The role of religion in shaping the values of nature
- Autores
- Ives, Christopher; Kidwell, Jeremy; Anderson, Christopher Brian; Arias-Arévalo, Paola; Gould, Rachelle; Kenter, Jasper; Murali, Ranjini
- Año de publicación
- 2024
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Environmental discourse frequently understands the values of nature as being instrumental, intrinsic, or relational and measured in biophysical, sociocultural, or monetary terms. Yet these specific values and value indicators are underpinned by worldviews, knowledge systems, and broad values that orient people towards nature in different ways and can be shared (or diverge) across spatio-temporal and social scales. The Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) Values Assessment emphasized the need for decision-making to embrace a plural-values approach that encompasses these diverse meanings of value to catalyze outcomes based on sustainability-aligned broad values like care, unity, reciprocity, and justice. Navigating these diverse values also highlights the salience of religion and its complexity in real-world scenarios as a force that shapes how people conceive the values of nature. For example, proposed modes of plural-value deliberation to reform institutions and shift social norms toward justice and sustainability need to be able to bridge sacred–secular policy divides. This article evaluates how religion interacts with nature’s values by building upon reviews conducted for the IPBES Values Assessment. We present different conceptualizations of religion and explore how these relate to various understandings of social-ecological change. Further, we delineate how religion interacts with values based on three interrelated forms of agency: personal, social, and more-than-human processes. Upon this foundation, we discuss how to better engage religion in environmental policy and research, considering four modes of mobilizing sustainability-aligned values: (1) enabling, (2) including, (3) reflecting, and (4) shifting values and two analytical axes regarding religion’s (1) social scale (individual versus collective) and (2) dynamic continuum (religion as stable versus changeable). Our assessment provides conceptual and practical tools to help consider religion in the processes and practices that shape, reinforce, or impede sustainability-aligned values for more inclusive and effective conservation decision-making.
Fil: Ives, Christopher. Science and Technology Facilities Council of Nottingham. Rutherford Appleton Laboratory; Reino Unido
Fil: Kidwell, Jeremy. The University Of Birmingham (tub);
Fil: Anderson, Christopher Brian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego, Antártida e Islas del Atlántico Sur. Instituto de Ciencias Polares, Ambientales y Recursos Naturales; Argentina
Fil: Arias-Arévalo, Paola. Universidad del Valle; Colombia
Fil: Gould, Rachelle. University Of Vermont.; Estados Unidos
Fil: Kenter, Jasper. Aberystwyth University.; Reino Unido
Fil: Murali, Ranjini. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Alemania - Materia
-
FAITH
INSTITUTIONS
PLURAL VALUES
SUSTAINABILITY - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/238686
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_128f75beef2641b7336ae554f05800b1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/238686 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
The role of religion in shaping the values of natureIves, ChristopherKidwell, JeremyAnderson, Christopher BrianArias-Arévalo, PaolaGould, RachelleKenter, JasperMurali, RanjiniFAITHINSTITUTIONSPLURAL VALUESSUSTAINABILITYhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.9https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Environmental discourse frequently understands the values of nature as being instrumental, intrinsic, or relational and measured in biophysical, sociocultural, or monetary terms. Yet these specific values and value indicators are underpinned by worldviews, knowledge systems, and broad values that orient people towards nature in different ways and can be shared (or diverge) across spatio-temporal and social scales. The Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) Values Assessment emphasized the need for decision-making to embrace a plural-values approach that encompasses these diverse meanings of value to catalyze outcomes based on sustainability-aligned broad values like care, unity, reciprocity, and justice. Navigating these diverse values also highlights the salience of religion and its complexity in real-world scenarios as a force that shapes how people conceive the values of nature. For example, proposed modes of plural-value deliberation to reform institutions and shift social norms toward justice and sustainability need to be able to bridge sacred–secular policy divides. This article evaluates how religion interacts with