Metadiscursive negation, evidential points of view and ethos in Argentine political discourse

Autores
Garcia Negroni, Maria Marta
Año de publicación
2023
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
parte de libro
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In this chapter, I will focus on the analysis of the evidential meaning of metadiscursive negation in Spanish that, like certain syntactic structures, certain adverbial constructions, some discourse markers, certain uses of verb tenses, etc., can convey this type of meaning. However, with a view to accounting for such meaning, I will drift from many of the assumptions upon which most studies on evidentiality rest. In fact, on the research paths paved by the theories of polyphony (Ducrot, 1984, 2001), dialogism (Bakhtin, 1981, 1982) and argumentative semantics (Carel, 2011; Carel & Ducrot, 2005; Ducrot, 2004), the dialogic approach to argumentation and polyphony (Caldiz, 2019; García Negroni, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2021; García Negroni & Hall, 2020, 2022; García Negroni & Libenson, 2020a, 2020b, 2020c, 2021; Zucchi, 2020), within which this study is framed, advocates a non-truth-value and non-referential characterisation of meaning (i.e., there is no meaning component that can actually be considered purely objective). Furthermore, this perspective drifts from the principle of the uniqueness of an intentional subject in discourse (i.e., the subjective points of view posed in a given utterance cannot necessarily be attributed to the same discursive being) while also focusing on the functioning of signs in the language system and in discourse.I will delve into what I have described as quotative evidential points of view (García Negroni, 2018, 2019, 2021) and into how such viewpoints are displayed in instances of metadiscursive negation. All the cases analysed here belong to a corpus collected from a series of speeches delivered by different Argentine political figures: Juan Domingo Perón, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner and Julio Cobos. I will seek to attain a two-fold aim. First, I will bring to light the fact that, in these cases, negative enunciation is presented as emerging from and responding to a discourse frame related to other voices –which are dialogically evoked by the enunciation itself. I will then seek to show that in dialogic response to such discourse frame, a given subjective responsive positioning arises along with a given ethos of the locuteur (Ducrot, 1984; Amossy, 1999). Associated with different scenes (Maingueneau, 1999, 2002) typical of political enunciation and moulded in light of the different addressees at stake, the variety of ethos identified in the analysis will be as follows: the ethos of confrontation and discredit; the pedagogical one; the defensive ethos of someone who cares for its own public image; the one showing a condition of symmetry; and the cautious, fearful one facing an extreme situation.
Fil: Garcia Negroni, Maria Marta. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
POLITICAL DISCOURSE
METADISCURSIVE NEGATION
ETHOS
EVIDENTIAL POINTS OF VIEW
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/240205

id CONICETDig_1e7e5b3482367df4cf58aebec0c6c83f
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/240205
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Metadiscursive negation, evidential points of view and ethos in Argentine political discourseGarcia Negroni, Maria MartaPOLITICAL DISCOURSEMETADISCURSIVE NEGATIONETHOSEVIDENTIAL POINTS OF VIEWhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6In this chapter, I will focus on the analysis of the evidential meaning of metadiscursive negation in Spanish that, like certain syntactic structures, certain adverbial constructions, some discourse markers, certain uses of verb tenses, etc., can convey this type of meaning. However, with a view to accounting for such meaning, I will drift from many of the assumptions upon which most studies on evidentiality rest. In fact, on the research paths paved by the theories of polyphony (Ducrot, 1984, 2001), dialogism (Bakhtin, 1981, 1982) and argumentative semantics (Carel, 2011; Carel & Ducrot, 2005; Ducrot, 2004), the dialogic approach to argumentation and polyphony (Caldiz, 2019; García Negroni, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2021; García Negroni & Hall, 2020, 2022; García Negroni & Libenson, 2020a, 2020b, 2020c, 2021; Zucchi, 2020), within which this study is framed, advocates a non-truth-value and non-referential characterisation of meaning (i.e., there is no meaning component that can actually be considered purely objective). Furthermore, this perspective drifts from the principle of the uniqueness of an intentional subject in discourse (i.e., the subjective points of view posed in a given utterance cannot necessarily be attributed to the same discursive being) while also focusing on the functioning of signs in the language system and in discourse.I will delve into what I have described as quotative evidential points of view (García Negroni, 2018, 2019, 2021) and into how such viewpoints are displayed in instances of metadiscursive negation. All the cases analysed here belong to a corpus collected from a series of speeches delivered by different Argentine political figures: Juan Domingo Perón, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner and Julio Cobos. I will seek to attain a two-fold aim. First, I will bring to light the fact that, in these cases, negative enunciation is presented as emerging from and responding to a discourse frame related to other voices –which are dialogically evoked by the enunciation itself. I will then seek to show that in dialogic response to such discourse frame, a given subjective responsive positioning arises along with a given ethos of the locuteur (Ducrot, 1984; Amossy, 1999). Associated with different scenes (Maingueneau, 1999, 2002) typical of political enunciation and moulded in light of the different addressees at stake, the variety of ethos identified in the analysis will be as follows: the ethos of confrontation and discredit; the pedagogical one; the defensive ethos of someone who cares for its own public image; the one showing a condition of symmetry; and the cautious, fearful one facing an extreme situation.Fil: Garcia Negroni, Maria Marta. