Variance misperception explains illusions of confidence in simple perceptual decisions

Autores
Zylberberg, Ariel Dario; Roelfsema, Pieter R.; Sigman, Mariano
Año de publicación
2014
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Confidence in a perceptual decision is a judgment about the quality of the sensory evidence. The quality of the evidence depends not only on its strength ('signal') but critically on its reliability ('noise'), but the separate contribution of these quantities to the formation of confidence judgments has not been investigated before in the context of perceptual decisions. We studied subjective confidence reports in a multi-element perceptual task where evidence strength and reliability could be manipulated independently. Our results reveal a confidence paradox: confidence is higher for stimuli of lower reliability that are associated with a lower accuracy. We show that the subjects' overconfidence in trials with unreliable evidence is caused by a reduced sensitivity to stimulus variability. Our results bridge between the investigation of miss-attributions of confidence in behavioral economics and the domain of simple perceptual decisions amenable to neuroscience research. © 2014 Elsevier Inc.
Fil: Zylberberg, Ariel Dario. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ingenieria. Instituto de Ingeniería Biomédica; Argentina. Netherlands Institute For Neuroscience; Países Bajos. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Computación; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Física. Laboratorio de Neurociencia Integrativa; Argentina
Fil: Roelfsema, Pieter R.. University of Amsterdam; Países Bajos. Academic Medical Center; Países Bajos. Netherlands Institute For Neuroscience; Países Bajos
Fil: Sigman, Mariano. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Física. Laboratorio de Neurociencia Integrativa; Argentina. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Materia
Introspection
Metacognition
Perceptual Decisions
Sensory Reliability
Signal-Detection Theory
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/77183
Acceder
id CONICETDig_2fc939c6d30b07b9dd55398f38f7e969
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/77183
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Variance misperception explains illusions of confidence in simple perceptual decisionsZylberberg, Ariel DarioRoelfsema, Pieter R.Sigman, MarianoIntrospectionMetacognitionPerceptual DecisionsSensory ReliabilitySignal-Detection TheoryConfidence in a perceptual decision is a judgment about the quality of the sensory evidence. The quality of the evidence depends not only on its strength ('signal') but critically on its reliability ('noise'), but the separate contribution of these quantities to the formation of confidence judgments has not been investigated before in the context of perceptual decisions. We studied subjective confidence reports in a multi-element perceptual task where evidence strength and reliability could be manipulated independently. Our results reveal a confidence paradox: confidence is higher for stimuli of lower reliability that are associated with a lower accuracy. We show that the subjects' overconfidence in trials with unreliable evidence is caused by a reduced sensitivity to stimulus variability. Our results bridge between the investigation of miss-attributions of confidence in behavioral economics and the domain of simple perceptual decisions amenable to neuroscience research. © 2014 Elsevier Inc.Fil: Zylberberg, Ariel Dario. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ingenieria. Instituto de Ingeniería Biomédica; Argentina. Netherlands Institute For Neuroscience; Países Bajos. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Computación; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Física. Laboratorio de Neurociencia Integrativa; ArgentinaFil: Roelfsema, Pieter R.. University of Amsterdam; Países Bajos. Academic Medical Center; Países Bajos. Netherlands Institute For Neuroscience; Países BajosFil: Sigman, Mariano. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Física. Laboratorio de Neurociencia Integrativa; Argentina. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaElsevier2014-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/77183Zylberberg, Ariel Dario; Roelfsema, Pieter R.; Sigman, Mariano; Variance misperception explains illusions of confidence in simple perceptual decisions; Elsevier; Consciousness and Cognition; 27; 1; 7-2014; 246-2531053-8100CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053810014000865info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.concog.2014.05.012info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:57:16Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/77183instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:57:16.893CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Variance misperception explains illusions of confidence in simple perceptual decisions
title Variance misperception explains illusions of confidence in simple perceptual decisions
spellingShingle Variance misperception explains illusions of confidence in simple perceptual decisions
Zylberberg, Ariel Dario
Introspection
Metacognition
Perceptual Decisions
Sensory Reliability
Signal-Detection Theory
title_short Variance misperception explains illusions of confidence in simple perceptual decisions
title_full Variance misperception explains illusions of confidence in simple perceptual decisions
title_fullStr Variance misperception explains illusions of confidence in simple perceptual decisions
title_full_unstemmed Variance misperception explains illusions of confidence in simple perceptual decisions
title_sort Variance misperception explains illusions of confidence in simple perceptual decisions
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Zylberberg, Ariel Dario
Roelfsema, Pieter R.