nature’s values by building upon reviews conducted for the IPBES Values Assessment. We present different conceptualizations of religion and explore how these relate to various understandings of social-ecological change. Further, we delineate how religion interacts with values based on three interrelated forms of agency: personal, social, and more-than-human processes. Upon this foundation, we discuss how to better engage religion in environmental policy and research, considering four modes of mobilizing sustainability-aligned values: (1) enabling, (2) including, (3) reflecting, and (4) shifting values and two analytical axes regarding religion’s (1) social scale (individual versus collective) and (2) dynamic continuum (religion as stable versus changeable). Our assessment provides conceptual and practical tools to help consider religion in the processes and practices that shape, reinforce, or impede sustainability-aligned values for more inclusive and effective conservation decision-making.Fil: Ives, Christopher. Science and Technology Facilities Council of Nottingham. Rutherford Appleton Laboratory; Reino UnidoFil: Kidwell, Jeremy. The University Of Birmingham (tub);Fil: Anderson, Christopher Brian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego, Antártida e Islas del Atlántico Sur. Instituto de Ciencias Polares, Ambientales y Recursos Naturales; ArgentinaFil: Arias-Arévalo, Paola. Universidad del Valle; ColombiaFil: Gould, Rachelle. University Of Vermont.; Estados UnidosFil: Kenter, Jasper. Aberystwyth University.; Reino UnidoFil: Murali, Ranjini. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; AlemaniaResilience Alliance2024-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/238686Ives, Christopher; Kidwell, Jeremy; Anderson, Christopher Brian; Arias-Arévalo, Paola; Gould, Rachelle; et al.; The role of religion in shaping the values of nature; Resilience Alliance; Ecology and Society; 29; 2; 5-2024; 111708-3087CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol29/iss2/art10/info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5751/ES-15004-290210info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T15:31:09Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/238686instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 15:31:10.292CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The role of religion in shaping the values of nature |
title |
The role of religion in shaping the values of nature |
spellingShingle |
The role of religion in shaping the values of nature Ives, Christopher FAITH INSTITUTIONS PLURAL VALUES SUSTAINABILITY |
title_short |
The role of religion in shaping the values of nature |
title_full |
The role of religion in shaping the values of nature |
title_fullStr |
The role of religion in shaping the values of nature |
title_full_unstemmed |
The role of religion in shaping the values of nature |
title_sort |
The role of religion in shaping the values of nature |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Ives, Christopher Kidwell, Jeremy Anderson, Christopher Brian Arias-Arévalo, Paola Gould, Rachelle Kenter, Jasper Murali, Ranjini |
author |
Ives, Christopher |
author_facet |
Ives, Christopher Kidwell, Jeremy Anderson, Christopher Brian Arias-Arévalo, Paola Gould, Rachelle Kenter, Jasper Murali, Ranjini |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Kidwell, Jeremy Anderson, Christopher Brian Arias-Arévalo, Paola Gould, Rachelle Kenter, Jasper Murali, Ranjini |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
FAITH INSTITUTIONS PLURAL VALUES SUSTAINABILITY |
topic |
FAITH INSTITUTIONS PLURAL VALUES SUSTAINABILITY |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.9 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Environmental discourse frequently understands the values of nature as being instrumental, intrinsic, or relational and measured in biophysical, sociocultural, or monetary terms. Yet these specific values and value indicators are underpinned by worldviews, knowledge systems, and broad values that orient people towards nature in different ways and can be shared (or diverge) across spatio-temporal and social scales. The Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) Values Assessment emphasized the need for decision-making to embrace a plural-values approach that encompasses these diverse meanings of value to catalyze outcomes based on sustainability-aligned broad values like care, unity, reciprocity, and justice. Navigating these diverse values also highlights the salience of religion and its complexity in real-world scenarios as a force that shapes how people conceive the values of nature. For example, proposed modes of plural-value deliberation to reform institutions and shift social norms toward justice and sustainability need to be able to bridge sacred–secular policy divides. This article evaluates how religion