Desmopressin in canine mammary carcinoma: Comments on the importance of the administration route

Autores
Alonso, Daniel Fernando; Turic, Esteban; Garona, Juan
Año de publicación
2021
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Several years ago, we proposed the haemostatic peptide desmopressin (1-desamino-8-d-arginine vasopressin; dDAVP) as a potential anti-metastatic agent to be used during surgical excision of locally advanced tumours. A prospective randomized study in 28 intact dogs with mammary carcinomas receiving perioperative intravenous dDAVP infusions (1 μg/kg) demonstrated a significant survival benefit in dogs with moderately (grade 2) or poorly differentiated (grade 3) tumours.1 dDAVP is known to exert anti-proliferative and anti-angiogenic effects in laboratory models, by acting on AVPR2 vasopressin receptors present in tumour and endothelial cells. Moreover, dDAVP can induce the release of von Willebrand factor (VWF) from microvascular endothelium into blood circulation. Beyond its critical function in primary haemostasis, VWF plays a protective role against metastatic dissemination. An abrupt increase in VWF blood levels is able to interfere with the arrest of circulating cancer cells at target organs and also to induce apoptosis in micrometastatic foci.2 The article entitled “A prospective randomized trial of desmopressin in canine mammary carcinoma” recently published in Veterinary and Comparative Oncology by Sorenmo et al retested dDAVP as a surgical adjuvant in 24 dogs with mammary carcinomas.3 They reported that few dogs developed metastatic disease in this study, and no significant benefit of perioperative dDAVP administration was observed. We completely agree with the authors in the sense that subgroup comparisons between the high-risk subgroups were very underpowered, since none of the dogs with grade 2 tumours developed metastasis and only one dog with a grade 3 tumour was randomized to receive dDAVP.3 More to the point, all intact dogs underwent ovariohysterectomy as part of their treatment in this study, thus reducing the risk of metastasis and possibly diminishing the impact of perioperative dDAVP on survival. However, it is important to note that Sorenmo et al used a nasal spray formulation of dDAVP administered by the subcutaneous route,3 instead of an intravenous infusion as in our previous study.1 Even though subcutaneous administration is the standard of care in bleeding disorders, it was clearly demonstrated that dDAVP is ineffective by the subcutaneous route in experimental metastasis assays in mice. A clear dose-dependent anti-metastatic action was observed by using the intravenous injection (dDAVP doses ranging from 0.3 to 2 μg/kg), while no significant effects were obtained with similar doses by the subcutaneous route.4 Although a haemostatic factor such as VWF is involved, anti-metastatic effects of dDAVP are not directly associated with the coagulation process.4 VWF is a multifunctional protein and its role in resistance to metastasis is independent of its role in haemostasis,2 probably requiring the rapid peak concentrations associated with high intravenous doses to favour the elimination of early metastatic cells. Finally, we agree with the authors in that a prospective randomized trial in dogs bearing grade 3 mammary tumours should be conducted with the aim of resolving discrepancies between studies. However, in order to confirm the therapeutic benefits of perioperative dDAVP, compound should always be administered using the intravenous route. In this setting, maintenance therapy based on additional postoperative doses of dDAVP, or its synthetic analog with enhanced cytostatic activity [V4Q5]dDAVP,5 could be used to consolidate the effect against dormant metastasis or disseminated tumour cells.
