The ichnogenus Dictyodora Weiss: an attempt to unify terminology

Autores
Gutiérrez, Carolina; Fernández, Diana Elizabeth; Pazos, Pablo Jose
Año de publicación
2024
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Dictyodora is a three-dimensional complex trace fossil characteristic of marine Paleozoic deposits recorded since the middle Cambrian [1]. According to the latest diagnosis [2], it is composed of a basal structure (lower margin) and a very thin structure (spreite) arranged perpendicular to the basal burrow showing a variable inclination. This structure appears as an irregular spiral or meandering "band", which corresponds to the intersection of the spreite with the planes parallel to the bedding [2]. Both structures were described as such in the last diagnosis [2]; however, they were called by different names in the literature. For example, the lower margin [2,3] has been referred to as the lower section [4] or basal burrow [5-7] or even as the lower part of the spreite [8]. Likewise, the spreite has been named as: striated vertical wall mural structure [9], narrow "wall" structure [6], dorsal vertical sediment curtain [10], crest-like or vertical wall [4,11], mid-dorsal vertical ridge [7], snorkel spreite [12]. Additionally, given the three-dimensional morphology of Dictyodora, the vertical, horizontal, and oblique preservations of each structure, and the different horizontal expressions (lower or higher horizontal sections) have also been given different names. The spreite is the structure that is frequently preserved in different planes and bedding levels (Fig. 1). The horizontal expression of the spreite is the most recorded and has been described with a wide range of morphologies and used as the main ichnotaxobases to determine ichnospecies. Six ichnospecies are currently valid [4]: Dictyodora liebeana (Geinitz), Dictyodora scotica (M’ Coy), Dictyodora silurica Yang and Hu, Dictyodora tenuis (M’ Coy), Dictyodora zimmermanni Hundt and Dictyodora atuelica Pazos et al. The morphology of the horizontal expression of the spreite varies in the ichnospecies from regular to irregular meanders with one or more orders of sinuosity. In other cases, irregular non-meandriform paths, and spiral meandriform or spiral forms are distinguished (Fig. 2). The use of terms such as "wide", "loop", "regular" or "irregular" have different meanings depending on the author. For instance, the word loop has been used to describe a meander [13]. This heterogeneity in the use of descriptive terms (some even used the original descriptions/diagnoses) is another problem when comparing ichnospecies. Moreover, some of the diagnostic features of the ichnospecies are not mutually exclusive and are sometimes present in more than one ichnospecies. For example, D. scotica is distinguished by regular first-order meanders, although they may also be irregular according to the same authors [5]. Also, D. silurica has both regular and irregular meanders [14]. In the case of D. tenuis, the morphology of the meanders is irregular [5], but it has also been described as completely irregular or more or less regular [15]. Another case is that of D. zimmermanni where the shape of the meanders is either quite irregular [13] or is less regular than in D. scotica [16] or may have both morphologies [15]. As used so far, this character is not useful to differentiate ichnospecies. Similarly, the secondary sinuosity is also ambiguous, being described as absent for example in D. zimmermanni but it seems present when illustrated by the same authors [13], or it is not described in D. silurica but it is showed in the type material [14]. This variability in the terminology hampers a proper comparison between specimens and an ichnotaxonomic discussion. Therefore, it is important to find an agreement in the use of these terms. Although it is beyond the scope of this work to discuss and redefine the ichnospecific ichnotaxobases for Dictyodora, it is important to achieve a consensus on the descriptive terms. After the study of hundreds of specimens from Gondwana and Laurentia, to solve some of the problems mentioned above, terms for each component and their respective morphologies are proposed (Fig.1).The term “basal burrow” is proposed because “lower margin” and “tube” have not been used in extenso in the literature. Furthermore, the use of the term "tube" refers to a single cylindrical structure, and in some cases the basal burrow does not have a cylindrical morphology as a whole, but rather lenticular, ovoid and even trilobed. Moreover, the term spreite is preferred for the medial structure arranged perpendicularly and above the basal burrow, partly because it is the term used in the diagnosis [2], but mainly because it is a descriptive term, highlighting characteristics of the structure such as the delicate and fine striations observed in its lateral vertical sections. Furthermore, it is also the term used most extensively in the literature. Finally, this structure has a wide range of inclinations (40º–90°) and is not consistent with being called a 'vertical structure' in the strict sense of the term. Given the morphological range of the spreite depending on which part of its vertical extension is sectioned, to aid in the description three different sections are here proposed. The wider, lower section, where the basal burrow connects to the spreite, is observed only in vertical or oblique preservation of Dictyodora, which is not frequent. The middle and upper sections are defined in relation to the lower section and reflect the horizontal expressions of the spreite that are most commonly preserved. The use of the terms "upper" and "middle" is considered arbitrary and with the sole purpose of allowing comparison of the spreite when this structure changes morphologically vertically within the same specimen [17]. Additionally, different terms to describe the morphology of the trajectories of both the basal burrow and the horizontal expression of the spreite are proposed (Fig. 2).