interacts with nature’s values by building upon reviews conducted for the IPBES Values Assessment. We present different conceptualizations of religion and explore how these relate to various understandings of social-ecological change. Further, we delineate how religion interacts with values based on three interrelated forms of agency: personal, social, and more-than-human processes. Upon this foundation, we discuss how to better engage religion in environmental policy and research, considering four modes of mobilizing sustainability-aligned values: (1) enabling, (2) including, (3) reflecting, and (4) shifting values and two analytical axes regarding religion’s (1) social scale (individual versus collective) and (2) dynamic continuum (religion as stable versus changeable). Our assessment provides conceptual and practical tools to help consider religion in the processes and practices that shape, reinforce, or impede sustainability-aligned values for more inclusive and effective conservation decision-making. Fil: Ives, Christopher. Science and Technology Facilities Council of Nottingham. Rutherford Appleton Laboratory; Reino Unido Fil: Kidwell, Jeremy. The University Of Birmingham (tub); Fil: Anderson, Christopher Brian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego, Antártida e Islas del Atlántico Sur. Instituto de Ciencias Polares, Ambientales y Recursos Naturales; Argentina Fil: Arias-Arévalo, Paola. Universidad del Valle; Colombia Fil: Gould, Rachelle. University Of Vermont.; Estados Unidos Fil: Kenter, Jasper. Aberystwyth University.; Reino Unido Fil: Murali, Ranjini. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Alemania |
description |
Environmental discourse frequently understands the values of nature as being instrumental, intrinsic, or relational and measured in biophysical, sociocultural, or monetary terms. Yet these specific values and value indicators are underpinned by worldviews, knowledge systems, and broad values that orient people towards nature in different ways and can be shared (or diverge) across spatio-temporal and social scales. The Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) Values Assessment emphasized the need for decision-making to embrace a plural-values approach that encompasses these diverse meanings of value to catalyze outcomes based on sustainability-aligned broad values like care, unity, reciprocity, and justice. Navigating these diverse values also highlights the salience of religion and its complexity in real-world scenarios as a force that shapes how people conceive the values of nature. For example, proposed modes of plural-value deliberation to reform institutions and shift social norms toward justice and sustainability need to be able to bridge sacred–secular policy divides. This article evaluates how religion interacts with nature’s values by building upon reviews conducted for the IPBES Values Assessment. We present different conceptualizations of religion and explore how these relate to various understandings of social-ecological change. Further, we delineate how religion interacts with values based on three interrelated forms of agency: personal, social, and more-than-human processes. Upon this foundation, we discuss how to better engage religion in environmental policy and research, considering four modes of mobilizing sustainability-aligned values: (1) enabling, (2) including, (3) reflecting, and (4) shifting values and two analytical axes regarding religion’s (1) social scale (individual versus collective) and (2) dynamic continuum (religion as stable versus changeable). Our assessment provides conceptual and practical tools to help consider religion in the processes and practices that shape, reinforce, or impede sustainability-aligned values for more inclusive and effective conservation decision-making. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-05 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/238686 Ives, Christopher; Kidwell, Jeremy; Anderson, Christopher Brian; Arias-Arévalo, Paola; Gould, Rachelle; et al.; The role of religion in shaping the values of nature; Resilience Alliance; Ecology and Society; 29; 2; 5-2024; 11 1708-3087 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/238686 |
identifier_str_mv |
Ives, Christopher; Kidwell, Jeremy; Anderson, Christopher Brian; Arias-Arévalo, Paola; Gould, Rachelle; et al.; The role of religion in shaping the values of nature; Resilience Alliance; Ecology and Society; 29; 2; 5-2024; 11 1708-3087 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol29/iss2/art10/ info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5751/ES-15004-290210 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Resilience Alliance |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Resilience Alliance |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1846083448156979200 |
score |
12.891075 |