Anaerobically mineralized nitrogen within macroaggregates as a soil health indicator
- Autores
- García, Gisela Vanesa; Campos, María E.; Wyngaard, Nicolás; Reussi Calvo, Nahuel I.; San Martino, Silvina; Covacevich, Fernanda; Studdert, Guillermo Alberto
- Año de publicación
- 2021
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Anaerobically mineralized nitrogen (AN) in bulk soil (ANBS) has been described as a soil health indicator. Considering that large macroaggregates (2000–8000 μm, MA) are more sensitive to management practices than the bulk soil (i.e. whole soil), AN within MA (ANMA) would be a better soil health indicator than ANBS. The aim of this study was to evaluate if ANMA is a better indicator of: i) soil organic carbon (SOC) and particulate organic carbon (POC) in bulk soil (SOCBS and POCBS, respectively) and ii) aggregate stability (AS) than ANBS. Soil samples were taken at 0–5 and 5–20 cm from 46 continuously cultivated plots (CC) and a reference plot for each CC (pseudo-pristine, PRIS). These soils, located in the Argentinean Pampas, were classified as Mollisols with contrasting surface textural classes. The AS, SOCBS, POCBS, ANBS, SOC (SOCMA), and POC (POCMA) within MA and ANMA were determined separately at 0–5 and 5–20 cm soil depths and estimated at the 0–20 cm layer. The ANMA was a good indicator of SOCBS (R2 0.75, 0.48, and 0.61 at 0–5, 5–20 and 0–20 cm depths, respectively), POCBS (R2 0.66, 0.31, and 0.49, respectively), and AS (R2 0.80, 0.68, and 0.76, respectively). The ANMA performed similarly to predict SOCBS, POCBS, and AS as compared to ANBS, because ANMA was closely correlated to ANBS (r 0.90 at 0–20 cm). Since ANMA determination is more time-consuming than ANBS determination, its use as a soil health indicator would not be convenient. Therefore, the use of ANBS would be recommended over ANMA as a variable to monitor soil health.
- Materia
-
Ciencias Agrícolas
Soil organic carbon
Particulate organic carbon
Aggregate stability
Soil quality - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires
- OAI Identificador
- oai:digital.cic.gba.gob.ar:11746/11216
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CICBA_fbc9ebc3627d00424f23e211a098dbe1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:digital.cic.gba.gob.ar:11746/11216 |
network_acronym_str |
CICBA |
repository_id_str |
9441 |
network_name_str |
CIC Digital (CICBA) |
spelling |
Anaerobically mineralized nitrogen within macroaggregates as a soil health indicatorGarcía, Gisela VanesaCampos, María E.Wyngaard, NicolásReussi Calvo, Nahuel I.San Martino, SilvinaCovacevich, FernandaStuddert, Guillermo AlbertoCiencias AgrícolasSoil organic carbonParticulate organic carbonAggregate stabilitySoil qualityAnaerobically mineralized nitrogen (AN) in bulk soil (ANBS) has been described as a soil health indicator. Considering that large macroaggregates (2000–8000 μm, MA) are more sensitive to management practices than the bulk soil (i.e. whole soil), AN within MA (ANMA) would be a better soil health indicator than ANBS. The aim of this study was to evaluate if ANMA is a better indicator of: i) soil organic carbon (SOC) and particulate organic carbon (POC) in bulk soil (SOCBS and POCBS, respectively) and ii) aggregate stability (AS) than ANBS. Soil samples were taken at 0–5 and 5–20 cm from 46 continuously cultivated plots (CC) and a reference plot for each CC (pseudo-pristine, PRIS). These soils, located in the Argentinean Pampas, were classified as Mollisols with contrasting surface textural classes. The AS, SOCBS, POCBS, ANBS, SOC (SOCMA), and POC (POCMA) within MA and ANMA were determined separately at 0–5 and 5–20 cm soil depths and estimated at the 0–20 cm layer. The ANMA was a good indicator of SOCBS (R2 0.75, 0.48, and 0.61 at 0–5, 5–20 and 0–20 cm depths, respectively), POCBS (R2 0.66, 0.31, and 0.49, respectively), and AS (R2 0.80, 0.68, and 0.76, respectively). The ANMA performed similarly to predict SOCBS, POCBS, and AS as compared to ANBS, because ANMA was closely correlated to ANBS (r 0.90 at 0–20 cm). Since ANMA determination is more time-consuming than ANBS determination, its use as a soil health indicator would not be convenient. Therefore, the use of ANBS would be recommended over ANMA as a variable to monitor soil health.2021-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttps://digital.cic.gba.gob.ar/handle/11746/11216enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.catena.2020.105034info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1872-6887info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0341-8162info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/reponame:CIC Digital (CICBA)instname:Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Airesinstacron:CICBA2025-09-11T10:18:33Zoai:digital.cic.gba.gob.ar:11746/11216Institucionalhttp://digital.cic.gba.gob.arOrganismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://digital.cic.gba.gob.ar/oai/snrdmarisa.degiusti@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:94412025-09-11 10:18:33.955CIC Digital (CICBA) - Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Airesfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Anaerobically mineralized nitrogen within macroaggregates as a soil health indicator |
title |
Anaerobically mineralized nitrogen within macroaggregates as a soil health indicator |
spellingShingle |
Anaerobically mineralized nitrogen within macroaggregates as a soil health indicator García, Gisela Vanesa Ciencias Agrícolas Soil organic carbon Particulate organic carbon Aggregate stability Soil quality |
