Advantages and limitations in the use of extant xenarthrans (Mammalia) as morphological analogues for paleobiological reconstruction.

Autores
Vizcaíno, Sergio F.; Toledo, Néstor; Bargo, María Susana
Año de publicación
2018
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión enviada
Descripción
Extant species of Xenarthra represent a severely restricted sample of the total diversity achieved by the group. Given their shared history, the extant representatives of the three major groups of xenarthrans (Cingulata, Folivora, and Vermilingua) provide a valuable basis for paleobiological inference. However, many extinct taxa are morphologically so dissimilar from their extant relatives that they suggest very different ways of life. In these cases, extinct forms do not have modern models within the group and the application of a simplistic and strict approach can produce nonsensical reconstructions. In this contribution, we evaluate the limitations of the use of extant xenarthrans as morphological models for paleobiological reconstructions. A database of linear dimensions of the appendicular skeleton of extant and extinct xenarthrans and other mammals (marsupials, carnivorans, rodents, primates, perissodactyls, artiodactyls, and proboscideans) was constructed. Exploratory analyzes were performed on general morphometric similarity between existing and extinct xenarthrans (PCA) and the accuracy of body mass estimates of extinct xenarthrans based on their close relatives and other mammals (simple and multiple linear regressions) were tested. Extinct xenarthrans occupy similar relative positions in the morphospaces as extant mammals other than their closest relatives. Most allometric equations, particularly those based only on xenarthrans, produced remarkable underestimates. This can be explained by dimensional differences (up to four orders of magnitude) and shape differences between most of the extinct and extant xenarthrans. This does not invalidate actualism and the use of analogues, but suggests the need to apply other approaches, such as mechanics, that address formfunction relationships but are not necessarily based on known biological comparators.
Materia
Ciencias Naturales y Exactas
Xenarthra . Paleobiology . Form-function . Actualism
Xenarthra
Paleobiology
Form-function
Actualism
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Repositorio
CIC Digital (CICBA)
Institución
Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires
OAI Identificador
oai:digital.cic.gba.gob.ar:11746/9964

id CICBA_44737e2df62b7442b84e523fa02baf12
oai_identifier_str oai:digital.cic.gba.gob.ar:11746/9964
network_acronym_str CICBA
repository_id_str 9441
network_name_str CIC Digital (CICBA)
spelling Advantages and limitations in the use of extant xenarthrans (Mammalia) as morphological analogues for paleobiological reconstruction.Vizcaíno, Sergio F.Toledo, NéstorBargo, María SusanaCiencias Naturales y ExactasXenarthra . Paleobiology . Form-function . ActualismXenarthraPaleobiologyForm-functionActualismExtant species of Xenarthra represent a severely restricted sample of the total diversity achieved by the group. Given their shared history, the extant representatives of the three major groups of xenarthrans (Cingulata, Folivora, and Vermilingua) provide a valuable basis for paleobiological inference. However, many extinct taxa are morphologically so dissimilar from their extant relatives that they suggest very different ways of life. In these cases, extinct forms do not have modern models within the group and the application of a simplistic and strict approach can produce nonsensical reconstructions. In this contribution, we evaluate the limitations of the use of extant xenarthrans as morphological models for paleobiological reconstructions. A database of linear dimensions of the appendicular skeleton of extant and extinct xenarthrans and other mammals (marsupials, carnivorans, rodents, primates, perissodactyls, artiodactyls, and proboscideans) was constructed. Exploratory analyzes were performed on general morphometric similarity between existing and extinct xenarthrans (PCA) and the accuracy of body mass estimates of extinct xenarthrans based on their close relatives and other mammals (simple and multiple linear regressions) were tested. Extinct xenarthrans occupy similar relative positions in the morphospaces as extant mammals other than their closest relatives. Most allometric equations, particularly those based only on xenarthrans, produced remarkable underestimates. This can be explained by dimensional differences (up to four orders of magnitude) and shape differences between most of the extinct and extant xenarthrans. This does not invalidate actualism and the use of analogues, but suggests the need to apply other approaches, such as mechanics, that address formfunction relationships but are not necessarily based on known biological comparators.2018-06-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttps://digital.cic.gba.gob.ar/handle/11746/9964enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10914-017-9400-2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/reponame:CIC Digital (CICBA)instname:Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Airesinstacron:CICBA2025-12-18T08:52:34Zoai:digital.cic.gba.gob.ar:11746/9964Institucionalhttp://digital.cic.gba.gob.arOrganismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://digital.cic.gba.gob.ar/oai/snrdmarisa.degiusti@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:94412025-12-18 08:52:34.625CIC Digital (CICBA) - Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Airesfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Advantages and limitations in the use of extant xenarthrans (Mammalia) as morphological analogues for paleobiological reconstruction.
title Advantages and limitations in the use of extant xenarthrans (Mammalia) as morphological analogues for paleobiological reconstruction.
spellingShingle Advantages and limitations in the use of extant xenarthrans (Mammalia) as morphological analogues for paleobiological reconstruction.
