Anaerobically mineralized nitrogen within macroaggregates as a soil health indicator

Autores
García, Gisela Vanesa; Campos, María E.; Wyngaard, Nicolás; Reussi Calvo, Nahuel I.; San Martino, Silvina; Covacevich, Fernanda; Studdert, Guillermo Alberto
Año de publicación
2021
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Anaerobically mineralized nitrogen (AN) in bulk soil (ANBS) has been described as a soil health indicator. Considering that large macroaggregates (2000–8000 μm, MA) are more sensitive to management practices than the bulk soil (i.e. whole soil), AN within MA (ANMA) would be a better soil health indicator than ANBS. The aim of this study was to evaluate if ANMA is a better indicator of: i) soil organic carbon (SOC) and particulate organic carbon (POC) in bulk soil (SOCBS and POCBS, respectively) and ii) aggregate stability (AS) than ANBS. Soil samples were taken at 0–5 and 5–20 cm from 46 continuously cultivated plots (CC) and a reference plot for each CC (pseudo-pristine, PRIS). These soils, located in the Argentinean Pampas, were classified as Mollisols with contrasting surface textural classes. The AS, SOCBS, POCBS, ANBS, SOC (SOCMA), and POC (POCMA) within MA and ANMA were determined separately at 0–5 and 5–20 cm soil depths and estimated at the 0–20 cm layer. The ANMA was a good indicator of SOCBS (R2 0.75, 0.48, and 0.61 at 0–5, 5–20 and 0–20 cm depths, respectively), POCBS (R2 0.66, 0.31, and 0.49, respectively), and AS (R2 0.80, 0.68, and 0.76, respectively). The ANMA performed similarly to predict SOCBS, POCBS, and AS as compared to ANBS, because ANMA was closely correlated to ANBS (r 0.90 at 0–20 cm). Since ANMA determination is more time-consuming than ANBS determination, its use as a soil health indicator would not be convenient. Therefore, the use of ANBS would be recommended over ANMA as a variable to monitor soil health.
Materia
Ciencias Agrícolas
Soil organic carbon
Particulate organic carbon
Aggregate stability
Soil quality
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Repositorio
CIC Digital (CICBA)
Institución
Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires
OAI Identificador
oai:digital.cic.gba.gob.ar:11746/11216

id CICBA_fbc9ebc3627d00424f23e211a098dbe1
oai_identifier_str oai:digital.cic.gba.gob.ar:11746/11216
network_acronym_str CICBA
repository_id_str 9441
network_name_str CIC Digital (CICBA)
spelling Anaerobically mineralized nitrogen within macroaggregates as a soil health indicatorGarcía, Gisela VanesaCampos, María E.Wyngaard, NicolásReussi Calvo, Nahuel I.San Martino, SilvinaCovacevich, FernandaStuddert, Guillermo AlbertoCiencias AgrícolasSoil organic carbonParticulate organic carbonAggregate stabilitySoil qualityAnaerobically mineralized nitrogen (AN) in bulk soil (ANBS) has been described as a soil health indicator. Considering that large macroaggregates (2000–8000 μm, MA) are more sensitive to management practices than the bulk soil (i.e. whole soil), AN within MA (ANMA) would be a better soil health indicator than ANBS. The aim of this study was to evaluate if ANMA is a better indicator of: i) soil organic carbon (SOC) and particulate organic carbon (POC) in bulk soil (SOCBS and POCBS, respectively) and ii) aggregate stability (AS) than ANBS. Soil samples were taken at 0–5 and 5–20 cm from 46 continuously cultivated plots (CC) and a reference plot for each CC (pseudo-pristine, PRIS). These soils, located in the Argentinean Pampas, were classified as Mollisols with contrasting surface textural classes. The AS, SOCBS, POCBS, ANBS, SOC (SOCMA), and POC (POCMA) within MA and ANMA were determined separately at 0–5 and 5–20 cm soil depths and estimated at the 0–20 cm layer. The ANMA was a good indicator of SOCBS (R2 0.75, 0.48, and 0.61 at 0–5, 5–20 and 0–20 cm depths, respectively), POCBS (R2 0.66, 0.31, and 0.49, respectively), and AS (R2 0.80, 0.68, and 0.76, respectively). The ANMA performed similarly to predict SOCBS, POCBS, and AS as compared to ANBS, because ANMA was closely correlated to ANBS (r 0.90 at 0–20 cm). Since ANMA determination is more time-consuming than ANBS determination, its use as a soil health indicator would not be convenient. Therefore, the use of ANBS would be recommended over ANMA as a variable to monitor soil health.2021-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttps://digital.cic.gba.gob.ar/handle/11746/11216enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.catena.2020.105034info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1872-6887info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0341-8162info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/reponame:CIC Digital (CICBA)instname:Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Airesinstacron:CICBA2025-09-11T10:18:33Zoai:digital.cic.gba.gob.ar:11746/11216Institucionalhttp://digital.cic.gba.gob.arOrganismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://digital.cic.gba.gob.ar/oai/snrdmarisa.degiusti@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:94412025-09-11 10:18:33.955CIC Digital (CICBA) - Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Airesfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Anaerobically mineralized nitrogen within macroaggregates as a soil health indicator
title Anaerobically mineralized nitrogen within macroaggregates as a soil health indicator
spellingShingle Anaerobically mineralized nitrogen within macroaggregates as a soil health indicator
García, Gisela Vanesa
Ciencias Agrícolas
Soil organic carbon
Particulate organic carbon
Aggregate stability
Soil quality
title_short Anaerobically mineralized nitrogen within macroaggregates as a soil health indicator
title_full Anaerobically mineralized nitrogen within macroaggregates as a soil health indicator
title_fullStr Anaerobically mineralized nitrogen within macroaggregates as a soil health indicator
title_full_unstemmed Anaerobically mineralized nitrogen within macroaggregates as a soil health indicator
title_sort Anaerobically mineralized nitrogen within macroaggregates as a soil health indicator
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv García, Gisela Vanesa
Campos, María E.