Fil: Gutiérrez, Carolina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; Argentina
Fil: Fernández, Diana Elizabeth. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; Argentina
Fil: Pazos, Pablo Jose. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; Argentina
The 5th International Congress on Ichnology
Florianopolis
Brasil
International Ichnological Asociation
Materia
DICTYODORA
ICHNOLOGY
PALEOZOIC
ICHNOTAXONOMY
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/232933

id CONICETDig_279b0eb36df9f94241c5da9ed8c7271c
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/232933
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling The ichnogenus Dictyodora Weiss: an attempt to unify terminologyGutiérrez, CarolinaFernández, Diana ElizabethPazos, Pablo JoseDICTYODORAICHNOLOGYPALEOZOICICHNOTAXONOMYhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Dictyodora is a three-dimensional complex trace fossil characteristic of marine Paleozoic deposits recorded since the middle Cambrian [1]. According to the latest diagnosis [2], it is composed of a basal structure (lower margin) and a very thin structure (spreite) arranged perpendicular to the basal burrow showing a variable inclination. This structure appears as an irregular spiral or meandering "band", which corresponds to the intersection of the spreite with the planes parallel to the bedding [2]. Both structures were described as such in the last diagnosis [2]; however, they were called by different names in the literature. For example, the lower margin [2,3] has been referred to as the lower section [4] or basal burrow [5-7] or even as the lower part of the spreite [8]. Likewise, the spreite has been named as: striated vertical wall mural structure [9], narrow "wall" structure [6], dorsal vertical sediment curtain [10], crest-like or vertical wall [4,11], mid-dorsal vertical ridge [7], snorkel spreite [12]. Additionally, given the three-dimensional morphology of Dictyodora, the vertical, horizontal, and oblique preservations of each structure, and the different horizontal expressions (lower or higher horizontal sections) have also been given different names. The spreite is the structure that is frequently preserved in different planes and bedding levels (Fig. 1). The horizontal expression of the spreite is the most recorded and has been described with a wide range of morphologies and used as the main ichnotaxobases to determine ichnospecies. Six ichnospecies are currently valid [4]: Dictyodora liebeana (Geinitz), Dictyodora scotica (M’ Coy), Dictyodora silurica Yang and Hu, Dictyodora tenuis (M’ Coy), Dictyodora zimmermanni Hundt and Dictyodora atuelica Pazos et al. The morphology of the horizontal expression of the spreite varies in the ichnospecies from regular to irregular meanders with one or more orders of sinuosity. In other cases, irregular non-meandriform paths, and spiral meandriform or spiral forms are distinguished (Fig. 2). The use of terms such as "wide", "loop", "regular" or "irregular" have different meanings depending on the author. For instance, the word loop has been used to describe a meander [13]. This heterogeneity in the use of descriptive terms (some even used the original descriptions/diagnoses) is another problem when comparing ichnospecies. Moreover, some of the diagnostic features of the ichnospecies are not mutually exclusive and are sometimes present in more than one ichnospecies. For example, D. scotica is distinguished by regular first-order meanders, although they may also be irregular according to the same authors [5]. Also, D. silurica has both regular and irregular meanders [14]. In the case of D. tenuis, the morphology of the meanders is irregular [5], but it has also been described as completely irregular or more or less regular [15]. Another case is that of D. zimmermanni where the shape of the meanders is either quite irregular [13] or is less regular than in D. scotica [16] or may have both morphologies [15]. As used so far, this character is not useful to differentiate ichnospecies. Similarly, the secondary sinuosity is also ambiguous, being described as absent for example in D. zimmermanni but it seems present when illustrated by the same authors [13], or it is not described in D. silurica but it is showed in the type material [14]. This variability in the terminology hampers a proper comparison between specimens and an ichnotaxonomic discussion. Therefore, it is important to find an agreement in the use of these terms. Although it is beyond the scope of this work to discuss and redefine the ichnospecific ichnotaxobases for Dictyodora, it is important to achieve a consensus on the descriptive terms. After the study of hundreds of specimens from Gondwana and Laurentia, to solve some of the problems mentioned above, terms for each component and their respective morphologies are proposed (Fig.1).The term “basal