Correlations between physical and chemical defences in plants: tradeoffs, syndromes, or just many different ways to skin a herbivorous cat?

Autores: Moles, Angela T.; Peco, Begoña; Wallis, Ian R.; Foley, William J.; Poore, Alistair G. B.; Bisigato, Alejandro Jorge; Cella Pizarro, Lucrecia; Peri, Pablo Luis; Farji Brener, Alejandro Gustavo; Blendinger, Pedro Gerardo; Andrew, Nigel R.; Boulter, Sarah L.; Borer, Elizabeth T.; Cornelissen, Johannes H. C.; DeGabriel, Jane L.; Jurado, Enrique; Kyhn, Line A.; Low, Bill; Mulder, Christa P. H.; Reardon Smith, Kathryn; Rodrıguez Velazquez, Jorge; De Fortier, An; Zheng, Zheng; Enquist, Brian J.; Facelli, Jose M.; Knight, Tiffany; Majer, Jonathan D.; Martinez Ramos, Miguel; McQuillan, Peter; Hui, Francis K. C.
Año de publicación: 2013
Idioma: inglés
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado: versión publicada
Descripción: - Most plant species have a range of traits that deter herbivores. However, understanding of how different defences are related to one another is surprisingly weak. Many authors argue that defence traits trade off against one another, while others argue that they form coordinated defence syndromes. - We collected a dataset of unprecedented taxonomic and geographic scope (261 species spanning 80 families, from 75 sites across the globe) to investigate relationships among four chemical and six physical defences. - Five of the 45 pairwise correlations between defence traits were significant and three of these were tradeoffs. The relationship between species’ overall chemical and physical defence levels was marginally nonsignificant (P = 0.08), and remained nonsignificant after accounting for phylogeny, growth form and abundance. Neither categorical principal component analysis (PCA) nor hierarchical cluster analysis supported the idea that species displayed defence syndromes. - Our results do not support arguments for tradeoffs or for coordinated defence syndromes. Rather, plants display a range of combinations of defence traits. We suggest this lack of consistent defence syndromes may be adaptive, resulting from selective pressure to deploy a different combination of defences to coexisting species.
Fil: Moles, Angela T.. University of New South Wales; Australia
Fil: Peco, Begoña. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; España
Fil: Wallis, Ian R.. Australian National University; Australia
Fil: Foley, William J.. Australian National University; Australia
Fil: Poore, Alistair G. B.. University of New South Wales; Australia
Fil: Bisigato, Alejandro Jorge. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina
Fil: Cella Pizarro, Lucrecia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Farji Brener, Alejandro Gustavo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; Argentina
Fil: Blendinger, Pedro Gerardo. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional.; Argentina
Fil: Andrew, Nigel R.. University of New England; Australia
Fil: Boulter, Sarah L.. Griffith University; Australia
Fil: Borer, Elizabeth T.. University of Minnesota; Estados Unidos
Fil: Cornelissen, Johannes H. C.. Vrije Unviversiteit Brussel; Bélgica
Fil: DeGabriel, Jane L.. James Cook University; Australia
Fil: Jurado, Enrique. Universidad de Nuevo León; México
Fil: Kyhn, Line A.. University Aarhus; Dinamarca
Fil: Low, Bill. Low Ecological Services; Australia
Fil: Mulder, Christa P. H.. University of Alaska Fairbanks; Estados Unidos
Fil: Reardon Smith, Kathryn. University of Queensland; Australia
Fil: Rodrıguez Velazquez, Jorge. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; México
Fil: De Fortier, An. University of Zululand; Sudáfrica
Fil: Zheng, Zheng. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de China
Fil: Enquist, Brian J.. University of Arizona; Estados Unidos
Fil: Facelli, Jose M.. Norwegian University of Science and Technology; Noruega
Fil: Knight, Tiffany. Washington University in St. Louis; Estados Unidos
Fil: Majer, Jonathan D.. Curtin University; Australia
Fil: Martinez Ramos, Miguel. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; México
Fil: McQuillan, Peter. University of Tasmania; Australia
Fil: Hui, Francis K. C.. University of New South Wales; Australia
Materia: Cyanogenesis
Extrafloral Nectaries
Hair
Leaf Toughness
Lipid
Plant-Herbivore Interactions
Spines
Tannin
Nivel de accesibilidad: acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
Institución: Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador: oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/29229

Acceder

id	CONICETDig_297bf8c1e94c028f3a371c3e9b85d896
oai_identifier_str	oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/29229
network_acronym_str	CONICETDig
repository_id_str	3498