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaStockholm University PressRoitman, Malin2023info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookParthttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248info:ar-repo/semantics/parteDeLibroapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/240205Garcia Negroni, Maria Marta; Metadiscursive negation, evidential points of view and ethos in Argentine political discourse; Stockholm University Press; 2023; 83-111978-91-7635-202-1CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.stockholmuniversitypress.se/site/chapters/e/10.16993/bcd.d/info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.16993/bcd.dinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:48:22Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/240205instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:48:23.122CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Metadiscursive negation, evidential points of view and ethos in Argentine political discourse
title Metadiscursive negation, evidential points of view and ethos in Argentine political discourse
spellingShingle Metadiscursive negation, evidential points of view and ethos in Argentine political discourse
Garcia Negroni, Maria Marta
POLITICAL DISCOURSE
METADISCURSIVE NEGATION
ETHOS
EVIDENTIAL POINTS OF VIEW
title_short Metadiscursive negation, evidential points of view and ethos in Argentine political discourse
title_full Metadiscursive negation, evidential points of view and ethos in Argentine political discourse
title_fullStr Metadiscursive negation, evidential points of view and ethos in Argentine political discourse
title_full_unstemmed Metadiscursive negation, evidential points of view and ethos in Argentine political discourse
title_sort Metadiscursive negation, evidential points of view and ethos in Argentine political discourse
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Garcia Negroni, Maria Marta
author Garcia Negroni, Maria Marta
author_facet Garcia Negroni, Maria Marta
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Roitman, Malin
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv POLITICAL DISCOURSE
METADISCURSIVE NEGATION
ETHOS
EVIDENTIAL POINTS OF VIEW
topic POLITICAL DISCOURSE
METADISCURSIVE NEGATION
ETHOS
EVIDENTIAL POINTS OF VIEW
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In this chapter, I will focus on the analysis of the evidential meaning of metadiscursive negation in Spanish that, like certain syntactic structures, certain adverbial constructions, some discourse markers, certain uses of verb tenses, etc., can convey this type of meaning. However, with a view to accounting for such meaning, I will drift from many of the assumptions upon which most studies on evidentiality rest. In fact, on the research paths paved by the theories of polyphony (Ducrot, 1984, 2001), dialogism (Bakhtin, 1981, 1982) and argumentative semantics (Carel, 2011; Carel & Ducrot, 2005; Ducrot, 2004), the dialogic approach to argumentation and polyphony (Caldiz, 2019; García Negroni, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2021; García Negroni & Hall, 2020, 2022; García Negroni & Libenson, 2020a, 2020b, 2020c, 2021; Zucchi, 2020), within which this study is framed, advocates a non-truth-value and non-referential characterisation of meaning (i.e., there is no meaning component that can actually be considered purely objective). Furthermore, this perspective drifts from the principle of the uniqueness of an intentional subject in discourse (i.e., the subjective points of view posed in a given utterance cannot necessarily be attributed to the same discursive being) while also focusing on the functioning of signs in the language system and in discourse.I will delve into what I have described as quotative evidential points of view (García Negroni, 2018, 2019, 2021) and into how such viewpoints are displayed in instances of metadiscursive negation. All the cases analysed here belong to a corpus collected from a series of speeches delivered by different Argentine political figures: Juan Domingo Perón, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner and Julio Cobos. I will seek to attain a two-fold aim. First, I will bring to light the fact that, in these cases, negative enunciation is presented as emerging from and responding to a discourse frame related to other voices –which are dialogically evoked by the enunciation itself. I will then seek to show that in dialogic response to such discourse frame, a given subjective responsive positioning arises along with a given ethos of the locuteur (Ducrot, 1984; Amossy, 1999). Associated with different scenes (Maingueneau, 1999, 2002) typical of political enunciation and moulded in light of the different addressees at stake, the variety of ethos identified in the analysis will be as follows: the ethos of confrontation and discredit; the pedagogical one; the defensive ethos of someone who cares for its own public image; the one showing a condition of symmetry; and the cautious, fearful one facing an extreme situation.