burrow” is proposed because “lower margin” and “tube” have not been used in extenso in the literature. Furthermore, the use of the term "tube" refers to a single cylindrical structure, and in some cases the basal burrow does not have a cylindrical morphology as a whole, but rather lenticular, ovoid and even trilobed. Moreover, the term spreite is preferred for the medial structure arranged perpendicularly and above the basal burrow, partly because it is the term used in the diagnosis [2], but mainly because it is a descriptive term, highlighting characteristics of the structure such as the delicate and fine striations observed in its lateral vertical sections. Furthermore, it is also the term used most extensively in the literature. Finally, this structure has a wide range of inclinations (40º–90°) and is not consistent with being called a 'vertical structure' in the strict sense of the term. Given the morphological range of the spreite depending on which part of its vertical extension is sectioned, to aid in the description three different sections are here proposed. The wider, lower section, where the basal burrow connects to the spreite, is observed only in vertical or oblique preservation of Dictyodora, which is not frequent. The middle and upper sections are defined in relation to the lower section and reflect the horizontal expressions of the spreite that are most commonly preserved. The use of the terms "upper" and "middle" is considered arbitrary and with the sole purpose of allowing comparison of the spreite when this structure changes morphologically vertically within the same specimen [17]. Additionally, different terms to describe the morphology of the trajectories of both the basal burrow and the horizontal expression of the spreite are proposed (Fig. 2).Fil: Gutiérrez, Carolina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; ArgentinaFil: Fernández, Diana Elizabeth. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; ArgentinaFil: Pazos, Pablo Jose. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; ArgentinaThe 5th International Congress on IchnologyFlorianopolisBrasilInternational Ichnological AsociationInternational Ichnological Asociation2024info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectCongresoBookhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/232933The ichnogenus Dictyodora Weiss: an attempt to unify terminology; The 5th International Congress on Ichnology; Florianopolis; Brasil; 2024; 127-129CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ichnia2024.com/Nacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-10T13:09:42Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/232933instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-10 13:09:42.801CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The ichnogenus Dictyodora Weiss: an attempt to unify terminology
title The ichnogenus Dictyodora Weiss: an attempt to unify terminology
spellingShingle The ichnogenus Dictyodora Weiss: an attempt to unify terminology
Gutiérrez, Carolina
DICTYODORA
ICHNOLOGY
PALEOZOIC
ICHNOTAXONOMY
title_short The ichnogenus Dictyodora Weiss: an attempt to unify terminology
title_full The ichnogenus Dictyodora Weiss: an attempt to unify terminology
title_fullStr The ichnogenus Dictyodora Weiss: an attempt to unify terminology
title_full_unstemmed The ichnogenus Dictyodora Weiss: an attempt to unify terminology
title_sort The ichnogenus Dictyodora Weiss: an attempt to unify terminology
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Gutiérrez, Carolina
Fernández, Diana Elizabeth
Pazos, Pablo Jose
author Gutiérrez, Carolina
author_facet Gutiérrez, Carolina
Fernández, Diana Elizabeth
Pazos, Pablo Jose
author_role author
author2 Fernández, Diana Elizabeth
Pazos, Pablo Jose
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv DICTYODORA
ICHNOLOGY
PALEOZOIC
ICHNOTAXONOMY
topic DICTYODORA
ICHNOLOGY
PALEOZOIC
ICHNOTAXONOMY
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Dictyodora is a three-dimensional complex trace fossil characteristic of marine Paleozoic deposits recorded since the middle Cambrian [1]. According to the latest diagnosis [2], it is composed of a basal structure (lower margin) and a very thin structure (spreite) arranged perpendicular to the basal burrow showing a variable inclination. This structure appears as an irregular spiral or meandering "band", which corresponds to the intersection of the spreite with the planes parallel to the bedding [2]. Both structures were described as such in the last diagnosis [2]; however, they were called by different names in the literature. For example, the lower margin [2,3] has been referred to as the lower section [4] or basal burrow [5-7] or even as the lower part of the spreite [8]. Likewise, the spreite has been named as: striated vertical wall mural structure [9], narrow "wall" structure [6], dorsal vertical