network_name_str	CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling	Correlations between physical and chemical defences in plants: tradeoffs, syndromes, or just many different ways to skin a herbivorous cat?Moles, Angela T.Peco, BegoñaWallis, Ian R.Foley, William J.Poore, Alistair G. B.Bisigato, Alejandro JorgeCella Pizarro, LucreciaPeri, Pablo LuisFarji Brener, Alejandro GustavoBlendinger, Pedro GerardoAndrew, Nigel R.Boulter, Sarah L.Borer, Elizabeth T.Cornelissen, Johannes H. C.DeGabriel, Jane L.Jurado, EnriqueKyhn, Line A.Low, BillMulder, Christa P. H.Reardon Smith, KathrynRodrıguez Velazquez, JorgeDe Fortier, AnZheng, ZhengEnquist, Brian J.Facelli, Jose M.Knight, TiffanyMajer, Jonathan D.Martinez Ramos, MiguelMcQuillan, PeterHui, Francis K. C.CyanogenesisExtrafloral NectariesHairLeaf ToughnessLipidPlant-Herbivore InteractionsSpinesTanninhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1- Most plant species have a range of traits that deter herbivores. However, understanding of how different defences are related to one another is surprisingly weak. Many authors argue that defence traits trade off against one another, while others argue that they form coordinated defence syndromes. - We collected a dataset of unprecedented taxonomic and geographic scope (261 species spanning 80 families, from 75 sites across the globe) to investigate relationships among four chemical and six physical defences. - Five of the 45 pairwise correlations between defence traits were significant and three of these were tradeoffs. The relationship between species’ overall chemical and physical defence levels was marginally nonsignificant (P = 0.08), and remained nonsignificant after accounting for phylogeny, growth form and abundance. Neither categorical principal component analysis (PCA) nor hierarchical cluster analysis supported the idea that species displayed defence syndromes. - Our results do not support arguments for tradeoffs or for coordinated defence syndromes. Rather, plants display a range of combinations of defence traits. We suggest this lack of consistent defence syndromes may be adaptive, resulting from selective pressure to deploy a different combination of defences to coexisting species.Fil: Moles, Angela T.. University of New South Wales; AustraliaFil: Peco, Begoña. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; EspañaFil: Wallis, Ian R.. Australian National University; AustraliaFil: Foley, William J.. Australian National University; AustraliaFil: Poore, Alistair G. B.. University of New South Wales; AustraliaFil: Bisigato, Alejandro Jorge. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico; ArgentinaFil: Cella Pizarro, Lucrecia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico; ArgentinaFil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Farji Brener, Alejandro Gustavo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; ArgentinaFil: Blendinger, Pedro Gerardo. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional.; ArgentinaFil: Andrew, Nigel R.. University of New England; AustraliaFil: Boulter, Sarah L.. Griffith University; AustraliaFil: Borer, Elizabeth T.. University of Minnesota; Estados UnidosFil: Cornelissen, Johannes H. C.. Vrije Unviversiteit Brussel; BélgicaFil: DeGabriel, Jane L.. James Cook University; AustraliaFil: Jurado, Enrique. Universidad de Nuevo León; MéxicoFil: Kyhn, Line A.. University Aarhus; DinamarcaFil: Low, Bill. Low Ecological Services; AustraliaFil: Mulder, Christa P. H.. University of Alaska Fairbanks; Estados UnidosFil: Reardon Smith, Kathryn. University of Queensland; AustraliaFil: Rodrıguez Velazquez, Jorge. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; MéxicoFil: De Fortier, An. University of Zululand; SudáfricaFil: Zheng, Zheng. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de ChinaFil: Enquist, Brian J.. University of Arizona; Estados UnidosFil: Facelli, Jose M.. Norwegian University of Science and Technology; NoruegaFil: Knight, Tiffany. Washington University in St. Louis; Estados UnidosFil: Majer, Jonathan D.. Curtin University; AustraliaFil: Martinez Ramos, Miguel. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; MéxicoFil: McQuillan, Peter. University of Tasmania; AustraliaFil: Hui, Francis K. C.. University of New South Wales; AustraliaWiley2013-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/29229Moles, Angela T.; Peco, Begoña; Wallis, Ian R.; Foley, William J.; Poore, Alistair G. B.; et al.; Correlations between physical and chemical defences in plants: tradeoffs, syndromes, or just many different ways to skin a herbivorous cat?; Wiley; New Phytologist; 198; 1; 1-2013; 252-2630028-646XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/nph.12116info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.12116/abstractinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T11:15:33Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/29229instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 11:15:33.679CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv	Correlations between physical and chemical defences in plants: tradeoffs, syndromes, or just many different ways to skin a herbivorous cat?
