The purest form of communicative power: A reinterpretation of the key to the legitimacy of norms in Habermas's model of democracy

Autores
Barreyro, María Emilia
Año de publicación
2018
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The present paper offers an analysis of the Habermasian concept of communicative power by considering where communicative power arises from, establishing a criterion to distinguish the different forms it can adopt, and linking it to the anarchistic core of unleashed communicative freedomswhich Habermas admits his theory presupposes. My purpose is not only toclarify this key concept of his theory but also to illuminate, from a newangle, the accusation that Habermas's model of democracy is hostile todissensus and a threat to individuals that are not part of the mainstream of society. The thesis I will defend here holds that only a wide reading of theconcept of communicative power, which identifies the informal publicsphere as the source of the "purest form" of communicative power is consistent with the radical-democratic content of Habermas's theory and the power-dissolving character of public discussion. I also argue that, after clarifying those points, we will be able to see that Habermas's theory cannot be interpreted as either hostile or favourable to dissensus per seand that this criticism is mistaken due to its blindness to the normative dimension that communicative power involves
Fil: Barreyro, María Emilia. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
PODER COMUNICATIVO
HABERMAS
LEGITIMIDAD
DEMOCRACIA RADICAL
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/135822

id CONICETDig_2c9a09f6928db71ba369fd7ec926c665
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/135822
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling The purest form of communicative power: A reinterpretation of the key to the legitimacy of norms in Habermas's model of democracyBarreyro, María EmiliaPODER COMUNICATIVOHABERMASLEGITIMIDADDEMOCRACIA RADICALhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6The present paper offers an analysis of the Habermasian concept of communicative power by considering where communicative power arises from, establishing a criterion to distinguish the different forms it can adopt, and linking it to the anarchistic core of unleashed communicative freedomswhich Habermas admits his theory presupposes. My purpose is not only toclarify this key concept of his theory but also to illuminate, from a newangle, the accusation that Habermas's model of democracy is hostile todissensus and a threat to individuals that are not part of the mainstream of society. The thesis I will defend here holds that only a wide reading of theconcept of communicative power, which identifies the informal publicsphere as the source of the "purest form" of communicative power is consistent with the radical-democratic content of Habermas's theory and the power-dissolving character of public discussion. I also argue that, after clarifying those points, we will be able to see that Habermas's theory cannot be interpreted as either hostile or favourable to dissensus per seand that this criticism is mistaken due to its blindness to the normative dimension that communicative power involvesFil: Barreyro, María Emilia. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaWiley2018-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/135822Barreyro, María Emilia; The purest form of communicative power: A reinterpretation of the key to the legitimacy of norms in Habermas's model of democracy; Wiley; Constellations; 25; 3; 9-2018; 459-4731351-04871467-8675CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/1467-8675.12342info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/1467-8675.12342info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:51:36Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/135822instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:51:36.557CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The purest form of communicative power: A reinterpretation of the key to the legitimacy of norms in Habermas's model of democracy
title The purest form of communicative power: A reinterpretation of the key to the legitimacy of norms in Habermas's model of democracy
spellingShingle The purest form of communicative power: A reinterpretation of the key to the legitimacy of norms in Habermas's model of democracy
Barreyro, María Emilia
PODER COMUNICATIVO
HABERMAS
LEGITIMIDAD
DEMOCRACIA RADICAL
title_short The purest form of communicative power: A reinterpretation of the key to the legitimacy of norms in Habermas's model of democracy
title_full The purest form of communicative power: A reinterpretation of the key to the legitimacy of norms in Habermas's model of democracy
title_fullStr The purest form of communicative power: A reinterpretation of the key to the legitimacy of norms in Habermas's model of democracy
title_full_unstemmed The purest form of communicative power: A reinterpretation of the key to the legitimacy of norms in Habermas's model of democracy
title_sort The purest form of communicative power: A reinterpretation of the key to the legitimacy of norms in Habermas's model of democracy
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Barreyro, María Emilia
author Barreyro, María Emilia
author_facet Barreyro, María Emilia
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv PODER COMUNICATIVO
HABERMAS
LEGITIMIDAD
DEMOCRACIA RADICAL
topic PODER COMUNICATIVO
HABERMAS
LEGITIMIDAD
DEMOCRACIA RADICAL
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The present paper offers an analysis of the Habermasian concept of communicative power by considering where communicative power arises from, establishing a criterion to distinguish the different forms it can adopt, and linking it to the anarchistic core of unleashed communicative freedomswhich Habermas admits his theory presupposes. My purpose is not only toclarify this key concept of his theory but also to illuminate, from a newangle, the accusation that Habermas's model of democracy is hostile todissensus and a threat to individuals that are not part of the mainstream of society. The thesis I will defend here holds that only a wide reading of theconcept of communicative power, which identifies the informal publicsphere as the source of the "purest form" of communicative power is consistent with the radical-democratic content of Habermas's theory and the power-dissolving character of public discussion. I also argue that, after clarifying those points, we will be able to see that Habermas's theory cannot be interpreted as either hostile or favourable to dissensus per seand that this criticism is mistaken due to its blindness to the normative dimension that communicative power involves
Fil: Barreyro, María Emilia. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description The present paper offers an analysis of the Habermasian concept of communicative power by considering where communicative power arises from, establishing a criterion to distinguish the different forms it can adopt, and linking it to the anarchistic core of unleashed communicative freedomswhich Habermas admits his theory presupposes. My purpose is not only toclarify this key concept of his theory but also to illuminate, from a newangle, the accusation that Habermas's model of democracy is hostile todissensus and a threat to individuals that are not part of the mainstream of society. The thesis I will defend here holds that only a wide reading of theconcept of communicative power, which identifies the informal publicsphere as the source of the "purest form" of communicative power is consistent with the radical-democratic content of Habermas's theory and the power-dissolving character of public discussion. I also argue that, after clarifying those points, we will be able to see that Habermas's theory cannot be interpreted as either hostile or favourable to dissensus per seand that this criticism is mistaken due to its blindness to the normative dimension that communicative power involves
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/135822
Barreyro, María Emilia; The purest form of communicative power: A reinterpretation of the key to the legitimacy of norms in Habermas's model of democracy; Wiley; Constellations; 25; 3; 9-2018; 459-473
1351-0487
1467-8675
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/135822
identifier_str_mv Barreyro, María Emilia; The purest form of communicative power: A reinterpretation of the key to the legitimacy of norms in Habermas's model of democracy; Wiley; Constellations; 25; 3; 9-2018; 459-473
1351-0487
1467-8675
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/1467-8675.12342
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/1467-8675.12342
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613585962008576
score 13.070432