The role of religion in shaping the values of nature

Autores
Ives, Christopher; Kidwell, Jeremy; Anderson, Christopher Brian; Arias-Arévalo, Paola; Gould, Rachelle; Kenter, Jasper; Murali, Ranjini
Año de publicación
2024
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Environmental discourse frequently understands the values of nature as being instrumental, intrinsic, or relational and measured in biophysical, sociocultural, or monetary terms. Yet these specific values and value indicators are underpinned by worldviews, knowledge systems, and broad values that orient people towards nature in different ways and can be shared (or diverge) across spatio-temporal and social scales. The Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) Values Assessment emphasized the need for decision-making to embrace a plural-values approach that encompasses these diverse meanings of value to catalyze outcomes based on sustainability-aligned broad values like care, unity, reciprocity, and justice. Navigating these diverse values also highlights the salience of religion and its complexity in real-world scenarios as a force that shapes how people conceive the values of nature. For example, proposed modes of plural-value deliberation to reform institutions and shift social norms toward justice and sustainability need to be able to bridge sacred–secular policy divides. This article evaluates how religion interacts with nature’s values by building upon reviews conducted for the IPBES Values Assessment. We present different conceptualizations of religion and explore how these relate to various understandings of social-ecological change. Further, we delineate how religion interacts with values based on three interrelated forms of agency: personal, social, and more-than-human processes. Upon this foundation, we discuss how to better engage religion in environmental policy and research, considering four modes of mobilizing sustainability-aligned values: (1) enabling, (2) including, (3) reflecting, and (4) shifting values and two analytical axes regarding religion’s (1) social scale (individual versus collective) and (2) dynamic continuum (religion as stable versus changeable). Our assessment provides conceptual and practical tools to help consider religion in the processes and practices that shape, reinforce, or impede sustainability-aligned values for more inclusive and effective conservation decision-making.
Fil: Ives, Christopher. Science and Technology Facilities Council of Nottingham. Rutherford Appleton Laboratory; Reino Unido
Fil: Kidwell, Jeremy. The University Of Birmingham (tub);
Fil: Anderson, Christopher Brian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego, Antártida e Islas del Atlántico Sur. Instituto de Ciencias Polares, Ambientales y Recursos Naturales; Argentina
Fil: Arias-Arévalo, Paola. Universidad del Valle; Colombia
Fil: Gould, Rachelle. University Of Vermont.; Estados Unidos
Fil: Kenter, Jasper. Aberystwyth University.; Reino Unido
Fil: Murali, Ranjini. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Alemania
Materia
FAITH
INSTITUTIONS
PLURAL VALUES
SUSTAINABILITY
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/238686

id CONICETDig_128f75beef2641b7336ae554f05800b1
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/238686
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling The role of religion in shaping the values of natureIves, ChristopherKidwell, JeremyAnderson, Christopher BrianArias-Arévalo, PaolaGould, RachelleKenter, JasperMurali, RanjiniFAITHINSTITUTIONSPLURAL VALUESSUSTAINABILITYhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.9https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Environmental discourse frequently understands the values of nature as being instrumental, intrinsic, or relational and measured in biophysical, sociocultural, or monetary terms. Yet these specific values and value indicators are underpinned by worldviews, knowledge systems, and broad values that orient people towards nature in different ways and can be shared (or diverge) across spatio-temporal and social scales. The Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) Values Assessment emphasized the need for decision-making to embrace a plural-values approach that encompasses these diverse meanings of value to catalyze outcomes based on sustainability-aligned broad values like care, unity, reciprocity, and justice. Navigating these diverse values also highlights the salience of religion and its complexity in real-world scenarios as a force that shapes how people conceive the values of nature. For example, proposed modes of plural-value deliberation to reform institutions and shift social norms toward justice and sustainability need to be able to bridge sacred–secular policy divides. This article evaluates how religion interacts with nature’s values by building upon reviews conducted for the IPBES Values Assessment. We present different conceptualizations of religion and explore how these relate to various understandings of social-ecological change. Further, we delineate how religion interacts with values based on three interrelated forms of agency: personal, social, and more-than-human processes. Upon this foundation, we discuss how to better engage religion in environmental policy and research, considering four modes of