title	Correlations between physical and chemical defences in plants: tradeoffs, syndromes, or just many different ways to skin a herbivorous cat?
spellingShingle	Correlations between physical and chemical defences in plants: tradeoffs, syndromes, or just many different ways to skin a herbivorous cat? Moles, Angela T. Cyanogenesis Extrafloral Nectaries Hair Leaf Toughness Lipid Plant-Herbivore Interactions Spines Tannin
title_short	Correlations between physical and chemical defences in plants: tradeoffs, syndromes, or just many different ways to skin a herbivorous cat?
title_full	Correlations between physical and chemical defences in plants: tradeoffs, syndromes, or just many different ways to skin a herbivorous cat?
title_fullStr	Correlations between physical and chemical defences in plants: tradeoffs, syndromes, or just many different ways to skin a herbivorous cat?
title_full_unstemmed	Correlations between physical and chemical defences in plants: tradeoffs, syndromes, or just many different ways to skin a herbivorous cat?
title_sort	Correlations between physical and chemical defences in plants: tradeoffs, syndromes, or just many different ways to skin a herbivorous cat?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv	Moles, Angela T. Peco, Begoña Wallis, Ian R. Foley, William J. Poore, Alistair G. B. Bisigato, Alejandro Jorge Cella Pizarro, Lucrecia Peri, Pablo Luis Farji Brener, Alejandro Gustavo Blendinger, Pedro Gerardo Andrew, Nigel R. Boulter, Sarah L. Borer, Elizabeth T. Cornelissen, Johannes H. C. DeGabriel, Jane L. Jurado, Enrique Kyhn, Line A. Low, Bill Mulder, Christa P. H. Reardon Smith, Kathryn Rodrıguez Velazquez, Jorge De Fortier, An Zheng, Zheng Enquist, Brian J. Facelli, Jose M. Knight, Tiffany Majer, Jonathan D. Martinez Ramos, Miguel McQuillan, Peter Hui, Francis K. C.
author	Moles, Angela T.
author_facet	Moles, Angela T. Peco, Begoña Wallis, Ian R. Foley, William J. Poore, Alistair G. B. Bisigato, Alejandro Jorge Cella Pizarro, Lucrecia Peri, Pablo Luis Farji Brener, Alejandro Gustavo Blendinger, Pedro Gerardo Andrew, Nigel R. Boulter, Sarah L. Borer, Elizabeth T. Cornelissen, Johannes H. C. DeGabriel, Jane L. Jurado, Enrique Kyhn, Line A. Low, Bill Mulder, Christa P. H. Reardon Smith, Kathryn Rodrıguez Velazquez, Jorge De Fortier, An Zheng, Zheng Enquist, Brian J. Facelli, Jose M. Knight, Tiffany Majer, Jonathan D. Martinez Ramos, Miguel McQuillan, Peter Hui, Francis K. C.
author_role	author
author2	Peco, Begoña Wallis, Ian R. Foley, William J. Poore, Alistair G. B. Bisigato, Alejandro Jorge Cella Pizarro, Lucrecia Peri, Pablo Luis Farji Brener, Alejandro Gustavo Blendinger, Pedro Gerardo Andrew, Nigel R. Boulter, Sarah L. Borer, Elizabeth T. Cornelissen, Johannes H. C. DeGabriel, Jane L. Jurado, Enrique Kyhn, Line A. Low, Bill Mulder, Christa P. H. Reardon Smith, Kathryn Rodrıguez Velazquez, Jorge De Fortier, An Zheng, Zheng Enquist, Brian J. Facelli, Jose M. Knight, Tiffany Majer, Jonathan D. Martinez Ramos, Miguel McQuillan, Peter Hui, Francis K. C.