sediment curtain [10], crest-like or vertical wall [4,11], mid-dorsal vertical ridge [7], snorkel spreite [12]. Additionally, given the three-dimensional morphology of Dictyodora, the vertical, horizontal, and oblique preservations of each structure, and the different horizontal expressions (lower or higher horizontal sections) have also been given different names. The spreite is the structure that is frequently preserved in different planes and bedding levels (Fig. 1). The horizontal expression of the spreite is the most recorded and has been described with a wide range of morphologies and used as the main ichnotaxobases to determine ichnospecies. Six ichnospecies are currently valid [4]: Dictyodora liebeana (Geinitz), Dictyodora scotica (M’ Coy), Dictyodora silurica Yang and Hu, Dictyodora tenuis (M’ Coy), Dictyodora zimmermanni Hundt and Dictyodora atuelica Pazos et al. The morphology of the horizontal expression of the spreite varies in the ichnospecies from regular to irregular meanders with one or more orders of sinuosity. In other cases, irregular non-meandriform paths, and spiral meandriform or spiral forms are distinguished (Fig. 2). The use of terms such as "wide", "loop", "regular" or "irregular" have different meanings depending on the author. For instance, the word loop has been used to describe a meander [13]. This heterogeneity in the use of descriptive terms (some even used the original descriptions/diagnoses) is another problem when comparing ichnospecies. Moreover, some of the diagnostic features of the ichnospecies are not mutually exclusive and are sometimes present in more than one ichnospecies. For example, D. scotica is distinguished by regular first-order meanders, although they may also be irregular according to the same authors [5]. Also, D. silurica has both regular and irregular meanders [14]. In the case of D. tenuis, the morphology of the meanders is irregular [5], but it has also been described as completely irregular or more or less regular [15]. Another case is that of D. zimmermanni where the shape of the meanders is either quite irregular [13] or is less regular than in D. scotica [16] or may have both morphologies [15]. As used so far, this character is not useful to differentiate ichnospecies. Similarly, the secondary sinuosity is also ambiguous, being described as absent for example in D. zimmermanni but it seems present when illustrated by the same authors [13], or it is not described in D. silurica but it is showed in the type material [14]. This variability in the terminology hampers a proper comparison between specimens and an ichnotaxonomic discussion. Therefore, it is important to find an agreement in the use of these terms. Although it is beyond the scope of this work to discuss and redefine the ichnospecific ichnotaxobases for Dictyodora, it is important to achieve a consensus on the descriptive terms. After the study of hundreds of specimens from Gondwana and Laurentia, to solve some of the problems mentioned above, terms for each component and their respective morphologies are proposed (Fig.1).The term “basal burrow” is proposed because “lower margin” and “tube” have not been used in extenso in the literature. Furthermore, the use of the term "tube" refers to a single cylindrical structure, and in some cases the basal burrow does not have a cylindrical morphology as a whole, but rather lenticular, ovoid and even trilobed. Moreover, the term spreite is preferred for the medial structure arranged perpendicularly and above the basal burrow, partly because it is the term used in the diagnosis [2], but mainly because it is a descriptive term, highlighting characteristics of the structure such as the delicate and fine striations observed in its lateral vertical sections. Furthermore, it is also the term used most extensively in the literature. Finally, this structure has a wide range of inclinations (40º–90°) and is not consistent with being called a 'vertical structure' in the strict sense of the term. Given the morphological range of the spreite depending on which part of its vertical extension is sectioned, to aid in the description three different sections are here proposed. The wider, lower section, where the basal burrow connects to the spreite, is observed only in vertical or oblique preservation of Dictyodora, which is not frequent. The middle and upper sections are defined in relation to the lower section and reflect the horizontal expressions of the spreite that are most commonly preserved. The use of the terms "upper" and "middle" is considered arbitrary and with the sole purpose of allowing comparison of the spreite when this structure changes morphologically vertically within the same specimen [17]. Additionally, different terms to describe the morphology of the trajectories of both the basal burrow and the horizontal expression of the spreite are proposed (Fig. 2).
