Gaze patterns of compound negation processing

Autores
Macbeth, Guillermo Eduardo; Razumiejczyk, Eugenia; Crivello, María del Carmen; Fernández, José Humberto
Año de publicación
2017
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The aim of this study is to describe some key components of the relation between reasoning and gaze behaviour. Specifically, we studied gaze dwell and fixations during a sentence-equivalence task that required the processing of compound negation for conjunctions and disjunctions. We derived opposite predictions from two different theories of reasoning. The Mental Models Theory was tested against the formalist PSYCOP theory. The former predicts specific patterns of inspection times and gaze fixations frequency as functions of representational complexity and semantic depth. That is, the more complex representation is, and the deeper the meaning processing is, the longer inspection times and the higher fixations frequency should be. PSYCOP predicts the opposite visual behaviour pattern or no difference at all. We tested such predictions experimentally using eye-tracking technology. Our results support the Mental Models Theory. That is, it seems that human mind constructs mental models to process the negation of conjunctions and disjunctions according to eye-tracking evidence.
Fil: Macbeth, Guillermo Eduardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos; Argentina
Fil: Razumiejczyk, Eugenia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos; Argentina
Fil: Crivello, María del Carmen. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos; Argentina
Fil: Fernández, José Humberto. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Materia
VISION
FIXATION
REASONING
NEGATION
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/73398
Acceder
id CONICETDig_447aadcc1ab419ae4252691be1bbced7
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/73398
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Gaze patterns of compound negation processingMacbeth, Guillermo EduardoRazumiejczyk, EugeniaCrivello, María del CarmenFernández, José HumbertoVISIONFIXATIONREASONINGNEGATIONhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5The aim of this study is to describe some key components of the relation between reasoning and gaze behaviour. Specifically, we studied gaze dwell and fixations during a sentence-equivalence task that required the processing of compound negation for conjunctions and disjunctions. We derived opposite predictions from two different theories of reasoning. The Mental Models Theory was tested against the formalist PSYCOP theory. The former predicts specific patterns of inspection times and gaze fixations frequency as functions of representational complexity and semantic depth. That is, the more complex representation is, and the deeper the meaning processing is, the longer inspection times and the higher fixations frequency should be. PSYCOP predicts the opposite visual behaviour pattern or no difference at all. We tested such predictions experimentally using eye-tracking technology. Our results support the Mental Models Theory. That is, it seems that human mind constructs mental models to process the negation of conjunctions and disjunctions according to eye-tracking evidence.Fil: Macbeth, Guillermo Eduardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos; ArgentinaFil: Razumiejczyk, Eugenia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos; ArgentinaFil: Crivello, María del Carmen. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos; ArgentinaFil: Fernández, José Humberto. Universidad de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaGeogian Technical University2017-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/73398Macbeth, Guillermo Eduardo; Razumiejczyk, Eugenia; Crivello, María del Carmen; Fernández, José Humberto; Gaze patterns of compound negation processing; Geogian Technical University; Education Sciences And Psychology; 46; 4; 12-2017; 3-101512-1801CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://gesj.internet-academy.org.ge/en/list_artic_en.php?b_sec=edu&issue=2017-12info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:39:45Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/73398instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:39:45.647CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Gaze patterns of compound negation processing
title Gaze patterns of compound negation processing
spellingShingle Gaze patterns of compound negation processing
Macbeth, Guillermo Eduardo
VISION
FIXATION
REASONING
NEGATION
title_short Gaze patterns of compound negation processing
title_full Gaze patterns of compound negation processing
title_fullStr Gaze patterns of compound negation processing
title_full_unstemmed Gaze patterns of compound negation processing
title_sort Gaze patterns of compound negation processing
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Macbeth, Guillermo Eduardo
Razumiejczyk, Eugenia
Crivello, María del Carmen
Fernández, José Humberto
author Macbeth, Guillermo Eduardo
author_facet Macbeth, Guillermo Eduardo
Razumiejczyk, Eugenia
Crivello, María del Carmen
Fernández, José Humberto
author_role author
author2 Razumiejczyk, Eugenia
Crivello, María del Carmen
Fernández, José Humberto
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv VISION
FIXATION
REASONING
NEGATION
topic VISION
FIXATION
REASONING
NEGATION
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The aim of this study is to describe some key components of the relation between reasoning and gaze behaviour. Specifically, we studied gaze dwell and fixations during a sentence-equivalence task that required the processing of compound negation for conjunctions and disjunctions. We derived opposite predictions from two different theories of reasoning. The Mental Models Theory was tested against the formalist PSYCOP theory. The former predicts specific patterns of inspection times and gaze fixations frequency as functions of representational complexity and semantic depth. That is, the more complex representation is, and the deeper the meaning processing is, the longer inspection times and the higher fixations frequency should be. PSYCOP predicts the opposite visual behaviour pattern or no difference at all. We tested such predictions experimentally using eye-tracking technology. Our results support the Mental Models Theory. That is, it seems that human mind constructs mental models to process the negation of conjunctions and disjunctions according to eye-tracking evidence.
Fil: Macbeth, Guillermo Eduardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos; Argentina
Fil: Razumiejczyk, Eugenia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos; Argentina
Fil: Crivello, María del Carmen. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos; Argentina
Fil: Fernández, José Humberto. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
description The aim of this study is to describe some key components of the relation between reasoning and gaze behaviour. Specifically, we studied gaze dwell and fixations during a sentence-equivalence task that required the processing of compound negation for conjunctions and disjunctions. We derived opposite predictions from two different theories of reasoning. The Mental Models Theory was tested against the formalist PSYCOP theory. The former predicts specific patterns of inspection times and gaze fixations frequency as functions of representational complexity and semantic depth. That is, the more complex representation is, and the deeper the meaning processing is, the longer inspection times and the higher fixations frequency should be. PSYCOP predicts the opposite visual behaviour pattern or no difference at all. We tested such predictions experimentally using eye-tracking technology. Our results support the Mental Models Theory. That is, it seems that human mind constructs mental models to process the negation of conjunctions and disjunctions according to eye-tracking evidence.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/73398
Macbeth, Guillermo Eduardo; Razumiejczyk, Eugenia; Crivello, María del Carmen; Fernández, José Humberto; Gaze patterns of compound negation processing; Geogian Technical University; Education Sciences And Psychology; 46; 4; 12-2017; 3-10
1512-1801
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/73398
identifier_str_mv Macbeth, Guillermo Eduardo; Razumiejczyk, Eugenia; Crivello, María del Carmen; Fernández, José Humberto; Gaze patterns of compound negation processing; Geogian Technical University; Education Sciences And Psychology; 46; 4; 12-2017; 3-10
1512-1801
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://gesj.internet-academy.org.ge/en/list_artic_en.php?b_sec=edu&issue=2017-12
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Geogian Technical University
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Geogian Technical University
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844614423623237632
score 13.069144

Publicaciones similares