Fil: Alonso, Daniel Fernando. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Departamento de Ciencia y Tecnología. Laboratorio de Oncología Molecular; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Turic, Esteban. Biogénesis Bagó; Argentina
Fil: Garona, Juan. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Departamento de Ciencia y Tecnología. Laboratorio de Oncología Molecular; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
PERIOPERATIVE DESMOPRESSIN
BREAST CANCER
AVPR2
DRUG REPURPOSING
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/170493

id CONICETDig_29fb36b0cc440f6f2de26722ee2be910
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/170493
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Desmopressin in canine mammary carcinoma: Comments on the importance of the administration routeAlonso, Daniel FernandoTuric, EstebanGarona, JuanPERIOPERATIVE DESMOPRESSINBREAST CANCERAVPR2DRUG REPURPOSINGhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Several years ago, we proposed the haemostatic peptide desmopressin (1-desamino-8-d-arginine vasopressin; dDAVP) as a potential anti-metastatic agent to be used during surgical excision of locally advanced tumours. A prospective randomized study in 28 intact dogs with mammary carcinomas receiving perioperative intravenous dDAVP infusions (1 μg/kg) demonstrated a significant survival benefit in dogs with moderately (grade 2) or poorly differentiated (grade 3) tumours.1 dDAVP is known to exert anti-proliferative and anti-angiogenic effects in laboratory models, by acting on AVPR2 vasopressin receptors present in tumour and endothelial cells. Moreover, dDAVP can induce the release of von Willebrand factor (VWF) from microvascular endothelium into blood circulation. Beyond its critical function in primary haemostasis, VWF plays a protective role against metastatic dissemination. An abrupt increase in VWF blood levels is able to interfere with the arrest of circulating cancer cells at target organs and also to induce apoptosis in micrometastatic foci.2 The article entitled “A prospective randomized trial of desmopressin in canine mammary carcinoma” recently published in Veterinary and Comparative Oncology by Sorenmo et al retested dDAVP as a surgical adjuvant in 24 dogs with mammary carcinomas.3 They reported that few dogs developed metastatic disease in this study, and no significant benefit of perioperative dDAVP administration was observed. We completely agree with the authors in the sense that subgroup comparisons between the high-risk subgroups were very underpowered, since none of the dogs with grade 2 tumours developed metastasis and only one dog with a grade 3 tumour was randomized to receive dDAVP.3 More to the point, all intact dogs underwent ovariohysterectomy as part of their treatment in this study, thus reducing the risk of metastasis and possibly diminishing the impact of perioperative dDAVP on survival. However, it is important to note that Sorenmo et al used a nasal spray formulation of dDAVP administered by the subcutaneous route,3 instead of an intravenous infusion as in our previous study.1 Even though subcutaneous administration is the standard of care in bleeding disorders, it was clearly demonstrated that dDAVP is ineffective by the subcutaneous route in experimental metastasis assays in mice. A clear dose-dependent anti-metastatic action was observed by using the intravenous injection (dDAVP doses ranging from 0.3 to 2 μg/kg), while no significant effects were obtained with similar doses by the subcutaneous route.4 Although a haemostatic factor such as VWF is involved, anti-metastatic effects of dDAVP are not directly associated with the coagulation process.4 VWF is a multifunctional protein and its role in resistance to metastasis is independent of its role in haemostasis,2 probably requiring the rapid peak concentrations associated with high intravenous doses to favour the elimination of early metastatic cells. Finally, we agree with the authors in that a prospective randomized trial in dogs bearing grade 3 mammary tumours should be conducted with the aim of resolving discrepancies between studies. However, in order to confirm the therapeutic benefits of perioperative dDAVP, compound should always be administered using the intravenous route. In this setting, maintenance therapy based on additional postoperative doses of dDAVP, or its synthetic analog with enhanced cytostatic activity [V4Q5]dDAVP,5 could be used to consolidate the effect against dormant metastasis or disseminated tumour cells.Fil: Alonso, Daniel Fernando. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Departamento de Ciencia y Tecnología. Laboratorio de Oncología Molecular; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Turic, Esteban. Biogénesis Bagó; ArgentinaFil: Garona, Juan. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Departamento de Ciencia y Tecnología. Laboratorio de Oncología Molecular; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaWiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc2021-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/170493Alonso, Daniel Fernando; Turic, Esteban; Garona, Juan; Desmopressin in canine mammary carcinoma: Comments on the importance of the administration route; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Veterinary And Comparative Oncology; 19; 3; 9-2021; 409-4101476-58101476-5829CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/vco.12640info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/vco.12640info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T12:01:11Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/170493instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 12:01:11.357CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Desmopressin in canine mammary carcinoma: Comments on the importance of the administration route