Wyngaard, Nicolás
Reussi Calvo, Nahuel I.
San Martino, Silvina
Covacevich, Fernanda
Studdert, Guillermo Alberto
author García, Gisela Vanesa
author_facet García, Gisela Vanesa
Campos, María E.
Wyngaard, Nicolás
Reussi Calvo, Nahuel I.
San Martino, Silvina
Covacevich, Fernanda
Studdert, Guillermo Alberto
author_role author
author2 Campos, María E.
Wyngaard, Nicolás
Reussi Calvo, Nahuel I.
San Martino, Silvina
Covacevich, Fernanda
Studdert, Guillermo Alberto
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Agrícolas
Soil organic carbon
Particulate organic carbon
Aggregate stability
Soil quality
topic Ciencias Agrícolas
Soil organic carbon
Particulate organic carbon
Aggregate stability
Soil quality
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Anaerobically mineralized nitrogen (AN) in bulk soil (ANBS) has been described as a soil health indicator. Considering that large macroaggregates (2000–8000 μm, MA) are more sensitive to management practices than the bulk soil (i.e. whole soil), AN within MA (ANMA) would be a better soil health indicator than ANBS. The aim of this study was to evaluate if ANMA is a better indicator of: i) soil organic carbon (SOC) and particulate organic carbon (POC) in bulk soil (SOCBS and POCBS, respectively) and ii) aggregate stability (AS) than ANBS. Soil samples were taken at 0–5 and 5–20 cm from 46 continuously cultivated plots (CC) and a reference plot for each CC (pseudo-pristine, PRIS). These soils, located in the Argentinean Pampas, were classified as Mollisols with contrasting surface textural classes. The AS, SOCBS, POCBS, ANBS, SOC (SOCMA), and POC (POCMA) within MA and ANMA were determined separately at 0–5 and 5–20 cm soil depths and estimated at the 0–20 cm layer. The ANMA was a good indicator of SOCBS (R2 0.75, 0.48, and 0.61 at 0–5, 5–20 and 0–20 cm depths, respectively), POCBS (R2 0.66, 0.31, and 0.49, respectively), and AS (R2 0.80, 0.68, and 0.76, respectively). The ANMA performed similarly to predict SOCBS, POCBS, and AS as compared to ANBS, because ANMA was closely correlated to ANBS (r 0.90 at 0–20 cm). Since ANMA determination is more time-consuming than ANBS determination, its use as a soil health indicator would not be convenient. Therefore, the use of ANBS would be recommended over ANMA as a variable to monitor soil health.
description Anaerobically mineralized nitrogen (AN) in bulk soil (ANBS) has been described as a soil health indicator. Considering that large macroaggregates (2000–8000 μm, MA) are more sensitive to management practices than the bulk soil (i.e. whole soil), AN within MA (ANMA) would be a better soil health indicator than ANBS. The aim of this study was to evaluate if ANMA is a better indicator of: i) soil organic carbon (SOC) and particulate organic carbon (POC) in bulk soil (SOCBS and POCBS, respectively) and ii) aggregate stability (AS) than ANBS. Soil samples were taken at 0–5 and 5–20 cm from 46 continuously cultivated plots (CC) and a reference plot for each CC (pseudo-pristine, PRIS). These soils, located in the Argentinean Pampas, were classified as Mollisols with contrasting surface textural classes. The AS, SOCBS, POCBS, ANBS, SOC (SOCMA), and POC (POCMA) within MA and ANMA were determined separately at 0–5 and 5–20 cm soil depths and estimated at the 0–20 cm layer. The ANMA was a good indicator of SOCBS (R2 0.75, 0.48, and 0.61 at 0–5, 5–20 and 0–20 cm depths, respectively), POCBS (R2 0.66, 0.31, and 0.49, respectively), and AS (R2 0.80, 0.68, and 0.76, respectively). The ANMA performed similarly to predict SOCBS, POCBS, and AS as compared to ANBS, because ANMA was closely correlated to ANBS (r 0.90 at 0–20 cm). Since ANMA determination is more time-consuming than ANBS determination, its use as a soil health indicator would not be convenient. Therefore, the use of ANBS would be recommended over ANMA as a variable to monitor soil health.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://digital.cic.gba.gob.ar/handle/11746/11216
url https://digital.cic.gba.gob.ar/handle/11746/11216
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.catena.2020.105034
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1872-6887
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0341-8162
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CIC Digital (CICBA)
instname:Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires
instacron:CICBA
reponame_str CIC Digital (CICBA)
collection CIC Digital (CICBA)
instname_str Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires
instacron_str CICBA
institution CICBA
repository.name.fl_str_mv CIC Digital (CICBA) - Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires
repository.mail.fl_str_mv marisa.degiusti@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1842974770126127104
score 12.993085