The migration of proportionality: narratives and questions

Autores
Clérico, María Laura
Año de publicación
2018
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Much has been written about the migration of proportionality, as a form of constitutional rights adjudication, from Germany to all around the world. Proportionality seems to have bought a one way ticket. The narrative is not written all the way around. For example, it does not sufficiently include the transformation of proportionality ‘as it crosses the border’. Or, it does not sufficiently include whether the idea of proportionality has ‘deeper indigenous roots than one might think, deeper even than the prevalence of citations to nondomestic sources would indicate´, as Mark Tushnet warns in general regarding the research in the field of constitutional comparative law. I will take the case of Argentine constitutional praxis and sustain that one cannot explain the discussion about the reception/rejection of the modern test of proportionality there as a matter of pure transfer from Germany to Latin America. In doing so, I will address later, what could be a “matter” of migration, and which interactions (or not) are producing at the constitutional and human rights praxis in Latin America. Therefore, I will distinguish the idea of proportionality from the structured test of proportionality as a methodology. This delimits the matter that could be transferred. Additionally, it serves me to point out, what in the narrative of the transfer seems to be opaque: the importance of the sequence of the steps in the German proportionality test. I will conclude that narratives of migration should pay more attention to the context of the so called ‘receipted´ practice. The ‘narrative’ of the migration of proportionality should buy a round trip ticket.
Fil: Clérico, María Laura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales "Dr. Ambrosio L. Gioja"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
Proportionality test
Narratives of migration
Context
Structure
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/178376

id CONICETDig_032b01f7b30d17b2a418eac4c1a998ae
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/178376
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling The migration of proportionality: narratives and questionsClérico, María LauraProportionality testNarratives of migrationContextStructurehttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Much has been written about the migration of proportionality, as a form of constitutional rights adjudication, from Germany to all around the world. Proportionality seems to have bought a one way ticket. The narrative is not written all the way around. For example, it does not sufficiently include the transformation of proportionality ‘as it crosses the border’. Or, it does not sufficiently include whether the idea of proportionality has ‘deeper indigenous roots than one might think, deeper even than the prevalence of citations to nondomestic sources would indicate´, as Mark Tushnet warns in general regarding the research in the field of constitutional comparative law. I will take the case of Argentine constitutional praxis and sustain that one cannot explain the discussion about the reception/rejection of the modern test of proportionality there as a matter of pure transfer from Germany to Latin America. In doing so, I will address later, what could be a “matter” of migration, and which interactions (or not) are producing at the constitutional and human rights praxis in Latin America. Therefore, I will distinguish the idea of proportionality from the structured test of proportionality as a methodology. This delimits the matter that could be transferred. Additionally, it serves me to point out, what in the narrative of the transfer seems to be opaque: the importance of the sequence of the steps in the German proportionality test. I will conclude that narratives of migration should pay more attention to the context of the so called ‘receipted´ practice. The ‘narrative’ of the migration of proportionality should buy a round trip ticket.Fil: Clérico, María Laura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales "Dr. Ambrosio L. Gioja"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaJUVE Publishing2018-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/178376Clérico, María Laura; The migration of proportionality: narratives and questions; JUVE Publishing; This Century´s Review; 2018; 2; 11-2018; 40-452195-3422CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.thiscenturysreview.com/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:03:49Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/178376instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:03:50.123CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The migration of proportionality: narratives and questions
title The migration of proportionality: narratives and questions
spellingShingle The migration of proportionality: narratives and questions
Clérico, María Laura
Proportionality test
Narratives of migration
Context
Structure
title_short The migration of proportionality: narratives and questions
title_full The migration of proportionality: narratives and questions
title_fullStr The migration of proportionality: narratives and questions
title_full_unstemmed The migration of proportionality: narratives and questions
title_sort The migration of proportionality: narratives and questions
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Clérico, María Laura
author Clérico, María Laura
author_facet Clérico, María Laura
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Proportionality test
Narratives of migration
Context
Structure
topic Proportionality test
Narratives of migration
Context
Structure
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Much has been written about the migration of proportionality, as a form of constitutional rights adjudication, from Germany to all around the world. Proportionality seems to have bought a one way ticket. The narrative is not written all the way around. For example, it does not sufficiently include the transformation of proportionality ‘as it crosses the border’. Or, it does not sufficiently include whether the idea of proportionality has ‘deeper indigenous roots than one might think, deeper even than the prevalence of citations to nondomestic sources would indicate´, as Mark Tushnet warns in general regarding the research in the field of constitutional comparative law. I will take the case of Argentine constitutional praxis and sustain that one cannot explain the discussion about the reception/rejection of the modern test of proportionality there as a matter of pure transfer from Germany to Latin America. In doing so, I will address later, what could be a “matter” of migration, and which interactions (or not) are producing at the constitutional and human rights praxis in Latin America. Therefore, I will distinguish the idea of proportionality from the structured test of proportionality as a methodology. This delimits the matter that could be transferred. Additionally, it serves me to point out, what in the narrative of the transfer seems to be opaque: the importance of the sequence of the steps in the German proportionality test. I will conclude that narratives of migration should pay more attention to the context of the so called ‘receipted´ practice. The ‘narrative’ of the migration of proportionality should buy a round trip ticket.
Fil: Clérico, María Laura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales "Dr. Ambrosio L. Gioja"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description Much has been written about the migration of proportionality, as a form of constitutional rights adjudication, from Germany to all around the world. Proportionality seems to have bought a one way ticket. The narrative is not written all the way around. For example, it does not sufficiently include the transformation of proportionality ‘as it crosses the border’. Or, it does not sufficiently include whether the idea of proportionality has ‘deeper indigenous roots than one might think, deeper even than the prevalence of citations to nondomestic sources would indicate´, as Mark Tushnet warns in general regarding the research in the field of constitutional comparative law. I will take the case of Argentine constitutional praxis and sustain that one cannot explain the discussion about the reception/rejection of the modern test of proportionality there as a matter of pure transfer from Germany to Latin America. In doing so, I will address later, what could be a “matter” of migration, and which interactions (or not) are producing at the constitutional and human rights praxis in Latin America. Therefore, I will distinguish the idea of proportionality from the structured test of proportionality as a methodology. This delimits the matter that could be transferred. Additionally, it serves me to point out, what in the narrative of the transfer seems to be opaque: the importance of the sequence of the steps in the German proportionality test. I will conclude that narratives of migration should pay more attention to the context of the so called ‘receipted´ practice. The ‘narrative’ of the migration of proportionality should buy a round trip ticket.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-11
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/178376
Clérico, María Laura; The migration of proportionality: narratives and questions; JUVE Publishing; This Century´s Review; 2018; 2; 11-2018; 40-45
2195-3422
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/178376
identifier_str_mv Clérico, María Laura; The migration of proportionality: narratives and questions; JUVE Publishing; This Century´s Review; 2018; 2; 11-2018; 40-45
2195-3422
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.thiscenturysreview.com/
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv JUVE Publishing
publisher.none.fl_str_mv JUVE Publishing
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269822207918080
score 13.13397