title Desmopressin in canine mammary carcinoma: Comments on the importance of the administration route
spellingShingle Desmopressin in canine mammary carcinoma: Comments on the importance of the administration route
Alonso, Daniel Fernando
PERIOPERATIVE DESMOPRESSIN
BREAST CANCER
AVPR2
DRUG REPURPOSING
title_short Desmopressin in canine mammary carcinoma: Comments on the importance of the administration route
title_full Desmopressin in canine mammary carcinoma: Comments on the importance of the administration route
title_fullStr Desmopressin in canine mammary carcinoma: Comments on the importance of the administration route
title_full_unstemmed Desmopressin in canine mammary carcinoma: Comments on the importance of the administration route
title_sort Desmopressin in canine mammary carcinoma: Comments on the importance of the administration route
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Alonso, Daniel Fernando
Turic, Esteban
Garona, Juan
author Alonso, Daniel Fernando
author_facet Alonso, Daniel Fernando
Turic, Esteban
Garona, Juan
author_role author
author2 Turic, Esteban
Garona, Juan
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv PERIOPERATIVE DESMOPRESSIN
BREAST CANCER
AVPR2
DRUG REPURPOSING
topic PERIOPERATIVE DESMOPRESSIN
BREAST CANCER
AVPR2
DRUG REPURPOSING
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Several years ago, we proposed the haemostatic peptide desmopressin (1-desamino-8-d-arginine vasopressin; dDAVP) as a potential anti-metastatic agent to be used during surgical excision of locally advanced tumours. A prospective randomized study in 28 intact dogs with mammary carcinomas receiving perioperative intravenous dDAVP infusions (1 μg/kg) demonstrated a significant survival benefit in dogs with moderately (grade 2) or poorly differentiated (grade 3) tumours.1 dDAVP is known to exert anti-proliferative and anti-angiogenic effects in laboratory models, by acting on AVPR2 vasopressin receptors present in tumour and endothelial cells. Moreover, dDAVP can induce the release of von Willebrand factor (VWF) from microvascular endothelium into blood circulation. Beyond its critical function in primary haemostasis, VWF plays a protective role against metastatic dissemination. An abrupt increase in VWF blood levels is able to interfere with the arrest of circulating cancer cells at target organs and also to induce apoptosis in micrometastatic foci.2 The article entitled “A prospective randomized trial of desmopressin in canine mammary carcinoma” recently published in Veterinary and Comparative Oncology by Sorenmo et al retested dDAVP as a surgical adjuvant in 24 dogs with mammary carcinomas.3 They reported that few dogs developed metastatic disease in this study, and no significant benefit of perioperative dDAVP administration was observed. We completely agree with the authors in the sense that subgroup comparisons between the high-risk subgroups were very underpowered, since none of the dogs with grade 2 tumours developed metastasis and only one dog with a grade 3 tumour was randomized to receive dDAVP.3 More to the point, all intact dogs underwent ovariohysterectomy as part of their treatment in this study, thus reducing the risk of metastasis and possibly diminishing the impact of perioperative dDAVP on survival. However, it is important to note that Sorenmo et al used a nasal spray formulation of dDAVP administered by the subcutaneous route,3 instead of an intravenous infusion as in our previous study.1 Even though subcutaneous administration is the standard of care in bleeding disorders, it was clearly demonstrated that dDAVP is ineffective by the subcutaneous route in experimental metastasis assays in mice. A clear dose-dependent anti-metastatic action was observed by using the intravenous injection (dDAVP doses ranging from 0.3 to 2 μg/kg), while no significant effects were obtained with similar doses by the subcutaneous route.4 Although a haemostatic factor such as VWF is involved, anti-metastatic effects of dDAVP are not directly associated with the coagulation process.4 VWF is a multifunctional protein and its role in resistance to metastasis is independent of its role in haemostasis,2 probably requiring the rapid peak concentrations associated with high intravenous doses to favour the elimination of early metastatic cells. Finally, we agree with the authors in that a prospective randomized trial in dogs bearing grade 3 mammary tumours should be conducted with the aim of resolving discrepancies between studies. However, in order to confirm the therapeutic benefits of perioperative dDAVP, compound should always be administered using the intravenous route. In this setting, maintenance therapy based on additional postoperative doses of dDAVP, or its synthetic analog with enhanced cytostatic activity [V4Q5]dDAVP,5 could be used to consolidate the effect against dormant metastasis or disseminated tumour cells.