Vizcaíno, Sergio F.
Ciencias Naturales y Exactas
Xenarthra . Paleobiology . Form-function . Actualism
Xenarthra
Paleobiology
Form-function
Actualism
title_short Advantages and limitations in the use of extant xenarthrans (Mammalia) as morphological analogues for paleobiological reconstruction.
title_full Advantages and limitations in the use of extant xenarthrans (Mammalia) as morphological analogues for paleobiological reconstruction.
title_fullStr Advantages and limitations in the use of extant xenarthrans (Mammalia) as morphological analogues for paleobiological reconstruction.
title_full_unstemmed Advantages and limitations in the use of extant xenarthrans (Mammalia) as morphological analogues for paleobiological reconstruction.
title_sort Advantages and limitations in the use of extant xenarthrans (Mammalia) as morphological analogues for paleobiological reconstruction.
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Vizcaíno, Sergio F.
Toledo, Néstor
Bargo, María Susana
author Vizcaíno, Sergio F.
author_facet Vizcaíno, Sergio F.
Toledo, Néstor
Bargo, María Susana
author_role author
author2 Toledo, Néstor
Bargo, María Susana
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Naturales y Exactas
Xenarthra . Paleobiology . Form-function . Actualism
Xenarthra
Paleobiology
Form-function
Actualism
topic Ciencias Naturales y Exactas
Xenarthra . Paleobiology . Form-function . Actualism
Xenarthra
Paleobiology
Form-function
Actualism
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Extant species of Xenarthra represent a severely restricted sample of the total diversity achieved by the group. Given their shared history, the extant representatives of the three major groups of xenarthrans (Cingulata, Folivora, and Vermilingua) provide a valuable basis for paleobiological inference. However, many extinct taxa are morphologically so dissimilar from their extant relatives that they suggest very different ways of life. In these cases, extinct forms do not have modern models within the group and the application of a simplistic and strict approach can produce nonsensical reconstructions. In this contribution, we evaluate the limitations of the use of extant xenarthrans as morphological models for paleobiological reconstructions. A database of linear dimensions of the appendicular skeleton of extant and extinct xenarthrans and other mammals (marsupials, carnivorans, rodents, primates, perissodactyls, artiodactyls, and proboscideans) was constructed. Exploratory analyzes were performed on general morphometric similarity between existing and extinct xenarthrans (PCA) and the accuracy of body mass estimates of extinct xenarthrans based on their close relatives and other mammals (simple and multiple linear regressions) were tested. Extinct xenarthrans occupy similar relative positions in the morphospaces as extant mammals other than their closest relatives. Most allometric equations, particularly those based only on xenarthrans, produced remarkable underestimates. This can be explained by dimensional differences (up to four orders of magnitude) and shape differences between most of the extinct and extant xenarthrans. This does not invalidate actualism and the use of analogues, but suggests the need to apply other approaches, such as mechanics, that address formfunction relationships but are not necessarily based on known biological comparators.
description Extant species of Xenarthra represent a severely restricted sample of the total diversity achieved by the group. Given their shared history, the extant representatives of the three major groups of xenarthrans (Cingulata, Folivora, and Vermilingua) provide a valuable basis for paleobiological inference. However, many extinct taxa are morphologically so dissimilar from their extant relatives that they suggest very different ways of life. In these cases, extinct forms do not have modern models within the group and the application of a simplistic and strict approach can produce nonsensical reconstructions. In this contribution, we evaluate the limitations of the use of extant xenarthrans as morphological models for paleobiological reconstructions. A database of linear dimensions of the appendicular skeleton of extant and extinct xenarthrans and other mammals (marsupials, carnivorans, rodents, primates, perissodactyls, artiodactyls, and proboscideans) was constructed. Exploratory analyzes were performed on general morphometric similarity between existing and extinct xenarthrans (PCA) and the accuracy of body mass estimates of extinct xenarthrans based on their close relatives and other mammals (simple and multiple linear regressions) were tested. Extinct xenarthrans occupy similar relative positions in the morphospaces as extant mammals other than their closest relatives. Most allometric equations, particularly those based only on xenarthrans, produced remarkable underestimates. This can be explained by dimensional differences (up to four orders of magnitude) and shape differences between most of the extinct and extant xenarthrans. This does not invalidate actualism and the use of analogues, but suggests the need to apply other approaches, such as mechanics, that address formfunction relationships but are not necessarily based on known biological comparators.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-06-10
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str submittedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://digital.cic.gba.gob.ar/handle/11746/9964
url https://digital.cic.gba.gob.ar/handle/11746/9964
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10914-017-9400-2
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CIC Digital (CICBA)
instname:Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires
instacron:CICBA
reponame_str CIC Digital (CICBA)
collection CIC Digital (CICBA)
instname_str Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires
instacron_str CICBA
institution CICBA
repository.name.fl_str_mv CIC Digital (CICBA) - Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires
repository.mail.fl_str_mv marisa.degiusti@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1851853412523573248
score 12.952241