The purest form of communicative power: A reinterpretation of the key to the legitimacy of norms in Habermas's model of democracy
- Autores
- Barreyro, María Emilia
- Año de publicación
- 2018
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The present paper offers an analysis of the Habermasian concept of communicative power by considering where communicative power arises from, establishing a criterion to distinguish the different forms it can adopt, and linking it to the anarchistic core of unleashed communicative freedomswhich Habermas admits his theory presupposes. My purpose is not only toclarify this key concept of his theory but also to illuminate, from a newangle, the accusation that Habermas's model of democracy is hostile todissensus and a threat to individuals that are not part of the mainstream of society. The thesis I will defend here holds that only a wide reading of theconcept of communicative power, which identifies the informal publicsphere as the source of the "purest form" of communicative power is consistent with the radical-democratic content of Habermas's theory and the power-dissolving character of public discussion. I also argue that, after clarifying those points, we will be able to see that Habermas's theory cannot be interpreted as either hostile or favourable to dissensus per seand that this criticism is mistaken due to its blindness to the normative dimension that communicative power involves
Fil: Barreyro, María Emilia. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina - Materia
-
PODER COMUNICATIVO
HABERMAS
LEGITIMIDAD
DEMOCRACIA RADICAL - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/135822
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_2c9a09f6928db71ba369fd7ec926c665 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/135822 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
The purest form of communicative power: A reinterpretation of the key to the legitimacy of norms in Habermas's model of democracyBarreyro, María EmiliaPODER COMUNICATIVOHABERMASLEGITIMIDADDEMOCRACIA RADICALhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6The present paper offers an analysis of the Habermasian concept of communicative power by considering where communicative power arises from, establishing a criterion to distinguish the different forms it can adopt, and linking it to the anarchistic core of unleashed communicative freedomswhich Habermas admits his theory presupposes. My purpose is not only toclarify this key concept of his theory but also to illuminate, from a newangle, the accusation that Habermas's model of democracy is hostile todissensus and a threat to individuals that are not part of the mainstream of society. The thesis I will defend here holds that only a wide reading of theconcept of communicative power, which identifies the informal publicsphere as the source of the "purest form" of communicative power is consistent with the radical-democratic content of Habermas's theory and the power-dissolving character of public discussion. I also argue that, after clarifying those points, we will be able to see that Habermas's theory cannot be interpreted as either hostile or favourable to dissensus per seand that this criticism is mistaken due to its blindness to the normative dimension that communicative power involvesFil: Barreyro, María Emilia. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaWiley2018-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/135822Barreyro, María Emilia; The purest form of communicative power: A reinterpretation of the key to the legitimacy of norms in Habermas's model of democracy; Wiley; Constellations; 25; 3; 9-2018; 459-4731351-04871467-8675CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/1467-8675.12342info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/1467-8675.12342info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:51:36Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/135822instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:51:36.557CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The purest form of communicative power: A reinterpretation of the key to the legitimacy of norms in Habermas's model of democracy |
title |
The purest form of communicative power: A reinterpretation of the key to the legitimacy of norms in Habermas's model of democracy |
spellingShingle |
The purest form of communicative power: A reinterpretation of the key to the legitimacy of norms in Habermas's model of democracy Barreyro, María Emilia PODER COMUNICATIVO HABERMAS LEGITIMIDAD DEMOCRACIA RADICAL |
title_short |
The purest form of communicative power: A reinterpretation of the key to the legitimacy of norms in Habermas's model of democracy |
title_full |
The purest form of communicative power: A reinterpretation of the key to the legitimacy of norms in Habermas's model of democracy |
title_fullStr |
The purest form of communicative power: A reinterpretation of the key to the legitimacy of norms in Habermas's model of democracy |
title_full_unstemmed |
The purest form of communicative power: A reinterpretation of the key to the legitimacy of norms in Habermas's model of democracy |
title_sort |
The purest form of communicative power: A reinterpretation of the key to the legitimacy of norms in Habermas's model of democracy |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Barreyro, María Emilia |
author |
Barreyro, María Emilia |
author_facet |
Barreyro, María Emilia |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
PODER COMUNICATIVO HABERMAS LEGITIMIDAD DEMOCRACIA RADICAL |
topic |
PODER COMUNICATIVO HABERMAS LEGITIMIDAD DEMOCRACIA RADICAL |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The present paper offers an analysis of the Habermasian concept of communicative power by considering where communicative power arises from, establishing a criterion to distinguish the different forms it can adopt, and linking it to the anarchistic core of unleashed communicative freedomswhich Habermas admits his theory presupposes. My purpose is not only toclarify this key concept of his theory but also to illuminate, from a newangle, the accusation that Habermas's model of democracy is hostile todissensus and a threat to individuals that are not part of the mainstream of society. The thesis I will defend here holds that only a wide reading of theconcept of communicative power, which identifies the informal publicsphere as the source of the "purest form" of communicative power is consistent with the radical-democratic content of Habermas's theory and the power-dissolving character of public discussion. I also argue that, after clarifying those points, we will be able to see that Habermas's theory cannot be interpreted as either hostile or favourable to dissensus per seand that this criticism is mistaken due to its blindness to the normative dimension that communicative power involves Fil: Barreyro, María Emilia. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina |
description |
The present paper offers an analysis of the Habermasian concept of communicative power by considering where communicative power arises from, establishing a criterion to distinguish the different forms it can adopt, and linking it to the anarchistic core of unleashed communicative freedomswhich Habermas admits his theory presupposes. My purpose is not only toclarify this key concept of his theory but also to illuminate, from a newangle, the accusation that Habermas's model of democracy is hostile todissensus and a threat to individuals that are not part of the mainstream of society. The thesis I will defend here holds that only a wide reading of theconcept of communicative power, which identifies the informal publicsphere as the source of the "purest form" of communicative power is consistent with the radical-democratic content of Habermas's theory and the power-dissolving character of public discussion. I also argue that, after clarifying those points, we will be able to see that Habermas's theory cannot be interpreted as either hostile or favourable to dissensus per seand that this criticism is mistaken due to its blindness to the normative dimension that communicative power involves |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-09 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/135822 Barreyro, María Emilia; The purest form of communicative power: A reinterpretation of the key to the legitimacy of norms in Habermas's model of democracy; Wiley; Constellations; 25; 3; 9-2018; 459-473 1351-0487 1467-8675 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/135822 |
identifier_str_mv |
Barreyro, María Emilia; The purest form of communicative power: A reinterpretation of the key to the legitimacy of norms in Habermas's model of democracy; Wiley; Constellations; 25; 3; 9-2018; 459-473 1351-0487 1467-8675 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/1467-8675.12342 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/1467-8675.12342 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613585962008576 |
score |
13.070432 |