Sigman, Mariano
author Zylberberg, Ariel Dario
author_facet Zylberberg, Ariel Dario
Roelfsema, Pieter R.
Sigman, Mariano
author_role author
author2 Roelfsema, Pieter R.
Sigman, Mariano
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Introspection
Metacognition
Perceptual Decisions
Sensory Reliability
Signal-Detection Theory
topic Introspection
Metacognition
Perceptual Decisions
Sensory Reliability
Signal-Detection Theory
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Confidence in a perceptual decision is a judgment about the quality of the sensory evidence. The quality of the evidence depends not only on its strength ('signal') but critically on its reliability ('noise'), but the separate contribution of these quantities to the formation of confidence judgments has not been investigated before in the context of perceptual decisions. We studied subjective confidence reports in a multi-element perceptual task where evidence strength and reliability could be manipulated independently. Our results reveal a confidence paradox: confidence is higher for stimuli of lower reliability that are associated with a lower accuracy. We show that the subjects' overconfidence in trials with unreliable evidence is caused by a reduced sensitivity to stimulus variability. Our results bridge between the investigation of miss-attributions of confidence in behavioral economics and the domain of simple perceptual decisions amenable to neuroscience research. © 2014 Elsevier Inc.
Fil: Zylberberg, Ariel Dario. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ingenieria. Instituto de Ingeniería Biomédica; Argentina. Netherlands Institute For Neuroscience; Países Bajos. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Computación; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Física. Laboratorio de Neurociencia Integrativa; Argentina
Fil: Roelfsema, Pieter R.. University of Amsterdam; Países Bajos. Academic Medical Center; Países Bajos. Netherlands Institute For Neuroscience; Países Bajos
Fil: Sigman, Mariano. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Física. Laboratorio de Neurociencia Integrativa; Argentina. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires; Argentina
description Confidence in a perceptual decision is a judgment about the quality of the sensory evidence. The quality of the evidence depends not only on its strength ('signal') but critically on its reliability ('noise'), but the separate contribution of these quantities to the formation of confidence judgments has not been investigated before in the context of perceptual decisions. We studied subjective confidence reports in a multi-element perceptual task where evidence strength and reliability could be manipulated independently. Our results reveal a confidence paradox: confidence is higher for stimuli of lower reliability that are associated with a lower accuracy. We show that the subjects' overconfidence in trials with unreliable evidence is caused by a reduced sensitivity to stimulus variability. Our results bridge between the investigation of miss-attributions of confidence in behavioral economics and the domain of simple perceptual decisions amenable to neuroscience research. © 2014 Elsevier Inc.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-07
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/77183
Zylberberg, Ariel Dario; Roelfsema, Pieter R.; Sigman, Mariano; Variance misperception explains illusions of confidence in simple perceptual decisions; Elsevier; Consciousness and Cognition; 27; 1; 7-2014; 246-253
1053-8100
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/77183
identifier_str_mv Zylberberg, Ariel Dario; Roelfsema, Pieter R.; Sigman, Mariano; Variance misperception explains illusions of confidence in simple perceptual decisions; Elsevier; Consciousness and Cognition; 27; 1; 7-2014; 246-253
1053-8100
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053810014000865
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.concog.2014.05.012
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269453146914816
score 13.13397

Publicaciones similares