Introduction to structured argumentation

Autores
Besnard, Philippe; García, Alejandro Javier; Hunter, Anthony; Modgil, Sanjay; Prakken, Henry; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo; Toni, Francesca
Año de publicación
2014
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In abstract argumentation, each argument is regarded as atomic. There is no internal structure to an argument. Also, there is no specification of what is an argument or an attack. They are assumed to be given. This abstract perspective provides many advantages for studying the nature of argumentation, but it does not cover all our needs for understanding argumentation or for building tools for supporting or undertaking argumentation. If we want a more detailed formalisation of arguments than is available with abstract argumentation, we can turn to structured argumentation, which is the topic of this special issue of Argument and Computation. In structured argumentation, we assume a formal language for representing knowledge, and specifying how arguments and counterarguments can be constructed from that knowledge. An argument is then said to be structured in the sense that normally the premises and claim of the argument are made explicit, and the relationship between the premises and claim is formally defined (for instance using logical entailment).In this introduction, we provide a brief overview of the approaches covered in this special issue on structured argumentation.
Fil: Besnard, Philippe. Université Paul Sabatier; Francia
Fil: García, Alejandro Javier. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Hunter, Anthony. University College London; Estados Unidos
Fil: Modgil, Sanjay. Kings College London; Reino Unido
Fil: Prakken, Henry. University of Utrecht; Países Bajos. University of Groningen; Países Bajos
Fil: Simari, Guillermo Ricardo. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Toni, Francesca. Imperial College London; Reino Unido
Materia
Argument in Logic Programming
Formal Models of Argumentation
Logic
Automated Argumentation Reasoning Systems
Argument And Automated Reasoning
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/21714
Acceder
id CONICETDig_0daea1cc050ff2f07dc1c484a8ee530d
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/21714
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Introduction to structured argumentationBesnard, PhilippeGarcía, Alejandro JavierHunter, AnthonyModgil, SanjayPrakken, HenrySimari, Guillermo RicardoToni, FrancescaArgument in Logic ProgrammingFormal Models of ArgumentationLogicAutomated Argumentation Reasoning SystemsArgument And Automated Reasoninghttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1In abstract argumentation, each argument is regarded as atomic. There is no internal structure to an argument. Also, there is no specification of what is an argument or an attack. They are assumed to be given. This abstract perspective provides many advantages for studying the nature of argumentation, but it does not cover all our needs for understanding argumentation or for building tools for supporting or undertaking argumentation. If we want a more detailed formalisation of arguments than is available with abstract argumentation, we can turn to structured argumentation, which is the topic of this special issue of Argument and Computation. In structured argumentation, we assume a formal language for representing knowledge, and specifying how arguments and counterarguments can be constructed from that knowledge. An argument is then said to be structured in the sense that normally the premises and claim of the argument are made explicit, and the relationship between the premises and claim is formally defined (for instance using logical entailment).In this introduction, we provide a brief overview of the approaches covered in this special issue on structured argumentation.Fil: Besnard, Philippe. Université Paul Sabatier; FranciaFil: García, Alejandro Javier. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Hunter, Anthony. University College London; Estados UnidosFil: Modgil, Sanjay. Kings College London; Reino UnidoFil: Prakken, Henry. University of Utrecht; Países Bajos. University of Groningen; Países BajosFil: Simari, Guillermo Ricardo. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Toni, Francesca. Imperial College London; Reino UnidoIOS Press2014-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/21714Besnard, Philippe; García, Alejandro Javier; Hunter, Anthony; Modgil, Sanjay; Prakken, Henry; et al.; Introduction to structured argumentation; IOS Press; Argument & Computation; 5; 1; 2-2014; 1-41946-2166CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19462166.2013.869764info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/19462166.2013.869764info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://content.iospress.com/articles/argument-and-computation/869764info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:54:35Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/21714instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:54:35.667CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Introduction to structured argumentation
title Introduction to structured argumentation
spellingShingle Introduction to structured argumentation
Besnard, Philippe
Argument in Logic Programming
