Aristippus' legacy. The Development of the Cyrenaic Philosophy

Autores
Mársico, Claudia Teresa
Año de publicación
2019
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The Socratic circle produced a series of strikingly contrasting philosophies. It is difficult to reconstruct their approaches, and it is even more difficult because each line concentrates the works of many authors. We have very damaged testimonies, plenty of anecdotes and some references to doctrines but usually without evolutionary elements. In the case of the Cyrenaics, this aspect is especially perplexing, given that we have information about positions within the group along with a very vague description of the shared theoretical foundations. In this context, the determination of the origin of these opinions is highly speculative and throws us into an embarrassing situation usual in the studies of Hellenistic philosophy. We have notice of numerous authors, but we can read only a few summaries without much detail related to the group in general. This case is even more complicated because some readings on the ancient sources disseminated the idea of a late composition of the main Cyrenaic ideas. Aristippus of Cyrene, the initiator of the group, would have developed a hedonistic way of life, but not doctrines, which should be associated with a later emergence.If this is the case, the study of the Cyrenaic interaction within the Socratic group during the first generation becomes illegitimate. Moreover, any discussion about hedonism in this period would have nothing to do with the Cyrenaic roots. In what follows, we will examine the tradition that supports the idea of an Aristippus devoid of theoretical developments. On that basis, we will analyse the elements of the Cyrenaic philosophy that can be attributed to Aristippus and the motives for the innovations introduced by his grandson, Aristippus the Younger, the Metrodidact. Finally, we will suggest some ideas about the evolution of the Cyrenaics from Aristippus to his reception in Arete and the Metrodidact, Hegesias, Anniceris and Theodorus in order to discuss the belief on a mainstream line based on the proposal of Metrodidact. This analysis will exhibit the development and central tenets of the Cyrenaic philosophy highlighting its contributions to classical and Hellenistic philosophy.
Este trabajo estudia la evolución de la filosofía cirenaica, analizando los elementos que pueden atribuirse a Aristipo en el contexto de las innovaciones introducidas por su nieto, el Metrodidacta. Además, evalúa la evolución de las ideas cirenaicas entre Hegesias, Aniceris y Teodoro para discutir la idea de una línea central en el seno de la filosofía del Metrodidacta. Este análisis permitirá mostrar el desarrollo y los tópicos centrales de la filosofía cirenaica enfatizando sus contribuciones a la filosofía clásica y helenística.
Fil: Mársico, Claudia Teresa. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
SOCRATICS
CYRENAICS
ARISTIPPUS
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/165689

id CONICETDig_22083812e62b9140ad4b497cef6ed1d7
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/165689
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Aristippus' legacy. The Development of the Cyrenaic PhilosophyEl legado de Aristippus. Sobre el desarrollo de la filosofía cirenaicaMársico, Claudia TeresaSOCRATICSCYRENAICSARISTIPPUShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6The Socratic circle produced a series of strikingly contrasting philosophies. It is difficult to reconstruct their approaches, and it is even more difficult because each line concentrates the works of many authors. We have very damaged testimonies, plenty of anecdotes and some references to doctrines but usually without evolutionary elements. In the case of the Cyrenaics, this aspect is especially perplexing, given that we have information about positions within the group along with a very vague description of the shared theoretical foundations. In this context, the determination of the origin of these opinions is highly speculative and throws us into an embarrassing situation usual in the studies of Hellenistic philosophy. We have notice of numerous authors, but we can read only a few summaries without much detail related to the group in general. This case is even more complicated because some readings on the ancient sources disseminated the idea of a late composition of the main Cyrenaic ideas. Aristippus of Cyrene, the initiator of the group, would have developed a hedonistic way of life, but not doctrines, which should be associated with a later emergence.If this is the case, the study of the Cyrenaic interaction within the Socratic group during the first generation becomes illegitimate. Moreover, any discussion about hedonism in this period would have nothing to do with the Cyrenaic roots. In what follows, we will examine the tradition that supports the idea of an Aristippus devoid of theoretical developments. On that basis, we will analyse the elements of the Cyrenaic philosophy that can be attributed to Aristippus and the motives for the innovations introduced by his grandson, Aristippus the Younger, the Metrodidact. Finally, we will suggest some ideas about the evolution of the Cyrenaics from Aristippus to his reception in Arete and the Metrodidact, Hegesias, Anniceris and Theodorus in order to discuss the belief on a mainstream line based on the proposal of Metrodidact. This analysis will exhibit the development and central tenets of the Cyrenaic philosophy highlighting its contributions to classical and Hellenistic philosophy.Este trabajo estudia la evolución de la filosofía cirenaica, analizando los elementos que pueden atribuirse a Aristipo en el contexto de las innovaciones introducidas por su nieto, el Metrodidacta. Además, evalúa la evolución de las ideas cirenaicas entre Hegesias, Aniceris y Teodoro para discutir la idea de una línea central en el seno de la filosofía del Metrodidacta. Este análisis permitirá mostrar el desarrollo y los tópicos centrales de la filosofía cirenaica enfatizando sus contribuciones a la filosofía clásica y helenística.Fil: Mársico, Claudia Teresa. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaMatica Sprska2019-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/165689Mársico, Claudia Teresa; Aristippus' legacy. The Development of the Cyrenaic Philosophy; Matica Sprska; Journal of Classical Studies; 21-22; 12-2019; 23-471450-6998CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:49:45Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/165689instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:49:45.29CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Aristippus' legacy. The Development of the Cyrenaic Philosophy