title_short |
Anaerobically mineralized nitrogen within macroaggregates as a soil health indicator |
title_full |
Anaerobically mineralized nitrogen within macroaggregates as a soil health indicator |
title_fullStr |
Anaerobically mineralized nitrogen within macroaggregates as a soil health indicator |
title_full_unstemmed |
Anaerobically mineralized nitrogen within macroaggregates as a soil health indicator |
title_sort |
Anaerobically mineralized nitrogen within macroaggregates as a soil health indicator |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
García, Gisela Vanesa Campos, María E. Wyngaard, Nicolás Reussi Calvo, Nahuel I. San Martino, Silvina Covacevich, Fernanda Studdert, Guillermo Alberto |
author |
García, Gisela Vanesa |
author_facet |
García, Gisela Vanesa Campos, María E. Wyngaard, Nicolás Reussi Calvo, Nahuel I. San Martino, Silvina Covacevich, Fernanda Studdert, Guillermo Alberto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Campos, María E. Wyngaard, Nicolás Reussi Calvo, Nahuel I. San Martino, Silvina Covacevich, Fernanda Studdert, Guillermo Alberto |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciencias Agrícolas Soil organic carbon Particulate organic carbon Aggregate stability Soil quality |
topic |
Ciencias Agrícolas Soil organic carbon Particulate organic carbon Aggregate stability Soil quality |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Anaerobically mineralized nitrogen (AN) in bulk soil (ANBS) has been described as a soil health indicator. Considering that large macroaggregates (2000–8000 μm, MA) are more sensitive to management practices than the bulk soil (i.e. whole soil), AN within MA (ANMA) would be a better soil health indicator than ANBS. The aim of this study was to evaluate if ANMA is a better indicator of: i) soil organic carbon (SOC) and particulate organic carbon (POC) in bulk soil (SOCBS and POCBS, respectively) and ii) aggregate stability (AS) than ANBS. Soil samples were taken at 0–5 and 5–20 cm from 46 continuously cultivated plots (CC) and a reference plot for each CC (pseudo-pristine, PRIS). These soils, located in the Argentinean Pampas, were classified as Mollisols with contrasting surface textural classes. The AS, SOCBS, POCBS, ANBS, SOC (SOCMA), and POC (POCMA) within MA and ANMA were determined separately at 0–5 and 5–20 cm soil depths and estimated at the 0–20 cm layer. The ANMA was a good indicator of SOCBS (R2 0.75, 0.48, and 0.61 at 0–5, 5–20 and 0–20 cm depths, respectively), POCBS (R2 0.66, 0.31, and 0.49, respectively), and AS (R2 0.80, 0.68, and 0.76, respectively). The ANMA performed similarly to predict SOCBS, POCBS, and AS as compared to ANBS, because ANMA was closely correlated to ANBS (r 0.90 at 0–20 cm). Since ANMA determination is more time-consuming than ANBS determination, its use as a soil health indicator would not be convenient. Therefore, the use of ANBS would be recommended over ANMA as a variable to monitor soil health. |
description |
Anaerobically mineralized nitrogen (AN) in bulk soil (ANBS) has been described as a soil health indicator. Considering that large macroaggregates (2000–8000 μm, MA) are more sensitive to management practices than the bulk soil (i.e. whole soil), AN within MA (ANMA) would be a better soil health indicator than ANBS. The aim of this study was to evaluate if ANMA is a better indicator of: i) soil organic carbon (SOC) and particulate organic carbon (POC) in bulk soil (SOCBS and POCBS, respectively) and ii) aggregate stability (AS) than ANBS. Soil samples were taken at 0–5 and 5–20 cm from 46 continuously cultivated plots (CC) and a reference plot for each CC (pseudo-pristine, PRIS). These soils, located in the Argentinean Pampas, were classified as Mollisols with contrasting surface textural classes. The AS, SOCBS, POCBS, ANBS, SOC (SOCMA), and POC (POCMA) within MA and ANMA were determined separately at 0–5 and 5–20 cm soil depths and estimated at the 0–20 cm layer. The ANMA was a good indicator of SOCBS (R2 0.75, 0.48, and 0.61 at 0–5, 5–20 and 0–20 cm depths, respectively), POCBS (R2 0.66, 0.31, and 0.49, respectively), and AS (R2 0.80, 0.68, and 0.76, respectively). The ANMA performed similarly to predict SOCBS, POCBS, and AS as compared to ANBS, because ANMA was closely correlated to ANBS (r 0.90 at 0–20 cm). Since ANMA determination is more time-consuming than ANBS determination, its use as a soil health indicator would not be convenient. Therefore, the use of ANBS would be recommended over ANMA as a variable to monitor soil health. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-03 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://digital.cic.gba.gob.ar/handle/11746/11216 |
url |
https://digital.cic.gba.gob.ar/handle/11746/11216 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.catena.2020.105034 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1872-6887 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0341-8162 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CIC Digital (CICBA) instname:Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires instacron:CICBA |
reponame_str |
CIC Digital (CICBA) |
collection |
CIC Digital (CICBA) |
instname_str |
Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires |
instacron_str |
CICBA |
institution |
CICBA |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CIC Digital (CICBA) - Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
marisa.degiusti@sedici.unlp.edu.ar |
_version_ |
1842974770126127104 |
score |
12.993085 |