Fil: Gutiérrez, Carolina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; Argentina
Fil: Fernández, Diana Elizabeth. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; Argentina
Fil: Pazos, Pablo Jose. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; Argentina
The 5th International Congress on Ichnology
Florianopolis
Brasil
International Ichnological Asociation
description Dictyodora is a three-dimensional complex trace fossil characteristic of marine Paleozoic deposits recorded since the middle Cambrian [1]. According to the latest diagnosis [2], it is composed of a basal structure (lower margin) and a very thin structure (spreite) arranged perpendicular to the basal burrow showing a variable inclination. This structure appears as an irregular spiral or meandering "band", which corresponds to the intersection of the spreite with the planes parallel to the bedding [2]. Both structures were described as such in the last diagnosis [2]; however, they were called by different names in the literature. For example, the lower margin [2,3] has been referred to as the lower section [4] or basal burrow [5-7] or even as the lower part of the spreite [8]. Likewise, the spreite has been named as: striated vertical wall mural structure [9], narrow "wall" structure [6], dorsal vertical sediment curtain [10], crest-like or vertical wall [4,11], mid-dorsal vertical ridge [7], snorkel spreite [12]. Additionally, given the three-dimensional morphology of Dictyodora, the vertical, horizontal, and oblique preservations of each structure, and the different horizontal expressions (lower or higher horizontal sections) have also been given different names. The spreite is the structure that is frequently preserved in different planes and bedding levels (Fig. 1). The horizontal expression of the spreite is the most recorded and has been described with a wide range of morphologies and used as the main ichnotaxobases to determine ichnospecies. Six ichnospecies are currently valid [4]: Dictyodora liebeana (Geinitz), Dictyodora scotica (M’ Coy), Dictyodora silurica Yang and Hu, Dictyodora tenuis (M’ Coy), Dictyodora zimmermanni Hundt and Dictyodora atuelica Pazos et al. The morphology of the horizontal expression of the spreite varies in the ichnospecies from regular to irregular meanders with one or more orders of sinuosity. In other cases, irregular non-meandriform paths, and spiral meandriform or spiral forms are distinguished (Fig. 2). The use of terms such as "wide", "loop", "regular" or "irregular" have different meanings depending on the author. For instance, the word loop has been used to describe a meander [13]. This heterogeneity in the use of descriptive terms (some even used the original descriptions/diagnoses) is another problem when comparing ichnospecies. Moreover, some of the diagnostic features of the ichnospecies are not mutually exclusive and are sometimes present in more than one ichnospecies. For example, D. scotica is distinguished by regular first-order meanders, although they may also be irregular according to the same authors [5]. Also, D. silurica has both regular and irregular meanders [14]. In the case of D. tenuis, the morphology of the meanders is irregular [5], but it has also been described as completely irregular or more or less regular [15]. Another case is that of D. zimmermanni where the shape of the meanders is either quite irregular [13] or is less regular than in D. scotica [16] or may have both morphologies [15]. As used so far, this character is not useful to differentiate ichnospecies. Similarly, the secondary sinuosity is also ambiguous, being described as absent for example in D. zimmermanni but it seems present when illustrated by the same authors [13], or it is not described in D. silurica but it is showed in the type material [14]. This variability in the terminology hampers a proper comparison between specimens and an ichnotaxonomic discussion. Therefore, it is important to find an agreement in the use of these terms. Although it is beyond the scope of this work to discuss and redefine the ichnospecific ichnotaxobases for Dictyodora, it is important to achieve a consensus on the descriptive terms. After the study of hundreds of specimens from Gondwana and Laurentia, to solve some of the problems mentioned above, terms for each component and their respective morphologies are proposed (Fig.1).The term “basal burrow” is proposed because “lower margin” and “tube” have not been used in extenso in the literature. Furthermore, the use of the term "tube" refers to a single cylindrical structure, and in some cases the basal burrow does not have a cylindrical morphology as a whole, but rather lenticular, ovoid and even trilobed. Moreover, the term spreite is preferred for the medial structure arranged perpendicularly and above the basal burrow, partly because it is the term used in the diagnosis [2], but mainly because it is a descriptive term, highlighting characteristics of the structure such as the delicate and fine striations observed in its lateral vertical sections. Furthermore, it is also the term used most extensively in the literature. Finally, this structure has a wide range of inclinations (40º–90°) and is not consistent with being called a 'vertical structure' in the strict sense of the term. Given the morphological range of the spreite depending on which part of its vertical extension is sectioned, to aid in the description three different sections are here proposed. The wider, lower section, where the basal burrow connects to the spreite, is observed only in vertical or oblique preservation of Dictyodora, which is not frequent. The middle and upper sections are defined in relation to the lower section and reflect the horizontal expressions of the spreite that are most commonly preserved. The use of the terms "upper" and "middle" is considered arbitrary and with the sole purpose of allowing comparison of the spreite when this structure changes morphologically vertically within the same specimen [17]. Additionally, different terms to describe the morphology of the trajectories of both the basal burrow and the horizontal expression of the spreite are proposed (Fig. 2).
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
Congreso
Book
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
status_str publishedVersion
format conferenceObject
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/232933
The ichnogenus Dictyodora Weiss: an attempt to unify terminology; The 5th International Congress on Ichnology; Florianopolis; Brasil; 2024; 127-129
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/232933
identifier_str_mv The ichnogenus Dictyodora Weiss: an attempt to unify terminology; The 5th International Congress on Ichnology; Florianopolis; Brasil; 2024; 127-129
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ichnia2024.com/
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Nacional
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv International Ichnological Asociation
publisher.none.fl_str_mv International Ichnological Asociation
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842980480055508992
score 12.993085