Fil: Garcia Negroni, Maria Marta. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description In this chapter, I will focus on the analysis of the evidential meaning of metadiscursive negation in Spanish that, like certain syntactic structures, certain adverbial constructions, some discourse markers, certain uses of verb tenses, etc., can convey this type of meaning. However, with a view to accounting for such meaning, I will drift from many of the assumptions upon which most studies on evidentiality rest. In fact, on the research paths paved by the theories of polyphony (Ducrot, 1984, 2001), dialogism (Bakhtin, 1981, 1982) and argumentative semantics (Carel, 2011; Carel & Ducrot, 2005; Ducrot, 2004), the dialogic approach to argumentation and polyphony (Caldiz, 2019; García Negroni, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2021; García Negroni & Hall, 2020, 2022; García Negroni & Libenson, 2020a, 2020b, 2020c, 2021; Zucchi, 2020), within which this study is framed, advocates a non-truth-value and non-referential characterisation of meaning (i.e., there is no meaning component that can actually be considered purely objective). Furthermore, this perspective drifts from the principle of the uniqueness of an intentional subject in discourse (i.e., the subjective points of view posed in a given utterance cannot necessarily be attributed to the same discursive being) while also focusing on the functioning of signs in the language system and in discourse.I will delve into what I have described as quotative evidential points of view (García Negroni, 2018, 2019, 2021) and into how such viewpoints are displayed in instances of metadiscursive negation. All the cases analysed here belong to a corpus collected from a series of speeches delivered by different Argentine political figures: Juan Domingo Perón, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner and Julio Cobos. I will seek to attain a two-fold aim. First, I will bring to light the fact that, in these cases, negative enunciation is presented as emerging from and responding to a discourse frame related to other voices –which are dialogically evoked by the enunciation itself. I will then seek to show that in dialogic response to such discourse frame, a given subjective responsive positioning arises along with a given ethos of the locuteur (Ducrot, 1984; Amossy, 1999). Associated with different scenes (Maingueneau, 1999, 2002) typical of political enunciation and moulded in light of the different addressees at stake, the variety of ethos identified in the analysis will be as follows: the ethos of confrontation and discredit; the pedagogical one; the defensive ethos of someone who cares for its own public image; the one showing a condition of symmetry; and the cautious, fearful one facing an extreme situation.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248
info:ar-repo/semantics/parteDeLibro
status_str publishedVersion
format bookPart
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/240205
Garcia Negroni, Maria Marta; Metadiscursive negation, evidential points of view and ethos in Argentine political discourse; Stockholm University Press; 2023; 83-111
978-91-7635-202-1
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/240205
identifier_str_mv Garcia Negroni, Maria Marta; Metadiscursive negation, evidential points of view and ethos in Argentine political discourse; Stockholm University Press; 2023; 83-111
978-91-7635-202-1
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.stockholmuniversitypress.se/site/chapters/e/10.16993/bcd.d/
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.16993/bcd.d
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Stockholm University Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Stockholm University Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842268921048072192
score 13.13397