El legado de Aristippus. Sobre el desarrollo de la filosofía cirenaica
title Aristippus' legacy. The Development of the Cyrenaic Philosophy
spellingShingle Aristippus' legacy. The Development of the Cyrenaic Philosophy
Mársico, Claudia Teresa
SOCRATICS
CYRENAICS
ARISTIPPUS
title_short Aristippus' legacy. The Development of the Cyrenaic Philosophy
title_full Aristippus' legacy. The Development of the Cyrenaic Philosophy
title_fullStr Aristippus' legacy. The Development of the Cyrenaic Philosophy
title_full_unstemmed Aristippus' legacy. The Development of the Cyrenaic Philosophy
title_sort Aristippus' legacy. The Development of the Cyrenaic Philosophy
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Mársico, Claudia Teresa
author Mársico, Claudia Teresa
author_facet Mársico, Claudia Teresa
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv SOCRATICS
CYRENAICS
ARISTIPPUS
topic SOCRATICS
CYRENAICS
ARISTIPPUS
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The Socratic circle produced a series of strikingly contrasting philosophies. It is difficult to reconstruct their approaches, and it is even more difficult because each line concentrates the works of many authors. We have very damaged testimonies, plenty of anecdotes and some references to doctrines but usually without evolutionary elements. In the case of the Cyrenaics, this aspect is especially perplexing, given that we have information about positions within the group along with a very vague description of the shared theoretical foundations. In this context, the determination of the origin of these opinions is highly speculative and throws us into an embarrassing situation usual in the studies of Hellenistic philosophy. We have notice of numerous authors, but we can read only a few summaries without much detail related to the group in general. This case is even more complicated because some readings on the ancient sources disseminated the idea of a late composition of the main Cyrenaic ideas. Aristippus of Cyrene, the initiator of the group, would have developed a hedonistic way of life, but not doctrines, which should be associated with a later emergence.If this is the case, the study of the Cyrenaic interaction within the Socratic group during the first generation becomes illegitimate. Moreover, any discussion about hedonism in this period would have nothing to do with the Cyrenaic roots. In what follows, we will examine the tradition that supports the idea of an Aristippus devoid of theoretical developments. On that basis, we will analyse the elements of the Cyrenaic philosophy that can be attributed to Aristippus and the motives for the innovations introduced by his grandson, Aristippus the Younger, the Metrodidact. Finally, we will suggest some ideas about the evolution of the Cyrenaics from Aristippus to his reception in Arete and the Metrodidact, Hegesias, Anniceris and Theodorus in order to discuss the belief on a mainstream line based on the proposal of Metrodidact. This analysis will exhibit the development and central tenets of the Cyrenaic philosophy highlighting its contributions to classical and Hellenistic philosophy.
Este trabajo estudia la evolución de la filosofía cirenaica, analizando los elementos que pueden atribuirse a Aristipo en el contexto de las innovaciones introducidas por su nieto, el Metrodidacta. Además, evalúa la evolución de las ideas cirenaicas entre Hegesias, Aniceris y Teodoro para discutir la idea de una línea central en el seno de la filosofía del Metrodidacta. Este análisis permitirá mostrar el desarrollo y los tópicos centrales de la filosofía cirenaica enfatizando sus contribuciones a la filosofía clásica y helenística.
Fil: Mársico, Claudia Teresa. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description The Socratic circle produced a series of strikingly contrasting philosophies. It is difficult to reconstruct their approaches, and it is even more difficult because each line concentrates the works of many authors. We have very damaged testimonies, plenty of anecdotes and some references to doctrines but usually without evolutionary elements. In the case of the Cyrenaics, this aspect is especially perplexing, given that we have information about positions within the group along with a very vague description of the shared theoretical foundations. In this context, the determination of the origin of these opinions is highly speculative and throws us into an embarrassing situation usual in the studies of Hellenistic philosophy. We have notice of numerous authors, but we can read only a few summaries without much detail related to the group in general. This case is even more complicated because some readings on the ancient sources disseminated the idea of a late composition of the main Cyrenaic ideas. Aristippus of Cyrene, the initiator of the group, would have developed a hedonistic way of life, but not doctrines, which should be associated with a later emergence.If this is the case, the study of the Cyrenaic interaction within the Socratic group during the first generation becomes illegitimate. Moreover, any discussion about hedonism in this period would have nothing to do with the Cyrenaic roots. In what follows, we will examine the tradition that supports the idea of an Aristippus devoid of theoretical developments. On that basis, we will analyse the elements of the Cyrenaic philosophy that can be attributed to Aristippus and the motives for the innovations introduced by his grandson, Aristippus the Younger, the Metrodidact. Finally, we will suggest some ideas about the evolution of the Cyrenaics from Aristippus to his reception in Arete and the Metrodidact, Hegesias, Anniceris and Theodorus in order to discuss the belief on a mainstream line based on the proposal of Metrodidact. This analysis will exhibit the development and central tenets of the Cyrenaic philosophy highlighting its contributions to classical and Hellenistic philosophy.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/165689
Mársico, Claudia Teresa; Aristippus' legacy. The Development of the Cyrenaic Philosophy; Matica Sprska; Journal of Classical Studies; 21-22; 12-2019; 23-47
1450-6998
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/165689
identifier_str_mv Mársico, Claudia Teresa; Aristippus' legacy. The Development of the Cyrenaic Philosophy; Matica Sprska; Journal of Classical Studies; 21-22; 12-2019; 23-47
1450-6998
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Matica Sprska
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Matica Sprska
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613537507311616
score 13.070432