mobilizing sustainability-aligned values: (1) enabling, (2) including, (3) reflecting, and (4) shifting values and two analytical axes regarding religion’s (1) social scale (individual versus collective) and (2) dynamic continuum (religion as stable versus changeable). Our assessment provides conceptual and practical tools to help consider religion in the processes and practices that shape, reinforce, or impede sustainability-aligned values for more inclusive and effective conservation decision-making.Fil: Ives, Christopher. Science and Technology Facilities Council of Nottingham. Rutherford Appleton Laboratory; Reino UnidoFil: Kidwell, Jeremy. The University Of Birmingham (tub);Fil: Anderson, Christopher Brian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego, Antártida e Islas del Atlántico Sur. Instituto de Ciencias Polares, Ambientales y Recursos Naturales; ArgentinaFil: Arias-Arévalo, Paola. Universidad del Valle; ColombiaFil: Gould, Rachelle. University Of Vermont.; Estados UnidosFil: Kenter, Jasper. Aberystwyth University.; Reino UnidoFil: Murali, Ranjini. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; AlemaniaResilience Alliance2024-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/238686Ives, Christopher; Kidwell, Jeremy; Anderson, Christopher Brian; Arias-Arévalo, Paola; Gould, Rachelle; et al.; The role of religion in shaping the values of nature; Resilience Alliance; Ecology and Society; 29; 2; 5-2024; 111708-3087CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol29/iss2/art10/info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5751/ES-15004-290210info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T15:31:09Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/238686instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 15:31:10.292CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The role of religion in shaping the values of nature
title The role of religion in shaping the values of nature
spellingShingle The role of religion in shaping the values of nature
Ives, Christopher
FAITH
INSTITUTIONS
PLURAL VALUES
SUSTAINABILITY
title_short The role of religion in shaping the values of nature
title_full The role of religion in shaping the values of nature
title_fullStr The role of religion in shaping the values of nature
title_full_unstemmed The role of religion in shaping the values of nature
title_sort The role of religion in shaping the values of nature
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ives, Christopher
Kidwell, Jeremy
Anderson, Christopher Brian
Arias-Arévalo, Paola
Gould, Rachelle
Kenter, Jasper
Murali, Ranjini
author Ives, Christopher
author_facet Ives, Christopher
Kidwell, Jeremy
Anderson, Christopher Brian
Arias-Arévalo, Paola
Gould, Rachelle
Kenter, Jasper
Murali, Ranjini
author_role author
author2 Kidwell, Jeremy
Anderson, Christopher Brian
Arias-Arévalo, Paola
Gould, Rachelle
Kenter, Jasper
Murali, Ranjini
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv FAITH
INSTITUTIONS
PLURAL VALUES
SUSTAINABILITY
topic FAITH
INSTITUTIONS
PLURAL VALUES
SUSTAINABILITY
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.9
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Environmental discourse frequently understands the values of nature as being instrumental, intrinsic, or relational and measured in biophysical, sociocultural, or monetary terms. Yet these specific values and value indicators are underpinned by worldviews, knowledge systems, and broad values that orient people towards nature in different ways and can be shared (or diverge) across spatio-temporal and social scales. The Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) Values Assessment emphasized the need for decision-making to embrace a plural-values approach that encompasses these diverse meanings of value to catalyze outcomes based on sustainability-aligned broad values like care, unity, reciprocity, and justice. Navigating these diverse values also highlights the salience of religion and its complexity in real-world scenarios as a force that shapes how people conceive the values of nature. For example, proposed modes of plural-value deliberation to reform institutions and shift social norms toward justice and sustainability need to be able to bridge sacred–secular policy divides. This article evaluates how religion interacts with nature’s values by building upon reviews conducted for the IPBES Values Assessment. We present different conceptualizations of religion and explore how these relate to various understandings of social-ecological change. Further, we delineate how religion interacts with values based on three interrelated forms of agency: personal, social, and more-than-human processes. Upon this foundation, we discuss how to better engage religion in environmental policy and research, considering four modes of mobilizing sustainability-aligned values: (1) enabling, (2) including, (3) reflecting, and (4) shifting values and two analytical axes regarding religion’s (1) social scale (individual versus collective) and (2) dynamic continuum (religion as stable versus changeable). Our assessment provides conceptual and practical tools to help consider religion in the processes and practices that shape, reinforce, or impede sustainability-aligned values for more inclusive and effective conservation decision-making.
