Solving Power and Trust Conflicts through Argumentation in Agent-mediated Knowledge Distribution

Autores
Chesñevar, Carlos Iván; Brena, Ramón; Aguirre, José Luis
Año de publicación
2006
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Distributing pieces of knowledge in large, usually distributed organizations is a central problem in Knowledge and Organization management. Policies for distributing knowledge and information are mostly incomplete or in potential conflict with each other. As a consequence, decision processes for information distribution may be difficult to formalize on the basis of a rationally justified procedure. This article presents an argumentative approach to cope with this problem based on integrating the JITIK multiagent system with Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP), a logic programming formalism for defeasible argumentation. We show how power relations, as well as delegation and trust, can be embedded within our framework in terms of DeLP, in such a way that a dialectical argumentation process works as a decision core. Conflicts among policies are solved on the basis of a dialectical analysis whose outcome determines to which specific users different pieces of knowledge are to be delivered.
Fil: Chesñevar, Carlos Iván. Universitat de Lleida; España. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca; Argentina
Fil: Brena, Ramón. Centro de Sistemas Inteligentes, Tecnológico de Monterrey; México
Fil: Aguirre, José L.. Centro de Sistemas Inteligentes, Tecnológico de Monterrey; México
Materia
DEFEASIBLE ARGUMENTATION
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/95861
Acceder
id CONICETDig_09ffc6df59c595f18d84f4d2085b06fc
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/95861
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Solving Power and Trust Conflicts through Argumentation in Agent-mediated Knowledge DistributionChesñevar, Carlos IvánBrena, RamónAguirre, José LuisDEFEASIBLE ARGUMENTATIONKNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENTMULTIAGENT SYSTEMShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2Distributing pieces of knowledge in large, usually distributed organizations is a central problem in Knowledge and Organization management. Policies for distributing knowledge and information are mostly incomplete or in potential conflict with each other. As a consequence, decision processes for information distribution may be difficult to formalize on the basis of a rationally justified procedure. This article presents an argumentative approach to cope with this problem based on integrating the JITIK multiagent system with Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP), a logic programming formalism for defeasible argumentation. We show how power relations, as well as delegation and trust, can be embedded within our framework in terms of DeLP, in such a way that a dialectical argumentation process works as a decision core. Conflicts among policies are solved on the basis of a dialectical analysis whose outcome determines to which specific users different pieces of knowledge are to be delivered.Fil: Chesñevar, Carlos Iván. Universitat de Lleida; España. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca; ArgentinaFil: Brena, Ramón. Centro de Sistemas Inteligentes, Tecnológico de Monterrey; MéxicoFil: Aguirre, José L.. Centro de Sistemas Inteligentes, Tecnológico de Monterrey; MéxicoIOS Press2006-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/95861Chesñevar, Carlos Iván; Brena, Ramón; Aguirre, José Luis; Solving Power and Trust Conflicts through Argumentation in Agent-mediated Knowledge Distribution; IOS Press; International Journal of Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Engineering Systems; 10; 4; 9-2006; 263-2761327-2314CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://content.iospress.com/articles/international-journal-of-knowledge-based-and-intelligent-engineering-systems/kes00083info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3233/KES-2006-10403info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://cs.uns.edu.ar/~cic/2006/2006_kes.pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4239/6421f937b8a997afda8ccc8ee04ef12aba61.pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:39:42Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/95861instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:39:42.417CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Solving Power and Trust Conflicts through Argumentation in Agent-mediated Knowledge Distribution
title Solving Power and Trust Conflicts through Argumentation in Agent-mediated Knowledge Distribution
spellingShingle Solving Power and Trust Conflicts through Argumentation in Agent-mediated Knowledge Distribution
Chesñevar, Carlos Iván
DEFEASIBLE ARGUMENTATION
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS
title_short Solving Power and Trust Conflicts through Argumentation in Agent-mediated Knowledge Distribution
title_full Solving Power and Trust Conflicts through Argumentation in Agent-mediated Knowledge Distribution
title_fullStr Solving Power and Trust Conflicts through Argumentation in Agent-mediated Knowledge Distribution
title_full_unstemmed Solving Power and Trust Conflicts through Argumentation in Agent-mediated Knowledge Distribution
title_sort Solving Power and Trust Conflicts through Argumentation in Agent-mediated Knowledge Distribution
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Chesñevar, Carlos Iván
Brena, Ramón
Aguirre, José Luis
author Chesñevar, Carlos Iván
author_facet Chesñevar, Carlos Iván
Brena, Ramón
Aguirre, José Luis
author_role author
author2 Brena, Ramón
Aguirre, José Luis
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv DEFEASIBLE ARGUMENTATION
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS
topic DEFEASIBLE ARGUMENTATION
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Distributing pieces of knowledge in large, usually distributed organizations is a central problem in Knowledge and Organization management. Policies for distributing knowledge and information are mostly incomplete or in potential conflict with each other. As a consequence, decision processes for information distribution may be difficult to formalize on the basis of a rationally justified procedure. This article presents an argumentative approach to cope with this problem based on integrating the JITIK multiagent system with Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP), a logic programming formalism for defeasible argumentation. We show how power relations, as well as delegation and trust, can be embedded within our framework in terms of DeLP, in such a way that a dialectical argumentation process works as a decision core. Conflicts among policies are solved on the basis of a dialectical analysis whose outcome determines to which specific users different pieces of knowledge are to be delivered.
Fil: Chesñevar, Carlos Iván. Universitat de Lleida; España. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca; Argentina
Fil: Brena, Ramón. Centro de Sistemas Inteligentes, Tecnológico de Monterrey; México
Fil: Aguirre, José L.. Centro de Sistemas Inteligentes, Tecnológico de Monterrey; México
description Distributing pieces of knowledge in large, usually distributed organizations is a central problem in Knowledge and Organization management. Policies for distributing knowledge and information are mostly incomplete or in potential conflict with each other. As a consequence, decision processes for information distribution may be difficult to formalize on the basis of a rationally justified procedure. This article presents an argumentative approach to cope with this problem based on integrating the JITIK multiagent system with Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP), a logic programming formalism for defeasible argumentation. We show how power relations, as well as delegation and trust, can be embedded within our framework in terms of DeLP, in such a way that a dialectical argumentation process works as a decision core. Conflicts among policies are solved on the basis of a dialectical analysis whose outcome determines to which specific users different pieces of knowledge are to be delivered.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/95861
Chesñevar, Carlos Iván; Brena, Ramón; Aguirre, José Luis; Solving Power and Trust Conflicts through Argumentation in Agent-mediated Knowledge Distribution; IOS Press; International Journal of Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Engineering Systems; 10; 4; 9-2006; 263-276
1327-2314
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/95861
identifier_str_mv Chesñevar, Carlos Iván; Brena, Ramón; Aguirre, José Luis; Solving Power and Trust Conflicts through Argumentation in Agent-mediated Knowledge Distribution; IOS Press; International Journal of Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Engineering Systems; 10; 4; 9-2006; 263-276
1327-2314
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://content.iospress.com/articles/international-journal-of-knowledge-based-and-intelligent-engineering-systems/kes00083
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3233/KES-2006-10403
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://cs.uns.edu.ar/~cic/2006/2006_kes.pdf
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4239/6421f937b8a997afda8ccc8ee04ef12aba61.pdf
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv IOS Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv IOS Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613256406106112
score 13.070432

Publicaciones similares