Formal Models of Argumentation
Logic
Automated Argumentation Reasoning Systems
Argument And Automated Reasoning
title_short Introduction to structured argumentation
title_full Introduction to structured argumentation
title_fullStr Introduction to structured argumentation
title_full_unstemmed Introduction to structured argumentation
title_sort Introduction to structured argumentation
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Besnard, Philippe
García, Alejandro Javier
Hunter, Anthony
Modgil, Sanjay
Prakken, Henry
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
Toni, Francesca
author Besnard, Philippe
author_facet Besnard, Philippe
García, Alejandro Javier
Hunter, Anthony
Modgil, Sanjay
Prakken, Henry
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
Toni, Francesca
author_role author
author2 García, Alejandro Javier
Hunter, Anthony
Modgil, Sanjay
Prakken, Henry
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
Toni, Francesca
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Argument in Logic Programming
Formal Models of Argumentation
Logic
Automated Argumentation Reasoning Systems
Argument And Automated Reasoning
topic Argument in Logic Programming
Formal Models of Argumentation
Logic
Automated Argumentation Reasoning Systems
Argument And Automated Reasoning
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In abstract argumentation, each argument is regarded as atomic. There is no internal structure to an argument. Also, there is no specification of what is an argument or an attack. They are assumed to be given. This abstract perspective provides many advantages for studying the nature of argumentation, but it does not cover all our needs for understanding argumentation or for building tools for supporting or undertaking argumentation. If we want a more detailed formalisation of arguments than is available with abstract argumentation, we can turn to structured argumentation, which is the topic of this special issue of Argument and Computation. In structured argumentation, we assume a formal language for representing knowledge, and specifying how arguments and counterarguments can be constructed from that knowledge. An argument is then said to be structured in the sense that normally the premises and claim of the argument are made explicit, and the relationship between the premises and claim is formally defined (for instance using logical entailment).In this introduction, we provide a brief overview of the approaches covered in this special issue on structured argumentation.
Fil: Besnard, Philippe. Université Paul Sabatier; Francia
Fil: García, Alejandro Javier. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Hunter, Anthony. University College London; Estados Unidos
Fil: Modgil, Sanjay. Kings College London; Reino Unido
Fil: Prakken, Henry. University of Utrecht; Países Bajos. University of Groningen; Países Bajos
Fil: Simari, Guillermo Ricardo. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Toni, Francesca. Imperial College London; Reino Unido
description In abstract argumentation, each argument is regarded as atomic. There is no internal structure to an argument. Also, there is no specification of what is an argument or an attack. They are assumed to be given. This abstract perspective provides many advantages for studying the nature of argumentation, but it does not cover all our needs for understanding argumentation or for building tools for supporting or undertaking argumentation. If we want a more detailed formalisation of arguments than is available with abstract argumentation, we can turn to structured argumentation, which is the topic of this special issue of Argument and Computation. In structured argumentation, we assume a formal language for representing knowledge, and specifying how arguments and counterarguments can be constructed from that knowledge. An argument is then said to be structured in the sense that normally the premises and claim of the argument are made explicit, and the relationship between the premises and claim is formally defined (for instance using logical entailment).In this introduction, we provide a brief overview of the approaches covered in this special issue on structured argumentation.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-02
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/21714
Besnard, Philippe; García, Alejandro Javier; Hunter, Anthony; Modgil, Sanjay; Prakken, Henry; et al.; Introduction to structured argumentation; IOS Press; Argument & Computation; 5; 1; 2-2014; 1-4
1946-2166
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/21714
identifier_str_mv Besnard, Philippe; García, Alejandro Javier; Hunter, Anthony; Modgil, Sanjay; Prakken, Henry; et al.; Introduction to structured argumentation; IOS Press; Argument & Computation; 5; 1; 2-2014; 1-4
1946-2166
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19462166.2013.869764
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/19462166.2013.869764
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://content.iospress.com/articles/argument-and-computation/869764
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv IOS Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv IOS Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269294527774720
score 13.13397

Publicaciones similares