Fil: Ives, Christopher. Science and Technology Facilities Council of Nottingham. Rutherford Appleton Laboratory; Reino Unido
Fil: Kidwell, Jeremy. The University Of Birmingham (tub);
Fil: Anderson, Christopher Brian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego, Antártida e Islas del Atlántico Sur. Instituto de Ciencias Polares, Ambientales y Recursos Naturales; Argentina
Fil: Arias-Arévalo, Paola. Universidad del Valle; Colombia
Fil: Gould, Rachelle. University Of Vermont.; Estados Unidos
Fil: Kenter, Jasper. Aberystwyth University.; Reino Unido
Fil: Murali, Ranjini. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Alemania
description Environmental discourse frequently understands the values of nature as being instrumental, intrinsic, or relational and measured in biophysical, sociocultural, or monetary terms. Yet these specific values and value indicators are underpinned by worldviews, knowledge systems, and broad values that orient people towards nature in different ways and can be shared (or diverge) across spatio-temporal and social scales. The Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) Values Assessment emphasized the need for decision-making to embrace a plural-values approach that encompasses these diverse meanings of value to catalyze outcomes based on sustainability-aligned broad values like care, unity, reciprocity, and justice. Navigating these diverse values also highlights the salience of religion and its complexity in real-world scenarios as a force that shapes how people conceive the values of nature. For example, proposed modes of plural-value deliberation to reform institutions and shift social norms toward justice and sustainability need to be able to bridge sacred–secular policy divides. This article evaluates how religion interacts with nature’s values by building upon reviews conducted for the IPBES Values Assessment. We present different conceptualizations of religion and explore how these relate to various understandings of social-ecological change. Further, we delineate how religion interacts with values based on three interrelated forms of agency: personal, social, and more-than-human processes. Upon this foundation, we discuss how to better engage religion in environmental policy and research, considering four modes of mobilizing sustainability-aligned values: (1) enabling, (2) including, (3) reflecting, and (4) shifting values and two analytical axes regarding religion’s (1) social scale (individual versus collective) and (2) dynamic continuum (religion as stable versus changeable). Our assessment provides conceptual and practical tools to help consider religion in the processes and practices that shape, reinforce, or impede sustainability-aligned values for more inclusive and effective conservation decision-making.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/238686
Ives, Christopher; Kidwell, Jeremy; Anderson, Christopher Brian; Arias-Arévalo, Paola; Gould, Rachelle; et al.; The role of religion in shaping the values of nature; Resilience Alliance; Ecology and Society; 29; 2; 5-2024; 11
1708-3087
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/238686
identifier_str_mv Ives, Christopher; Kidwell, Jeremy; Anderson, Christopher Brian; Arias-Arévalo, Paola; Gould, Rachelle; et al.; The role of religion in shaping the values of nature; Resilience Alliance; Ecology and Society; 29; 2; 5-2024; 11
1708-3087
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol29/iss2/art10/
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5751/ES-15004-290210
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Resilience Alliance
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Resilience Alliance
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846083448156979200
score 12.891075