Fil: Alonso, Daniel Fernando. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Departamento de Ciencia y Tecnología. Laboratorio de Oncología Molecular; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Turic, Esteban. Biogénesis Bagó; Argentina
Fil: Garona, Juan. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Departamento de Ciencia y Tecnología. Laboratorio de Oncología Molecular; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description Several years ago, we proposed the haemostatic peptide desmopressin (1-desamino-8-d-arginine vasopressin; dDAVP) as a potential anti-metastatic agent to be used during surgical excision of locally advanced tumours. A prospective randomized study in 28 intact dogs with mammary carcinomas receiving perioperative intravenous dDAVP infusions (1 μg/kg) demonstrated a significant survival benefit in dogs with moderately (grade 2) or poorly differentiated (grade 3) tumours.1 dDAVP is known to exert anti-proliferative and anti-angiogenic effects in laboratory models, by acting on AVPR2 vasopressin receptors present in tumour and endothelial cells. Moreover, dDAVP can induce the release of von Willebrand factor (VWF) from microvascular endothelium into blood circulation. Beyond its critical function in primary haemostasis, VWF plays a protective role against metastatic dissemination. An abrupt increase in VWF blood levels is able to interfere with the arrest of circulating cancer cells at target organs and also to induce apoptosis in micrometastatic foci.2 The article entitled “A prospective randomized trial of desmopressin in canine mammary carcinoma” recently published in Veterinary and Comparative Oncology by Sorenmo et al retested dDAVP as a surgical adjuvant in 24 dogs with mammary carcinomas.3 They reported that few dogs developed metastatic disease in this study, and no significant benefit of perioperative dDAVP administration was observed. We completely agree with the authors in the sense that subgroup comparisons between the high-risk subgroups were very underpowered, since none of the dogs with grade 2 tumours developed metastasis and only one dog with a grade 3 tumour was randomized to receive dDAVP.3 More to the point, all intact dogs underwent ovariohysterectomy as part of their treatment in this study, thus reducing the risk of metastasis and possibly diminishing the impact of perioperative dDAVP on survival. However, it is important to note that Sorenmo et al used a nasal spray formulation of dDAVP administered by the subcutaneous route,3 instead of an intravenous infusion as in our previous study.1 Even though subcutaneous administration is the standard of care in bleeding disorders, it was clearly demonstrated that dDAVP is ineffective by the subcutaneous route in experimental metastasis assays in mice. A clear dose-dependent anti-metastatic action was observed by using the intravenous injection (dDAVP doses ranging from 0.3 to 2 μg/kg), while no significant effects were obtained with similar doses by the subcutaneous route.4 Although a haemostatic factor such as VWF is involved, anti-metastatic effects of dDAVP are not directly associated with the coagulation process.4 VWF is a multifunctional protein and its role in resistance to metastasis is independent of its role in haemostasis,2 probably requiring the rapid peak concentrations associated with high intravenous doses to favour the elimination of early metastatic cells. Finally, we agree with the authors in that a prospective randomized trial in dogs bearing grade 3 mammary tumours should be conducted with the aim of resolving discrepancies between studies. However, in order to confirm the therapeutic benefits of perioperative dDAVP, compound should always be administered using the intravenous route. In this setting, maintenance therapy based on additional postoperative doses of dDAVP, or its synthetic analog with enhanced cytostatic activity [V4Q5]dDAVP,5 could be used to consolidate the effect against dormant metastasis or disseminated tumour cells.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/170493
Alonso, Daniel Fernando; Turic, Esteban; Garona, Juan; Desmopressin in canine mammary carcinoma: Comments on the importance of the administration route; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Veterinary And Comparative Oncology; 19; 3; 9-2021; 409-410
1476-5810
1476-5829
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/170493
identifier_str_mv Alonso, Daniel Fernando; Turic, Esteban; Garona, Juan; Desmopressin in canine mammary carcinoma: Comments on the importance of the administration route; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Veterinary And Comparative Oncology; 19; 3; 9-2021; 409-410
1476-5810
1476-5829
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/vco.12640
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/vco.12640
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846782342455099392
score 12.982451