Helga; Wydra, Doris; Obeng Odoom, Franklin; Arts, Bas; Edwards, Peter; et al.; Current forest-related discourses; International Union of Forest Research Organizations; 2024; 83-117 978-3-903345-25-6 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/269199 |
identifier_str_mv |
Pülzl, Helga; Wydra, Doris; Obeng Odoom, Franklin; Arts, Bas; Edwards, Peter; et al.; Current forest-related discourses; International Union of Forest Research Organizations; 2024; 83-117 978-3-903345-25-6 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.iufro.org/publications/world-series-vol-43-international-forests-governance-a-critical-review-of-trends-drawbacks-and-new-approaches |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
International Union of Forest Research Organizations |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
International Union of Forest Research Organizations |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613915680440320 |
score |
13.070432 |