author2_role	author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv	Cyanogenesis Extrafloral Nectaries Hair Leaf Toughness Lipid Plant-Herbivore Interactions Spines Tannin
topic	Cyanogenesis Extrafloral Nectaries Hair Leaf Toughness Lipid Plant-Herbivore Interactions Spines Tannin
purl_subject.fl_str_mv	https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv	- Most plant species have a range of traits that deter herbivores. However, understanding of how different defences are related to one another is surprisingly weak. Many authors argue that defence traits trade off against one another, while others argue that they form coordinated defence syndromes. - We collected a dataset of unprecedented taxonomic and geographic scope (261 species spanning 80 families, from 75 sites across the globe) to investigate relationships among four chemical and six physical defences. - Five of the 45 pairwise correlations between defence traits were significant and three of these were tradeoffs. The relationship between species’ overall chemical and physical defence levels was marginally nonsignificant (P = 0.08), and remained nonsignificant after accounting for phylogeny, growth form and abundance. Neither categorical principal component analysis (PCA) nor hierarchical cluster analysis supported the idea that species displayed defence syndromes. - Our results do not support arguments for tradeoffs or for coordinated defence syndromes. Rather, plants display a range of combinations of defence traits. We suggest this lack of consistent defence syndromes may be adaptive, resulting from selective pressure to deploy a different combination of defences to coexisting species. Fil: Moles, Angela T.. University of New South Wales; Australia Fil: Peco, Begoña. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; España Fil: Wallis, Ian R.. Australian National University; Australia Fil: Foley, William J.. Australian National University; Australia Fil: Poore, Alistair G. B.. University of New South Wales; Australia Fil: Bisigato, Alejandro Jorge. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina Fil: Cella Pizarro, Lucrecia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Farji Brener, Alejandro Gustavo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; Argentina Fil: Blendinger, Pedro Gerardo. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional.; Argentina Fil: Andrew, Nigel R.. University of New England; Australia Fil: Boulter, Sarah L.. Griffith University; Australia Fil: Borer, Elizabeth T.. University of Minnesota; Estados Unidos Fil: Cornelissen, Johannes H. C.. Vrije Unviversiteit Brussel; Bélgica Fil: DeGabriel, Jane L.. James Cook University; Australia Fil: Jurado, Enrique. Universidad de Nuevo León; México Fil: Kyhn, Line A.. University Aarhus; Dinamarca Fil: Low, Bill. Low Ecological Services; Australia Fil: Mulder, Christa P. H.. University of Alaska Fairbanks; Estados Unidos Fil: Reardon Smith, Kathryn. University of Queensland; Australia Fil: Rodrıguez Velazquez, Jorge. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; México Fil: De Fortier, An. University of Zululand; Sudáfrica Fil: Zheng, Zheng. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de China Fil: Enquist, Brian J.. University of Arizona; Estados Unidos Fil: Facelli, Jose M.. Norwegian University of Science and Technology; Noruega Fil: Knight, Tiffany. Washington University in St. Louis; Estados Unidos Fil: Majer, Jonathan D.. Curtin University; Australia Fil: Martinez Ramos, Miguel. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; México Fil: McQuillan, Peter. University of Tasmania; Australia Fil: Hui, Francis K. C.. University of New South Wales; Australia
description	- Most plant species have a range of traits that deter herbivores. However, understanding of how different defences are related to one another is surprisingly weak. Many authors argue that defence traits trade off against one another, while others argue that they form coordinated defence syndromes. - We collected a dataset of unprecedented taxonomic and geographic scope (261 species spanning 80 families, from 75 sites across the globe) to investigate relationships among four chemical and six physical defences. - Five of the 45 pairwise correlations between defence traits were significant and three of these were tradeoffs. The relationship between species’ overall chemical and physical defence levels was marginally nonsignificant (P = 0.08), and remained nonsignificant after accounting for phylogeny, growth form and abundance. Neither categorical principal component analysis (PCA) nor hierarchical cluster analysis supported the idea that species displayed defence syndromes. - Our results do not support arguments for tradeoffs or for coordinated defence syndromes. Rather, plants display a range of combinations of defence traits. We suggest this lack of consistent defence syndromes may be adaptive, resulting from selective pressure to deploy a different combination of defences to coexisting species.
publishDate	2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv	2013-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format	article
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv	http://hdl.handle.net/11336/29229 Moles, Angela T.; Peco, Begoña; Wallis, Ian R.; Foley, William J.; Poore, Alistair G. B.; et al.; Correlations between physical and chemical defences in plants: tradeoffs, syndromes, or just many different ways to skin a herbivorous cat?; Wiley; New Phytologist; 198; 1; 1-2013; 252-263 0028-646X CONICET Digital CONICET
url	http://hdl.handle.net/11336/29229
identifier_str_mv	Moles, Angela T.; Peco, Begoña; Wallis, Ian R.; Foley, William J.; Poore, Alistair G. B.; et al.; Correlations between physical and chemical defences in plants: tradeoffs, syndromes, or just many different ways to skin a herbivorous cat?; Wiley; New Phytologist; 198; 1; 1-2013; 252-263 0028-646X CONICET Digital CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv	eng
language	eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/nph.12116 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.12116/abstract
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv	application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Wiley
publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Wiley
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv	reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str	CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection	CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str	Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv	CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_	1846781591002546176
score	12.982451

Correlations between physical and chemical defences in plants: tradeoffs, syndromes, or just many different ways to skin a herbivorous cat?

Publicaciones similares