Vote and Protest in Argentina and Brazil: contemporary research based reflections on political participation

Autores
Pena, Camila; Rosa, Marcelo; Pereyra, Sebastian
Año de publicación
2017
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The article presents a comparative analysis of recent citizen?s reflections on politi-cal participation in Argentina and Brazil. Throughout the recollection of data from focus groups carried out in 2015 and 2016, we aim to discuss the ways the partici-pants conceived and related the compulsory act of voting with the participation in the recent wave of demonstration in both countries. In the cases presented, there was a prevalent understanding of voting and protesting as complementary forms of political engagement and the participation in protests was conceived as a form to compensate the limitations of formal electoral politics.
Fil: Pena, Camila. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; Brasil
Fil: Rosa, Marcelo. Universidade do Brasília; Brasil
Fil: Pereyra, Sebastian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Instituto de Altos Estudios Sociales; Argentina
Materia
Political participation
Protest
Vote
Argentina-Brazil
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/75455
Acceder
id CONICETDig_07ee15a4f0c0deb474620092f4859111
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/75455
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Vote and Protest in Argentina and Brazil: contemporary research based reflections on political participationPena, CamilaRosa, MarceloPereyra, SebastianPolitical participationProtestVoteArgentina-Brazilhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5The article presents a comparative analysis of recent citizen?s reflections on politi-cal participation in Argentina and Brazil. Throughout the recollection of data from focus groups carried out in 2015 and 2016, we aim to discuss the ways the partici-pants conceived and related the compulsory act of voting with the participation in the recent wave of demonstration in both countries. In the cases presented, there was a prevalent understanding of voting and protesting as complementary forms of political engagement and the participation in protests was conceived as a form to compensate the limitations of formal electoral politics.Fil: Pena, Camila. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; BrasilFil: Rosa, Marcelo. Universidade do Brasília; BrasilFil: Pereyra, Sebastian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Instituto de Altos Estudios Sociales; ArgentinaSociedade Brasileira de Sociologia2017-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/75455Pena, Camila; Rosa, Marcelo; Pereyra, Sebastian; Vote and Protest in Argentina and Brazil: contemporary research based reflections on political participation; Sociedade Brasileira de Sociologia; Sociologies in dialogue; 3; 2; 8-2017; 96-1172447-2670CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.20336/sid.v3.i2.82info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sbsociologia.com.br/sid/index.php/sid/article/view/82info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T11:09:51Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/75455instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 11:09:52.275CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Vote and Protest in Argentina and Brazil: contemporary research based reflections on political participation
title Vote and Protest in Argentina and Brazil: contemporary research based reflections on political participation
spellingShingle Vote and Protest in Argentina and Brazil: contemporary research based reflections on political participation
Pena, Camila
Political participation
Protest
Vote
Argentina-Brazil
title_short Vote and Protest in Argentina and Brazil: contemporary research based reflections on political participation
title_full Vote and Protest in Argentina and Brazil: contemporary research based reflections on political participation
title_fullStr Vote and Protest in Argentina and Brazil: contemporary research based reflections on political participation
title_full_unstemmed Vote and Protest in Argentina and Brazil: contemporary research based reflections on political participation
title_sort Vote and Protest in Argentina and Brazil: contemporary research based reflections on political participation
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Pena, Camila
Rosa, Marcelo
Pereyra, Sebastian
author Pena, Camila
author_facet Pena, Camila
Rosa, Marcelo
Pereyra, Sebastian
author_role author
author2 Rosa, Marcelo
Pereyra, Sebastian
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Political participation
Protest
Vote
Argentina-Brazil
topic Political participation
Protest
Vote
Argentina-Brazil
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The article presents a comparative analysis of recent citizen?s reflections on politi-cal participation in Argentina and Brazil. Throughout the recollection of data from focus groups carried out in 2015 and 2016, we aim to discuss the ways the partici-pants conceived and related the compulsory act of voting with the participation in the recent wave of demonstration in both countries. In the cases presented, there was a prevalent understanding of voting and protesting as complementary forms of political engagement and the participation in protests was conceived as a form to compensate the limitations of formal electoral politics.
Fil: Pena, Camila. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; Brasil
Fil: Rosa, Marcelo. Universidade do Brasília; Brasil
Fil: Pereyra, Sebastian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Instituto de Altos Estudios Sociales; Argentina
description The article presents a comparative analysis of recent citizen?s reflections on politi-cal participation in Argentina and Brazil. Throughout the recollection of data from focus groups carried out in 2015 and 2016, we aim to discuss the ways the partici-pants conceived and related the compulsory act of voting with the participation in the recent wave of demonstration in both countries. In the cases presented, there was a prevalent understanding of voting and protesting as complementary forms of political engagement and the participation in protests was conceived as a form to compensate the limitations of formal electoral politics.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/75455
Pena, Camila; Rosa, Marcelo; Pereyra, Sebastian; Vote and Protest in Argentina and Brazil: contemporary research based reflections on political participation; Sociedade Brasileira de Sociologia; Sociologies in dialogue; 3; 2; 8-2017; 96-117
2447-2670
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/75455
identifier_str_mv Pena, Camila; Rosa, Marcelo; Pereyra, Sebastian; Vote and Protest in Argentina and Brazil: contemporary research based reflections on political participation; Sociedade Brasileira de Sociologia; Sociologies in dialogue; 3; 2; 8-2017; 96-117
2447-2670
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.20336/sid.v3.i2.82
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sbsociologia.com.br/sid/index.php/sid/article/view/82
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Sociologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Sociologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846781451776819200
score 12.982451

Publicaciones similares